Sunday, September 30, 2018

Reddit Does More Censorious Commie Crap, Gets Mocked By Everyone - Reddit Turns 9/11 Discussion Into a Leper Colony

Reddit Turns 9/11 Discussion Into a Leper Colony

Reddit tells us if we want the truth about the event, we should surf over to the government to the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States website.

It is a sincerely astounding document that puts forth all kinds of conspiracy theories—for instance, how Arabs supposedly violated the laws of physics—and these assorted fairy tales and scary bedtime stories are expected to be accepted without question, lest one become a “truther” and face the scorn of the state and now social media.

The near perfect “pancake” or “gravitational” collapse of the WTC is impossible, to say nothing about the absurd theory jet fuel melted steel girders.

And yet, thanks to the government and its tethered media, if you question the science of the collapse you’re deluded a “tinfoil hatter,” maybe dangerous, an extremist.

It’s interesting Reddit decided to call this a quarantine. It has locked down the board in the hope the contagion of questions will not spread. It is like sending lepers to a remote island in the South Pacific.

Not that it matters. For most of the American people, 9/11 is a distant memory. Its horrific legacy—a surveillance and police state, the permanence of war and war crimes—has faded into the white noise of social media.

The occasional reappearance of the truther virus must not be allowed, not by Reddit or the government, for as Robert Gates, the former CIA boss and “defense” secretary under Bush and Obama said: “The American people know what they saw with their own eyes on September 11, 2001. To suggest any kind of government conspiracy in the events of that day goes beyond the pale.”

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, October 1st, 2018.]
Reddit Does More Censorious Commie Crap, Gets Mocked By Everyone - Reddit Turns 9/11 Discussion Into a Leper Colony

3rd Kavanaugh accuser has history of legal disputes

The Associated Press
Julie Swetnick, one of the women who has publicly accused Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct, has an extensive history of involvement in legal disputes, including a lawsuit in which an ex-employer accused her of falsifying her college and work history on her job application. Legal documents from Maryland, Oregon and Florida provide a partial picture of a woman who stepped into the media glare amid the battle over Kavanaugh’s nomination for the nation’s highest court. Court records reviewed by The Associated Press show Swetnick has been involved in at least six legal cases over the past 25 years. Along with the lawsuit filed by a former employer in November 2000, the cases include a personal injury suit she filed in 1994 against the Washington, D.C., regional transit authority. Her lawyer, Michael Avenatti, told AP that court cases involving her have no bearing on the credibility of her claims about Kavanaugh. Avenatti said the suit from her ex-employer — it was dismissed a month after it was filed — was “completely bogus, which is why it was dismissed almost immediately.”



The hysterical, deceitful fake news reporting by the left-wing media is driving left-wing activists to violence and bloodshed. Never forget the rifle assault by a deranged leftist that targeted conservative U.S. lawmakers on a softball field, injuring Rep. Steve Scalise (and nearly killing him). Also do not forget the violent physical assault on Sen. Rand Paul by his unhinged Democrat neighbor.
We are now learning that left-wing domestic terrorism groups are openly discussing “kill team” tactics on Twitter and Facebook, discussing methods of carrying SBRs (short-barreled rifles) under their clothing, blending in with crowds, then popping out of the crowds to assassinate prominent conservatives such as U.S. Senators, Supreme Court justices and prominent conservative radio personalities. All this was first reported by PJ Media.
In addition to the open discussion of “kill team” tactics on social media platforms, we’re also seeing:
– The deliberate “doxxing” of conservative Senators by congressional staffers who appear to be linked to the office of Maxine Waters, an unhinged lunatic Leftist who has repeatedly called for violence against conservatives. Sen. Rand Paul is now calling for an investigation into the doxxing.
– Left-wing website editors calling for home invasions and assaults of conservatives. The editor of Think Progress, a George Soros-linked “progressive” website, recently encouraged left-wing activists to stage home invasions of targeted conservatives.
– “Mob assaults” on U.S. Senators like Sen. Ted Cruz, who was mobbed by a group of screaming lunatics at a public restaurant in D.C. It’s not difficult to imagine these lunatic mobs escalating this one more step to the point of attempting to stab or shoot conservative Senators in public. These acts, were they to be carried out, would no doubt be celebrated by the Huffington Post, Buzz Feed and other left-wing radical publishers that have all but declared war on America.
– The surreptitious use of government databases by embedded deep state socialists / communists who use their government privileges to locate the home addresses of their intended conservative targets, allowing those individuals to be targeted in their own homes. This has now been openly admitted by these deep state operatives as caught in the Project Veritas videos.
– Complicity on the part of tech giants which are systematically banning conservative voices but deliberately protecting the channels of left-wing terrorism groups like Antifa.
The intended targets of these unhinged, radical Leftists obviously include:
– Conservative U.S. Senators and House Representatives
– Conservative radio personalities such as Alex Jones, Michael Savage, Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh
– President Donald J. Trump
– Conservative authors and speakers such as Ann Coulter or Greg Jarrett
I have recorded and published a warning to all Americans, detailing the plans of unhinged, deranged Leftists who continue to be driven to insanity by a lying, dishonest left-wing media which “feeds the frenzy” on a daily basis. With USA Today now printing columns that essentially declare Brett Kavanaugh to be a pedophile who should never be allowed near children, the so-called “media” in America has jumped the shark, abandoning anything resembling the First Amendment role of reporting the news and now resorting to smearing innocent people while encouraging mass hysteria and violence among left-wing lunatics.

