Permanent Top Post

In the fight to uncover the truth about 9/11 we must contend with individuals and groups that distort, omit and lie about important details in order to defend the official narrative - the 911 truth Debunkers.

The NORAD stand-down and various whistleblowers make a strong case that the attacks involved substantial inside help. The physical evidence centred around the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Buildings in New York provides forensic proof that cannot be refuted except via misrepresentation and outright falsehoods.

It is the purpose of this website to rebut the hollow claims of the so-called 911 truth 'Debunkers' and clarify what is known about the attacks for the benefit of those following the debate and also for the largely uninformed public.

Sorry that we don't allow any comments, but if you wish to communicate any thoughts you have about the published material please contact us here.

FAIR USE NOTICE

Richard Gage, Bob McIlvaine, and Deborah Voorhees Respond to Rachel Maddow's Anti 911 Truth Rant

In this episode of 9/11 Free Fall Richard Gage AIA, 9/11 victim's family member Bob McIlvaine, and journalist Deborah Voorhees respond to MSNBC host Rachel Maddow's recent diatribe attacking 9/11 Truth. This interview includes Richard and Bob's challenge to Maddow to bring them onto her show, and Deborah's insight regarding journalistic ethics and the obstacles to getting the 9/11 controlled demolition evidence into the corporate controlled media.



_______________________________________________

Apart from a big nod to the physical evidence that trumps Maddow's put down of 'conspiracy theories' the show also explains how the mainstream media works in maintaining the cover-up.

Today there are only a few major corporations that own all the media and those employed by these huge companies are often stopped from airing stories that rock the boat.  The only real independent media today is found online.

The big point raised against Maddow's case is that her 'argument' rested on a generalised dismissal implying that all conspiracies are to be rejected rather than addressing any specific information on the 911 attacks. She was simply hand waving away direct points of criticism with her misleading portrayal. Surprisingly Maddow trotted out the 911 Commission Report and the 911 Myths books as answers to everything when we know, through detailed research, that both tomes provide grossly misleading accounts of the 911 attack and the subsequent non-official investigations.

In relation to the second book, 911 Myths, that addresses the 911 truth movement, Adam Taylor writing on this blog thoroughly demonstrates how bankrupt their arguments are in a multipart refutation.

Are all telephone calls recorded and accessible to the US government? A former FBI counterterrorism agent claims on CNN that this is the case

A heads up from Gregg Roberts over at AE911Truth.org:

Are all telephone calls recorded and accessible to the US government?

A former FBI counterterrorism agent claims on CNN that this is the case

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/04/telephone-calls-recorded-fbi-boston

G

P.S. I assume that this source was speaking loosely, and strongly encrypted messages (such as are enabled by Thunderbird+GPG+Enigmail) are still "secure enough" (i.e, worth the supercomputer time needed to decrypt them only if you have already otherwise given the government serious reason to do so). I trust neither Hushmail nor Comodo, which both admit they'll hand the key to your email to the government if asked.

P.P.S. See also:

http://www.democracynow.org/2012/4/20/whistleblower_the_nsa_is_lying_us
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/may/04/drone-death-us-moral-compass
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/11/07/AR2007110700006.html
http://www.historycommons.org/context.jsp?item=civilliberties_235#civilliberties_235 (note the date carefully)

Paper Accepted and Published at Scientific Method 9/11

I’m happy to announce that I’ve successfully had a paper accepted and published at the website Scientific Method 9/11. It’s an updated version of my paper Other Collapses in Perspective. In it, I present scientific explanations for why other steel structure fire-induced collapses are not comparable to the WTC buildings. It’s obvious that fire could not have brought down the Towers on 9/11. But don’t just take my word for it; read for yourself here and decide if I’m right.

http://www.scientificmethod911.org/docs/Other_Collapses_Apr27_2013.pdf

Special thanks to the moderators at Scientific Method 9/11 for their review and helpful comments.

See also my SM9/11 profile page for other writings of mine.

Fukushima's Catastrophic Aftermath Continues (Something for the Debunkers and Propagandists to Think About)

In her book titled No Immediate Danger: Prognosis for a Radioactive Earth, nuclear power/environmental health expert Rosalie Bertell (1929 - 2012) said:

Should the public discover the true health cost(s) of nuclear pollution, a cry would rise from all parts of the world and people would refuse to cooperate passively with their own death.

