Friday, December 17, 2021

Washington Compost Debunked: How 9/11 'Truther' conspiracy theories fueled the war on reality | Opinion



Conspiracy theories blaming George W. Bush for the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks have been debunked, yet millions of Americans still believe them. When Osama bin Laden was the obvious "outsider," why did so many people turn against Bush and what does it say about U.S. society today? In this short film, conspiracy theory researchers Evan Laine and Raju Parakkal connect the dots between 9/11 "trutherism" and the "Big Lie." #September11 #911 #washingtonpost

Been debunked? By who? Not by your gutter rag certainly, or anyone else...
Well, I take that back. Truthers, as in those who seek actual truth, and not just to pseudo-skeptically defend an establishment narrative, have actually debunked some stuff...

Constructive Criticism and Real Debunking

They of course hone in on just the Bush angle and in doing so mischaracterize the nuance of real investigators by pigeonholing us into mutually exclusive and thus adversarial camps...

Many people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."

Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of the US government and intelligence apparatus, as well as other international intelligence agencies, were involved, doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved.

In the fight to uncover the truth about 9/11 we must contend with individuals and groups that distort, omit and lie about important details in order to defend the official narrative - the 911 truth debunkers.

ThemTube has removed the dislike button in an transparent attempt to hide the widespread public distain for the Biden Regime/official COVID narrative, etc., but the free speech remnants still allowed in the form of comments, clearly favor the 9/11 truth movement. Let's sample just a tiny fraction right from the top down, no cherry picking done or needed, and then I'll add a little extra research material/factual back-up as a cherry on top.

Daniel F 
This is such a helpful video! Because sometimes I think “Hey wait a minute, how could Building 7, which wasn’t hit by a plane, come down at free fall speed despite being one the sturdiest high rises ever created?” Then I watch videos like this and I remember that I that I have cognitive dissonance and am just not thinking clearly.

Of course, Daniel F, has his tongue in his cheek and knows he is thinking clearly! › debunking-mick-west-on-hulsey-wtc-7
Thumbnail image
Sep 5, 2019 ... Mick: Modeling complex events is hard. Here's a comparison between the NIST simulation of the collapse of WTC7 (left), the actual collapse ( ... › 2015/12 › was-nist-wtc-7-simulation-bunk
Thumbnail image
Dec 4, 2015 ... 9/11 debunker Frank Greening seemed to think so. Time will tell! Excerpt from The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: ... › debunking-governments-wtc-7-report
Thumbnail image
Sep 18, 2019 ... Are there more problems with the UAF/Hulsey/AE911Truth WTC7 Draft Report or the NIST WTC 7 Report? You Decide. › 2012/05 › wtc-7-petition-to-national-institute
Thumbnail image
May 19, 2012 ... WTC 7 Petition to the National Institute for Standards and Technology, U.S. Congress, and President Obama. Revise the U.S. government final ... › eddie-bravo-rants-about-tower-7-moon
Thumbnail image
Jan 2, 2018 ... Nov 12, 2008 ... "Observations: WTC-7 does not collapse neatly into its own footprint; you can see that it starts straight down but the ... › 2016/12
Thumbnail image
Dec 20, 2016 ... FRAUD EXPOSED IN NIST WTC 7 REPORTS — PART 1 OF 5. All things being equal, the fire would have spread consistently. But the NIST computer ... › gerrycan1-debunks-debunker-mick-west
Thumbnail image
Sep 26, 2019 ... Are there more problems with the UAF/Hulsey/AE911Truth WTC7 Draft Report or the NIST WTC 7 Report? You Decide. › wtc-7-evaluation-is-two-year-study-by
Thumbnail image
Feb 12, 2018 ... WTC 7 Evaluation is a two-year study by Dr. J Leroy Hulsey, Chair of UAF's Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, and two Ph.D. › 2019/09 › are-there-more-problems-with
Thumbnail image
Sep 10, 2019 ... Are there more problems with the UAF/Hulsey/AE911Truth WTC7 Draft Report or the NIST WTC 7 Report? You Decide. › 911-bombshell-cnbc-news-anchor-ron
Thumbnail image
Sep 28, 2019 ... 9/11 BOMBSHELL CNBC News Anchor Ron Insana WTC-7 Brought Down by Controlled Implosion Related: Ph.D. Structural Engineer: “$10,000 to Anyone ...

