Wednesday, December 31, 7000

Permanent Top Post by JM Talboo and Steve W.

By JM Talboo and Steve W.

Many people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issuesconcerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."

Just because the evidence suggests that rouge criminal elements of US and other international intelligence agencies were involved doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved. In the fight to uncover the truth about 9/11 we must contend with individuals and groups that distort, omit and lie about important details in order to defend the official narrative - the 911 truth Debunkers.

The NORAD-stand-down, various whistleblowers, and physical evidence centered around the destruction of the 3 World Trade Center Buildings in New York, make a strong case that the attacks involved substantial inside help.

We might be wrong about where we suspect this all leads, but the "debunkers" are wrong when many essentially argue that it's acceptable for 70% of 9/11 family members questions to have never been answered by the 9/11 Commission. So of course, most have no qualms about promises made to 9/11 family members being broken by the Commission to investigate all whistleblower claims, which a substantial amount of the public find highly-suspicious at minimum with many regarding the evidence as suggestive of complicity to varied degrees.

[The below link proves that many thousands of family members want a new investigation. Likely the amount of people killed that day is outnumbered by these 9/11 victim's family members.

So again, these fine patriots are just dandy with controlled demolition being ruled out by skipping key forensic tests. And it stands to reason, that these ilk feel the lack of air defense story is above scrutiny to the point that secrecy and rewards are warranted. So what if this tale consists of 3, or some contend 4, mutually contradictory versions of events and admitted lies. It makes perfect sense, that the top officials from NORAD and the FAA received promotions, as opposed to having to provide documents with data that would prove that the jet fight fighters were acceptably responsive, given the past response time averages.

Unsurprisingly, they hate even the best of the Loose Change films, but loose ends are no biggie.

The Washington Post reported on August 2, 2006 that:
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources... "We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. 'It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
So, if 9/11 didn't have an inside element, what's to stop such a scenario from taking place in the future when we get investigations that have attributes like these? 

It is therefore the purpose of this website to rebut the hollow claims of the so-called 911 truth 'Debunkers' and clarify what is known about the attacks for the benefit of those following the debate and also for the largely uninformed public.

Sorry that we don't allow any comments, but if you wish to communicate any thoughts you have about the published material please contact us here. Ad hominems will be ignored, but well-formed rebuttals may be addressed (and that is a subjective matter) provided we have not refuted the points therein numerous times on this blog already.


National Security Notice via Washinghton's Blog:

We are NOT calling for the overthrow of the government. In fact, we are calling for the reinstatement of our government. We are not calling for lawlessness. We are calling for an end to lawlessness and lack of accountability and a return to the rule of law. Rather than trying to subvert the constitution, we are calling for its enforcement. We are patriotic Americans born and raised in this country. [Four foreign countries also represented here at DTD]. We love the U.S. We don't seek to destroy or attack America ... we seek to restore her to strength, prosperity, liberty and respect. We don't support or like Al Qaeda, the Taliban or any supporting groups. We think they are all disgusting. The nation's top legal scholars say that draconian security laws which violate the Constitution should not apply to Americans. Should you attempt to shut down this site or harass its authors, you are anti-liberty, anti-justice, anti-American ... and undermining America's national security.

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

McCain Admits to Meeting with ISIS, Still in Contact with them

Published on Sep 16, 2014
Lead war monger and Senator John McCain has confirmed what many people had suspected, he met with ISIS in Syria and is in direct contact with them.

He even goes so far as to admit that he "knows these people intimately, I talk to them all the time." unlike Senator Rand Paul.

Tuesday, September 16, 2014

WTC Debate Chris Mohr vs Richard Gage

Published on Sep 14, 2014
Originally this video was uploaded in 11 segments on YouTube. See: I am uploading it now as one single video for reasons discussed below.

On March 6th, 2011, Mr. Mohr debated with architect Richard Gage on the WTC collapses. (See: Although the audio of the debate has been released, the group Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth has decided not to release the video of the debate. As a result, Mr. Mohr has recently uploaded a series of videos to YouTube which aim to rebut the claims made by Richard Gage in his video presentation 9/11 Blueprint for Truth. (See:

Mr. Mohr refers to these videos as “respectful rebuttals” and not “debunking.” Indeed, after reviewing Mr. Mohr’s videos myself, I find that he is very sincere about his concerns regarding the WTC demolition theory, and truly wants there to be a civil and respectful debate of the topic. However, I do not believe that Mr. Mohr’s rebuttals offer solid refutations of the points made in 911BT. In this paper, I will demonstrate why Mr. Mohr’s videos, while presenting some legitimate concerns of the controlled demolition theory, do not ultimately disprove the theory and do not support the theory of  “natural collapse.”

Read full paper here: to Every Legislator: Have You Read the 28 Pages?

Yesterday, alerted the nation to indications of a looming scandal on Capitol Hill: At a time when Congress is being consulted on life-and-death decisions in the Middle East, there’s reason to believe only a slim minority of lawmakers have bothered to read a classified, 28-page finding on foreign government support of the 9/11 hijackers.

