Sunday, May 20, 2018

Judge Jeanine: Sessions is the most dangerous man in America - Admits Conspiracy Theorists and Trump Were Right about Spying and Deep State! 'He Was Right! He Was Right!'

Judge Jeanine: Sessions is the most dangerous man in America - Admits Conspiracy Theorists and Trump Were Right about Spying and Deep State! 'He Was Right! He Was Right!'


Confirmed: FBI Was Spying on the Trump Campaign - The FBI Spied on Donald Trump: Legacy Media Runs Massive Damage Control - FBI SPY-OP EXPOSED: TRUMP CAMPAIGN INFILTRATED BY LONGTIME CIA/MI6 ASSET

FISA Memo Released: Proof of DNC FBI Collusion, and, Yes, Worse than Watergate - Tom Fitton Blasts Paul Ryan on FISA Memo

Deep State Spied on both Trump and Sen Sessions

Mueller/FBI: The Deep State Rats Nest Soft Coup Proves Trump Right When Tapping Manafort and Company - BIGGER Than Watergate! Trump Was Right And Limbaugh Knew It: Obama Wiretapped Trump

Roger Stone: Mueller Has Told Manafort To Lie About Trump Or He Will Be Railroaded To Prison - Full Show - Trump Right About Illegal Spying / Morgan Freeman Goes Completely Insane - 09/19/2017

FBI May Have Spied on POTUS Trump

Susan Rice Lied About Unmasking Trump Campaign Members, Media Lauds Her

BREAKING: Samantha Power Caught Unmasking ‘Hundreds’ In Final Year Of Obama Admin

LIMBAUGH: Focus On Russians Is A Deflection From Obama SPYING On The Trump Campaign

Obama Violated Fourth Amendment, Sought Unredacted Intel on US Citizens During Election

BREAKING! TRUMP WAS 100% RIGHT! THE GUARDIAN JUST PROVED FOX NEWS’ JUDGE NAP WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG! - CNN Confirms Judge Napolitano Was Right British Intelligence Help Obama Spy On Trump

New Wiretap Report Unravels CNN's Obama/Susan Rice Cover Up


LIMBAUGH: TRUMP WAS RIGHT In Claiming That Obama Wiretapped Him - RUSH: 'Very Clear' Obama Admin Spied On Trump And Rice Is Lying Because Those Things Happened Before

Susan Rice Is The First Official To Be Identified As Unmasking Trump People For Political Purposes - Susan Rice Reportedly "Unmasked" Trump in Incidental Data Collection


Obama's Own Defense Deputy Accidentally Admits Obama Admin Spied On Trump - HANNITY AMBER ALERT: "Evelyn Farkas Get An Attorney Immediately"

Whistle Blower Dennis Montgomery Claims Obama Administration Spied On Trump's Team

Bill Mitchell: Trump always ends up being right. It's almost a little freaky. - The Hoax Collapses: House Intel Chair Says Trump WAS Surveilled


Saturday, May 19, 2018

Here’s the Proven Deep State Conspiracy that Will Hang ’em All!

You can’t make up a story like this, but here it is…..

Is there just a little corruption in DC? Read this. It explains all.

 From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation.
A Grand Jury had been empaneled.

Governments from around the world had donated to the “Charity”.

Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared.

Hmmm, now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.

Guess who took over this investigation in 2002?

Bet you can’t guess.

None other than James Comey.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was transferred in to the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS?

Your friend and mine, Lois “Be on The Look Out” (BOLO) Lerner.

Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

It gets better, well not really, but this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right?

Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005?

None other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States , Rod Rosenstein.
Now, that’s interesting, isn’t it?

Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this timeframe???

I know, it’s a miracle, just a coincidence, just an anomaly in statistics and chances, Robert Mueller.
What do all four casting characters have in common?

They all were briefed and/or were front line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation.

Now that’s just a coincidence, right?

Ok, lets chalk the last one up to mere chance.

Let’s fast forward to 2009.

James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin.

