Wednesday, December 31, 7000

Permanent Top Post by JM Talboo and Steve W.

By JM Talboo and Steve W. people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."

Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of US and other international intelligence agencies were involved doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved.

In the fight to uncover the truth about 9/11 we must contend with individuals and groups that distort, omit and lie about important details in order to defend the official narrative - the 911 truth debunkers.


The NORAD-stand-down, various whistleblowers, and physical evidence centered around the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Buildings in New York, make a strong case that the attacks involved substantial inside help.

“I think it’s implausible to believe that 19 people, most of whom didn’t speak English, most of whom had never been in the United States before, many didn’t have a high school education, could have carried out such a complicated task without some support from within the United States”
Former Sen. Bob Graham on 60-Minutes 

We might be wrong about where we suspect this all leads, but the "debunkers" are wrong when many essentially argue that it's acceptable for 70% of 9/11 family members questions to have never been answered by the 9/11 Commission. So of course, most have no qualms about promises made to 9/11 family members being broken by the Commission to investigate all whistleblower claims, which a substantial amount of the public find highly-suspicious at minimum, with many regarding the evidence as suggestive of complicity to varied degrees.

The below link proves that many thousands of family members want a new investigation. Likely the amount of people killed that day is outnumbered by these 9/11 victim's family members.

[On the left side (above) is a video of WTC 7 collapsing. On the right side is a video of a controlled demolition.]

So it stands to reason, that these ilk feel the lack of air defense story is above scrutiny to the point that secrecy and rewards are warranted. So what if this tale consists of 3, or some contend 4, mutually contradictory versions of events and admitted lies. It makes perfect sense that the top officials from NORAD and the FAA received promotions, as opposed to having to provide documents with data that would prove that the jet fighters were acceptably responsive, given the past response time averages.

Unsurprisingly, the duh-bunkturds hate even the best of the "Loose Change" films, but loose ends are no biggie.

The Washington Post reported on August 2, 2006 that:
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources... "We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. 'It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
So, if 9/11 didn't have an inside element, what's to stop such a scenario from taking place in the future when we get investigations that have attributes like these? 

It is therefore the purpose of this website to rebut the hollow claims of the so-called 911 truth "debunkers" and clarify what is known about the attacks for the benefit of those following the debate and also for the largely uninformed public. This site now features 9/11 truth related and not-so-related content. So please utilize our search feature (found also on the sidebar) to find a massive treasure trove of well-researched info on nearly every issue in the realm of 9/11 truth debate. 

Sorry that we don't allow any comments, but if you wish to communicate any thoughts you have about the published material please contact us here. Ad hominems will be ignored, but well-formed rebuttals may be addressed (and that is a subjective matter) provided we have not refuted the points therein numerous times on this blog already.


National Security Notice via Washington's Blog:

We are NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, we are calling for the reinstatement of our government. We are not calling for lawlessness. We are calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, we are calling for its enforcement. We are patriotic Americans born and raised in this country. [Four foreign countries also represented here at DTD]. We love the U.S. We don't seek to destroy or attack America ... we seek to restore her to strength, prosperity, liberty and respect. We don't support or like Al Qaeda, the Taliban or any supporting groups. We think they are all disgusting. The nation's top legal scholars say that draconian security laws which violate the Constitution should not apply to Americans. Should you attempt to shut down this site or harass its authors, you are anti-liberty, anti-justice, anti-American ... and undermining America's national security.

Friday, July 20, 2018

Harvard Study Confirms Fluoride Reduces Children’s IQ

Recently-published Harvard University meta-analysis funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has concluded that children who live in areas with highly fluoridated water have “significantly lower” IQ scores than those who live in low fluoride areas. 

In a 32-page report that can be downloaded free of charge from Environmental Health Perspectives, the researchers said:

A recent report from the U.S. National Research Council (NRC 2006) concluded that adverse effects of high fluoride concentrations in drinking water may be of concern and that additional research is warranted. Fluoride may cause neurotoxicity in laboratory animals, including effects on learning and memory ...  
To summarize the available literature, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies on increased fluoride exposure in drinking water and neurodevelopmental delays. We specifically targeted studies carried out in rural China that have not been widely disseminated, thus complementing the studies that have been included in previous reviews and risk assessment reports ...  
Findings from our meta-analyses of 27 studies published over 22 years suggest an inverse association between high fluoride exposure and children’s intelligence ... The results suggest that fluoride may be a developmental neurotoxicant that affects brain development at exposures much below those that can cause toxicity in adults ...  
Serum-fluoride concentrations associated with high intakes from drinking-water may exceed 1 mg/L, or 50 Smol/L, thus more than 1000-times the levels of some other neurotoxicants that cause neurodevelopmental damage. Supporting the plausibility of our findings, rats exposed to 1 ppm (50 Smol/L) of water-fluoride for one year showed morphological alterations in the brain and increased levels of aluminum in brain tissue compared with controls ... 
In conclusion, our results support the possibility of adverse effects of fluoride exposures on children’s neurodevelopment. Future research should formally evaluate dose-response relations based on individual-level measures of exposure over time, including more precise prenatal exposure assessment and more extensive standardized measures of neurobehavioral performance, in addition to improving assessment and control of potential confounders.
Studies Have Repeatedly Linked Fluoride to Reduced IQ and Brain Damage

