Saturday, February 27, 2021

Thursday, February 25, 2021

People always say 'I may not agree with what you say, but I'd fight to the death for your right to say it' Now when the time comes they don't even speak out

My appeal letter to TikTok after being censored for the 13th time... I have free speech. An inalienable right. The only illegal speech is that which promotes violence. Saying the election was rigged is an opinion not violence. Talking about legally owning guns for self defense is not violence. Storming the capital is illegal. Peacefully protesting as the artist says is not violence. I am on the right side of history. You are the tyrants unfairly targeting people that the song is talking about. I'm good. You're evil. Do you know that? I am your enemy make no mistake about it and we will defeat your authoritarianism. Your fascist bullshit. I'm mad and I'm not gonna take it anymore! Ban my whole channel bitch and I'll pop back up like those arcade game whack a moles!

Wednesday, February 24, 2021

Monday, February 22, 2021

Trump Plaza implosion reminds commenters of 9/11


Just like the twin towers. smh 

H H 

Leslie Cummings 
Looked just like the twin towers coming down.

Laurey Wallut 
Reminds me of something. I just can’t remember what. 😒

pinkberry consumer 

dennell winston 
Interesting that it looked just like when the twin tower came down

2 Close 
Now there is a good reason to believe 911 buildings demolished just like this one! no terrorist involved in either....

Steven Pallesen 
Just like the twin towers

Clay Girl 
Looked like the twin towers but smaller scale.

Did the government assist with this implosion too Asking for a friend

Tha DiZZo 
Dropped like Building 7.

Wow.. Kind of like Building 7 huh?

"Pull it" 

Jessie Leech
Wow just like the twin towers. Amazing 

Ho Lee Chit
And just liked that the twin towers fell.... Boom boom boom floors just started popping out!

Richard Frerks 

OG Brown 

Zk Nk 
Hmmm seems familiar...9/11???

Frank Hardie
makes me think of 911

Victor Ortiz 
Reminds me of how the towers fell. Straight down at free fall speeds. Mhmm what a coincidence.

Olle Stahlberg 
Cool! This planned demolition makes the building fall exactly like a super tall building burning with jet plane fuel on the top floors. Weird!...

This video gives Red-pilled viewers 911 PTSD -- read the comments...

john springate
Not nearly as symmetrical as the twin towers and building 7 Clearly, aviation fuel is much more effective than dynamite.

Looks just like the way the Twin Towers fell too!

David Simchock
I wonder if any passports were found in the debris? Let’s ask Lucky Larry.

Jay Eddleston
Looked just like 9/11 just saying

Bry Far
Looks familiar

Shane Hudson 
Flash backs!! Looks real 911ish!!!

Lucas McInnis
I remember a little time ago some buildings falling the same exact way and blamed it on Muslims

Francisco Garcia 
Just like 9/11

Nancy simmer 
This does not look like the Twin Towers coming down at all,go back and look at the Twin Towers how they came down and compare it to this one 
Re: Ho Lee Chit
You are full of BS

T j 
Just like twin towers wow

Strange looks just like the twin towers

Compared to building 7. I give it a 4.

Arstan Jacob  
9/11 Again

That may tell us something strange happened the Twin Tower

acwao 371
There's a lot of very twisted individuals out there comparing another trump bankruptcy failure to the 9/11 terrorist attacks
Re: Flickyhecky 
Not twisted...both buildings fell in a similar way (as in a controlled explosion) 
Re: Brantley Jezak 
time to wake up and stop being a sleeping sheep 
Re: Andrew Dean 
Bankruptcy is a normal thing in business. You hear "bankruptcy" and you think of what YOU personally know about individual bankrupcy. Bankrupcy is one of the NORMAL ways a business is dissolved in the state.. You marxist trump hating clowns can't stop screaming at the sky, can you? Also, 9-11 was an inside job 


Friday, February 19, 2021

Facebook Just BANNED Basically The ENTIRE Country Of Australia In Most INSANE Act Of Censorship EVER (Tim Pool)

Facebook has been censoring alternative media on their platform for a long time and now, when the mainstream news channels are being hit, everyone is kicking up a fuss. The reason for the news ban was because the Australian Government wanted FB to pay for corporate news being hosted on their platform.  One could argue that FB was actually acting like a publisher with the censoring of the Alt media, and so they needed to pay up. 