I love how they basically imply that if you ever question the “official narrative” that you don’t know how to think and that you’re reaching for conclusions that make you feel more comfortable because you’re afraid. We need to teach people how to think by getting them to not think is basically what he’s saying. 

Whistle Blower1
‘It’s easier to fool a man than to convince them that they have been fooled’ -Mark Twain 

If you’re old enough to remember, everything that has led up to today, began on 9/11. 


Digital Media and “Warp-Speed” Censorship in the Covid Era

Way Back in 2008 when Biden was in the White House legitimately!  

Rampant Un-American Censorship of the 9/11 Truth Movement

And oh, by the way, debunking the 2020 stolen election claims is the very thinly veiled ulterior aim of this hitpiece I'm currently composting away. Equating the two in an attempt to destroy both is lazy on its face and falsely assumes that the public largely feels the official 9/11 story is AOK. A more direct route would have been somewhat wiser, but either way the strategy is lame, as far too many can see through both charades. 

9/11 Truth Petitions/Polls and Debunking of Debunker Analysis Suggesting 9/11 Truth is Dead

Updates: A Majority of Americans Do Not Believe the Official 9/11 Story

Regarding 2020 funny business, please do bear witness... They Admitted That They Did It! Don't Let the Deniers Forget It! Click below image to enlarge...

Plus, Democrats on video screaming "coup, this is my party but this is not shit I can't do!" You know who else knew? Former Democrat mayor Rod Blagojevich too! He said we always steal elections like this, it's just what we do! But never this bad, I feel bad enough to tell you all it's a screw, job, thank you Rod! Sworn affidavits of such things in droves and droves, but the media said there's no evidence, so, Trump didn't fall in line. This is the path HE CHOSE. Trump could have shut up like a good RINO and just not let us know! Look at the drama he's caused by not just enjoying the political theater, world wrestling show!

And this is what the Compost calls the big lie, while their eyes cross from staring at their glaring and flaring, growing, lies showing, Pinocchio nose. Think we've been hosed? Hell no! Despite your puppet string media and Muppet, hand up their ass, fake TV show hosts, it's clearly really a case of death throes and even Pinocchio knows! Well, I guess your partisan election whistle blowers are in on it too, OR they are brethren unless they're exposing what you do! You know what they say about shoes? If they fit you must not acquit! I could rest my case there, but my laurels don't want me to. That's the slacker shit the fake-vomit-stream, legacy media types do. Here's the rest of the still unfolding case that I've compiled, it's wild, and compelling, it's true. A spade is a spade, Bush stole two elections too and we expose that shit too... AKA

BILL COOPER REPORTED ON 911 THAT THE TWIN TOWERS WERE BROUGHT DOWN BY CONTROLLED DEMOLITION Editor's Note: The reasons he thought it was carried out and his predictions of things to come are especially noteworthy given the current state of affairs.

Shane Elliott 
How is this debunking any theory? I feel even stronger about the “theory” after watching this. 

Duh-bunk-turds have been known to help persuade open-minded thinker thunkers that they are full of shit via their logical fallacy and omission ridden arguments. Transparent spin and agendas on full display has the ability to make the truth shine, while the lies turn gray. Here is a prime example from a blog post here by Adam Taylor, who wrote:

So I've just finished watching a repeat of the History Channel's documentary "The 9/11 Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction?" And I basically felt the same thing I usually feel when I watch this particular piece: disgust. This documentary has always had a special significance with me, because it was this very piece that got me interested into researching 9/11. And to this day I still believe it is the most biased and slimy propaganda piece ever put out attacking the 9/11 Truth Movement. I find it both funny and sad that they actually aired this piece again. Funny because many of the debunking attempts in the piece have themselves long been debunked (particularly the section on Building 7, where almost every argument they brought up has been discredited by NIST itself; damage, fuel tanks, etc.

Those who can't see the light in the face of such (to borrow a Biden campaign slogan/old man adjective) malarkey, have blinders on anyway and must be convinced via other means, such as pointing out the substantial support from victim's family members and firefighters for instance.

The below link proves that many thousands of family members want a new investigation. Likely the amount of people killed that day is outnumbered by these 9/11 victim's family members.