Hillary Clinton is running the State Department, on her own personal email server by the way.
The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of the Hillary.

Like all good public servants do, you know looking out for America ’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to no other than, the Russians.

Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn’t, the People got absolutely nothing out of it.

However, prior to the sales approval, no other than Bill Clinton goes to Moscow, gets paid 500K for a one hour speech then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.

 Ok, no big deal right?

Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.

Guess who was the FBI Director during this timeframe?

Yep, Robert Mueller.

He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.

Guess who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland .

None other than, Rod Rosenstein.

Guess what happened to the informant?

The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.

How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise?

Guess what happened soon after the sale was approved?

$145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.

Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division?

None other than, Lois Lerner.

Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?

Let’s fast forward to 2015.

Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovers that the Hillary ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server. He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law.

He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.

Sparing you the State Departments cover up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…… they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillary.

Now this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013?

 Guess who secured 17 no-bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer?

None other than James Comey.

Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at State, huh?

Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” after of course his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and exonerates her.

Nope. Couldn’t find any crimes there.

Can you guess what happened next?

In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillary Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy.

They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury.

Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Homey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016, and exonerates Hillary from any wrongdoing.

Can you see the pattern?

It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.

FISA Abuse, political espionage….. pick a crime, any crime, chances are…… this group and a few others did it.

All the same players.

All compromised and conflicted.

All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves.

All connected in one way or another to the Clinton ‘s.

They are like battery acid, they corrode and corrupt everything they touch.

How many lives have these two destroyed?

They cannot be numbered.

As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.

Let us not forget that Comey’s brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes.


[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 20th, 2018.]

Debunked: Video of ‘Fake Dead Palestinians’ Exposes Pro-Israel Propaganda

A video circulating on social media claiming to be evidence that Hamas is faking deaths in Gaza does not actually portray what has been claimed. And not only that – the footage is more than four years old.

The video was shared among pro-Israel social media users in the wake of Monday’s Great Return March protests in Gaza, in which Israeli fire killed at least 60. People shared it as ‘proof’ that Hamas is either faking the number of deaths reported after Monday’s unrest or is manipulating people into feeling sympathy for the Palestinian cause.

However, the video actually dates back to 2013 and has been used as anti-Palestinian propaganda since at least 2014, when Israel’s Operation Protective Edge war on Gaza saw more than 2,200 Palestinians killed, more than 1,462 of whom were civilians, according to the UN.

A YouTube search for ‘fake Hamas funeral’ brings up a 2014 videoentitled, ‘HHamas [sic] lies? Dead bodies that move? Propaganda gone wrong – you decide.’ The video itself isn’t an original, but the logo is legible –  it’s from an Egyptian news organization, called el Badil.

Loud, cheerful music plays in the video and the ‘corpses’ have their feet exposed. Usually, Muslim burial shrouds cover the feet, and rope is normally tied around the shrouds. At one stage, a man inside a shroud moves. Another of those covered by the shrouds also moves the material laying over him, and scratches his face. This part of the video is cited by those sharing it on social media as clear evidence that it’s a faked video.

A reverse image search of the video’s thumbnail brings up lots of results claiming the video shows proof of Hamas lying. In one instance, the video is even portrayed as being evidence of deaths being faked in Syria.

A few comments under the tweets circulating in the last 24 hours say the video is of a mock funeral at a university. One commenter posted a link to a 2014 video of a news presenter explaining that there’s more to the video than at first appears. Ultimately, the original el Badil report hails from 2013 and depicts a Muslim Brotherhood protest at al-Azhar University.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 20th, 2018.]

Childish Gambino - This Is America... Debunked

Childish Gambino - This Is America... Debunked

Gun Control is a Snake Oil "Cure" for a Nonexistent Crisis

If I argued for destroying the right to privacy because a few people misuse private chat features to sell drugs or whatever, you'd think I was nuts, right? And gun control won't do anything anyways. The UK has plenty of it and they now need metal detectors in schools and are melting down as a society.