The media is deliberately driving America into a bloody civil war in a desperate attempt to destabilize the nation, invoke shooting in the streets and ultimately call in United Nations “peacekeeping” troops that will depose President Trump and attempt to disarm the entire U.S. civilian population. (Fortunately for America, the people own 100+ million firearms and have a Second Amendment right to defend their nation against foreign invaders.)
Things are collapsing rapidly. Watch my video for full details, and note that I was forced to build and launch an entirely independent video platform just to be able to broadcast such videos. YouTube would have banned this in five minutes. You can only see such videos on, now featuring over 5,000 channels of patriots and independent media personalities:

Diamond and Silks full interview with Roseanne Barr

Diamond and Silks full interview with Roseanne Barr

Saturday, September 29, 2018



Rape Survivor with PTSD Doesn’t Believe Dr. Ford

RUSH: Susan in Massachusetts. You’re first on Open Line Friday. Hi.
CALLER: Hi, Rush. First, it’s an honor to speak with you. I’m a listener since 1990.
RUSH: Thank you very much.
CALLER: I have been watching the hearings. I watched them all day yesterday, and, as a rape survivor, I just want to tell you: You don’t forget one minute of the whole thing. You remember the color of the walls, you remember how you got home, you remember the face, you remember the music that was playing, you remember the layout of the house. You don’t forget it, particularly as she said she had PTSD? I’ve been diagnosed with PTSD. You relive that every single day. You never forget it! So I don’t believe one word of this woman, and I feel sorry that I have to say that, because women should be believed. But this is so blatantly political and partisan, I can’t stand it anymore! That’s my comment.
RUSH: Well, I’m glad you called. You wanted to get it off your chest.
CALLER: Oh, yes.
RUSH: Now, wait a minute. Let me just ask you something.
RUSH: Are there not some traumas that are so harrowing that victims do repress the memory and forget?
CALLER: Not with PTSD. PTSD, part of the symptoms is you relive it every day, and sometimes multiple times.
RUSH: A-ha. A good point! She did say PTSD.
RUSH: PTSD, in order to have it, you have to have the memory. Is that what you’re saying?
CALLER: Well, you know what? Then she had more than one beer, which makes her a perjurer.
RUSH: Yeah.
CALLER: Okay? My question is —
RUSH: Your question is?
CALLER: Go ahead. I’m sorry.
RUSH: No! What’s your question?
CALLER: My question is, “Can Brett Kavanaugh sue for defamation of character?”
CALLER: Why not?
RUSH: Well, everything’s possible. In politics, it’s really difficult to do this because of the First Amendment. The First Amendment was really written for political speech. No limits on it whatsoever. So you can defame people in political ads, for example. People have tried to run defamation suits. But they usually end because of this thing called “discovery.” (chuckles) You have to open your life up to the competing client and lawyer. Let me tell you something about PTSD. I know a guy who had to go to drug rehab, and he told me a story about it.
One of the things that they do in drug rehab is try to take you back to the earliest memories you have in life that could have caused some kind of psychological disorder, which could have led to your being unable to face reality and looking for ways to numb pain and so forth. And he told me they tried to tell him, based on some stories that he described of this childhood, that he had PTSD because of the way his parents treated him, and he had never…
Until he had been told in drug therapy, he’d never considered any of the sort of thing. But they zeroed in on his upbringing and stories he told about growing up. They turned around and said, “You have been traumatized. Your parents traumatized you.” My point is that therapists out there have… There are certain hot issues that go from time to time. PTSD is one, and I’m not informed enough to know what all the different disorders are.
But somebody who never thought they had PTSD — it would never even occur that they had Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, especially from the way their parents treated ’em — were told that they had it. Now, if you happen to be somewhat insecure and if you happen to be looking for excuses to explain the things about yourself that you don’t like, and somebody comes along and tells you, “You have PTSD,” it may be easy to believe it. And thereby have a built-in excuse for whatever is wrong with you. I just think it’s interesting that somebody that had never even considered it, they tried to convince him he had it and it was why he was behaving the way he was.