Incidentally, I saw in a local Australian newspaper how a politician was complaining how bad it was that 'professional journalists, with sound editorial departments, and fact checking systems' were now being banned. What a joke ! The Australian media, when it comes to world and US affairs, is a disgrace. The MSM in Australia tends to feed off the corrupt US corporate networks without properly fact checking anything. Their own journalists seem corrupt too - especially the foreign correspondents that skew stories to suit the US Deep State narrative.

Screw the MSM and screw FB. As individuals you can still get around the censorship by sharing and posting news and videos (without providing URL links) on that platform. Post Alt news information while the ban is being enforced. 

ps. This ban helps to reveal what a monster big tech has become - a threat to free speech and democracy.  Companies like FB, Google, and You Tube might need a level of regulation and oversight. They are acting as public utilities through their monopolies. However, regulation should be unnecessary as people now have the opportunity to move to other platforms (making these companies the next MySpace). 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 20, 2021.]

Thursday, February 18, 2021

CNN Paid Leftist Who Stormed The Capitol $35,000, Corporate Media is FUNDING What They Call Terror (Tim Pool)

The important fact in this case is that Mr Sullivan actually incited violence at the Capitol and had invited other Antifa types who likely mixed with the crowd. How many of these violence advocating Antifa people showed up? What we need is background information on all those that incited violence, that fought with police, and damaged property when they stormed Capitol Building. One should not draw conclusions about what happened without further investigation. 

On the other hand Trump didn't incite the violence. He invited people to peacefully protest (which is evident if you listen to his entire speech and not the doctored and spliced together versions aired in the mainstream propaganda media). 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 19, 2021.]