Editor's Note: Metal detectors is a great idea, as is armed guards and trained civilians, and as Styx points out, better mental health treatment, teachers, and parents, would be just grand as well.

Gun Control is a Snake Oil "Cure" for a Nonexistent Crisis


5 Points To Counter The NRA DEBUNKED - Penn & Teller Helps Gun Control Supporters Understand The 2nd Amendment:

Debunking Gun Control Advocate Statistical Analysis - DAVID HOGG: The Unfiltered, Unpopular Truth! | Louder With Crowder:

Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Trump Will Not Back Israel In Larger War With Iran - Netanyahu Must Step Down For Peace In The Middle East - Iran Threatens To Expose Western Diplomats

Trump Will Not Back Israel In Larger War With Iran - Netanyahu Must Step Down For Peace In The Middle East - Iran Threatens To Expose Western Diplomats


VIDEO: Pat Buchanan Says Netanyahu Was Lying The U.S. Into World War - Netanyahu Rabblerouses for War with Iran Again - I Believe Absolutely Nothing That Any Government Tells Me to Justify or Explicate Unnecessary War - CENSORED REPORT: Trump Knows Obama Armed Iran To Trigger Islamic Armageddon:

Alex Jones Talks About Why He Supports Israel - Violent Clashes Mark Opening Of US Embassy In Israel:

Shapiro: Media outlets acting as propaganda arm for Hamas - New York Times accused of anti-Israel bias - Turkey Recalls Ambassadors From U.S. And Israel After Over 50 Palestinians Killed In Gaza::

Sunday, May 13, 2018

David Seaman Attacks #QAnon for Going after Alex Jones - Warning! Q Anon Crew Malicious Malware Application & Ponzy Scheme Exposed

David Seaman Attacks #QAnon for Going after Alex Jones - Warning! Q Anon Crew Malicious Malware Application & Ponzy Scheme Exposed


QAnon Compromised: Intel Source Hijacked By The Deep State's Disinformation Campaign - QAnon Attacks Infowars / President Trump’s Developing Plan To Fire Mueller, Rosenstein, and Sessions:

Friday, May 11, 2018

To Freaked Out Truthers and Panicked Patriots: If You Think You Know the Truth You Obviously Don't

MY CRITICAL MESSAGE TO TRUTHER TYROS OVERWHELMED WITH THE FRACTIONALIZED WORLD THAT SEEMS TO BE DISINTEGRATING. As Mario Andretti spake thusly: “If everything seems under control, you're not going fast enough.” Be calm and aware that what you're feeling now is commensurate with the level of complexity that you're addressing. Fear not. March on, patriots. March on. Trust the plan, indeed.

To Freaked Out Truthers and Panicked Patriots: If You Think You Know the Truth You Obviously Don't

Thursday, May 10, 2018

Lawyers Begin Grand Jury Process for 911 Inquiry - Full Show—9/11 Lies, War & Torture: America in Freefall

Members of the “Lawyers Committee for 911 Inquiry” explain the process they have begun to get a Grand Jury. What have they discovered with forensic evidence, expert testimony, eyewitness accounts and video. Attorneys David Meiswinkle & Julio Gomez explain how will the process work and what happens next.

Lawyers Begin Grand Jury Process for 911 Inquiry - Full Show—9/11 Lies, War & Torture: America in Freefall


Ed Asner introduces The Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry - PETITION: Support Legal Action on 9/11--At Last! - Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry - Mick Harrison:

Tuesday, May 8, 2018

Frank Greening Iron Sphere Paper... Debunked

Comment 12: - By: Simon Falkner, - Received: 03/04/18 - Posted: 03/20/18
Dr. Greening: You say you did not mention the red/gray chips, studied by Harrit et al. (2009) [1], because you did not find any red/gray chips in your WTC dust sample. You essentially dismiss any such chips as environmental contaminants. In comment 3, you argue that the chips could be "flakes of spalled iron-oxide from so-called weathering steels" since they "would be quite common in the particulate matter found in any large urban center." In comment 3, you support your dismissal by noting that your calculations show that some of the chips studied by Harrit et al. were too large to have been dispersed far enough to reach some of the sampling locations. The chips must therefore, in your view, have been environmental contaminants at the sampling locations, rather than having been from the WTC collapses. In comment 8, you further support your case by adding that other major studies of the WTC dust did not find red/gray chips, and that a book about those studies did not mention them either (a book written by an author of some of the official governmental dust studies, Dr. P.J. Lioy, [2]). There are several obvious problems with this line of reasoning:
  1. Sample #2 in Harrit et al. was collected within 10 minutes of the collapse of the North Tower - after the dust collector and his surroundings had been smothered by a thick layer of the dust that obviously came from that event right there and then. In Part 1.0 of your paper, you describe this sort of a sample as the ideal sample.
  2. Your calculation-based argument begins with the premise that a gravitational collapse was the only possible force that could have flung the chips. You ignored other possibilities, most importantly (in this context) the possibility of energetic materials as a secondary power source: The red part of the red/gray chips is as you know one of the suggested energetic materials in question.
  3. Figure 16 in Part 4.1 of your paper shows that your calculations predict that most particles smaller than 500 microns would have settled within 300 meters from Ground Zero (GZ). But as Dr. Niels Harrit has already noted in comment #7, 4 ton steel beams were hurled up to 200 meters from GZ. Thus, real-life observations have demonstrated that your argument is obviously invalid.
  4. In comment 1, the moderators have this to say: "..Frank Greening replied: "I spent a lot of time looking for red-grey chips, but found none. And I did find a few mono-layered iron-oxide chips.""
    I find it curious that you do not even report finding potential candidates, and I suspect closer inspection would reveal some. Dr. Steven Jones [3] and chemical engineer Mark Basil [4] have both noted that there are many different red materials in the dust, in addition to the thermitic red/gray chips. Were the "mono-layered iron-oxide chips" red by any chance? Did you analyze them and rule out that they could be examples of the red layer without the gray layer [5] or perhaps burnt or charred examples of the red layer or even a red layer from a different source? The upper-right corner of Figure 2 in Part 3.1 of your paper shows the top half of what looks like the red layer of a red/gray chip.
  5. The presence of red/gray chips in the WTC dust has in fact been independently verified by three (3) different researchers in the years following the publishing of the 2009 Harrit et al paper: Mark Basile in the USA [6] and Henry-Couannier in France [7] both reported finding chips in their dust samples, and Dr. Millette in the USA [8] also found red/gray chips in WTC dust even though he had been hired to refute Harrit et al.. These researchers may not agree about the nature of the red material, and they may even have studied different kinds of red/gray chips[9], but they do confirm that red/gray chips are indeed found in the WTC dust. Had you forgotten about them when you scanned Dr. Lioy's book for red/gray chip references?
  6. Not finding red/gray chips in Dr. Lioy's book is a very poor excuse. As chemist Kevin Ryan has observed [10], "Millette and his colleagues did not report iron spheres in the official WTC dust signature study" even though other studies found them to be a prominent characteristic of the dust - yet the spheres are easily found when one really looks for them, as you know. Dr. Millette was the leading laboratory scientist for WTC dust studies sponsored by the government, and thus one of Lioy's co-authors in his WTC dust studies. These studies seemingly neglected to report any red/gray chips, but Dr. Millette had no trouble finding red/gray chips in his own dust samples once he had been independently hired to refute the Harrit et al. report. It can therefore be said that Dr. Lioy's lab technician has in fact independently confirmed that red/gray chips were indeed part of the WTC dust.
  7. Whether or not you agree that the red/gray chips are indeed remnants of the WTC collapse events is not really the main point. In my opinion, you had a scientific obligation to note in your paper that you looked but did not find any chips in your sample. And above all, you had an obligation to explain their relevance to your hypothesis for iron-rich spheres: Harrit et al. showed that their red/gray chips produced iron-rich spheres when ignited, and these chips therefore represent a hypothesis for iron-rich spheres that competes with yours. In my next essay, I will review your iron-sphere hypothesis as well as your fly-ash hypothesis for "iron-poor" spheres.
[2] Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen"Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2,7-31.
[5] Frédéric Henry-Couannier"Redred Chips".
[6] Mark Basile"Progress Report, August 2014".
[7] Frédéric Henry-Couannier"Independent analysis of WTC dust in Marseille".
[9] John-Michael Talboo and Ziggi Zugam"9/11: Explosive Material in the WTC Dust," Pages 15 - 18 in particular.

