Sunday, July 31, 2016

JM Talboo Reviews Ghostbusters - Official Endorsers of Hillary Clinton for President 2016 - A Good Film Gone Bad by Aggressive Agenda-Driven Promotion

No major spoilers of any kind in this review itself beyond a few minor details and many of the links lead to spoilers. If you don't want to know anything, like even the mention of a ghostly character that appears on screen then best avoid.

The Bad News First:

I personally can say that I enjoyed this flick on the big screen a few nights ago with my wifey after receiving some free tickets. That being said, those responsible for this production, meaning everyone from the studio, to the director, to the actors, do not in any way deserve your hard earned money. Why? Because of the disingenuous and agenda-driven way that they have all promoted the film. The decision by the studio execs to get involved in the the culture war and surrounding politics was quite possibly not driven by genuine ideological motives so much as financial ones, but the aftermath is the same either way. And the director Paul Feig quite obviously is a man hating (male) Social Justice Warrior type. I recommend this positive review of the film that also attempts to psychoanalyze Feig, so as to, in the immortal words of Bill Murray, find out what makes him tick. As they state in the review video description, "paul feig is a lolcow. ghostbusters was cute. but is it worth giving money to someone who hates you (and himself)?"

I don't think the movie itself is anywhere nearly as tainted by an SJW agenda as Mundane Matt (below video) and others have made it out to be. Although some of those criticisms have merit, while other things are being understandably overly scrutinized leading to conclusions of an agenda where there likely was none.

Another downside is that there are noteworthy amounts of really corny (not funny corny) parts and failed attempts at humor.

Next up, is the majorly overused CGI special effects, which is not in  keeping with the original films that by comparison took a less is more type of approach, which makes the viewer appreciate the razzle dazzle moments much more. Furthermore, a substantial amount of said effects are cartoonish, very Disney's Haunted Mansion-esque and were an actual major cause for the early heavy criticisms of the film trailer, earning it the title of most disliked video in YouTube history. This innocent critical observation was among the things viciously and ignorantly spun into unfounded allegations of misogyny, see first link above. Case in point on the bad effects, is that Slimer and the Stay Puft Marshmallow Man look better in the 1984 version. I recently rewatched the 1984 original and the special effects hold up quite well and are overall better than this film. The one exception in the original is the goofy looking claymation part where the demon dog is running around, when it's stationary  the animatronic version of the dog looks great. Now don't get me wrong, there are also some great modern effects that surpass anything in the older film as well,  some of which I'll get to in a sec. However, better visuals should be expected with the advancements in the tech available. This is why I say overall the effects are better in the old film, because they didn't use a lot vs this incarnation and what they did use always aimed and largely succeeded in coming off as realistic.

The Good News:

Overall I give it a solid 2 1/2 stars. It's at least as good if not better than Ghostbusters 2. The material that misses the mark in the laugh department is countered by a fair share of smile inducing and lol worthy material from some very funny ladies. I think they all did a great job and I particularly liked Kristin Wigg's performance, which includes a hip-hop dance performance that I found impressive and due to the situation it occurs in it got me chucking. I also thought Kate McKinnon's character was great, much wilder but reminiscent of the beloved Dr. Egon Spangler in her eccentricity and role as the brains of the brainy crew. Actor Harold Ramis, who is now decreased, gave life to Dr. Spangler and there is an Easter egg in the new film that pays him tribute. The cameos from the former Ghostbusters stars I also thought were great and did not seem out of place and forced as some have argued.  I also left the theater with the opinion that the criticism that Leslie Jones is playing a black woman stereotype is unwarranted. It was not the over-the-top cringe fest I was told so often to expect. She herself has rejected this notion saying that "if I'm stereotype, so be it." This was in reference to her character being an average Joe in comparison to the 3 other genius scientist Ghostbusters. I'd go one step further and say that from what I can tell she talks very much like her character in real life, so she's not playing a stereotype, but rather proof that stereotypes don't materialize out of thin air as do the ghosts in the movie.

One thing nobody has mentioned that I've come across, is that the 3D version of the movie makes the best use of that technology that I have seen and I'm a huge 3D fan. The film masterfully uses the trick of adding a letterbox to create the illusion of things literally coming out of the screen and the 3D is just really good in general. And contrary to appearances from the trailer, the film does respect the subject matter of the paranormal. They do a pretty good damn job with that aspect and made a pretty good damn film really.

I'm just one guy, but I bet I'm not alone in saying that if those involved in this film series can just keep the politics to a minimum, treat the fans with respect, and not turn a true misogynistic minority into a monolithic majority, that I'll pay to go see the planned sequel. I'll buy the Blu-Ray of this one when it comes out, but I think they deserved getting slimed at the box office.

