Sunday, November 30, 2008

Rampant Un-American Censorship of the 9/11 Truth Movement

On Thursday of last week a blatant attempt by Microsoft to stifle the 9/11 truth movement was exposed on the website The poster, VeilLifter, reported that the online gaming service Xbox Live deleted his user name, www911TRUTHorg. Upon checking the Terms of Use the only thing that might have applied was their policy regarding "advertising," although is a non-profit, educational organization, it could have been an honest mistake. However, after switching the user name to x911 False Flag, it was also deleted whitin 24 hours. The next attempt was the user name Sept11FalseFlag, and yet again the same result occurred, this time within a few days. Rather than being an isolated incident, this seems to be a part of a continuing trend.

Yesterday I put out this message:
In this week's International edition of Newsweek (Dec 1, 2008), there's an article entitled "President 2.0". In reading it, I discovered that a new site ( is collecting and posting ideas for the Obama administration and the top 10 ideas, the ideas that have received the most votes, will be presented to the President on Inauguration Day. An idea was just added to suggest that a new investigation into 9/11 be conducted.
However, today I received this email from the site:
Hello John-Michael,

We wanted to send you a note about an idea you recently voted on in the Ideas for Change in America competition titled "Conduct a new, independent investigation into the attacks of September 11, 2001

We support calls for truth and transparency in our government on every subject and welcome you to directly petition the new administration about this matter, which you can do at However, this is unfortunately outside the scope of the Ideas for Change in America project, which aims to offer specific policy solutions rather than investigations into past government action. As such, it is not eligible to enter the second round of the competition.
We understand that good people may disagree with our vision. But this is a private effort not connected to the Obama campaign or transition team, and we reserve the right to keep the competition and its content aligned with the stated mission and overall spirit of the project.
Thank you for your understanding. As mentioned above, we welcome you to directly petition the Obama administration about your proposal at And we hope you continue your work to advance change.
- The Ideas for Change in America Team
They shouldn't have preemptively thanked me for understanding, because I don't! This idea was in first place in the category of criminal justice, and was the leading idea on the site overall with 660 votes. The second place idea has yet to reach 400, and most other top ideas haven't reached 300. What is the point of letting the people pick the top ten ideas for "change" if you decide what they can and cannot pick. Furthermore, saying that the truth of 9/11 isn't a potential policy solution is utterly ridiculous when our foreign policy is completely based on this event, and much of our domestic policy as well. Click here to see these points in more detail.

Related Info: deletes new 9/11 investigation idea as it had more votes then any other idea
These are only the most recent censorship issues, here are some previous examples:


A video entitled "BBC Reported Building 7 Collapse 20 Minutes Before It Fell" somehow failed to achieve the honor it deserved for having 390,000 views and 9400 comments. This should have ranked the video at #26 in the category of most discussed of all time, as well as #8 in most discussed of all time in the category of news and politics.

Google Video:

The film "TerrorStorm: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism" found itself the apparent victim of statistical manipulation when viewing totals numbering in the hundreds of thousands were reset to zero, preventing it from reaching tens of millions of people. 9/11 truth related stories have also had trouble making it into Google search engine results at times, such was the case when the story of actor Charlie Sheens' questions about 9/11 yielded no search results.


The website, which covers the topic of 9/11 truth on a regular basis, is admittedly censored by MySpace when it is posted on user bulletins of people who have chosen to link to one another, the excuse being that the URL is used so frequently in user posted bulletins that MySpace's servers automatically classify it as spam and ban it.

New York Indymedia:

The site began censoring all articles questioning the official version of the 9/11 attack in June of 2005. Click here for more info.


In Feb of 2007 a computer programmer unearthed a bug on the website that allowed him to view a "bury" feature used to suppress controversial content, of course 9/11 truth was a target of this disingenuous abuse.

Related Info:

Is Digg Rigged?

The Huffington Post:

On 07/23/2008 Arianna Huffington admitted in an interview with Politico:
"There are certain obvious things we have, certain specific things," says Huffington. "Conspiracy theories — we don’t allow conspiracy theories. If you thought Sept. 11 was caused by the Bush administration, your comment is not going to appear unless it is a mistake."

So, Huffinton readily admits that she doesn't allow free speech, and you could gather from her comments that this is due to her thinking it is all just conspiracy theory nonsense, but perhaps she is afraid of the repercussions of such a revelation. Perhaps she fears that if government complicity were revealed that it would cause, as David Ray Griffin suggests in his book Debunking 9/11 Debunking of many of the elite class, "a crisis of confidence in US institutions, or lead to a global economic meltdown," either way she is a gatekeeper. So, what of the rest? Honest mistakes? Concerted effort? Cognitive dissonance? Some combination thereof? You decide, but ask yourself this, why all the fuss over something that supposedly has no substance, why not let it prove itself as being so lacking in validity and just watch it fade away? forum member, Saundra Hummer, states the following regarding this blog post:
If this is not to be believed, then why the censoring of a radical, not to be taken seriously, article? This to me is more than a little bit strange. The censorship of this position and theory, makes one more likely to believe that there is fire behind the smoke, that there is more to this article than one can imagine. A lot of bright men who know of these things, tell us not all is as we've been told.
Not a conspiracy theorist myself, but this is so odd, this censoring of those who question the validity of the 9/11 official reports. About MicroSoft, read up on the PNAC's giving of all copyrights to it involving Iraq. Sure it's going to keep things down if it can, or so I believe.
Why on earth would anyone fuel the fire of doubt with censorship if there is nothing to it? Perhaps they believe it falls into the trap of degrading their blog site, like the senseless blather of "Nuke em", and other such nonsense. The censorship which is happening seems senseless, but then this administration, along with it's supporters and perhaps even it's detractors, those at the top, as well as their underlings, haven't always, or perhaps never, had their thinking hat's on, just their ass hat's.
Related Info:

We Don't Care for Free Speech...

Saturday, November 29, 2008

Discussion @ for a new investigation into the 9-11 attack

Thanks to "cjvabch" at the Veterans for 911 Truth Yahoo Group for passing this along...

"In this week's International edition of Newsweek (Dec 1, 2008), there's an article entitled "President 2.0". In reading it, I discovered that a new site ( is collecting and posting ideas for the Obama administration and the top 10 ideas, the ideas that have received the most votes, will be presented to the President on Inauguration Day. An idea was just added to suggest that a new investigation into 9/11 be conducted.