The False and Exaggerated Claims Still Being Spread About the Capitol Riot

Steve Weathers tS9 ipgonfgshoeremdrs · Let's test this FB news ban .... (if I don't put up any link). ps. The New York Times had to issue a correction, but they stuck it on their old posts as an update. The one cop that died didn't die from being attacked there. The only people killed were protesters/rioters. The zip tie people apparently found the ties in the building (and the Feds agree with them). I think the media was trying to weaponise what happened to avoid talking about the vote counting issue (that is still largely unaddressed and pissed off a lot of people). The False and Exaggerated Claims Still Being Spread About the Capitol Riot - Glenn Greenwald. What took place at the Capitol on January 6 was undoubtedly a politically motivated riot. As such, it should not be controversial to regard it as a dangerous episode. Any time force or violence is introduced into what ought to be the peaceful resolution of political conflicts, it should be lamented and condemned. But none of that justifies lying about what happened that day, especially by the news media. Condemning that riot does not allow, let alone require, echoing false claims in order to render the event more menacing and serious than it actually was. There is no circumstance or motive that justifies the dissemination of false claims by journalists. The more consequential the event, the less justified, and more harmful, serial journalistic falsehoods are. Yet this is exactly what has happened, and continues to happen, since that riot almost seven weeks ago. And anyone who tries to correct these falsehoods is instantly attacked with the cynical accusation that if you want only truthful reporting about what happened, then you’re trying to “minimize” what happened and are likely an apologist for if not a full-fledged supporter of the protesters themselves. One of the most significant of these falsehoods was the tale — endorsed over and over without any caveats by the media for more than a month — that Capitol Police officer Brian Sicknick was murdered by the pro-Trump mob when they beat him to death with a fire extinguisher. That claim was first published by The New York Times on January 8 in an article headlined “Capitol Police Officer Dies From Injuries in Pro-Trump Rampage.” It cited “two [anonymous] law enforcement officials” to claim that Sicknick died “with the mob rampaging through the halls of Congress” and after he “was struck with a fire extinguisher.” A second New York Times article from later that day — bearing the more dramatic headline: “He Dreamed of Being a Police Officer, Then Was Killed by a Pro-Trump Mob” — elaborated on that story ---------------------------------------------------------- After publication of these two articles, this horrifying story about a pro-Trump mob beating a police officer to death with a fire extinguisher was repeated over and over, by multiple journalists on television, in print, and on social media. It became arguably the single most-emphasized and known story of this event, and understandably so — it was a savage and barbaric act that resulted in the harrowing killing by a pro-Trump mob of a young Capitol police officer. It took on such importance for a clear reason: Sicknick’s death was the only example the media had of the pro-Trump mob deliberately killing anyone. In a January 11 article detailing the five people who died on the day of the Capitol protest, the New York Times again told the Sicknick story: “Law enforcement officials said he had been ‘physically engaging with protesters’ and was struck in the head with a fire extinguisher.” But none of the other four deaths were at the hands of the protesters: the only other person killed with deliberate violence was a pro-Trump protester, Ashli Babbitt, unarmed when shot in the neck by a police officer at close range. The other three deaths were all pro-Trump protesters: Kevin Greeson, who died of a heart attack outside the Capitol; Benjamin Philips, 50, “the founder of a pro-Trump website called Trumparoo,” who died of a stroke that day; and Rosanne Boyland, a fanatical Trump supporter whom the Times says was inadvertently “killed in a crush of fellow rioters during their attempt to fight through a police line.” This is why the fire extinguisher story became so vital to those intent on depicting these events in the most violent and menacing light possible. Without Sicknick having his skull bashed in with a fire extinguisher, there were no deaths that day that could be attributed to deliberate violence by pro-Trump protesters. Three weeks later, The Washington Post said dozens of officers (a total of 140) had various degrees of injuries, but none reported as life-threatening, and at least two police officers committed suicide after the riot. So Sicknick was the only person killed who was not a pro-Trump protester, and the only one deliberately killed by the mob itself. It is hard to overstate how pervasive this fire extinguisher story became. Over and over, major media outlets and mainstream journalists used this story to dramatize what happened ---------------------------------------------------------- After the media bombarded Americans with this story for a full month without pause, it took center stage at Trump’s impeachment process. As former federal prosecutor Andrew McCarthy noted, the article of impeachment itself stated that “Trump supporters ‘injured and killed law enforcement personnel.’” The House impeachment managers explicitly claimed on page 28 of their pretrial memorandum that “the insurrectionists killed a Capitol Police officer by striking him in the head with a fire extinguisher.” Once the impeachment trial ended in an acquittal, President Joe Biden issued a statement and referenced this claim in the very first paragraph. Sicknick, said the President, lost “his life while protecting the Capitol from a violent, riotous mob on January 6, 2021.” The problem with this story is that it is false in all respects. From the start, there was almost no evidence to substantiate it. The only basis were the two original New York Times articles asserting that this happened based on the claim of anonymous law enforcement officials. Despite this alleged brutal murder taking place in one of the most surveilled buildings on the planet, filled that day with hundreds of cellphones taping the events, nobody saw video of it. No photographs depicted it. To this day, no autopsy report has been released. No details from any official source have been provided. Not only was there no reason to believe this happened from the start, the little that was known should have caused doubt. On the same day the Times published its two articles with the “fire extinguisher” story, ProPublica published one that should have raised serious doubts about it. The outlet interviewed Sicknick’s brother, who said that “Sicknick had texted [the family] Wednesday night to say that while he had been pepper-sprayed, he was in good spirits.” That obviously conflicted with the Times’ story that the mob “overpowered Sicknick” and “struck him in the head with a fire extinguisher,” after which, “with a bloody gash in his head, Mr. Sicknick was rushed to the hospital and placed on life support.” But no matter. The fire extinguisher story was now a matter of lore. Nobody could question it. And nobody did: until after a February 2 CNN article that asked why nobody has been arrested for what clearly was the most serious crime committed that day: the brutal murder of Officer Sicknick with a fire extinguisher. Though the headline gave no hint of this, the middle of the article provided evidence which essentially declared the original New York Times story false: "In Sicknick's case, it's still not known publicly what caused him to collapse the night of the insurrection. Findings from a medical examiner's review have not yet been released and authorities have not made any announcements about that ongoing process. According to one law enforcement official, medical examiners did not find signs that the officer sustained any blunt force trauma, so investigators believe that early reports that he was fatally struck by a fire extinguisher are not true." The CNN story speculates that perhaps Sicknick inhaled “bear spray,” but like the ProPublica interview with his brother who said he inhaled pepper spray, does not say whether it came from the police or protesters. It is also just a theory. CNN noted that investigators are “vexed by a lack of evidence that could prove someone caused his death as he defended the Capitol during last month's insurrection.” Beyond that, “to date, little information has been shared publicly about the circumstances of the death of the 13-year veteran of the police force, including any findings from an autopsy that was conducted by DC's medical examiner.” Few noticed this remarkable admission buried in this article. None of this was seriously questioned until a relatively new outlet called Revolver News on February 9 compiled and analyzed all the contradictions and lack of evidence in the prevailing story, after which Fox News’ Tucker Carlson, citing that article, devoted the first eight minutes of his February 10 program to examining these massive evidentiary holes. That caused right-wing media outlets to begin questioning what happened, but mainstream liberal outlets — those who spread the story aggressively in the first place — largely and predictably ignored it all. This week, the paper that first published the false story — in lieu of a retraction or an explanation of how and why it got the story wrong — simply went back to the first two articles, more than five weeks later, and quietly posted what it called an “update” at the top of both five-week-old articles. [Link deleted by me to the rest of the story. Google it if you want to finish reading this.]