There are so many scientific studies showing the direct, toxic effects of fluoride on your body, it’s truly remarkable that it’s NOT considered a scientific consensus by now. Despite the evidence against it, fluoride is still added to 70 percent of U.S. public drinkingwater supplies. 

It amazes me that the medical (and dental) communities are so stubbornly resistant to connect the dots when it comes to the skyrocketing increase of cognitive decline in adults and behavioral issues in children (ADD, ADHD, depression and learning disabilities of all kinds). In fact, there have been more than 23 human studies and 100 animal studies linking fluoride to brain damage. Fluoride can also increase manganese absorption, compounding problems, since manganese in drinking water has also been linked to lower IQ in children. 

Reported effects of fluoride on your brain include:

• Reduction in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors
• Damage to your hippocampus
• Formation of beta-amyloid plaques (the classic brain abnormality in Alzheimer’s disease)
• Reduction in lipid content
• Damage to purkinje cells
• Exacerbation of lesions induced by iodine deficiency
• Impaired antioxidant defense systems
• Increased uptake of aluminum
• Accumulation of fluoride in your pineal gland

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, July 20th, 2018.]


Over 4,000 Professionals Call for an End to Water Fluoridation - Learn Why, How You Can Help Their Campaign, & How to Filter Fluoride in Your Drinking Water:

Russia Didn't Do It - A Letter to Australian Senator Craig Kelly Over Comments Made About the MH17 Shoot Down

Hello Senator Kelly,

Recently you copped a lot of flak for saying that we should “look over” the MH17 incident when it comes to the rebuilding of US-Russian relations.
I am writing to inform you that the Russians most likely had nothing to do with the incident.  

A review of the evidence shows that two possibilities exist. That the aircraft was brought down accidentallyby an air-to-air missile or that the aircraft was deliberately brought down by an air-to-air missile. The former possibility would be a Ukrainian assassination attempt gone wrong on President Putin’s aircraft that flew near to this area an hour or so earlier (the colour schemes of both aircraft are similar), while the latter possibility would be the deliberate downing of a commercial airliner in order to vilify the rebels and Russia.
The reason I have concluded that an air-to-air missile was used, and not a large ground-launched BUK system, is the lack of damage inflicted upon the aircraft. All interested parties agree, due to triangulation of the shrapnel impacts, that the warhead detonated a few meters from the cockpit. The problem is that tests done in Russia with a real BUK warhead saw much larger damage patterns with warhead fragments flying clean through one side of the cockpit and out the other. This sort of damage was not seen in the wreckage of MH17. 
'MH17 crash' test simulation video: Il-86 plane cockpit hit with BUK missile
Furthermore, the Dutch led investigation claimed that butterfly shaped shrapnel was used in the warhead, recovering such fragments from the pilots bodies. However actual tests with such warheads always leave butterfly shaped holes in the aircraft skin and none were seen in the MH17 wreckage. This sort of discrepancy points to fraud conducted by the Dutch in this case. It also casts doubt on the claim they recovered parts of the BUK missile from the crash site, as opposed to getting parts from the Ukrainian authorities that have this weapon in their inventory. 
Here is the Dutch public presentation, that is very light when it comes to discussing the forensics: 
Dutch Safety Board MH17 final report (FULL VIDEO)
It should be further noted that the Dutch did not perform any physical tests in order to replicate what happened to MH17, they only ran computer simulations that showed blast patterns too small to be from a large BUK warhead. 
I recommend you review the full Russian Arms manufacturer investigation into this incident. Nothing that they have put forward here has been disproved. Their conclusion was that perhaps an older model BUK warhead was used in the incident, not using butterfly shrapnel, a type the Russian army no longer employs. Their presentation data actually shows that the warhead used was much smaller than the alleged BUK – which is why I strongly suspect an air-to-air weapon.
Russian arms manufacturer Almaz-Antey delivers MH17 report
In fact there were witnesses that said they saw a fighter-sized “military jet(s)” flying in the region at the time MH17 came down – aircraft that carry air-to-air missiles. This is something the Ukraine authorities deny happened. Nevertheless, BBC Russia correspondents interviewed people on the ground who said they saw these jets:
Deleted BBC Russia MH17 report about 'Ukrainian military jets' (Eng Subs)
Adding to what appears to be a cover-up is the US refusal to release their spy satellite images of the area in the minutes after the incident. The Russians requested the US release their satellite images of the crime scene and Washington refused. A US satellite was right overhead at the time and would have easily seen the launch vehicle and the distinctive smoke trail from the missile. This smoke trail should have also been seen by witnesses for many miles around and would have appeared on cell phone videos and photographs - but wasn't. How is it that we have clear satellite imagery of Russian aircraft deployed in Syria and yet nothing for this incident?
When it comes to the Ukrainian Government claims about recordings of the rebels “admitting” to the shoot down, the recording they have appears to have been spliced together and it only shows that the rebels on the ground thought they had downed the aircraft. Having shot down other aircraft in the region (low altitude attack aircraft and transport planes using short range missiles), this was a logical assumption to make. It is not proof they were responsible. 
Timeframe: Expert dissects Ukraine's MH17 'smoking gun'
The Ukraine government also claimed there were videos showing a BUK missile launcher in rebel held areas missing a missile. However, the film in question comes from a time where the Ukrainian Government was in control of the area, well before the MH17 incident:
 "BUK" in Zugres
Mr Kelly, Russia has been falsely accused of this incident because key (corrupt) people within the Western power structure want to ramp up another Cold War. They will take advantage of any situation to do so, like they took advantage of the 911 attacks in order to attack Iraq, concocting connections between Saddam's Iraq and the threat of an al Qaeda WMD attack. 
Rather than “look over” what happened with the MH17 incident I would call for further investigations – calling on physical tests using BUK warheads AND air-to air missile warheads that would show the damage done to the aircraft was due to a smaller missile (thus ruling out the BUK hypothesis, and demolishing the Dutch investigators’ fraudulent case).  