Paul Revere
“The first element of all warfare is deception.” Sun Tzu the art of war

adam courville
The irony of him talking about cognitive dissonance! Lmao 


"Cognitive dissonance relates to the concept of being exposed to information or having experiences that conflict with our existing base of “what we know.” “Conspiracy theories” seem to be the quintessentially cognitive dissonant concepts of our culture. For many people, the idea that JFK was killed by the government or “9/11 was an inside job” threatens the entire fabric of their consciousness. These things simply cannot be true and people will bend over backwards and resort to irrationality and ridicule to avoid considering them." - Source:

FirstName LastName
“Fear creates a different narrative.” Yes, that’s exactly how the government does it. 

don dada 
I’m more worried about a person that believes everything the media says than a person who believes conspiracy theories. 

Think about the Air Force's F16 pilots playing "war games" on the morning on 9-11-2001. They were playing out a scenario out over the ocean far away from the primary airspace that they are tasked to protect. The scenario included two large aircraft were hijacked and used as missiles crashed into the twin towers. This "practice" scenario wasn't just for "practice", but it was ACTUALLY HAPPENING at the same exact time, day, location, same target, and same weapon within MINUTES of the practice scenario. The odds of all of those things neatly happening together simultaneously is statistically impossible.


Duh-bunk-turds call that reasoning hollow conspiracy theory. A mind must be of that consistency to think such a vacuous story isn't the epitome of vacant, coincidence theorist tripe, in which to wallow, in an desperate attempt to choke down a red pill so big, it'd take an airplane engine sized orifice to swallow. Much like the 9/11 Omission Report...

...and all the other debunked official excuse documents...

...the swiss cheese like holes in the NORAD account might well just be of sufficient size to fly the whole damn plane through! Better kindling that steel framed buildings and 1000% more deserving! See the large amount of linked red text above to learn how the debunkers have indeed been demonstrated to be the ones peddling bunkum on the lack of needed air response that day! The material is free, written, and compiled by yours truly.

Funny that they bring up Loose Change, but neglect to tell you about the film maker's major efforts to refine their arguments and they forget their own related reporting!

Unsurprisingly, the duh-bunk-turds hate even the best of the "Loose Change" films, but loose ends are no biggie.

The Washington Post reported on August 2, 2006 that:
Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources... "We to this day don't know why NORAD [the North American Aerospace Command] told us what they told us," said Thomas H. Kean, the former New Jersey Republican governor who led the commission. 'It was just so far from the truth. . . . It's one of those loose ends that never got tied."
So, if 9/11 didn't have an inside element, what's to stop such a scenario from taking place in the future when we get investigations that have attributes like these? 

Of course, that was under the old ownership of the paper. 
Amazon chief and hyper-partisan anti-Trumper, Jeff Bezos, bought the Washington Post in 2013.

They use the tired talking point that people seek meaning out of random chaos and use JFK conspiracy belief as one example. But yet again, they overplay their hand, especially since...

Majority in U.S. Still Believe JFK Killed in a Conspiracy

The reason this is so, is because there is not only droves of unofficial, but much OFFICIAL EVIDENCE that this is the case. Don't act like you don't know Compost Clown Show!

Proof of a JFK Assassination Plot Without Debating a Magic Bullet


You have one hell of an argument without debating a magic bullet when you combine this material with the other facts Marrs speaks of in the interview especially those concerning the 
doctoring up of the Zapruder film and autopsy records to cover-up the exit wound in the back of Kennedy's head thus covering up the kill shot from the front. The latter is the subject of this little book as detailed in the related link below the interview.

In the book above an official government investigator into the JFK assassination testifies to seeing doctored autopsy evidence proving a second gunman.

The government also officially concluded there was a conspiracy. This is from a .gov page of the National Archives, outlining the conclusions of the House Select Committee on Assassinations.

I.A. Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy. The second and third shots he fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President
I.B. Scientific acoustical evidence establishes a high probability that two gunmen fired at President John F. Kennedy. Other scientific evidence does not preclude the possibility of two gunmen firing at the President. Scientific evidence negates some specific conspiracy allegations
I.C. The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy.


It is NOT a Mystery in a Conspiracy Scenario as to Who Killed JFK, We Know Exactly Who Did It

Furthermore, as if that wasn't enough, the recently released official JFK files that had long been sealed, but were released under President Trump, provided bombshell corroborative evidence, despite mainstream fake news media denials, which served to prop up propaganda like the 9/11 trash reporting I'm skewering here, but also denied Trump any accolades...