'It Was the WORST Day of My Life ...' Alex Jones Tells ALL! | Ash Wednesday | Louder with Crowder

Wednesday, February 10, 2021








BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 half an hour before it fell - how did she know?


9/11 INSIDE JOB Not everyone is aware of the lies and distortions of our history, so if you find anything you can't swallow remember to spit out the bones.


Study Disputes That Earth Is in a ‘Climate Emergency’

  Study Disputes That Earth Is in a ‘Climate Emergency’ There is no “climate emergency”, according to a study for the Global Warming Policy Foundation by independent scientist Dr Indur Goklany. Empirical evidence directly contradicts claims that increased carbon dioxide has reduced human wellbeing. In fact, human wellbeing has never been higher


I think they meant "unlocking the mysteries of the natural world and/or the universe" or something akin to that? Scientists devoted to unlocking science mysteries just seems redundant and silly. Especially since the lefty persuasion are generally self-assured there's no such things as paranormal science mysteries or anything they could possibly be wrong about (like say the the Sun's impact vs son of a bitch Republican climate deniers) concerning their pet science issue of global warm... er, climate change. Deboonked! You say?

Quick aside...

The last above link offers a rebuttal or at least counter-point narrative to the dopes at sNopes, but no pseudo-skeptic claptrap is required to demonstrate, that both terms have long coexisted, to know that a leftist political decision was made on high to push to predominantly use the larger climate umbrella term, as to avoid common societal criticism. Like that of my former neighbor, who razzed my young (and predictable for youth I was first taught by him) bleeding heart. The Day After Tomorrow had finally come, but unlike my doom and gloom scenario, the new day had my frenemy marveling at how shoveling piles of white and freezing cold global warming was a bitch to deal with in the winter! Well, um, climate change I retorted! The heating could trigger a mass cooling, you see? So, I won either way in my mind. Talk about perfect political spin! Makes my head spin now. 

“If you’re not liberal when you’re young, you have no heart; if you’re not conservative when you’re old, you have no brain.” - Francois Guizot

I used to be a major lefty (now I'm a scary domestic phantom menace Libertarian). I lived through this BS. The global warming term was just as prevalent as the Joe Six-Pack common sense rebuttals. As time went on, and Al Gore's crazy predictions in his "global warming education film," that was subtitled A Global Warning, failed to materialize, just as a great many before him, the deliberate shift in approach was self-evident. The fact that the warming trend began to subside and revert might have also played a wee role in the damage control rhetoric shift. Joe Six being on top of this with his peasant wits could not persist, I insist. But I digress...

This purported unquestionable consensus reality serves to prop up their pro-regressive superiority complex on all things scientific. It's no wonder this is their strategy, coming from the likes of those who insist there are endless amount of genders, as opposed to the overwhelming consensus reality precedent, of just two. Or take for instance, their ilk's attempts to slam ‘the most important psychiatrist of the last half-century’ because he debunks transgender ideology.

Debunking Potholer54 and Global Warming/Climate Change Propaganda

Joe Biden campaigned on promises to govern by “consensus.” He devoted his Inaugural Address to “unity.” Yet he has issued more executive orders and actions in the first three weeks of his presidency than any president in U.S. history

 52 Executive Orders and Actions Already Put into Place by Joe Biden President Joe Biden campaigned on promises to govern by “consensus.” He devoted his Inaugural Address to “unity.” Yet he has issued more executive orders and actions in the first three weeks of his presidency than any president in U.S. history Breitbart

Saturday, February 6, 2021


They're also trying to treat Trump as a terrorist leader to prevent him to from ever holding office. Clearly he was a threat to the system. He was an anti-Globalist (although still a corporatist), undermined backing for terrorist forces in Syria, and he went after (relatively low level) pedo networks. 