When it comes to obfuscating the truth about aircraft shoot downs or crashes there are precedents – most notably the cover-up of the TWA Flight 800 incident that occurred on the same date (17/7) in 1996. Recently NTSB investigators came out and admitted the FBI doctored evidence to hide the fact that TWA 800 had been shot down (by accident, via the US Navy most likely). 

Thanks for your attention

Ps. It’s likely our intelligence services know full well what happened here, but are playing along for geopolitical reasons.
PPs. For more on TWA Flight 800 start with: Silenced: Flight 800 And The Subversion Of Justice (2001) and then, New Evidence on TWA Flight 800 Disaster Revealed in Documentary - Megyn Kelly Reports - 6/19/13 

This email was forwarded to ABC News Radio with the following intro:

Dear News Radio,

I recently sent a letter to Senator Craig Kelly about his comments on the MH17 shoot down. I told him we should look further into this incident because the physical evidence shows the Russians likely didn't do it and that the official investigation/narrative offered up by the West is a sham. Also, your coverage of the Trump-Putin meeting, stupidly pushing the mainstream media line that Trump trusts Russia more than the FBI, is ridiculous. The people squawking this rhetoric are crooked establishment types and dodgy politicians (all of whom hate Trump and are spinning what happened). Your coverage is Grossly Biased and I call on you to air opposing viewpoints which point out the FBI and CIA have histories of lying and distorting. 

When it comes to the US election hacking the fact is that the FBI has made a number of unfounded assertions about a hack whereas Wikileaks and experts like Bill Binney, formerly of the NSA, point out that the emails were leaked (not hacked). 

Here is my letter to Senator Craig Kelly. Please follow up and properly investigate what happened with MH17 rather than have spin doctoring foreign correspondents (like Matt Brown) fudge what happened:

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, July 20th, 2018.]

HACKS! Left-wing media cowards so SCARED Trump was going to get us into WAR now CALLING for one against RUSSIA

The same month uber-Left Guardian fretted, “Trump has taken us to the brink of nuclear war. Can he be stopped?

Far-Left Vox pondered in November 2017, “Trump can’t start a nuclear war by himself, but there’s not much stopping him.”

MSNBC hacks Joe Scarborough and bride Mika Brzezinski voiced ‘concern‘ earlier this year that Trump would get America into a nuclear exchange with North Korea.

And so on.

But now, after POTUS Trump’s landmark summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin, some of these same Left-wing hacks are clamoring for the president to declare Putin’s 2016 election meddling “an act of war” which, generally speaking, provokes some sort of military response.

One of them is CNN host Chris Cuomo.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, July 21st, 2018.]

Message To Trump: Pass Law Against Censorship & Political Discrimination