Please click the link below and VOTE for this idea. Then forward the link to everyone you know and ask that they vote for it too. If this is for real, it is an excellent opportunity to get out collective voice heard. Loud and Clear. Finally." - Ideas for Changing America: Conduct a new, independent investigation into the attacks of September 11, 2001

Related Info...

UPDATE... deletes new 9/11 investigation idea as it had more votes then any other idea

Rampant Un-American Censorship of the 9/11 Truth Movement

Friday, November 28, 2008

9/11 Debate: Jon Gold V.S. Pat Curley
Wednesday, November 26 2008 - 9/11 A/V Galleries

The following videos are a debate between 9/11 Activist Jon Gold and Pat Curley the creator of the popular blog ScrewLooseChange.

The debate took place on Monday, November 24th, 2008 on the Franklin Pierce University closed circuit television show, The Dynamic Duo and was moderated by the show's hosts Justin Martell and Eric Jackman.

The only editing that has been done to the three segments is all references to commercials have been removed (to make the conversation continuous), along with the opening and closing credits. The content of the debate has not been altered in any way.

FP-TV's The Dynamic Duo is in no way affiliated with the GCN Radio Network show of the same name.


'Debunker' Related Excerpts from and Review of '9/11 Truther The Fight for Peace, Justice and Accountability' by Jon Gold

Debunking the Debunkers search results: Pat Curley

David Ray Griffin Debunks Popular Mechanics in Osaka

November 05, 2008

David Ray Griffin talks about Popular Mechanics' 9/11 debunking at a 9/11 Truth Conference in Osaka, Japan on November 1, 2008. For more information on the conference, please visit the homepage at:

To listen to David Ray Griffin's full speech, please visit The Corbett Report:

This blog entry is also posted at

9/11 Truth Debunker Embaresses Himself

October 30, 2008

This is the full raw unedited footage of the 9/11 Truth Debunker at Calgary City Hall on August 31st 2008. The only cuts in the video are when the camera was not filming. The original edited footage was removed from YouTube because he complained, however he is seen in this footage agreeing to do an interview and this happened in a public place so there was no reason for the original video to be removed.

9/11 Truth Debunker Embaresses Himself Part 1/4:

9/11 Truth Debunker Embaresses Himself Part 2/4:

9/11 Truth Debunker Embaresses Himself Part 3/4:

9/11 Truth Debunker Embaresses Himself Part 4/4:

Saturday, November 22, 2008

We Are Change Central Indiana End The Fed Protest in Downtown Indy,, End The Fed protest in downtown Indy. We Are Change Central Indiana. End the federal reserve now!

In Indianapolis we made the local radio station take notice by holding our signs up to their window where they were broadcasting. The host was our local prosecutor Carl Brizzi, while broadcasting he said that there were some End The Fed protesters outside of the window, described our signs, and mentioned Ron Paul, he also mentioned that he appreciated our passion. We had an effect where I am, and judging from the other videos below tons of others had an effect on their local community, so just keep being the change you want to see.


Zeitgeist - The Movie: Federal Reserve (Part 1 of 5)

1/12 Zeitgeist Movie Undebunked with Peter joseph radio show

End The Fed Rally Draws Thousands Around the Country, Few Seem to Notice

Alex Jones & End The Fed Video Compilation

US protesters: End the Federal Reserve

$700 billion is nothing

END THE FED - WeAreChange Indy April 25, 2009

WeAreChange Indy - 9/11 Truth Street Action

WACCI - Free Speech Zone Indy remix

Scorpions - Wind of Change

WACCI - Iran War Protest

Friday, November 21, 2008

Cognitive Dissonance Meets 9/11 Truth

"Cognitive dissonance relates to the concept of being exposed to information or having experiences that conflict with our existing base of “what we know.” “Conspiracy theories” seem to be the quintessentially cognitive dissonant concepts of our culture. For many people, the idea that JFK was killed by the government or “9/11 was an inside job” threatens the entire fabric of their consciousness. These things simply cannot be true and people will bend over backwards and resort to irrationality and ridicule to avoid considering them." - Source:

Friday, November 14, 2008

Interview With Founder David C. Byers

"The World Unification Network is the first ever online network aimed at bringing true equality, peace, and freedom to the people of Earth! It is equally owned and operated (shared) by the entirety of our membership, and everyone is invited to join us!"

John-Michael Talboo (JMT)-Q:

First off, just let me say that I love the concept of this network that you have set up. Social networks are generally used for a lot of mindless fluff, and are shunned by many adults for their reputation of being a teenie bopper pass time. However, when these systems are used to unite activists it really shows how great of a tool these networks can be. What really sets your network apart for me though is the fact that it is totally censorship free.

As it is posted on the site...

The "Admin Account is the only account with the ability to delete (aka censor) member content on our network so in the sake of freedom of speech, I've started this note as a place to publicly account for all activity."

And you actually show in detail every small change you make to the site. I think this is a great precedent to set. There is the exception that group hosts can delete posts, but you also say "let this be a good example of how we want to do things here @ theWUN."

So first off, was this policy sparked by any specific incidents that have taken place on other networks such as user bulletins being censored on MySpace, and secondly how does one go about setting up a network like this?

David C. Byers-A:

Thanks so much for noticing and bringing this up! I've been keeping up the blog for a while but wasn't sure anyone had even looked at it yet!

Since our network's inception on Myspace back in April 2007 and the idea of the "World Unification Network" became more clear to me, it became obvious that it was kind of a, for lack of better words, "sacred duty" of a network like ours, which was built to help us collectively reach such overarching goals, to offer a free and open forum for people to say what's on their mind about whatever they want, even if it's about the network being posted on, actually, especially if it's about the network being posted on, we could not expect to achieve any one of our goals, let alone get anyone to join us if we couldn't promise that this place is any different than any other commercial venture big name social network, networks who's legal policies promise you that they can delete anything "they" feel like. This time we're trying something different, a network without a "legal policy" without a headquarters, without an owner, heck I made the page, but I've tried to make it as clear as I can that this is a member owned network, and that it is shared by everyone who uses it, really i just had this idea that I wanted it to be a tool to bring the whole world a little bit closer together, by our own free will, and for the rights and planet we all share, that, I feel, is the true potential of this wonderful tool we have in the internet. Also, I have always felt very strongly about our rights to freedom and since my youth was a close analyst of what the term "freedom" really means here in America, so when I built the page, in the light of overwhelming censorship and communication repression techniques utilized by Myspace I decided that one of the goals of our network, which we will continue to pursue, is to effectively "fool-proof" the censorship issue, it's not perfected yet, but we're on our way, I will be happy when we get to the point where censorship or deletion of content is virtually impossible except by the individual member who made the post.