Ordinary people that backed Trump are being targeted as domestic terrorists. The military is being purged - they'll be no one left. This is a huge set up to recruit a politicised military force to act like Gestapo agents for the corrupt people in charge (ie servants of the pedos). Meanwhile the Proud Boys, that fought against BLM terrorist actions (police were executed during BLM protests), are now labelled as terrorists in Canada. 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 7, 2021.]

This panel of prominent doctors discuss the dangers of vaccines and the cover-up by the CDC and the Pharma industry.


Alex Jones interviews Boogalo and Antifa leaders Magnus Panvidya and Star Shakti about their ideas for what America should be.




Tucker Carlson sounds off on continued occupation of the Nation's Capitol.

Tucker: Bank of America secretly turned over customer data to FBI

Friday, February 5, 2021

YouTube Deletes Mike Lindell's Documentary "Absolute Proof"

Mike Lindell, Mary Fanning, and Brannon Howse Present the Docu-movie : "Absolute Proof" Exposing Election Fraud and the Theft of America by Enemies Foreign and Domestic.




Wednesday, February 3, 2021

Tuesday, February 2, 2021

Become informed about COVID vaccinations and then do your own risk vs. benefit analysis

   Dear Family, Friends, and Activists,        February 2, 2021

Will the newly released experimental vaccines create more health problems than COVID-19?

I have been learning about the tragic reactions to these new vaccinations. I hope you will look at various sources of information and then make your own decision about whether you will accept this "warp speed" vaccine being so heavily promoted by our media, government, and pharmaceutical companies.

(Very recently, there has been some good news. The therapeutic and prophylactic Ivermectin is showing promise and is now unrestricted in the US. What this means is that we are not limited to taking our chances with an experimental vaccine for questionable protection. Be sure to see the section below with a red heading.)

We have sacrificed a lot to “stay safe” and to "get back to normal."  COVID-19 can be life threatening to those who are elderly and/or with underlying comorbidities.  According to Dr. Joseph Mercola, between 10% and 45% of those who are treated for COVID-19 develop long term symptoms. Dr. Mercola explains these persistent symptoms and how to help yourself if this were to become the case for you.

The following information, therefore, may be unwelcome, causing you to feel between a rock and a hard place. It may also be shocking if you get your news only from corporate media.

The sources I look at to balance what I receive from our corporately funded media and politicians are credible — yet censored — scientists, physicians, and investigators. The media are funded by pharmaceutical companies to the tune of billions of dollars annually. Politicians are also funded extremely generously by the pharmaceutical companies.

Three sources I find credible are:;  

JeremyHammond (dot) com (an independent investigative journalist); and  (Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s organization)

These sources are not against vaccinations, but they are for safe vaccinations. I recommend signing up for their email notices to keep yourselves apprised of the upcoming news about these vaccines.

The sources below span the entire political spectrum. This topic has been terribly politicized and is very divisive, so please keep an open mind and use your own discernment.

Reports of the tragic, immediate side effects of these experimental COVID-19 vaccinations are increasing faster than I can keep up with them, but we will not have data for long-term effects for years.

That is my main concern and why I send this email.

I asked my Primary Care Physician (PCP), "Will you take the vaccine for COVID?"  Her immediate reply was "Hell no! We will all be guinea pigs!"

She added that we should never take any new drug, but we should wait until we can see what the long-term fallout might be.   She as well as my other healthcare practitioners think highly of Dr. Mercola, by the way.  His site is a good one for information on what you can do to enhance your health and immune system. 

To be fair, some MDs tell us these vaccines are safe. (But I am concerned about their pharmaceutical bias. Aren’t they, to a great degree, educated by the pharmaceutical industry?)

Why are we not getting the reports of these tragic vaccination reactions from our media? 
Censorship is the answer, but the "who" and the "why" of this huge uptick in censorship in our society is a broad subject. I will address that issue comprehensively — including information on the so-called independent "fact checkers" — in my next essay. Email me if you want to find out how to receive it once it is published. (

If you cannot find a YouTube video listed below, search on Bitchute or Lbry with the same title.