In her article titled "Radioactivity: No Immediate Danger," she coined a new word. "Omnicide" describes the ultimate human rejection of life. It's "difficult to comprehend," but it's happening, she said.

She called industrial radioactive pollution "cumulatively greater than Chernobyl. We are now in a no-win situation with radioactive materials, where (it's) acceptable to have cancer deaths, deformed children and miscarriages."
-------------------------------------------------------
Separately, she said:

There is no such thing as a radiation exposure that will not do damage. There is a hundred per cent possibility that there will be damage to cells. The next question is: which damage do you care about?

All toxic hazards are serious, she explained. Nuclear radiation is worst of all. It threatens all human life. "Our present path is headed toward species death - whether fast with nuclear war or technological disaster, or slow, by poison."

Global suicide is certain. Continued nuclear proliferation and Fukushima accelerated it.

March 11 marked its second anniversary. It's perhaps the worst ever environmental disaster. Reliable experts call large parts of Japan unsafe. They're too hazardous to live in.

According to Professor Hiroaki Koide, Tokyo's as contaminated as Fukushima. Thousands of city residents protested. They oppose nuclear power. They want safe energy sources replacing it.

Radiation contamination is widespread. East Asia, North America, Europe and other areas are affected.

Hazardous air, water and land readings across many areas globally are many multiples too high. Future epidemic cancer levels are certain. It occurs when body cells divide and spread uncontrollably. If untreated, it metastasizes and kills.
http://www.activistpost.com/2013/04/fukushimas-catastrophic-aftermath.html

The Fukushima disaster is still with us. There is no containment to stop radioactive material from escaping into the environment. Corrective action must be taken immediately.

An international effort needs to be made to entomb the ruins. If that requires a huge multi-billion dollar engineering project then so be it.

We can no longer afford to live in a world where corporate/government lies and cover-ups are normal. This system needs a shake up. The truth about the corruption needs to come out.

Those people involved in the 'cover-up business' need to realise that we are ALL in very big trouble. 'The truth' is desperately needed so we can get out of our present fix. With some imagination the world can be made a better place for everyone.
________________________________

Dear Debunkers and Propagandists - keeping the truth hidden about the corruption within our government is leading to disaster. You are all smart enough to work out where things are leading. You people are not exempt from the mess we are in. Some or all of you can make a difference by exposing the truth. Do what you can. We understand the game you are playing in the court of public opinion - protecting powerful interests - but there comes a time when you have to cut the bullshit and face up to the consequences of your actions.

Update: Debunking the Debunkers Poll ...

Poll now closed due to technical difficulties or perhaps conspiracy!

In the short period of time this poll was open, the results heavily favored 9/11 having had inside help, hence "debunkers" creating a conspiracy theory in which the results were manipulated. There were at one time nearly 1,060 respondents showing on the poll results, a number which oddly then decreased itself to 980 something over the next month. If anybody deserves to cry conspiracy here it's us! But it was probably just a glitch or something.

Did the attacks of 911 receive inside help?

Click at the top of the right side column.

___________________________________

___________________________________

___________________________________



Salon blames Infowars and "conspiracy theories" for the holocaust!

Just when you thought the attacks couldn't get more ridiculous...

Tamerlan Tsarnaev was an Alex Jones fan:

"Tamerlan “took an interest in Infowars,” according to Elmirza Khozhugov, the ex-husband of Tamerlan’s sister. He was also apparently interested in anti-Semitic conspiracy theories and was trying to find a copy of “The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,” one of the most notorious conspiracy tomes of history."

"In the real world, it underscores how dangerous and seductive conspiracy theories can be. The ideology of al-Qaida, which seems to be the primary influence on the Tsarnaev plot, can be seen as a conspiracy theory in itself, which places the United States at the center of all evil in the world. Even the extermination campaigns of the Third Reich were essentially built on a conspiracy theory."

Ironically, if you were living in early 1940s Germany and you believed people were being exterminated and tortured in those camps, you would likely have been dismissed as something akin to a conspiracy theorist by the Nazis. When the US Army liberated Dachau they said the people of the town "were to blame for their cowardice" for not standing up to the SS and forced them to tour the camps, see the piles of naked corpses and confront what they had allowed to happen. The most common excuse from the citizens was, "Wir sind aberall belogen worden" - we have all been lied to. The few citizens that stood up to the Nazis - the "conspiracy theorists" of that time in other words - were praised for their courage. So don't blame "conspiracy theories" for the holocaust you pathetic faux-intellectual shill.