And great asking how to do this, I started the concept of the World Unification Network on Myspace back in April 2007, and little did I know enables anyone to build their own social network from scratch, for free, and they work really well, and they've been doing it for a while! So, I got on here as soon as I realized it, and it's been great, I highly recommend Ning social networks for ease of use and interconnectivity among other Ning networks, and all I've really done to help ensure member's free speech is created a separate account without any administrator status that I use as my personal page, have not enabled any other admins, and the one admin account I make sure to only use for style changes and broadcast messages. Thought I should mention also that, included in the right to free speech theWUN was built upon, is the right to promote your non-profit website, so say you build a Ning network, have a network already, or have another not for profit group, idea, or website, you can then build a group @ theWUN specifically for your page, with a link, to help people find you and move back and forth, between, and among our networks. We are called theWUN but never presume to be the WUN & only, I know that we can only grow if we grow together. I realize that, and extend the invitation to everyone to join us and help us pursue our mission, or as I like to call it Y(Our) mission. We hope to grow into a global hub big enough to change the world, to help people everywhere find causes they can relate to, so to do that right we had to start by being a cause everyone can relate to, I feel that if we can promote, above all, the rights of peace and freedom, not only freedom of speech, but in all ways, while continuing to grow the network, the message of our members as a whole will shine through, especially, as a larger, more diverse group of people, our "family of friends", make use of the personal empowerment tool that "theWUN" was designed to be, while helping to build upon and more clearly define the very purpose why it continues to exist.


Very informative, I'm definitely hoping that the readers will sign up for the WUN network, create their own networks, and groups, and keep growing this monster like the blob!

Moving on, I'm aware that you are a 9/11 truther, so the million dollar question for this blog is of course your thoughts on the so-called 9/11 debunkers. If you have ever ran into these nice people (some of them are) they probably called you a twoofer, or a CT, which is short for conspiracy theorist. Which is funny to me because first off, the 9/11 truth movement was started by the 9/11 families, so I guess they are twoofers too?! Secondly, as David Ray Griffin pointed out on a radio interview, speaking in regard to statements of John McCain...

"He wants to say that the conspiracy theorists are not satisfied with the mundane truth. He says that generally the truth is pretty mundane. So the truth is simply that Osama bin Laden was able to inspire 19 young men, including some who couldn't fly, to fly these planes through the air, defeat the most sophisticated military defense system in history, strike the Pentagon, which is surely the most protected building on the face of the planet, and then bring down three WTC buildings by striking two of them, and bringing them down in such a way that several laws of physics we're violated."

He makes many more points like these in his book, Debunking 9/11 Debunking - An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory, which shatters the idea that the only people that are conspiracy theorists are those with alternative views. After all, official simply means "of or relating to an office or a post of authority," it certainly doesn't mean that something is the objective truth! The historical precedent worldwide and domestically for honest and open government is pretty much none, and if you live on the same planet that I do, I thought this was pretty clear. I could list government lies and atrocities for days on end with link after link to various information, but here are just two to chew on...



So, the fact that we have so many people defending the government's line on things is just astounding to me. McCain is one thing, but there are a ton of debate forums and websites just swamped by seemingly average people that attack those calling for a new investigation and searching for the truth.

They try to downplay highly credentialed and credible people that question the official story, and any witnesses that report damning information are either said to be confused or lying. As if an underfunded and conflict of interest ridden commission wasn't enough justification! Please give the readers your take on all of this.

David C. Byers-A:

You are right I'm a truther and proud of it, hell call me a "conspiracy theorist" if you want, I think it's pretty clear to those who are paying attention we've been living in conspiracy reality for quite some time! My thoughts on the whole thing, and what I try and tell the sheep I meet, is only some basic facts, for one, it is physically impossible for buildings like the twin towers, who's exoskeleton was built exactly for the purpose of helping distribute the load and prevent it from falling in such events, to literally crumble to dust, simply from an hour's worth of burning jet fuel!

I too believed the "official" story when I first heard it as a freshmen in high school, but, I also gave middle easterners dirty looks in public for at least a week without any real reason afterwards! And, now, the more I look at it, the more clear it is that we have been TRICKED. I am at a loss as to how people can still deny the truth about 9/11, without having a vested interest in the military-industrial complex, which as it happens, most Americans do, and like my own mother & father continue to deny the real story behind that fateful day.

In the light of such widespread ignorance and the continued strategy of "divide and conquer" being utilized by those who would make us their slaves, I was inspired to start this effort of the "World Unification Network" which led me to the idea for PEACEfest, which is really, nothing but some days that I think we should set aside to celebrate for the things all humans share, this planet, all of its resources, and the future, the idea is, we could share peace too, if we stand up for our rights and make it happen, and the only day I can think of that would be right to start off these celebrations was September 11.

Now the idea of PEACEfest started quite some time ago, but hasn't really grown to be anything resembling a revolution, let alone even a fest, this year, but it has evolved since then into another global network built to unite people on their local levels for worthy causes by enabling them to join up in a local group and post events, protests, and other things people in their area should know about, I figure that if we can continue to network and make it grow we could have thousands of individually organized grass roots celebrations going on by 9/11/09, which we're tentatively calling "the next rEvolution"! ....on a note related to the labeling that society does to those of us who choose to seek the truth instead of basking in our own ignorance and arrogance, I've created a group all about PEACEfest in the US, and I've called it "the 'Crazy' Party", for the one reason that, I've come to the conclusion that people can call me "crazy" or "conspiracy theorist" all they want, when it comes down to God's honest truth, we are the ones who are pursuing it and bringing it to light, and anyone who wants to live in denial and pretend like everything's all right are the ones with the real "crazy" issues. So the title is a play on words, because if all goes well, PEACEfest2009 will be the craziest party of all!"


You raise a very valid points in regard to the resiliency of the Twin Towers. Many people have heard that the buildings were designed to sustain jet impacts. The problem is that there is also a lot of misinformation out there that claims that the type of planes anticipated at the time were much smaller and lighter on fuel, but this simply is not the case. In fact the size and fuel capacity of the anticipated 707s and DC 8s are quite comparable. The WTC Construction and Project Manager, Frank A. De Martini, even stated on the documentary, World Trade Center - A Modern Marvel that...