7 Unanswered Questions About the 28 Pages Declassification

7 Unanswered Questions About the 28 Pages Declassification

by editor28pages
Two weeks ago, after a declassification review led by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), the congressional intelligence committees finally released 28 pages from a joint congressional inquiry that outline a wide variety of connections between Saudi government officials, members of the Saudi royal family, suspected Saudi intelligence operatives and the 9/11 hijackers. While the pages […]

Released 28 Pages Reveal Double Cross War On The USA

BREAKING NEWS: 28 Pages Prove 9/11 Was An Inside Job

Empire Unmasked Excerpt explaining the 28 pages and beyond

Those Secret 28 Pages on 9/11: Read This Before You Read Them

Friday, July 29, 2016

Kathleen Willey talks about Bill Clinton rapes & sex assaults

Kathleen Willey says she has talked to over 20 women raped & sexually assaulted by President Clinton.

Kathleen Willey on The Brian Craig Show Podcast.


What’s the real difference between Bill Clinton and Bill Cosby? The media is starting to ask.

"And during that time, Hillary engaged in on-going intimidation and smear campaigns against any “bimbo eruptions” that might pop up. Her tactics included slander by her and her surrogates, and having henchmen murder pets, slash tires, burgle their homes and leave threatening messages in order to keep the women silent."

Thursday, July 28, 2016

What’s the real difference between Bill Clinton and Bill Cosby? The media is starting to ask.

From the Washington Post:

What’s the difference between the alleged sexual misconduct of Bill Clinton and Bill Cosby? No two cases are identical, of course, but can you really articulate why one man is a national disgrace and the other remains a political icon, hitting the campaign trail for the wife who stood by him in the face of multiple allegations?
MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough doesn’t think you can. “I am fascinated to hear why comparing Bill Clinton to Bill Cosby is wrong,” the “Morning Joe” host said on Monday’s program.
He added: “I wonder how the public looks at Bill Cosby and says, ‘This beloved man who changed American culture as much as any entertainment figure in our lifetime is going to have to be accountable for the way he treated women behind closed doors.’ How does a public that has come to that conclusion say, ‘The Bill Clinton stuff is okay?'”
Scarborough, a former Republican congressman from Florida, drew the comparison during an exchange with guest Harold Ford Jr., the former Democratic congressman from Tennessee. Ford contended that “Bill Cosby and Bill Clinton’s cases are completely different,” noting that more than 50 women have come forward with similar accounts of being drugged and sexually assaulted by the legendary comedian.
It’s true that Clinton’s list of accusers isn’t nearly as long. He’s generally portrayed in the media as a philanderer, not a predator, owing to admitted extramarital affairs with Gennifer Flowers and Monica Lewinsky, as well as claims of affairs by Dolly Kyle Browning, Elizabeth Ward Green and Sally Miller.
But Clinton has also been accused of rape by Juanita Broaddrick, a former campaign volunteer who repeated her claim last week on Twitter and in an interview with Vox.

I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now never goes away.

Clinton also paid $850,000 to settle a lawsuit brought by former Arkansas state employee Paula Jones, who said the then-governor propositioned her and exposed himself in 1991. And Kathleen Willey, a former White House aide, accused Clinton of groping her in his office in 1993.
Some will surely argue that this accounting of allegations against Clinton from the WP is a bit whitewashy...

There’s Eileen Wellstone, who claimed in 1969 that Clinton raped her when she was 19 after they met at a pub. There’s the unnamed then 22-year-old woman who claimed in 1972 that Clinton sexually assaulted her. There’s the Arkansas University student who complained Clinton – who was her law school instructor – in 1974 tried to prevent her from leaving his office and groped her and put his hand inside her blouse.

There’s Juanita Broaddrick who claims Clinton raped her in 1978. There’s Carolyn Moffet who in 1979 met Clinton at a fundraiser and was later invited to meet him in a hotel room where he greeted her wearing only a shirt and tried to make her perform oral sex on him. There’s at least seven more women identified by Arkansas State Troopers on Clinton’s security detail who claimed Clinton either forced or attempted to force himself on sexually.

There’s Elizabeth Ward, a former Miss Arkansas and Miss America who claimed she was forced by Clinton to have sex with him in 1982. There’s Connie Hamzy who claims Clinton propositioned her at a Little Rock hotel in 1984.

There’s Paula Corbin Jones, Sandra Allen James, Christy Zercher and Kathleen Willey who all claimed in the late 1980s and early 1990s to have been on the receiving end of sexual assaults and harassing behavior by Clinton.