5 Ways Giant Corporations Are Threatening Free Speech in America

by John Hawkins

Conservatives quite correctly consider the government to be the primary threat to their freedom in America. However, free speech goes beyond the First Amendment — and the government is not the only threat to it. As long as they’re at least lightly regulated and face real competition, corporations are not a threat to free speech. If anything, we over-regulate corporations in America, so that’s not a big worry. On the other hand, even though breaking up monopolies is a conservative idea with a long pedigree, it has fallen out of favor in recent years. That has allowed corporations in a number of areas to become monopolies with the power to determine who gets heard and who doesn’t. The first way they’re doing this has started to get a lot of attention.

1. People on the right being silenced on social media

Conspiracy theorist Alex Jones was dropped by Facebook, Apple, YouTube, and Spotify at the same time. Whatever you may think of Jones, this is extremely disturbing because it indicates that Jones was dropped for who he is, not for some violation of policy. Twitter banned mainstream conservatives Gavin McInnes and multiple Proud Boys groups he founded, presumably (we don’t really know) because liberals falsely accused them of being white supremacist groups. You don’t have to imagine being banned from a social media website — not because of what you say, but because of what liberals say about you — because it has already happened to McInnes and the Proud Boys. “Accidental” banning, censoring, and suspensions of conservatives have become a regular happening. Are most of these really accidents? Probably… but it also seems entirely possible that these social media networks are testing the limits of what they can get away with. If there is a big enough outcry, the “accident” is fixed; if not, they censor people they don’t like. When giant monopolies control who gets to talk in the 21st-century version of the public square, free speech is guaranteed to be a loser.

2. Loans/insurance

Liberals haven’t been able to convince the public to go along with their dream of getting rid of the Second Amendment, but corporations can be a little easier to coerce.  After the Department of Justice under Barack Obama was accused of targeting gun shop owners by cutting off their access to banking, New York began using the same tactics. After pressure and fines from the state of New York, the NRA is no longer able to get insurance or banking in that state. The NRA is suing and says it may have to shut down large portions of its operations over it. There are also liberals expressly urging banking/financial organizations to take away your Second Amendment rights by refusing to deal with any company that deals in firearms. If you can’t get loans and insurance, then you can’t do business.