"The building was designed to have a fully loaded [Boeing] 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door -- this intense grid -- and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting."

The small difference between a 707 and 757 is surely compensated for if we are to believe this statement. And even if we dismissed it, the difference is more than compensated for due to the fact that the anticipated scenarios made calculations for a 707 traveling at 600 mph, whereas the 767s that hit the WTC towers were said, according to liberal figures, to be traveling at 470 and 590 mph, according to conservative figures at, 440 and 540 mph.

I think it is great that you are making efforts to ask questions, spread truths, and unite people to engage in activism. I think picking 9/11/09 for your PEACEfest events is very fitting.

You have also been working on an offshoot of the World Unification Network known as the WUN Radio Network. It is putting a focus on people's musical interests, with political music definitely being in the fold. I for one love music, but as you say... "who doesn't, robots?"

But seriously the power of music is just an amazing force, and when combined with images that speak a thousand words, an amazing tool to spread the truth on a primordial level.

I myself recently put together a video for Gary Jules - Mad World that was played on 9-11 at the Grand Lake Theater in Oakland Ca. I hear the place was PACKED from noon till 11pm, so hundreds of people saw it in one sitting.

So, I will be definitely be sharing my creations on the network!

Now, the network is in its infancy, and I know that you have plans to also do some talk radio as well. Please tell the readers what some of the plans are and how they can get involved.

Also, what are you thoughts about music being an agent of political change, and what is on your headphones?

David C. Byers-A:

So, we've got WUN Network Radio going like you mentioned, and I really feel this may be the place that really takes off first in our group of WUN Networks, because its basically listner created radio, going along with the same philosophy of theWUN we believe that if we unite as artists, as fans of art, and on every other level, we can accomplish much, my ideas that stem from WUN Network Radio that I hope to develop and build more as we grow are the notion of a "record label" that we can use to revolutionarily distribute art to the people of earth without going through the usual mediums and without the usual record contracts, I built peacefest to help accommodate the artists, and people in general on a local level, and very soon we hope to integrate a video channel into the concept of WUN Network Radio, so like I say in the my introductory forum post there, we hope to build a centralized hub that is available and useful to all!

Music is without a doubt one of the best, if not the best tool to reach people anywhere on earth and about anything, what else can I say? Music knows no borders, and has the ability to raise awareness to new levels by bringing people together from all walks of life. I love music, so much, its indescribable, how many times could I say that music has saved my life, I don't know, but let's say at least once!

My headphones don't stop either! I really can't not listen to music, exept I am right now strangely, but I keep the rotation pretty random, not shuffed though, I like albums, and my only criteria is that it's GOOD. That covers a lot! Mostly around the house we listen to Beatles, Bob Marley, The Doors, etc., forever, and when I'm alone or in the car I just can't stop rockin hip hop lately! Aesop Rock, Talib Kweli, and Immortal Technique are my favorites, I think they're truly revolutionizing hip hop, and trying to bring back its good name since radio crap rap took over! I really will and do listen to alot, and have just recently began playing some more as well, and hope to get recording within this next year, I just turned 23 today so i guess that's a good goal to be rocking on stage @ PEACEfest 2009 before I'm 24! I just checked and I'm at 51 days of music on my itunes, maybe that's why the computer is running so slow!


Crap rap most definitely dominates, but the underground scene is going strong. I actually put together a small website that covers the subject of conscious rap, and how artists like Immortal Technique have been a huge force in the 9/11 truth movement.

I believe that there has been a concerted effort by people with a lot of pull to dumb down the artform of hip-hop, as to not have it educate and create dissent. I came to this conclusion because it has been demonstated that conscious rap can bring in the cash flow, but there is stong resistance to it. Immortal Technique even declined a major label deal because they asked him to tone down his lyrics.

Do you get that feeling as well?

David C. Byers-A:

Good to hear we're on the same page! Actually since Pete, a member here @ theWUN started WUN Network Radio I've been hearing lots of originals from our members that have blown me away! I've featured a few of the hip hop artists in my profile over there ( and even hope to start a show featuring many of them and to get myself on the air over there! Also I'll have to get a talk show going there eventually, I'll be sure to have you on! And on the topic of a concerted effort to dumb down commercial hip hop, I think its the same concerted effort to dumb down every other aspect of society and hip hop has been a casualty, it's a shame, so many people "hate" "rap" because everything on the radio is basically junk.... I used to be one of those people and never would have even discovered many of my now favorites had I not broke out of that mindset!


We'll I can't wait for you to get a show going, I love doing talk radio, my nerves hate it though! I would be more than happy to tackle my nerves and really throw out a tongue lashing for these debunkers for one thing!

To wrap up, what are some activist outlets, petitions, upcoming events, etc. that you think people should be aware of? Other than that you can close on whatever foot you like, and thanks for doing the interview and for all your efforts to change this crazy world.

David C. Byers-A:

I really just want to emphasize that all are welcome and invited here, not because I want to build "my" website but because its going to take all of us to really change the world as much as it needs to change, so please join, make it representative of the things you believe in, and let's build this thing together... I had someone say the other day that they thought I could possibly be a project of the NWO, but I had to say right back, if I was this project would have been funded for more than $50 since its inception more then a year and a half ago, so I guess that makes me just another pissed off peon... as far as I can see a shared network is the best way to go, and just because something is shared does not mean that we can't all get just as much out of it, quite the opposite, I truly believe it's going to take all those organizations that are working for REAL change to REALLY learn to work together, our foe has us pretty pinned unless we do! So far I've joined almost 100 similar efforts via social networks, newsletters, etc., and I'm working on a new open source comprehensive list of all these real organizations together with an overhaul of our old myspace network to highlight the list called O.P.E.N. (one peaceful earth network) @ and hope to build huge networks of people around them on different social networks, this will allow for more exposure to not only theWUN but all the great efforts that are going on out there. Which reminds me of something I heard the other day which rang pretty true about the only way we can beat Goliath is by getting ALL of the Davids in the world to work together!

Un-debunking the WTC Demolition Squibs

Related Info:

High-Velocity "Demolition Squibs" Are Visible in the Twin Towers' Collapses

Wednesday, November 12, 2008

Does New Footage of WTC 7's Collapse Disprove Controlled Demolition Theories?