Reading those pages is no exercise in idle curiosity: According to former Senator Bob Graham, who co-chaired the intelligence inquiry that wrote the 28 pages, they’re highly relevant to the current crisis in the Middle East. Representative Walter Jones said he was “shocked” by what he read and said “what was so surprising was that those whom we thought we could really trust disappointed me.” Congressman Thomas Massie said the 28 pages prompted him to “stop every two or three pages and rearrange my perception of history.”

Clearly, at a time when the Middle East is more difficult to sort out than ever, the 28 pages should be required reading on Capitol Hill.  And if there is indeed an ongoing mass dereliction of duty by representatives and senators in regard to reading the 28 pages, it is a willful one, since it’s happening in the face of repeated appeals by Congressmen Jones, Massie and Stephen Lynch to do so.

The American people deserve to know which lawmakers have read the 28 pages and which have not. We urge constituents and journalists to contact legislators and ask two simple questions:
  • Have you read the 28 pages?
  • If not, have you requested permission from your intelligence committee to do so?

 HOUSE SURVEY PHOTO is chipping in, too: We’ve begun distributing a questionnaire that asks those same questions of every representative who hasn’t cosponsored House Resolution 428 and every senator (Rep. Jones is still working to find a Senate ally to introduce a comparable resolution in that body). Since legislators generally feel a higher sense of accountability to constituents and media than to organizations like ours, however, it’s absolutely critical that citizens and journalists join us in asking those two questions.

Because it’s election season—and the answer to whether incumbents have read the 28 pages is indicative of how seriously they take national security—we’re front-loading our survey process with those incumbents who are in the most competitive election contests. We expect to begin reporting preliminary results in early October—including identifying those officials who don’t think the public deserves to know whether they’ve fully informed themselves about foreign government support of the 9/11 terrorists.

In the meantime, if you want to know which Capitol Hill legislators join former Senator Graham, both the chairman and vice-chairman of the 9/11 Commission, and Representatives Jones, Lynch and Massie in believing you should see what’s in those 28 pages, the list is right here.

REDACTED w911 makes it easy to ask your representative and senators if they’ve read the 28 pages—with helpful guidance, phone scripts and ready-to-print letters.

Join Millions in Calling Congress Today Questioning ISIS Strategy

If you rather write than call. --->

Peace Action: Working for Peace Since 1957 FacebookTwitterBlogContact us

Today is a national call in day to question the U.S. government’s ISIS strategy organized by two dozen groups including MoveOn, Veterans for Peace and Friends Committee on National Legislation (which provided the toll free number).  With Members of Congress participating in Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) hearings over the next few days and a vote likely tomorrow on providing arms to Syrian fighters, now is the time to be heard.

Call Now!  Congressionals switchboards are open between 9am and 5pm, eastern time.  (855) 68 NO WAR (66 927 toll free)  First, ask for your Representative, when finished call both of your Senators.  Tell them:

“I am a constituent and I question whether there is a military solution to the ISIS problem. I also want my Congressperson to vote against arming Syrian fighters.”

Perhaps you don’t agree exactly with the above statement.  I’m sure you still have questions or think Congress should at least hold a debate or claim its constitutional war powers.  Please make three calls today and state your concerns.

The United States is rushing headlong into another open-ended war in the Middle East.  We know from the past disasters in Iraq and Afghanistan that war isn’t the answer.  Even President Obama has said that there is no military solution to ISIS.  Among other actions, organizing regional diplomacy, cutting off oil income from sales to ISIS, and getting the UN to restart talks to end the Syrian civil war are more likely to achieve success over bombing and spreading weapons that might end up in the wrong hands.  For more on nonmilitary solutions see our action alert from last week.

Pick up your phone!  (855) 68 NO WAR (66 927 toll free)  First, ask for your Representative, when finished call both of your Senators.  Use the above script.

As I mentioned, it seems Congress will vote tomorrow to send more weapons into Syria.  Already ISIS is using U.S. weapons against us,  and garnered from Syria and Iraq.  Sending more weapons into the Middle East is like pouring gasoline on a fire.  Congress should vote no.

Make Three Calls Now!  (855) 68 NO WAR (66 927 toll free)  First, ask for your Representative, when finished call both of your Senators.  Use the above script.

Your calls today are essential because, as we mentioned, this week the House and Senate are holding hearings with experts like Secretary of Defense Charles Hagel, Secretary of State John Kerry and General Martin Dempsey.

And know that your calls are being amplified by supporters of over twenty organizations that are calling Congress as you read this.
Humbly for Peace,

Kevin Martin
Executive Director
Peace Action
P.S. - Today is a national call in day organized by a few dozen groups to question the U.S. strategy on ISIS.  Call now!  (855) 68 NO WAR (66 927 toll free)  First, ask for your Representative, when finished call both of your Senators.  Tell them:

“I am a constituent and I question whether there is a military solution to the ISIS problem. I also want my Congressperson to vote against arming Syrian fighters.”

After calling, please forward this important email.

Take Action:

Call Now! Tell Congress to Oppose Iraq Bombing and Arming Syrian Fighters!  (855) 68 NO WAR (66 927 toll free)


Invest in Peace