3. Controlling the flow of information

Although most people don’t realize it, this is by far the most dangerous one on the list because if you can control what information people see over the long term, you can control how they think. Services like Twitter, Facebook, and Google don’t present information to you chronologically, they use an algorithm to control what you see and what you don’t. They suggest to the public that the algorithm is “neutral,” but of course, it’s not. An algorithm is written by human beings with biases and preferences that will be reflected in the results. For example, most conservative Facebook pages are lucky to do one-tenth of the traffic today that they did in 2015. An algorithm didn’t make that decision, human beings at Facebook did and then they changed the algorithm to reflect what they wanted to happen.
Consider the fact that 86 percent of American web searches go through Google and then reflect on this information:
Randomized, controlled experiments conducted with more than 10,000 people from 39 countries suggest that one company alone — Google LLC, which controls about 90 percent of online search in most countries — has likely been determining the outcomes of upwards of 25 percent of the national elections in the world for several years now, with increasing impact each year as Internet penetration has grown.
As online information becomes more detailed and computers that analyze it become more sophisticated, you’re going to increasingly see social media networks, advertisers, and political campaigns that may know more about how to press your buttons than you do.

4. Content Delivery Networks

A “distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack is an attempt to make an online service unavailable by overwhelming it with traffic from multiple sources.” DDoS attacks have become common on the Internet, so much so that large websites can’t remain functional without using a service like Cloudflare. One website that was using Cloudflare was the famously loathsome Nazi website, the Daily Stormer. Here’s an excerpt from Matthew Prince, the owner of Cloudflare, who  explains the dangers of his decision to ban the website from using his services,
The size and scale of the attacks that can now easily be launched online make it such that if you don’t have a network like Cloudflare in front of your content, and you upset anyone, you will be knocked offline. In fact, in the case of the Daily Stormer, the initial requests we received to terminate their service came from hackers who literally said: “Get out of the way so we can DDoS this site off the Internet.”
In a not-so-distant future, if we’re not there already, it may be that if you’re going to put content on the Internet you’ll need to use a company with a giant network like Cloudflare, Google, Microsoft, Facebook, Amazon, or Alibaba.
101 Things All Young Adults Should Know


by Sir John Hawkins

John Hawkins's book 101 Things All Young Adults Should Know is filled with lessons that newly minted adults need in order to get the most out of life. Gleaned from a lifetime of trial, error, and writing it down, Hawkins provides advice everyone can benefit from in short, digestible chapters.
For context, Cloudflare currently handles around 10% of Internet requests.
Without a clear framework as a guide for content regulation, a small number of companies will largely determine what can and cannot be online.
Someone on our team asked after I announced we were going to terminate the Daily Stormer: “Is this the day the Internet dies?” He was half joking, but only half. He’s no fan of the Daily Stormer or sites like it. But he does realize the risks of a company like Cloudflare getting into content policing.
If you love the idea of a handful of giant corporations deciding who gets to have a website and who doesn’t, then this should thrill you. For everybody else, it’s a little scary.

5. Advertising

When I first started running ads through Facebook’s Instant Article service, I was told by the people that I was working with not to run anything “controversial” that might offend the liberals on the website. So, nothing on Muslim terrorism, Black Lives Matter, transsexuals in bathrooms, etc., because it could potentially get you kicked off the service. Google’s AdWords, which control a third of online Internet advertising, are also notoriously finicky about what they find offensive. At YouTube, which Google controls, many videos have been demonetized solely for presenting a mainstream conservative viewpoint. If you asked whether people are being censored, you would hear a “no,” but videos with high production values take a lot of man-hours to produce. If liberals are allowed to make money with their videos on YouTube, but many conservative channels like PragerU are told, “You’re not allowed to make money on conservative content, no matter how popular it is,” you’re going to see a lot of them give it up over time. Advertising networks can and already do have an enormous impact on what sort of content websites create. If they decide that you’re not allowed to tackle certain topics or slants, you will simply see those disappear over time. It’s already happening and it’s only going to get worse.

Judge Andrew Napolitano: Brett Kavanaugh and the Patriot Act

At Mises University 2018, Judge Andrew Napolitano looked at some troubling parts of Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's legal career. Auburn, Alabama; 16 July 2018.

Interesting info from Napolitano ... but the MSM aired accusations vs Kavanaugh appear to be fabrications. The problem is that he (Kavanaugh) was involved in stopping the investigation of Vince Foster's death (a very close associate of Hillary Clinton) and he was involved with the Patriot Act (essentially treason - existing US Law contained everything needed to stop terrorists etc. People who have been following this issue over the last decade know this). 