Recently, previously unreleased footage of the collapse of WTC1 and WTC7 surfaced on the internet. At first details were sparse, but more details have now came to the surface thanks to the work of James Corbett of

Pat Curley of the Screw Loose Change blog had this to say in regard to the WTC 7 footage:

"Observations: WTC-7 does not collapse neatly into its own footprint; you can see that it starts straight down but the south side shows less resistance and the building topples in that direction. Which means that the Troofers were right all along; the building should have (and did) collapse asymmetrically towards the area of most damage. On WTC-1, note the debris hitting WTC-7."

No, WTC 7 does not collapse into its own footprint, a more accurate statement is, as WTC states:

"The pile was almost entirely within the footprint of the former building."

Take a look for yourself.

Here is what the FEMA report had to say:

"The collapse of WTC 7 had a small debris field as the facade was pulled downward, suggesting an internal failure and implosion… The average debris field radius was approximately 70 feet. (FEMA, 2002, chapter 5.)"

The fact that the building slumped to the south side has been known from other videos such as this one for a long time, this video is just a better view.

Pat says:

"You can see that it starts straight down. The building should have (and did) collapse asymmetrically."

No, the building collapsed in a nearly-symmetrical fashion. As Dr. Steven Jones notes in his paper "Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Collapse?":

"A near-symmetrical collapse, as observed, evidently requires the simultaneous “pulling” of many of the support columns. The likelihood of complete and nearly-symmetrical collapse due to random fires as in the 'official' theory is small, since non-symmetrical failure is so much more likely. If one or a few columns had failed, one might expect a portion of the building to crumble while leaving much of the building standing. For example, major portions of WTC 5 remained standing on 9/11 despite very significant impact damage and severe fires."

Even the August 21, 2008 final report on WTC 7 from NIST didn't claim the collapse was asymmetrical. From the GeorgeWashington blog:

"NIST lamely tried to explain the symmetrically collapse as follows:

WTC 7’s collapse, viewed from the exterior (most videos were taken from the north), did appear to fall almost uniformly as a single unit. This occurred because the interior failures that took place did not cause the exterior framing to fail until the final stages of the building collapse. The interior floor framing and columns collapsed downward and pulled away from the exterior frame. There were clues that internal damage was taking place, prior to the downward movement of the exterior frame, such as when the east penthouse fell downward into the building and windows broke out on the north face at the ends of the building core. The symmetric appearance of the downward fall of the WTC 7 was primarily due to the greater stiffness and strength of its exterior frame relative to the interior framing.

NIST can't have it both ways. If the exterior frame was so stiff and strong, then it should have stopped the collapse, or - at the very least - we would have seen a bowing effect where tremendous opposing forces were battling each other for dominance in determining the direction of the fall. See also this. In real life, the thick structural beams and 'stiff [and strong]' exterior frame used in the building should have quickly stopped any partial collapse, unless the support columns were all blown. At the very worst, we should see a 1 or 2 floor partial collapse."

Of course the SW corner damage from floors 8 to 18 must be considered when trying to figure out why the building had a southward slump, but again there is a distinction between a southward slump and an asymmetrical collapse, see examples here.

This is also not to confuse this issue for an explanation for the collapse, as is suggested by Pat when he tells us to "note the debris hitting WTC-7." As I pointed out before regarding the August 21, 2008 final report by NIST:

The geniuses at NIST have now shown, after their three-year research efforts, that fire can collapse a skyscraper into its own footprint at nearly freefall speed. The 9/11 "debunkers" tried much harder, bringing up the "massive hole" in the building. The same massive hole described here:

"I walked around it (Building 7). I saw a hole. I didn't see a hole bad enough to knock a building down, though." -former NYPD officer and first responder, Craig Bartmer

Even NIST now admits that "the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse."

Of course the diesel fuel for WTC 7's emergency generators was something that seemed to have some promise, but no. They state that, the diesel fuel "played no role in the destruction of WTC 7," and that it was "the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building," and that they were "similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings."

The newly released video also shows a good view of what has long pointed out are "streamers suggestive of demolition charges that emerged from the facade, halfway through Building 7's 6.5-second plunge."

Of course there are many other points that can be raised to support the theory that WTC 7 was brought down due to controlled demolition, but I'll just leave you with this from my interview, Debunking the "9/11 Debunkers" With Stewart Bradley:

"Even after directing them to the WPI Study, cleverly buried in Appendix C of the FEMA report, which details the WTC steel being 'melted like swiss cheese' by temperatures impossible by burning jet fuel in a diffuse environment, the debunkers still stubbornly insist that does not 'prove' the use of a thermite type demolition charge. Although they can offer no alternative hypothesis to explain this phenomena, trying to convince them of any foul play on 9/11 is like banging your head against a wall."

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Obama, Truth & Rights

By Colin D. Donoghue

Obama as president is a good sign, and is a good thing, as far as progress from racism goes. For those racist dinosaurs that still roam America, this is a clear message that their ideas are no longer mainstream in the slightest, judging a man or woman by the color of his/her skin is extremely ignorant, and the mindset is gratefully being evolved out of human consciousness. That being said, I'm afraid this is not as "historic" a moment for "change" as the media has been portraying it.

Remember the Constitution? Remember our RIGHTS that were taken away by the Patriot Act and similar legislation?! Remember that over a million civilians have died (and are still being killed) in occupations based on complete lies?! Remember that the official 9/11 story doesn't hold up to science or common sense? Remember that the past two elections were clearly rigged, and that corporations control the election process? Why did the corporate media completely ignore Green Party Candidate Cynthia Mckinney, who along with Congressman Dennis Kucinich and others, were talking about 9/11 Truth, The Federal Reserve, and Election Truth? Is Obama winning really a "miracle"? Or is it just the move needed by the people that really run the show, to get the support they need for their
"esoteric" agenda (i.e. more centralized power, less personal freedom)?

Maybe I'm wrong, but if there's another act of "terror", as Biden, Powell, Brzezinski, Albright and the Pentagon have
"guaranteed" there will be, who better then the messianic Obama to talk the People into going along with a police state agenda? If you got Obama fever, I'm not trying to bring you down. McCain/Palin symbolized the ignorant minority that we need to leave behind. I'm trying to point out that a black president is great, but Constitutional Rights are greater. A black president is great, but the end of imperial occupations and "terrorist" acts based on lies is greater. A black president is great, but the end of the Federal Reserve and our central bank debt-based economy is greater. Lets get real people, anyone who isn't a moron isn't racist. Can we move on to the 21st century now? -------->

We need to focus on whats really important, and has always been whats most important: Truth, Peace, Freedom and Rights. Naomi Wolf's books "The End of America" & "Give Me Liberty" should be on every patriots bookshelf, if you haven't read them yet, I highly recommend you do so.