But doesn't the FDA protect us by not allowing unsafe drugs on the market? 
We have likely heard about "regulatory capture" and the "revolving door" of US regulatory agencies, but here is a more in-depth article from Frontline detailing why we would be unwise to trust the FDA unreservedly.



There are many more, but these seem to me to be some of the most credible.

(As of Jan. 29, 2020) 329 Deaths + 9,516 Other Injuries Reported Following COVID Vaccine, Latest CDC Data Show


China Health Experts Call for Suspension of COVID Vaccines as Norway Investigates 33 Deaths, Germany Probes 10 Deaths


Caution needed in using mRNA-based vaccines to prevent unknown risks including death

California Health Officials Call for Pause on Moderna Vaccine Batch 
[one batch] Due to Reports of Allergic Reactions

13 Israelis suffer facial paralysis after coronavirus vaccine - report

Mexican doctor hospitalized after receiving Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine


Home Run King Hank Aaron Dies of ‘Undisclosed Cause’ 18 Days After Receiving Moderna Vaccine

Could mRNA COVID-19 vaccines be dangerous in the long-term?

‘Perfectly Healthy’ Florida Doctor Dies Weeks After Getting Pfizer COVID Vaccine

Johns Hopkins Scientist: ‘A Medical Certainty’ Pfizer Vaccine Caused Death of Florida Doctor

Bell's Palsy and Vaccines: What's the Connection?

US Nurse Gets Bell's Palsy

Several Others with Bell's Palsy from Vax


Portuguese Nurse Dies after Pfizer Vax

FDA Investigates Allergic Reactions to Pfizer COVID Vaccine After More Healthcare Workers Hospitalized

Uncontrollable convulsions?
Shawn Skelton Explains What the MODERNA VACCINE Did to Her as She Convulses Uncontrollably 
(YouTube has censored this video).

Louisiana Woman Convulses Uncontrollably after Being Injected with the Experimental Pfizer COVID Shot

(NOTE: Let's hope these uncontrollable convulsions are not due to taking these vaccines. They seem to be credible reports, but I have no confirmation so far from or, two sites I trust.)


COVID-19 Vaccine Warnings
Important Warnings on COVID-19 Vaccines 
(A very good site to subscribe to in order to keep informed on many issues.)

Issues covered:  Vaccine Trials Not Designed to Measure Viral Spread or Deaths; Adverse Reactions; No Pharma Liability, Little Chance of Compensation for Vaccine Injuries; A Form of Genetic Engineering – Never Before Used on Humans; Vaccines Will Not End Restrictive Measures; Follow the Money; Huge Pharmaceutical Lawsuits and Settlements

Informed Consent for COVID Vaccine (This article explains ADE — Antibody-Dependent Enhancement — and the history documenting that vaccinations can actually enhance the disease when the vaccinated person encounters the wild virus.  This is an unknown for the current COVID-19 vaccines but is, nonetheless, important information.)

Side Effects and Data Gaps Raise Questions on COVID Vaccine (Important Risk-Benefit analysis on high rate of severe side effects, ADE and pathogenic priming of COVID vaccines, autoimmune reactions in both COVID and from the vaccination, relative vs. absolute effectiveness of the vaccines, etc.)


White House Asks CDC to Study How Many Have Died After COVID Vaccine Shots


RFK, Jr. Warned FDA Three Months Ago About Ingredient in Pfizer COVID Vaccine That Likely Caused Life-Threatening Reaction in Two UK Healthcare Workers (Why PEG is the ingredient most likely to cause anaphylaxis in the COVID vaccines.)

Issues regarding the COVID-19 vaccinations  (This is a running list of articles from around the world.)


CDC issues new guidance addressing allergic reactions to coronavirus vaccine


Pregnant or Under 18? Don’t Get Moderna’s COVID Vaccine, WHO Says


Chicago-area hospital to resume vaccinations after 4 workers experience adverse reactions: report

WHO Changes Definition of Herd Immunity; plus why natural immunity is superior


Dr. Simone Gold - The truth about the CV19 vaccine (Highly recommended and worth watching the entire talk! This physician leans politically to the right while I lean left, but I find her facts to be credible and important. With reason, she calls this “vaccine” an “experimental biological agent.” She lists the potentially serious “unknowns” about this agent.)