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 29th, 2018.]



Dems say they’ll vote red in November after Supreme Court nominee show trial

The Brett Kavanaugh Senate Judiciary show trial chaos Thursday forced voters who align with the Democrat political spectrum to reconsider their allegiance to the party.
My husband has been a life long Democrat while I’ve been a Republican. When Hillary Clinton ran for president, my husband walked away! He said he was going to change his political affiliation to Independent. After today’s hearing, he is changing to Republican!

After witnessing what Kavanaugh(and Dr. Ford) went though at the hands of Democrats and their operatives, it mirrored a lot of what I went through in terms of political smears and it is evident that the party(as a whole) no longer cares about humanity or integrity.
As of today, I no longer identify as a Democrat and will no longer put my support behind this party that smears and attacks decent people for having an opposing point of view and using victims of violent crime as pawns for political chess. I want no part of that.
@JeffFlake I was a democrat my entire life! I have never despised a party like I currently do our democrats....I speak for the majority of America.. Yet, another disgusting display..
No my parents, registered democrats have sworn to never vote democrat again! My mom was in tears watching Judge Kavanaugh and her words, "I have two sons, this could be either of them"
Reformed Democrat here! Voted 2 times for Obama before my eyes were opened. Changed my party 2 days ago!
I agree. The Democrats are not the party they used to be. I certainly will never vote for one again until they stat putting Americans first.
Yep. I’m an independent swing voter and there’s no way I’m voting democrat in the near future. It’s not in any American’s best interest to vote for these people. They’re power hungry, crazed, and bent on destroying every facet of American life.
I did the same thing! I rarely voted in midterm elections and didn’t vote party lines. This year I won’t be home for elections but made sure I requested my absentee ballot, declared myself a republican and will vote for all GOP candidates. Disgusted by the last 2 weeks
One anonymous Hispanic Democrat writing for described he disliked President Trump, but said the Kavanaugh debacle has forced him to recant his previous political affiliations.
“I am a college-educated, suburban, first-generation Latino immigrant. I voted for President Obama in 2008 and 2012. I find President Trump to lack the basic moral character that we should expect in our political leaders and did not consider, even for a moment, voting for him in 2016. After watching how Senate Democrats and the media handled the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh, however, I will be voting Republican in 2018 and for Trump in 2020,” a man using the pseudonym Tomas Mendoza wrote.
Others, disgusted by Dems’ treatment of Kavanaugh, were thankful they left the party when they did:
Actually my Democrat husband is a . He came to his senses and is a Republican now. Thank God. I πŸ˜‰
For 20 years I was a registered Democrat, I changed my affiliation, and very carefully made the change I may add. @walkaway
Yep it’s all a stunt. A money grabbing stunt at the expense of an Innocent man! . are despicable. What happened to the party i once knew, or were they always like this and I was blinded? So happy I ran away! ! This is a political travesty
I feel so sorry for what your doing to America this should have come out months ago u should have been honest with her ur party is disgusting glad I left it will never vote for a DEMONCRAT again πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ€¬πŸ€¬
I have always voted Democrat. I had to re-register to vote and was proud to say I am now Republican.
I feel your frustration. Coming from Chicago where the swamp plug is & with ALL the democrats that run the city, county & state doing NOTHING for years for the Black community, I left the party a while back. What DO we have to loss supporting @POTUS @realDonaldTrump
Thank you! I used to be Democrat so i still do understand why people vote that way because what’s best for one family is not always best for the next. But this using sexual assault as a political ploy is disgusting and doubt it’s helping the party like they think.
#WalkAway is a movement started by former Democrat Brandon Straka which supports and encourages members of the Democrat party who feel disillusioned by its antics to switch parties.
Straka has organized a #WalkAway march on Washington, D.C., set to take place October 26-28.

Leftists Have Radicalized The Democratic Party To Dominate America


The Red Elephants: The #WalkAway Movement is Bigger Than I thought and It's Not Russian Bots - #WalkAway movement GAINING TREMENDOUS MOMENTUM (hundreds of thousands have walked away):