This is a transparent game their playing, despite what the corporate media presents to us as reality. The "Problem, Reaction, Solution" strategy of tyrants/fascists is something all Americans should be familiar with thanks to the 9/11 Truth Movement. We now have the Nazi inspired Dept. of Homeland Security, suppressing dissent throughout the nation (violating countless citizen's rights) while urging us to "be ready" ( and to "prepare" for upcoming emergencies. And guess what the “solution” will be, just as it always has been throughout history? More centralized power, less personal freedoms. We must always consider "Who benefits"? Freedom must stay at the forefront of American consciousness as what is always most important.

'Those who would sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither'
- Benjamin Franklin.

And what is currently restricting our freedom above all else in America? Debt. This financial crisis is not caused simply by greed and uniformed consumers, as has become the Media's suggestion, it was manufactured, just like many previous financial emergencies of the past. See part 3 of for a good overview of the Central Banking/Federal Reserve System and how it creates market crashes to further consolidate wealth and power in fewer hands. There are other excellent books and documentaries on the Federal Reserve listed on the "Sources" section of the website (and elsewhere) worth seeing, but that's basically the crux of it, and that's what Benjamin Franklin said was the main cause of the Revolution: the colonist's desire to disconnect from the Central Bank of England and the dependence and exploitation they caused. Unfortunately Americans forgot about that by 1913 and were duped into thinking the Fed would prevent a future financial crisis, but of course that was not the case. The Corporate Media has been talking a lot about the Fed in recent months, about how they are doing all they can to keep the economy afloat, by “bailing out” huge financial institutions. This is simply "Cover My Ass" maneuvering by the Fed (and corporate theft of our tax dollars), so that the current crisis, which may get worse, will not appear (to those uniformed) to be the fault of the Central/International banks behind it all along.

So along with continued financial tyranny, what else should we "be ready" for? I suggest you read some of these “Executive Orders” that support various dictatorial powers and FEMA police-state powers (mass illegal detentions of citizens, etc.), in the event of a “National Emergency”:

Among the many "Anti-Terror" laws (Patriot Act, Military Commissions Act, Homegrown Terrorism Prevention Act, etc.) that were passed with little to no attention by the corporate media, were details such as allowing martial law and the suspension of elections altogether if another attack or major crisis emerges. You see, rigging them like they did in 2000 and 04 is much more difficult due to the strong activism that has occurred based on the vast amount of documented evidence showing how they did it, so now they wouldn't even bother with that, they'll just cancel the election, and institute martial law. We may be one step away from that now.

What will that step be? Here are possibilities:

1) Complete collapse of US Dollar followed by the "solution" of a North American Union and the Amero currency.
2) Avian Flu outbreak (state-sponsored).
3) Another "terrorist" attack, possibly blamed on Iran, N. Korea, or their old CIA standby “Al Queda”. (Illegal arrests and detention of activists, etc. who will be labeled “enemy combatants” is also likely in this scenario.)

There is a lot of evidence to suggest all of these are possible, and even likely, due to the amount of preparation that has already been done by the neo-con/fascists to carry out each of them. (Look into each are you not familiar with that evidence.) The reason why none of it is really far-fetched is because it has been shown beyond any reasonable doubt that 9/11 was an inside job, and therefore something similar happening while the same perpetrators are in power is actually probable. It's important for the public to be aware of these possibilities, so that if one actually occurs, they wont be fooled again.

If there is another trauma inducing event, please don't buy the line they feed you through their 4th Branch (aka the Media), like you may have bought the 9/11 Fairy Tale. Don't allow your Rights (and democracy) to be ignored in the name of their latest deception.

Over 1 million Iraqi and Afghani civilians (a fact the corporate media ignores), and thousands of our troops, have already been killed on an operation based on lies. The only thing that can probably stop their insane imperial/police-state agenda, bring our troops home and get our Rights back, is the same thing I and many others have been saying for years now:
Impeachment (They're still in the White House people! We must have accountability for war crimes and abuse of power!) & expose the 9/11 Lie which is the foundation of their entire agenda, through quality sources of information, like these:

a) Books:
1."The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions and Distortions", “Debunking 9/11 Debunking”, and "9/11 Contradictions: An Open Letter to Congress and the Press", all by David Ray Griffin
2.“The Terror Timeline” by Paul Thompson
3.“Crossing the Rubicon” by Michael Ruppert
4.“The War On Truth: 9/11, Disinformation And The Anatomy Of Terrorism” by Nafeez Mosaddeq Ahmed
b) Documentaries:
1."9/11 Press For Truth" (,
2."9/11 Mysteries" (
3."Martial Law: 9/11 and the Rise of the Police State" (
c) Groups:
1.Scholars for 9/11 Truth & Justice:
2.Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth:

It's an old game people and it's as simple as this: There have been a few that have always sought increased wealth and power no matter what harm that causes, and there have also always been the many that know there is much more to life than that and have no desire to harm anyone. The battle between good and evil, I'm sure you've heard of it. It's time to stop buying the lies of mass murderers and "strike at the root of evil" as Thoreau said, and in this time and this place, that means exposing the official 9/11 conspiracy theory for what is: pure bullshit.

The Un-Debunkable Molten Metal

Factual back-up, sources, and further research materials:

Alex Jones with Richard Gage on WTC 03-21-08

Alex Jones Interviews Steven Jones


9/11: NIST engineer John Gross denies WTC molten steel (extended)

PNAC Rebuilding America's Senses Steven Jones Lecture

Dr. Jones is Right - Molten Aluminum IS Silver

Molten STEEL Flowed Under Ground Zero for Months After 9/11

Washington's Blog
April 28, 2008

In response to the numerous reports of molten metal under ground zero, defenders of the official version of 9/11 have tried to argue that it was not steel, but some other kind of metal with a lower melting point.

Well, here are what top experts who eyewitnessed the molten metal say...