Comment 13: - By: Simon Falkner, - Received: 04/21/18 - Posted: 05/08/18

Comments on Characterization of a World Trade Center Dust Sample, by Greening and Greening (2017) - A Response to Dr. Frank Greening, by Simon Falkner

Part 1. The concrete in the floors of the Twin-Towers was NOT a source of fly-ash spheres.
Dr. Greening, in section 4.2.1 in your paper, you suggest that the glassy and "iron poor" aluminosilicate-based spheres found in the WTC dust came from fly-ash mixed into the floor-concrete in the Twin Towers (Greening and Greening, PDF pages 27 - 28), but I notice some problems with this hypothesis:
(1.1) Lack of documentation to prove that this concrete contained fly-ash. You have been making this argument for about 10 years [1] now, so you have had plenty of time to fine comb NIST (and other) sources for such a reference. Your original statement in 2007 was this: "... fly ash is frequently used as aggregate in lightweight concrete, so microspheres may have been present in the Twin Tower's concrete even before the fires of 9/11. Given that so much concrete was pulverized during the collapse of the towers, fly ash debris would be present in large amounts in the rubble pile." In the absence of supporting evidence, this statement is only speculation.
(1.2) You neglect to mention that Dr. Steven Jones is on record [1] responding to you (the conversation quoted in point 1.1 above) that he once looked for magnetic fly-ash spheres in a sample of WTC concrete, but found none. Your glassy spheres may not be magnetic, but have you ruled out that any supposed fly-ash could have contained magnetic spheres in addition to glassy spheres? Did you at any point ask Dr. Jones if he ever searched for non-magnetic spheres in WTC concrete as well? You offer no experimental results (your own or from other researchers) that contradict Dr. Jones either.
(1.3) The floor-concrete in the WTC Twin Towers contained haydite, not fly-ash, according to NIST [2].
Thus, the research and evidence so far actually demonstrates that the concrete did in fact NOT have any fly-ash sourced spheres (or any other kind of spheres for that matter).
Part 2. The WTC fires could not have heated the concrete enough to create fly-ash type spheres.
In part 4.2.2 you ask if the building fires could possibly have heated the concrete floors to temperatures high enough to form the glassy alumino-silicate spheres mentioned in Part 1 above. I agree with your conclusion that "..the temperatures attained by the fire-exposed floors in WTC 2 show that aggregate melting as a precursor to the formation of spherical particles in WTC 2 dust is simply not credible" (Greening and Greening, PDF page 31).
Part 3. The WTC fires could not have heated the steel enough to create the iron-rich microspheres.
In section 4.2.3 you acknowledge the presence of "iron-rich" spheres in the WTC dust, and spheres composed of pure iron (Greening and Greening, PDF pages 31-32). More importantly, you have essentially acknowledged what AE911Truth has been pointing out for years [3]: that the open-air fires at the WTC 9/11 event could not have attained temperatures high enough to create the iron-rich spheres. You do this indirectly by referring to the maximum temperature possibly attained by the steel itself, instead of referring to the maximum possible temperature of the WTC fires (PDF page 40). This is, however, a moot point since it is a generally known fact that open-air fires are limited to temperatures far below your cited 1500 degree (C) melting-point for iron[4].
Part 4. Welding during construction not a source for the iron-rich spheres.