JFK Files: Foreknowledge Warning to Media, 2nd Shooter Evidence, CIA Plan to Bomb US Cities

JFK files: British paper got anonymous call just before assassination - Memo from CIA to FBI says senior reporter at Cambridge Evening News was told to call the American embassy for ‘some big news’:


JFK files BOMBSHELL: New evidence of SECOND gunman behind assassination released: 

JFK Files: CIA Plotted To Kill Castro, Stage Bombings In Miami: 

JFK Documents Reveal That the CIA Floated the Idea of Bombing Miami and Washington D.C.: 

More JFK Files Revelations: CIA Employed 40 Journalists, KGB In Possession of Data Indicating LBJ Killed JFK - LBJ Admin Official: 'We Can Convince the Public Oswald is the Real Assassin' - FBI Informant: J.D Tippit was the REAL Assassin:

Truth Teller's Radio Episode 10 - JFK Document Dump - Release of JFK Assassination Files: 

The CIA Commits Over 100,000 Serious Crimes Each Year: 

Regarding the last link above, that yet again comes from official sources, the next time a 9/11 "debunker" tells you that 9/11 couldn't have been an inside job because someone involved would have talked, ask them how many of the 1 million serious crimes the CIA has committed in the last decade they are aware of. Ask them if they are aware of this following CIA criminality factoid and if not, why not? Demand a conspiracy query as to who must have worked with the media they frequent, as to keep them in the dark about such shocking history...

Operation Gladio was a false-flag terror program set up by the CIA and NATO. Although Gladio was eventually exposed officially and without question, it was not just a single event, but an ongoing operation that remained secret for decades, in which hundreds of innocent people were killed and injured in terrorist attacks that were blamed on other groups.

Such info should be common knowledge, as it forever should rightly inform our thought processes when possibly similar current events unfold, or when such a basis in knowledge gives important greater context to other historical issues under the microscope, such as...

An inside job: CIA a suspect for some in JFK's killing


Attorney General Robert Kennedy was not a believer in the lone gunman theory.  Like many Americans, he could not accept that a man as ordinary as Lee Harvey Oswald could have acted alone in assassinating the president of the United States, his brother John F. Kennedy.  Who did he suspect was part of the plot?  "Apparently Bobby Kennedy’s first suspicion was that it was some rogue element in the CIA," said Philip Shenon, author of a new book on the JFK assassination.

As the story goes, the CIA spooks were able to convince him with their patented brand of "intelligence" that he was sniffing up the wrong tree, although he reportedly maintained a belief in a larger conspiracy excluding their involvement, but not ruling out the Mafia or Cuba.

Or perhaps they "spooked" him enough to nearly pee and pray "please I hope I'm not next, please God not me!" You see, that speculation isn't kooky at all when one knows of the extreme nefariousness that has long festered in the agency, but without that foundation, one might come off as being too paranoid. 

NBC News Excerpt:

Why the spooks? President Kennedy — killed in Dallas on Nov. 22, 1963 — was thought to have had a prickly relationship with CIA brass, mostly appointed under his White House predecessor, Dwight D. Eisenhower. Heading the agency at the time was Allen Dulles. Below him were Richard Helms, the director of central intelligence, and James Angleton, chief of counterintelligence. Where the CIA under Dulles had spent years working to topple foreign heads of state — in Guatemala and Iran, for example — Kennedy preferred a more diplomatic approach, though he was not entirely opposed to covert operations. Before Kennedy, the CIA acted largely without restriction; under him that changed. CIA officials were reportedly deeply angered by Kennedy’s lack of support in the failed Bay of Pigs invasion to oust Cuba's Fidel Castro, a debacle that cost Dulles his job in 1961. Conspiracy buffs argue that Dulles's firing incited plans for an assassination. Kennedy was even once quoted in a New York Times report, by an anonymous source said to be a trusted aide, as saying he wanted "to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds," following the Bay of Pigs. “It would be odd in a way if [the CIA] didn’t go after Kennedy,” said Lisa Pease, a Los Angeles-based author and researcher who recently spoke at a JFK conspiracy symposium in Pittsburgh, Pa. “He was one of the few leftist leaders still standing.”

The overarching point here, is that there is an solid intellectual case for a conspiracist worldview. That is to say, that conspiracy is the MO of power, not an aberration, but the norm... 