Face off with the Debunkers, Part 2 - Ryan Owens

Stewart Bradley
January 11, 2009

From videos like "Molten Metal Explained" and "No Pools of Molten Metal" you claim that the there was no molten steel, just molten aluminum. But I have never heard you address the WPI metallurgical study of WTC steel done for the FEMA investigation, which indeed found steel had melted by eutectic reactions, which caused "intergranular melting capable of turning a solid steel girder into Swiss cheese." I can't fault you for not knowing about the study because FEMA buried it in appendix C of their final report and NIST totally ignored it, but you can read it here... No response from Ryan Owens.
9/11 - Ground Zero Molten Metal Confirmed
Molten Steel in the Rubble of the World Trade Centre Collapse = Inside Job

Monday, November 10, 2008

Dennis Kucinich Needs Our Help!

Political suicide comes in many forms, and judging from the reactions of both major political parties in the US to the 9/11 truth movement, calling for a new investigation into the September 11th terror attacks seems to be viewed as sure of a death as a shotgun blast to the head.

Even outspoken politicians like Democratic Congressman Dennis Kucinich were initially hesitant to speak up on the subject. Leland Lehrman, who ran Dennis Kucinich's campaign for President in Santa Fe, NM. in 2003/2004 wrote an article on in October 2007 that stated, "In 2004, Kucinich was wary of 9/11 inside job questions from his New Mexico campaign, saying he had no evidence to support such a thesis and acting worried that comments he made might be used against him later."

However, by 2007 Kucinich was calling for a full investigation. Perhaps the congressman had taken notice of the first scientific survey of Americans' belief in a 9/11 cover up conducted by Zogby International which found that over 70 Million voting age Americans support a new 9/11 investigation. Or maybe he noticed the results of a scientific poll conducted in 2006 by the The New York Times/CBS which found that 84% of the American people reject the official 9/11 Story.

Whether Kucinich heard the results of these polls or not, he was definitely hearing the concerned voices of the populace. In an 2007 interview conducted by Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth founder Justin Martell, Kucinich stated:

First of all, you have to understand that all over the country people are concerned about whether or not they've been told the truth about 9/11 and the way that the administration handled 9/11, taking us into a war against Iraq that had nothing to do with 9/11. It deepened people's suspicions about the possibility there may have been a cover-up. Because, why would the government lie about a cause for war? And so, what I'm saying is that I respect the concerns people have about whether they've been told the truth or not.
On Monday June 9, 2008 Kucinich presented 35 Articles of Impeachment against George W. Bush to the House of Representatives, including three concerning the events of 9/11.

Article XXXIII
Repeatedly Ignored and Failed to Respond to High Level Intelligence Warnings of Planned Terrorist Attacks in the US, Prior to 911.

Article XXXIV
Obstruction of the Investigation into the Attacks of September 11, 2001.

Article XXXV
Endangering the Health of 911 First Responders.
The last of the articles dealing with 9/11 concerned the fact that the White House ordered the EPA to lie about post-911 air quality. However, even this issue is taken on by the so-called 9/11 debunkers! But first responders, many of whom belong to the 9/11 truth movement, had voiced their concerns to Kucinich earlier in the year, after which Kucinich made their fight and his commitment to them public in a speech at the steps of the Capital Building in Washington.

John Feal is a 9/11 first responder, 9/11 truth advocate, and founder of his own 9/11 responders aid organization called the FealGood Foundation. In a video posted by the activist and 9/11 truth organization WeAreChange, Feal states, "When I think of America I think of Dennis Kucinich, a great elected official. He speaks the language of the American people, he does not get caught up in the political games."

While I agree that this is true, it did still take him being made aware of the issues of 9/11 health, and if it weren't for an outpouring of 9/11 truth supporters getting through to him we might have never heard him take the stances he has on the subject.

Most recently, on this past anniversary of the 9/11, Kucinich announced a proposal for a truth and reconciliation commission on 9/11 "which will have the power to compel testimony and gather official documents to reveal to the American people not only the underlying deception which has divided us, but in that process of truth seeking set our nation on a path of reconciliation."

However he made it clear that he could not do this without your help, in closing he stated, "I will call upon the American people to join me in supporting this effort. The truth can move us forward, as a unified whole, so that we can one day become a re-United States. 9/11 is the day the world changed. It is the day America embraced a metaphor of war. If we are open to truth and reconciliation, we may one day be able, once again, to embrace peace."

So are you open to truth and reconciliation? Let him know you support his efforts!

The Democrats have the numbers to make it happen, but you have to let them know that you want it; that you support the efforts of Congressman Kucinich!

There are also Republicans like Arizona State Senator Karen S. Johnson and Congressman Ron Paul that are calling for a new investigation, and even Sarah Palin said she supports a new 9/11 investigation... yeah you read that right... Sarah Palin. So contact The Republican party too!

After that, visit the Activist Center for tons of other ways to get in contact with media and elected representatives.

Barack Obama stated, "I will never forget who this victory truly belongs to – it belongs to you." So if it belongs to us then it is also up to us to urge him to really bring us the change that we need!

Political suicide is defined as, "The concept that a politician or political party would lose widespread support and confidence from the voting public by proposing actions that are seen as unfavourable or that might threaten the status quo."

It is up to us to take this stigma of away from our need for truth and justice in regard to the events of 9/11, and if is any indication we are doing OK. Now that we have efforts such as those proposed by Kucinich, and the NYC Ballot Initiative on the table, we must go that extra mile to see these things through to fruition. Remember it was yes we can, not yes he can, so no matter what your issue is, get to work!

Sunday, November 9, 2008

Would the Real Osama Please stand/Where in the world is bin Laden

OK I have seen enough. I have seen enough evidence to have major questions.

Lets talk Satellites and videos.
First satellites.....

We have amazing satellite technology.
I can go to Google map quest and get a picture of my house and see it clearly.
This technology is global and the military usage of satellites is even better,
than what Google will let us see.
Our satellites have a technology called remote sensing.
We can track weather systems and forest fires. The Military use remote sensing to provide air and ground forces with information.
Our satellites can observe the entire globe and get the tiniest of details pretty clear.
What has this to do with bin Laden?
Our military claims they cannot find him.
Our FBI says there is not enough evidence to connect him with 9/11.
Yes you read that correctly ...Not enough evidence.
I could list all the many different websites giving that evidence but the best one is the FBI website itself. (Go to the most wanted list and read the charges)
This says more than all the other evidence given (and there is plenty).
We have everyone (supposedly) in the world looking for this man.
Rumors are that he is already dead and has been that way for some time now.
My question is that with all the satellite technology we have then why could they not locate him?
HMMMMM..... perhaps it was because they really did not want to.
If they had found Osama there would have been no reason to do all the things they have done and thousands of people would still be alive today.

