Wednesday, December 31, 7000

Permanent Top Post by JM Talboo and Steve W.

By JM Talboo and Steve W. people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."

Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of US and other international intelligence agencies were involved doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved.

In the fight to uncover the truth about 9/11 we must contend with individuals and groups that distort, omit and lie about important details in order to defend the official narrative - the 911 truth debunkers.


The NORAD-stand-down, various whistleblowers, and physical evidence centered around the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Buildings in New York, make a strong case that the attacks involved substantial inside help.

“I think it’s implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many didn’t have a high school education, could have carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States”
Former Sen. Bob Graham on 60-Minutes 

We might be wrong about where we suspect this all leads, but the "debunkers" are wrong when many essentially argue that it's acceptable for 70% of 9/11 family members questions to have never been answered by the 9/11 Commission. So of course, most have no qualms about promises made to 9/11 family members being broken by the Commission to investigate all whistleblower claims, which a substantial amount of the public find highly-suspicious at minimum, with many regarding the evidence as suggestive of complicity to varied degrees.

The below link proves that many thousands of family members want a new investigation. Likely the amount of people killed that day is outnumbered by these 9/11 victim's family members.

Truth Teller's Radio Episode 16 - 9/11/2018 JM Talboo Interviews Richard Gage about the 3000+ Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:

So it stands to reason, that these ilk feel the lack of air defense story is above scrutiny to the point that secrecy and rewards are warranted. So what if this tale consists of 3, or some contend 4, mutually contradictory versions of events and admitted lies. It makes perfect sense that the top officials from NORAD and the FAA received promotions, as opposed to having to provide documents with data that would prove that the jet fighters were acceptably responsive, given the past response time averages.

Unsurprisingly, the duh-bunkturds hate even the best of the "Loose Change" films, but loose ends are no biggie.

The Washington Post reported on August 2, 2006 that:
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources... "We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. 'It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
So, if 9/11 didn't have an inside element, what's to stop such a scenario from taking place in the future when we get investigations that have attributes like these? 

It is therefore the purpose of this website to rebut the hollow claims of the so-called 911 truth "debunkers" and clarify what is known about the attacks for the benefit of those following the debate and also for the largely uninformed public. This site now features 9/11 truth related and not-so-related content. So please utilize our search feature (found also on the sidebar) to find a massive treasure trove of well-researched info on nearly every issue in the realm of 9/11 truth debate. 

Sorry that we don't allow any comments, but if you wish to communicate any thoughts you have about the published material please contact us here. Ad hominems will be ignored, but well-formed rebuttals may be addressed (and that is a subjective matter) provided we have not refuted the points therein numerous times on this blog already.


National Security Notice via Washington's Blog:

We are NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, we are calling for the reinstatement of our government. We are not calling for lawlessness. We are calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, we are calling for its enforcement. We are patriotic Americans born and raised in this country. [Four foreign countries also represented here at DTD]. We love the U.S. We don't seek to destroy or attack America ... we seek to restore her to strength, prosperity, liberty and respect. We don't support or like Al Qaeda, the Taliban or any supporting groups. We think they are all disgusting. The nation's top legal scholars say that draconian security laws which violate the Constitution should not apply to Americans. Should you attempt to shut down this site or harass its authors, you are anti-liberty, anti-justice, anti-American ... and undermining America's national security.

Wednesday, February 20, 2019

RIP Ian Neal - Engineer and Founder of UK 9/11 Truth Campaign

Editor's Note: In response to the comment I've included below. If what you are saying is correct, one thing is certain, Judy Woods is not helping your case, but rather would seemingly be hurting it intentionally. Using easily debunkable evidence such as the dustification of the spire is a surefire way to make people disregard your theory...

RIP Ian Neal - Engineer and Founder of UK 9/11 Truth Campaign

Anthony Williams
RIP Ian, you did your best when nobody wanted to hear the Truth. Oddly enough, the red flag of an " inside job" as most rational people have understood 911 to be, is evidenced not at the site of " Ground Zero " as it has been subsequently called, but in several locations far away from New York, some as far as Alaska, where the seismic and magnetometric signals were checked after the event on that fateful day in New York.

The charts on the magnetometer measuring equipment show severe and abrupt changes in the polarity of the earth, from North to South, during the time of the collapse, and subsequently the indicator needles returned to normal positions after the collapses took place. The conclusion that can be drawn from this data is that during the collapse, there was a massive electrical interference , sufficient to abruptly disturb the north / south readings of earth's polarity, and this data was collected hundreds of miles away from New York. It follows therefore, that allegations of Directed Energy Weapons, might have been founded on such accredited data, and the spurious rumours of "mini nukes" or "nano thermite" or other kinetic weapons , was a smokescreen to distract, divert, and discredit genuine Engineering analysis of what happened on that day . The book by Dr. Judy Wood, "Where Did The Towers Go? " is the only definitive study of the events, and answers questions that were never addressed in the subsequent N.I.S.T. report.

The Problem Of Belief In The 9/11 Truth Movement

It's easy to believe...belief leads to endless opportunities and requires only one constant which is imagination. It's harder to research and study information which leads to knowledge, for that takes time and the willingness to dedicate yourself to the field of study without pre-concieved bias. This video i try my best to explain why the 9/11 Truth Community is so bereft of a willingness to dedicate themselves to study 9/11 in depth but rather wish for an easier alternative which relies on them not to study but to listen to others who sell them an imaginative fantasy wrought with incomplete data and a dead end.

The Problem Of Belief In The 9/11 Truth Movement

9/11 Commission Report - Sen. Mark Dayton

Sen. Mark Dayton pointing out multiple versions (under oath) issued by NORAD on what happened that day re: the hijacked airliners - where we have huge gaps of inaction for up to 15+mins (the FAA later proved it had informed NORAD, and NORAD did nothing - where hijacked aircraft were not intercepted for 2 hours!). There was a massive failure to follow standard operating procedure. People should have gone to jail for gross negligence and blatantly lying (that they couldn't see aircraft with their transponders switched off, that their RADARs were looking outward, that the hijack exercise drill that was happening at the exact same time as the real event "helped" with their response time?! - this drill with multiple phantom targets, VIGILANT GUARDIAN ... "is this real world or exercise" - quoted from ATC tapes.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 21st, 2019.]

Tulsi Gabbard - The Establishment Is Desperate To Stop Anti-War Candidate - David Icke

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 21st, 2019.]