Debunking Myths on Conspiracy Theories:

Responses to 'The truth is rushing out there: why conspiracy theories spread faster than ever':

Quotes on Conspiracy Theories:

This isn't manufacturing reality or conspiracies, or ignoring science, rather it's simply
acknowledging the existence of all of the above as they are. Not as we would like them to be, which the Compost argues, is exactly these nightmare scenarios! Why would any of this be more comforting than lone nut jobs and upstanding intelligence institutions devoid of criminality. It's absurd on its face.

Nor do the implications of the science the Compost ignores bring me any solace...

Peer-Reviewed 9/11 Truth - Who is Winning the Peer-Reviewed Scientific Literature Battle?

Just as it is absurd that the government would need to write, "
We Can Convince the Public Oswald is the Real Assassin." A truth such as this, if it were so, should simply reveal itself to be self evident as the facts are laid bare in a no nonsense fashion. But that is not what happened, (with JFK, 9/11, many other events) because the facts and circumstances were as clear as mud and as suspicious as the hamburgler creepily tip toeing and trying to be incognito, while wearing his stereotypical crook outfit, and trying to steal living/talking hamburgers that are each ratting him out as he tries to steal 20 screaming witnesses, all while the clown cop is two feet away! I am not exaggerating either! I'm seriously trying to illustrate a point.

Any of the these following things (non-comprehensive list) could have not gone in the peculiar way that they did, but they all did...

Excerpts from an academic peer-reviewed paper entitled 9/11, JFK, and War:  Recurring Patterns in America’s Deep Events...

While I myself am still open-minded as to how seriously we should interpret these similarities, we should also open our minds to the alternative: that it was not by chance that two major events were soon followed, first in 1965 and again in 2003, by America’s longest military involvements in the nation’s history. JFK and 9/ll: Possibly Innocent Similarities I will begin with three similarities which could possibly, especially in the case of the first, be marginal or irrelevant to how the events themselves unfolded. 1) Stock market speculation: By this I am not referring to the dip and recovery that followed both events, which is common after any unsettling news. I am referring to the dealings in special stocks which suggested, in both cases, prior knowledge of what was to come. In early November 1963, David Harold (“Dry Hole”) Byrd and his investment partner, James Ling, bought $2 million worth of stock (132,600 shares) in Ling-Temco-Vought (LTV), their own defense company. Then in February 1964 LTV received from the Navy the first major LBJ prime defense contract – for a fighter plane to be used in limited wars like Vietnam.  I have calculated that this $2.5 million insiders’ purchase was worth $26 million by the end of 1967. Moreover the prescient purchase was about one hundred times the size of any other insider purchase in aerospace issues in the same period. This does not prove that Byrd and Ling were directly involved in the Kennedy assassination, but it is likely that Byrd may have had inklings of what was going to happen. For Byrd owned the Texas School Book Depository building, where Oswald had been hired as an employee in October 1963. I have hypothesized that Oswald thought he was there on a surveillance assignment, to report on a fellow worker who was under investigation by the Dallas Police. Byrd may have been privy to this arrangement, and have suspected more. This stock purchase is comparable to the notorious “put option purchases” just before 9/11 in 2001, in the stock of United Airlines and American Airlines. Here too the advance purchases suggest special knowledge, but here too the purchasers and the perpetrators need not have been the same, especially if we accept the indications that many widely scattered people and agencies had prior indications of the event about to occur. There were scattered indications that a few people had advance knowledge of the Kennedy assassination, a fact hard to reconcile with the Warren Commission conclusion that Oswald, a disgruntled loner, acted on his own. The most significant case was that of a Southern racist and activist, Joseph Milteer, who correctly predicted to a Miami police informant, that Kennedy would be shot "from an office building with a high-powered rifle." But Milteer was not unique. There were also pre-9/11 indications and warnings, far too numerous to enumerate here, of knowledge about an impending attack using hijacked airplanes.

To reiterate, no nonsense facts being laid bare and revealing self evident truth is the antithesis of key evidence being dismissed, ignored, altered, and suppressed. You don't have to have a screw loose or be on drugs to clearly see, that this is as clear as mud.

The JFK facts of the case, just as it was... was... way before it existed or was cool to call something SUS. The conspiratorial view is likely not askew if one can easily say "you can't make this shit up!" What that really means is, that you can and it does seem like a fiction purporting to be random stuff. 