Just think; No war in Iraq, No ongoing war presence in Afghanistan (which of course is right off the Russian border.) Our soldiers home.

It is my personal belief is that we have been lied to in a large way.
It all began with the cover-up of 9/11 for if the truth had been known there is no way this country would be where we are today.
It is my personal belief that untill the truth of 9/11 is known or reinvestigated we cannot undo what has been done to our country since that day.

Now on to videos:
To incite the Americans fervor the spindoctors of propaganda showed us several videos.
These videos were of Osama bin Laden? and his little band of men speaking on how great it was, "their plan" had succeeded ect.
Now I found it rather odd that the bin Laden in that video looked strikingly different than his photo.
You see one of the things I do in my spare time is facial portraits. I freehand draw them and I have done this since I was a child.
Now I can tell you that the face in that video is not the same as the photos of bin Laden that we have been shown and it is very clear, the cheek bones are different, the noise is different ect.
So hence my question -would the real Osama please stand!

Osama Bin Laden - 911 Anniversary 2007:

Thursday, November 6, 2008

Yes We Can!

Update: Reflecting Back on November 6, 2008

"I will listen to you, especially when we disagree." - PRESIDENT-ELECT BARACK OBAMA

As a friend of mine that goes by the name of BMutiny ThemIDefy pointed out in a mass email yesterday...

"Obama landslide victory shows U.S. public does NOT support Negative Campaigning. Landslide Victory for the first mixed-race Black-White President, definitively shows that the MAJORITY of the U.S. public, especially young people, do not respond in the old way to Negative Campaigning, using coded Racism, and Xenophobia, Religious Bigotry, Stereotypes, and such Fear Messages as that."

I couldn't agree more, and what a wonderful thing it is, but now we must go to work. The GeorgeWashingtonBlog reminded us yesterday that...

"Now that a Democrat has been elected president, the Democrats in Congress have no excuse. They can no longer pretend that they have to “hold back” to win the election.

They have no excuse to delay war crimes charges against Bush, Cheney and company for Iraq.

They have no excuse to delay war crimes charges for torture.

They have no excuse to delay criminal charges for spying on Americans.

They have no excuse to delay criminal charges for 9/11.

Now is not the time for Democratic machine politics. Now is the time to implement true American values - cherished across the political aisle - of liberty and justice."

Now today statements have emerged from from Ralph Nader that offer Obama a little advice...

“My advice to Obama is to try and organise his people, because from day one he’s going to be a prisoner of the giant corporations, who control the government he presides over. There will be a lot of economic crisis, wars in Iraq and on the Afghanistan-Pakistani border, and growing unemployment. So he doesn’t have much room to maneuver, unless he builds more political energy among the people."

Nader then goes on to express his doubts about whether Obama is capable of such a task, and states that Obama's "foreign policy will be very much like George W. Bush," but that wouldn't be change would it? But I think Nader has this equation backwards, as Obama stated, "I will never forget who this victory truly belongs to – it belongs to you."

So if it belongs to us then it is also up to us to "build more political energy among the people," as Nader states.

So can we endlessly demand that Obama address the unanswered questions of the 9/11 victims' families? Yes We Can!

Can we endlessly demand that Obama address the questions of the more than 500 architectural and engineering professionals that are "demanding of Congress a truly independent investigation into the “collapses” of all 3 WTC high-rise buildings on 9/11"? Yes We Can!

Can we endlessly pose to Obama the same question that Student Scholars for 9/11 Truth founder Justin Martell did early on in Obama's campaign when he asked the now President-elect "will you stand behind Dennis Kucinich and Ron Paul in advocating for a new investigation into 9/11?" Yes We Can!

Can we make it known that when The Guardian published the article, Obama Might Pursue Criminal Charges Against Bush Administration - Biden says criminal violations will be pursued, that a huge amount of Americans were excited. Can we prove that it is a huge amount of us? Can we make it known that Obama's concerns, quoted in the article, of being "perceived by Republicans" of being on "a partisan witch hunt" are unfounded in the face of the evidence? Yes We Can!

On that note I leave you with the closing statements of the aforementioned email from my friend BMutiny ThemIDefy...

"This is an Historic Opportunity to make your voices heard, whatever your political views!!!

As a mere beginning, I have joined with the Avaaz effort to send the President-elect any message you please, to be posted on a wall in Washington D.C.. My message was, to MAKE IT A PRIORITY FOR THE NEW ADMINISTRATION TO END TORTURE APPROVED-OF AND INSTITUTED BY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT, with the "War on Terror" as the excuse. I asked Obama to BRING THE PERPETRATORS ON THE HIGHEST LEVEL, TO TRIAL AS WAR CRIMINALS. {That includes, of course, most of the present Bush-Cheney mis-Administration!} Obama is an EXPERT IN CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, which he studied at Harvard and has TAUGHT at Columbia University. [The Constitution, of course, BANS IN EXPLICIT TERMS, all "Cruel and Unusual Punishments" -- Amendment VIII, the Bill of Rights...... which is CLEAR ENOUGH.]

My feeling is, that young people and Liberals and Black groups, which did so much to elect Obama, can BE OF GREAT INFLUENCE in guiding policy in the next Administration; my feeling is, that we are not going to dis-band and leave it all up to Obama, our "Savior" {barf!} to "save the world" all by his little lonesome self! Obama NEEDS our input; now more than ever!!! to fulfil our righteous dreams of Justice and Peace.

That is why I am making the suggestion here, that you each and all send YOUR message, stating YOUR thoughts, of what you want Obama to PRIORITIZE. There are STILL 3 MONTHS to go, before he takes office! A LOT CAN BE DONE AND PLANNED before next January 20th, Inauguration Day!

Sending A MILLION messages, within the next 48 hours, is a way to SHOW STRENGTH and a BEGINNING of a New Page in Social Activism!!!! That is my firm belief. That a lot of what goes on in a future Obama Administration, is, in every sense, up to US!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Go to the link below. {And, you don't have to be American to participate in this!}"

Let's get to 1 million signers and messages to Obama!

Click HERE for other ways to contact Barack Obama.

Related Info...