Saturday, April 23, 2011
5 No-planer Claims Refuted
This is for anyone who still thinks the no-plane theories have any credibility. Please consider this my public statement about no-plane theories: They have no merit and are all wrong.
Debunking "September Clues" and "No Plane" Theories
The plane does decelerate:
Interpreting the Boeing-767 Deceleration During Impact with the WTC Tower
The F=MA argument
No "TV Fakery":
A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories
Letter Added to A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories
Rebuttal of Ace Baker's "Chopper 5 Composite" Analysis
DEBUNKING “SEPTEMBER CLUES” A POINT-BY-POINT ANALYSIS
September Clues - Busted! U-Tube version
South Towers Anomalies -- Busted!
Impossible speed? No:
Simulator Proves “Impossible Speed” was “probable” for Flt 11 and Flt 175
9/11: Impossible Speed & Impact -- Busted!
9/11: Possible or Impossible Speed?
Can planes penetrate steel structures? Yes:
9/11 No Planer Open your eyes War Planes vs Steel
There were reliable witnesses to the crashes:
No Planes Theory: R.I.P.
9/11 — Plane Impacts: Real or Faked?
at 6:15 PM
Labels: 9/11 disinformation, 9/11 no plane theories, CGI holograms 9/11, no-planers 9/11, Tv-Fakery, World Trade Center no-plane theories
I am a concerned citizen who wants the real truth about 9/11 exposed. I find science fascinating. I also enjoy researching the history of the origins of religion. Bio: http://www.scientificmethod911.org/authors/taylor_author.html Facebook page: http://tinyurl.com/3zynhh3