Funny how whenever I make comparisons to the Nazis in videos and posts about false flags or global warming, I get criticized for invoking "Godwin's Law", but when debunkers do it, it's okay it seems.

Also, I don't even know what this "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" thing is and only ever seem to hear about it from debunkers.

Why is George W Bush being honored with #BushCenter Library?

Join CODEPINK in sharing this message together at the same time - automatically.

https://www.thunderclap.it/projects/2005-and-justice-for-all

Related:

Ladies in Pink Slips: 10 Years of CODEPINK Creativity

Prison for a poem?

Limits on Obama's Flying Killer Robots?

Drones protest gains local and national support

stopwar.org.uk · 020 7561 9311 · 23 April 2013

1) Drones protest gains local and national support
2) Shaker Aamer - parliamentary meeting & demonstration

---

1) Drones protest gains local and national support
 

The news of the Ground the Drones protest at RAF Waddington this Saturday has provoked discussion in nearby Lincoln about Britain's use of drones abroad. In a statement from Lincoln Trades Council, Nick Parker, a Lincoln resident, said “as a trade union movement, it is vital that we support [the Ground the Drones protest on the 27th]." The TUC statement went on to say

We reject the massive amount of money spent on armaments while there are cuts taking place in jobs and services in Lincolnshire. Our group recognises that the armed forces are an important part of the local economy and we support the unions who represent civilians in defending their conditions, while calling for public investment in socially-useful jobs.  

A public meeting has been called which will take place this evening at 7pm at the Revival Centre off Sincil Street. The protest has also caught the interest of local media, with stories in the Lincoln Echo and The Lincolnite. The news of the protest also led to a debate on the BBC's Sunday morning debating programme The Big Questions.

Take action

• Join the protest this Saturday 27th in Lincoln. 12.30pm at Lincoln South Park.
• Full details here. Please share the Facebook event with your online contacts.
• Low cost transport from Birmingham, Bradford, Cambridge, Cardiff, Coventry, Doncaster, Leeds, Manchester, Norwich, Sheffield and York.
• Add your name to our statement against Drones along with thousands of others including Rowan Williams and Denis Halliday.

---

2) Shaker Aamer - parliamentary meeting & demonstration

• Wednesday 24 April
• Parliamentary meeting 9.30am to 11am
• Demonstration at 11.30am

The Save Shaker Aamer Campaign is calling a debate on Shaker Aamer on Wednesday 24th April in Westminster Hall from 9.30am to 11am. Shaker has been on hunger strike for too many weeks and the campaign has now learned from his lawyers that Shaker's life is in danger.

The Government must act urgently to demand the return of Shaker, a long-term British resident, from eleven years of torture and abuse in Guantanamo Bay detention camp. Though he has never been charged with any crime, and the US has produced no evidence against him, the UK Government’s repeated requests for Shaker’s release and return to the UK have been ignored.

The e-petition calling for Shaker’s immediate return has a total of 117,372 signatures, reflecting the strength of public demand for Shaker’s return to his home and family in the UK and has led to the parliamentary meeting tomorrow.

Please join our friends at the Save Shaker Aamer Campaign in a demonstration tomorrow outside Parliament. For more information, please visit the Stop the War web site.

Related:

7 March 2013 Drone Strikes To Kill U.S. Citizens on American Soil Legal Status

Limits on Obama's Flying Killer Robots?

Michael Isikoff To Rachel Maddow: Obama Has 'More Elastic' Concept Of Imminent Threats

The FBI Would Never Manufacturer any Terror, Would They?

To hear the way the Salon.com article, "Alex Jones is phoning it in - Alex, your latest theory is terrible -- we expect more from you," tells it, you would think everything coming from Infowars.com on the Boston boming is Bunkum. Take for instance, the article "Full Extent of FBI Role in Boston Bombing Will Never Be Known." The FBI would never manufacturer any terror, would they?



One of the many reasons there is no justification for the "War On Terror."
http://www.motherjones.com/special-reports/2011/08/fbi-terrorist-informants
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/nov/16/fbi-entrapment-fake-terror-plots
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/12/newburgh-four-fbi-entrapment-terror
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/29/opinion/sunday/terrorist-plots-helped-along-by-the-fbi.html
http://www.salon.com/2010/11/28/fbi_8/

Related:

Another Terror Attack; Another Terror Drill