"What the COVID Vaccine Hype Fails to Mention" by Gilbert Berdine, MD
He concludes: My colleagues include resident physicians and faculty physicians who work with covid patients on a daily basis. I have asked a number of my colleagues whether they will be first in line for the new vaccine. I have yet to hear any of my colleagues respond affirmatively. The reasons for hesitancy are that the uncertainties about safety exceed what they perceive to be a small benefit. In other words, my colleagues would prefer to take their chances with covid rather than beta test the vaccine. Many of my colleagues want to see the safety data after a year of use before getting vaccinated; these colleagues are concerned about possible autoimmune side effects that may not appear for months after vaccination. [or years?]

These announcements by Pfizer and Moderna are encouraging. I certainly hope that these vaccines protect people from the harm of covid-19. I certainly hope that these vaccines are safe. If both of these conditions are true, nobody will need to be coerced into taking the vaccine. However, you should pay even more attention about what is left out of an announcement than about what is stated. The pharmaceutical companies are more than happy for patients to misunderstand what is meant by efficacy. Caveat emptor (buyer beware)!

Dr. Andy Wakefield "'It's Not A Vaccine' it's Genetic Engineering Never Tested on Humans Before" (Andy Wakefield, a hero in my estimation, has been horribly smeared by the media and pharmaceutical industries.)

Dr. Lee Merritt Interview (Merritt is a right leaning MD. I am not comfortable with her speculation on the possibility of this being a Chinese bioweapon, and she leaves me unclear about whether the ADE of past coronaviruses were mRNA experimental agents or regular vaccines. Otherwise, some good info.)



Coronavirus Information Center

Coronavirus Vaccine Problems News Articles

Trump Gives 1.16 Billion To Bill Gates’ Vaccine Alliance & Inks Deal With Pfizer For A COVID Vaccine (About “alternative” therapies, the role of the “invisible government,” comparing COVID and the flu, etc.)

Individual Rights and Freedoms Under Siege in Era of COVID

Is this really a vaccine? Or is it really a type of chemotherapy? (David E. Martin, patent attorney)

Or a medical device? 
(David E. Martin) (This is fascinating and worth watching. The “vaccination” we are told we must take is actually a “device” or a “synthetic pathogen” injected into the body. 80% of those injected have some kind of immediate adverse reaction.)

If the vaccination damages your health can you sue for compensation? (Essentially, No.)


According to my PCP and my other healthcare practitioners, the main thing we can do is support our immune system by building up our levels of vitamin D3. 4000 iu is not too much to take.  Ideally, your PCP should do a blood assay each year that tells what your D3 level is. If this is not feasible, Dr. Mercola has recommended the GrassrootsHealth Nutrient Research Institute where you can get your D3 and other nutrients tested.  

Physicians vary, but my PCP wants my D3 level to be in the 60s ng/mL (nanograms/milliliter). They should be at least above 30 ng/mL.  I am continually amazed that nutrient panels, especially for D3, are not a common practice at annual medical checkups.  Since research clearly shows that those with elevated levels do much better with this new coronavirus (as well as with other infections), I find it criminal that our authorities and our media are not telling us about this.

While Colorado will not mandate the COVID-19 vaccine, according to a letter from my state representative, your employer may mandate that you become vaccinated as a prerequisite to return to work. In fact, 71% of employers nationwide may mandate a vaccination to return to work. Schools may require a vaccination to return to school.  (See next source.)

Fauci Now Says COVID-19 Vaccine May Become Mandatory (Or maybe not. Will these “vaccinations” give us protection from infection or protection from transmission?  Will they give us “herd immunity” so we can “get back to normal,” as Bill Gates has promised? Amazingly, the answer is No!)



Highly recommended! Dr. Seheult, MD: Vitamin D and COVID 19: The Evidence for Prevention and Treatment of Coronavirus (SARS CoV 2).  (This video is for those who want to dig more deeply into the amazing role of D3, both a vitamin and a hormone. It covers many studies from around the world.)

Dr. Mercola has many articles on how to prevent and treat COVID-19 with adequate D3, plus the importance of enough magnesium and K2 to activate D3, and other recommendations for how to protect and empower yourself.
Could Most COVID-19 Deaths Have Been Prevented?

More Than 80% of COVID Patients Are Vitamin D Deficient

How Long Will We Ignore the Truth About Vitamin D?