In section 4.3 you state that, "However, specifically for shielded metal arc and gas metal arc welding, (as used for on-site assembly of components at the WTC), references[32, 33] indicate that Mn/Fe ratios can be as high as 30%" (Greening and Greening, PDF page 33).
It is worth pointing out that the above quote indicates that welding during construction could not have been a source for the iron-rich spheres because you did not find any spheres with a high enough Mn/Fe ratio. Figure 7 confirms this as it shows you finding amorphous particles with a high enough Mn/Fe ratio but no spheres (PDF page 35). This point should have been spelled out, in my opinion. This raises another interesting point not addressed in your paper: You go on to hypothesize that cutting and grinding during construction was the source of the iron-rich spheres, but if spheres from cutting and grinding during construction could have survived intact in the buildings for about 30 years, should the spheres from the welding not have survived as well? Since you do not find any surviving spheres from the welding operations, does this not cast a serious doubt on the cutting and grinding hypothesis?
Part 5. Cutting and grinding during construction not a plausible major source of iron-rich spheres.
You propose that cutting and grinding during the construction of the buildings left behind the iron-rich spheres found in the dust some 30 years later (Greening and Greening, PDF page 34). But the hypothesis that these activities were a major source does not appear credible. Here is why:
(5.1) The construction crews most likely cleaned-up the vast majority of any spheres along with other crud as the construction moved along.
(5.2) And then, it seems reasonable to assume that most of any remaining spheres would have rusted away during the 30 odd years of air-exposure in the rust-promoting coastal (humid and salty) climate.
(5.3) A question raised in Part 4 (Welding during construction not a source for the iron-rich spheres) shows that the above two points are very likely true: Where are the Mn-rich spheres from the welding operations during construction? If spheres from cutting and grinding during construction survived all these years, then surely spheres from the welding would have survived as well - Yet, you did not find any.
(5.4) Given the three points above, if a large amount of iron-rich spheres was to be expected anyway, then why was their prevalence in the WTC dust so unique that researchers thought of them as a signature marker[3] for the WTC dust? That is not consistent with your hypothesis, but it is consistent with the three points above, suggesting that iron-rich spheres from the days of construction would be quite rare, at best.
Part 6. Specific Mn/Fe ratio does not prove cutting and grinding hypothesis for iron-rich spheres.
You state that spheres from the cutting and grinding of the steel would have "essentially the same chemical composition as the source material" (PDF page 33). Your hypothesis is that since you found manganese in your spheres in an amount that matches the WTC steel (according to you), the iron-rich spheres were produced via cutting and grinding during construction of the buildings. In order for your hypothesis to be valid, you would have to be able to (1) rule out possible competing manganese sources, (2) demonstrate that all studies reporting iron-rich spheres in the WTC dust show manganese in the spheres, and (3) argue that the reported Mn/Fe ratio is generally consistent with the one you report - But, none of these requirements are met:

A. Iron-rich spheres not typically reported to have manganese and specific Mn/Fe ratio.

(6.1) Dr. Steven Jones [5] has noted that manganese is actually a known thermite ingredient according to a company that does forensic testing, Materials Engineering, Inc. (Revisiting 9/11/2001, PDF page 26). Thus, manganese in iron-rich spheres can also be a marker for a thermitic material.
(6.2) You do not cite all the other known WTC dust studies (that report iron-rich spheres) to confirm that the iron spheres in those studies also consistently had not only manganese in them, but also in the same proportion you found. Thus, you have no data to prove that your Mn/Fe ratio is generally a defining feature of the iron-rich spheres.
(6.3) Dr. Jones has in fact analyzed iron spheres from WTC dust on his own, and reviewed other reports, and his research [5][6] demonstrates that the iron-rich spheres are not in general found with manganese in them. Dr. Jones has specifically noted that "we have looked at the chemical compositions of a number [of] iron-rich spherules as well as that of steel, and the compositions are not the same at all" (Revisiting 9/11/2001, PDF page 23). The iron-rich sphere from WTC dust documented in Harrit et al. (2009)[7] did not have any manganese in it either. The available data does, therefore, not support your hypothesis.

B. Another hypothesis explains the data.

(6.4) Dr. Jones has observed that if cutter-charges based on thermite were used to cut WTC steel beams on 9/11, distinctive spheres could possibly be found from those charges and from the cut steel (Revisiting 9/11/2001, PDF page 23 and 24) - the latter spheres would in this case have the Mn/Fe signature you refer to. The finding of Mn in only a portion of the iron sphere samples is therefore consistent with the thermite hypothesis (see Comment 12, Point 7), but not your hypothesis.
Part 7. Even if true, "cutting and grinding" hypothesis would not refute thermite hypothesis.
The red material in the red/gray chips, documented by Harrit et al. (2009), is still the only proven explanation for the iron-rich spheres in the WTC dust. Even if it were proven that cutting and grinding during construction of the Towers could have left behind a substantial amount of iron-rich spheres, you would merely be left with a hypothetically possible secondary source of iron-rich spheres.
Part 8. Even if true, "fly-ash" hypothesis for aluminosilicate spheres would not refute thermite hypothesis.
If true, this would only prove that other sources could explain some (see next point) or all aluminosilicate spheres. The red material would still remain a proven source of iron-rich spheres.
Part 9. Thermitic materials potential explanation for iron-rich and aluminosilicate spheres, and other noted WTC data.
Although some researchers may assume that the presence of a thermitic material on 9/11 would only leave behind metallic iron spheres, the reality is quite different:
(9.1) The standard iron/aluminum thermite mixture can leave behind iron-oxide spheres and spheres containing iron-aluminum compounds in addition to the signature metallic iron spheres[8]. More complex thermite mixtures would presumably leave behind even more diverse ingredients in the expelled spheres, and another look at Harrit et al. does support that. The red material tested in their paper was comprised of iron-oxide and aluminum in a silicon-rich matrix material. When ignited, this material left behind spheres containing some mixture of aluminum, iron, oxygen, and silicon - as well as spheres containing metallic iron. It is often forgotten that this material also left behind translucent silicon-rich spheres that did not receive detailed study in the paper. One wonders if more detailed study would reveal that this material also expelled the spheres you have described as glassy aluminosilicates?
(9.2) Thermite can explain all the iron-rich spheres since thermitic cutter-charges would probably leave behind evidence from the thermite reaction and the cut steel beams (Part 6.4). But what about the aluminosilicate spheres? Would a thermitic material not melt just about any material it came into close contact with? Since the temperature of even the traditional thermite reaction is about 2500 degrees (C), the presence of thermitic materials in the Towers could account for just about any melted metal and even melted concrete[9], and just about any kind of microsphere. When you ruled out the possibility that heat from the office fires could have melted the concrete aggregate (see Part 2), you relied on a hypothetical number for the maximum concrete temperatures given office fires - but you could reach a different conclusion if you were to consider a thermitic material as the primary source of heat.
(9.3) Finally, it should be noted that thermitic materials also explain a lot of the other noted WTC evidence[10][11].
[1] 9-11-01 History Archive:"Dr. Steven Jones and Dr. Frank Greening Email Correspondence in 2007," Frank Greening JREF post on 12-26-07.
[2] National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)"NIST NCSTAR 1-6B," Page 21, pdf page 57.
[4] Thomas W. Eagar and Christopher Musso"Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation," JOM, 53 (12) (2001), pp. 8-11.
[5] Dr. Steven E. Jones"Revisiting 9/11/2001 --Applying the Scientific Method," Journal of 9/11 Studies, May, 2007.
[6] Steven E. Jones, Jeffrey Farrer, Gregory S. Jenkins, Frank Legge, James Gourley, Kevin Ryan, Daniel Farnsworth, and Crockett Grabbe"Extremely high temperatures during the World Trade Center destruction," Journal of 9/11 Studies, January, 2008.
[7] Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley and Bradley R. Larsen"Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," The Open Chemical Physics Journal, 2009, 2, 7-31.
[8] Yi WANG1, Xiao-lan SONG, Wei JIANG, Guo-dong DENG, Xiao-de GUO, Hong-ying LIU, Feng-sheng LI,"Mechanism for thermite reactions of aluminum/iron-oxide nanocomposites based on residue analysis," Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 24(2014) 263−270.
[9] Energy Innovation Portal"Linear Thermite Charge."
[10] Kevin Ryan"How to Debunk WTC Thermite," Dig Within.
[11] Steven Jones, Robert Koro, Anthony Szamboti and Ted Walter"15 YEARS LATER: ON THE PHYSICS OF HIGH-RISE BUILDING COLLAPSES," Europhysicsnews, 2016.