The “Legend” of Lee Harvey Oswald


Although he was someone who tried to defect to the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War, he traveled in right-wing, anti-Communist circles of former Russian émigrés. His new best friend was George de Mohrenschildt, a petroleum geologist with international business connections who was a CIA contract agent and colleague of George Herbert Walker Bush... Upon his return to the US, Oswald continued his counterintelligence role as agent provocateur, informer, and ultimately as “patsy.”

Lee Harvey Oswald died proclaiming his innocence. Hours before being shot by Jack Ruby while in police custody just two days after JFK was assassinated, Oswald not only refused to confess, he insisted “I’m just a patsy!”

On November 24, 1963, Oswald is going to be shot by Dallas night club owner Jack Ruby in the garage of the Dallas Police headquarters in full view of television cameras broadcasting live to millions and die at Parkland Hospital. Ruby had stalked Oswald at police headquarters all weekend since his arrest. Jack Ruby had long standing connections to organized crime figures, all the way back when he was a numbers runner for Al Capone’s mob in Chicago while a youth. In the weeks prior to the assassination he had been in contact with major crime figures from around the country.

How many licks to get the center of a Tootsie Pop and how many coincidences does it take to equal a conspiracy? Inquiring minds want to know! But wait there's more!


This is just the tip of the iceberg, but sufficient enough to say that it wasn't financially motivated authors and nutters that were grasping at straws. This is part of the psychological operations document strategy that the CIA sent out to "media propaganda assets" to use against critics of the JFK Warren Commission. This official declassified memo gave birth to the derogatory, weaponized, version of the label "conspiracy theorist" that the Compost is still utilizing today.

The CIA Didn't Literally Invent the Term 'Conspiracy Theorist' But THEY ARE Responsible for the Connotation:

Lastly, I just want to note that this also serves to illustrate the point that, right or wrong, the Sandy Hook issue with Alex Jones that the Compost touched on, is again, ass backwards. He is not the one who broke down institutional faith. Nor is he the one to first suggest the seemingly outrageous idea of faking deaths for political goals, nope, that was your government...

Alex Jones in the News Again for Sandy Hook Lawsuits - What Exactly Did He Say FOR REAL NO SPIN and Why is Free Speech Never Brought Up? - Jones Has Been Targeted for What He Gets Right Not Something He May Have Got Wrong


In his "Final Statement on Sandy Hook" video from late 2016, which was memory holed thanks to censorship, Jones stated that he considered all sides, that he changed his mind at times, but that he had returned to his original position of thinking kids were killed, but still noted many anomalies that he did not think had been debunked while others had. Politifact essentially confirms he is telling the truth in this characterization while at the same time trying to give Hillary Clinton a victory over him.

He has repeatedly sincerely apologized if he hurt the feelings of any victim's family members.

Analyzing the official story of an historical event and considering the political impact of it, even if that means offending people involved, is not a crime. It's exercising free speech and just plain smart if one knows their history concerning government corruption and proven conspiracies.

These 33 conspiracy theories turned out to be true and here are 42 admitted false flag attacks. Source:

Sorry, I always question whether people's indignation is healthy when others question if people actually died in an event. Seeing as how our government actually put these phrases in a document...

"Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."
"Conduct funerals for mock-victims"

Joe Rogan is right about Alex Jones being right about a lot and more than he knows...

How low does the rabbit hole really go? I don't know, but we never win the prize of societal trust and relative collective sanity again unless we seriously reign in statist/secret/unelected power and tyranny and face our systemic and spiritual sins and I don't mean, divide and conquer, majorly (not totally) contrived racial and law enforcement distractions.

Two Key Things That Got Overlooked About Project MK Ultra:

Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent In Charge and head of the Los Angeles FBI: SATANISM AND THE CIA: INTERNATIONAL TRAFFICKING IN CHILDREN


Then President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110 on June 4th, 1963. This order authorized the Treasury to issue a new government currency, the US Note, based on silver in Fort Knox, recycled from the huge magnets used in early Uranium enrichment at Oak Ridge. This allowed the Kennedy administration to purchase four billion dollars worth of goods and services without having to borrow the money from the Federal Reserve, and signaled Kennedy's intention to restore the nations' economic system to the model used by the Founding Fathers. John F. Kennedy's United States Note. Five months later, John Kennedy was assassinated and his US Notes withdrawn from circulation. The Warren Commission, now widely acknowledged to have been a cover-up, included as a member John J. McCloy, President of Chase Manhattan Bank and President of the World Bank.