Thursday, February 4, 2010

More Problems for the CIT-Heads: Paik Testimony

Pat Curley
Thursday, February 04, 2010

Sometimes the Troofers do good debunking, but only on the parts of the fantasy that they don't agree with personally.

There are problems with some elements of Shinki and Ed Paik’s accounts, but CIT has compounded these by omitting or distorting elements of Ed and Shinki’s accounts, while selectively interpreting and hyping other elements. CIT has a history of doing this, they’ve consistently done it in ways that support their theory about ‘north path’ and ‘Pentagon flyover’, and their doing so- while accusing their critics of being ‘agents’ and ‘disinformation’- has created controversy and undermined their own credibility.

I think Pat is just mad that Scootle recently pointed out that, "ScrewLooseChange hasn't really been debunking much lately. It's essentially now little more than a 9/11 truth gossip blog. And when they do debunk it's usually a repost of something about CIT created by people in the 9/11 truth movement. And on the rare occasion when they do some original debunking, it's usually nitpicking."

Related Info:

Dawn Vignola’s Account vs. CIT’s Methods by Erik Larson

A Clarification on Disinfo

National Geographic, Muse, Internet Censorship, Sibel Edmonds, Invisible Empire, 911-DIS.INFO and the Union of Truthers and Debunkers