Simple Strategies That Will Improve Your Immunity



The therapeutic Ivermectin is having very good results and since January 14, 2021, is unrestricted in the US for COVID-19, thanks to Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance. It is possible that other prophylactics and therapeutics may follow. See the next four sources:

NY Judge Orders Hospital To Use Ivermectin, Woman Recovers (TrialSite News)


First EU Nation To Approve Ivermectin For Covid-19 (Slovakia; TrialSite News)


Can Ivermectin Help Prevent COVID-19 Deaths?


New York Times Explains the How But Not the Why Behind Lack of COVID Treatments (Very important article for understanding WHY we have not had therapeutic or prophylactic treatments before now.  Highly recommended to understand the politics and profit motive involved.)





Besides recognizing the potential severity of COVID-19 for anyone over 70 and anyone with specific underlying conditions, we also need a greater perspective. The large majority of us (80%) have no or only mild symptoms. Luckily, children and young adults are hardly affected at all.


Across the globe, the noninstitutionalized overall death rate is .2% - .26%, and the major part of this percentage are those in the 70+ age group.


39% of all US fatalities are the residents and staff of nursing homes. (Sept. 2020)


People under 40 in the US have an infection fatality ratio (IFR) of .01%; for those 60+ the IFR is 1.71%.  78% of all COVID related deaths in Colorado have come from the 70+ age group (from Colorado's governor). 


So far, severe adverse reactions from vaccination are 2.79%.  “Extrapolated to the total U.S. population of 328.2 million, we can then expect 9,156,780 Americans to be injured by the vaccine if every single man, woman and child is vaccinated. Is this really reasonable for a virus that has an average survival rate of 99.74%?”


Why COVID-19 Is Not the 3rd Leading Cause of Death

"Viral Issue" with Irish engineer, Ivor Cummins 
(How lockdowns and masks seemed to have had no effect on the COVID-19 trajectory. Fascinating and recommended!)

Edward Snowden Says Governments Are Using COVID-19 To “Monitor Us Like Never Before”

Just Like 9/11 Did, COVID-19 Is Shifting Human Consciousness In A Major Way

United Nations Human Rights:  "Coronavirus: Human rights need to be front and centre in response, says Bachelet"

United Nations Human Rights:  "COVID-19: States should not abuse emergency measures to suppress human rights – UN experts"


Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and CHD Urge Congress to Investigate the Origins of COVID-19


Conflicts of Interest Taint Investigations Into COVID Origins


TRUTH, with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Season 2, Episode 8 featuring David E. Martin

(David E. Martin is a patent attorney. He explains how, in 2016, Moderna wrote in 4 patent applications that because of the concern for the "reemergence of, or deliberate release of, SARS coronavirus, vaccine development was initiated."  This begins around 31:00 minutes.


Big Brother News Watch: Governments Crack Down on Journalists in Attempt to Control Pandemic Narrative

Google Partners With Industry Lapdog to Promote Vaccines

The Plan for a Global System of Slavery--Catherine Austin Fitts


Censorship and Oppression Threaten America’s Trademark Standards of Democracy and Open Debate (Impassioned speech by RFK, Jr., giving the big picture.)

Think Global Vaccine Passports Are Scary? Wait Until You See What’s Next
(CommonPass, developed initially to track COVID testing and vaccinations, is setting the stage for biometric surveillance which will eventually be tied in with all your other medical records, digital ID, digital banking and a social credit system.)

Storing medical information below the skin’s surface

(Specialized dye, delivered along with a vaccine, could enable “on-patient” storage of vaccination history.)


Forced to Get the COVID Vaccine? ICAN May Be Able to Help.


Under Federal Law, Can Your Employer Make You Get the COVID Vaccine?


Is a totalitarian response to COVID-19 in the works? Yes, our authorities are planning mandatory vaccinations — you may need one, they tell us, to return to workfly, attend indoor events, etc.  This is a fact, I am astonished to say.


If your employer mandates a vaccination, you still have a choice, but I suggest that you start now by educating him or her and clearly stating your position. Most importantly, see the two articles immediately above regarding legal help.

Use your own discernment regarding what is right for your health!  Hopefully, you will not comply with an authoritarian demand regarding what should be your private health decision.



Fran Shure


PS: Consider forwarding this to your contacts and loved ones so they can make informed decisions.