Mark Basile - Raman Update

The last update, dated February 24, 2018, had this to say:

Chemical engineer Mark Basile has completed his own Raman spectroscopy study on red/gray chips and other materials, including paint. He is currently writing up the data and the report will be made publicly available soon - how soon depends on whether it will simply be posted as a publicly available PDF file, or published in a journal.

I was hoping to be able to report in this update that the Raman report is ready, but Mr. Basile is planning additional DSC testing to compare how materials with different Raman spectra perform when heated up.

Look for a major update this summer, including more news about the Raman report and some news about independent testing.

Saturday, May 5, 2018

US ‘freezes funding’ for White Helmets as Group’s Douma Chem Attack Claim Falls Apart

US is reportedly freezing its funding of controversial Syrian emergency response organisation the White Helmets. The move's being met with major disappointment by the group's leaders who say it will impact on their ability to save lives.

The comments for this video at YT are gold.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, May 6th, 2018.]


It’s Official: ISIS Staged Chemical Attack In Syria To Draw U.S. Back Into The War:

Friday, May 4, 2018

The Same Criminals Behind 9/11 Are Behind Mueller Probe

The Same Criminals Behind 9/11 Are Behind Mueller Probe


NY district court judge: ‘Iran liable for the deaths of more than 1,000 people as a result of the September 11 attacks’

An American judge ruled on Tuesday that Iran must pay $6 billion to victims or those affected by the 9/11 terror attacks.
Judge George B. Daniels of the Southern District Court of New York ruled that “the Islamic Republic of Iran, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, and The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran liable for the deaths of more than 1,000 people as a result of the September 11 attacks.”
Court filings state that the payout equates to “$12,500,000 per spouse, $8,500,000 per parent, $8,500,000 per child, and $4,250,000 per sibling” to the families and estates of the deceased. The ruling also includes an annual 4.1 percent interest rate from the year the attacks took place.
Thomas Burnett Sr. filed the lawsuit in 2004, but it was only allowed to proceed in 2016 after Congress passed the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act (JASTA) allowing individual citizens to file lawsuits against countries accused of financing terrorism.

Tuesday, May 1, 2018

VIDEO: Pat Buchanan Says Netanyahu Was Lying The U.S. Into World War - Netanyahu Rabblerouses for War with Iran Again - I Believe Absolutely Nothing That Any Government Tells Me to Justify or Explicate Unnecessary War - CENSORED REPORT: Trump Knows Obama Armed Iran To Trigger Islamic Armageddon

Netanyahu nukes:

Have we forgotten everything about modern war? It's virtually always unnecessary, unwarranted unjustified and based on lies, deception and obfuscation. Remember Colin Powell? The Downing Street Memo? Have we forgotten everything? History would be a wonderful of thing if only it were true, thus spake Tolstoy. We overthrew Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh in Operation Ajax. Think that may have PO'd the folks? We fall for it every time.

VIDEO: Pat Buchanan Says Netanyahu Was Lying The U.S. Into World War - Netanyahu Rabblerouses for War with Iran Again - I Believe Absolutely Nothing That Any Government Tells Me to Justify or Explicate Unnecessary War - CENSORED REPORT: Trump Knows Obama Armed Iran To Trigger Islamic Armageddon