There’s Gennifer Flowers, Elizabeth (Ward) Gracen, Dolly Kyle Browing, Sally Perdue, Lencola Sullivan, Elizabeth Ward, Susie Whiteacre and Bobbie Ann Williams who engaged in long-term affairs with Clinton.

And of course, there’s Monica Lewinsky, the impressionable young White House intern that Clinton took advantage of, an act that ultimately resulted in his impeachment.

Finally, Clinton’s reputation as a philander continues, and he’s known to have ridden more than once on pedophile Jeffery Epstein’s private jet dubbed “Lolita Express.”

And during that time, Hillary engaged in on-going intimidation and smear campaigns against any “bimbo eruptions” that might pop up. Her tactics included slander by her and her surrogates, and having henchmen murder pets, slash tires, burgle their homes and leave threatening messages in order to keep the women silent.

The Clintons' War on Women by Roger Stone... by debunkerbuster


Wednesday, July 27, 2016

'The Long-Hidden Saudi-9/11 Trail' by Kristen Breitweiser


by James Hufferd, Ph.D.                                                                                      
Coordinator, 911 Truth Grassroots Organization
     The United States of America, as to a greater or lesser extent other western democracies in-name-only, is today, like a perfectly-good sponge might be when saturated with a cyanide solution, contaminated thereby. There is nothing basically wrong with the sponge itself; it is the cyanide that is the problem.
     The best and clearest (though far from the only) example of this most-thorough contamination and spoilage of which I am aware is the ever-more-rotten electoral process, the operation and outcome of which, of course, quite literally determines the outcome of almost everything else. This is something very distressing that I’ve mentioned here before; but the subject is of such overriding importance as to bear further exploration.
     The set of conditions involved such as can be readily accessed in cyberspace would stun Orwell by both their immediacy and their audacity. Basically, their vileness is practiced out in the open, and the precise circumstances, although certainly not some of the practices, are unique to this year’s presidential contest.
     The first outstanding circumstance started years ago with the beguiling of a young progressive-by-appearance political chameleon activist from birth, a sometime “Goldwater girl” named Hillary Rodham, by the same neo-Nazi elitist internationalist “intellectuals” who also beguiled her new husband at the time, Bill, the Arkansas wonder-boy and his super-prolific teacher/mentor, Carroll Quigley before him, to become favored adopted spawn of the American affiliate Council on Foreign Relations, the hatchery of American militarist foreign policy.
     Politically, Ms. Rodham Clinton has proven conveniently to be a lot like the unflavored Jello my mom used to buy – she can blithely (and rather notoriously) assume any flavoring or content needed to advance her, secure the praise of her adoptive highfalutin multi-billionaire “cohorts”, and almost imperceptibly deliver them in return the favors and discretionary control their fawning support entitles them to. Note, I said almost imperceptibly, because she tends to be so sloppily nonchalant in trying to cover it up that people who look at all closely are often startled to practically observe that happening or follow its trail in broad daylight.
     And so she’s stumbled her inept, unprincipled, frequently bad-tempered way through enough placements and experiences to attract the cachet of “experienced”, which is invoked unendingly by her own numerous fawning, tone-deaf train of acolytes, while her neocon (neo-Nazi) attachments have made her disastrously pro-war all the time, in the riskiest sort of way of any serious presidential candidate since James K. Polk.
     As I have said, lots of people have seen through her constant and characteristic machinations and manipulations (and I’m not talking about her partisan knee-jerk haters – I. after all, am a normally-progressive sometime-Democrat (as are Susan Sarandon, Ben Jealous, Cenk Uygur, etc.).  She got one of her top acolytes, Florida Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, appointed chair of the national Democratic Party, and Wasserman-Schultz made damn sure anyone who dared oppose her in the primaries would get totally shafted on voter exposure and debate scheduling, and irregularities (including outright felony election fraud) started showing up early in state after state in the running and counting of their DNP-sponsored primaries and caucuses.
     In at least 11 states, the privately-owned and programmed, restricted-access voting machines used must have been programmed to flip or nullify her opponents’ votes, because the announced final tallies, invariably favoring Clinton in those states, differed wildly from the normally-accurate exit poll results, so that she was declared the winner and recipient of most of the delegates in states where she had struggled to fill school gymnasiums and church basements with local followers at her rallies, while her opponent regularly filled stadiums with exuberant overflow crowds.
     And that’s how she “won” – all the while under ultimately feckless FBI criminal investigation into her, as it turned out, open-source State Department emails. And the deleted, but hacked giant trove of DNC and Clinton emails delivered in a first installment this week by Wikileaks details in part, forbodingly, what else she, the national Democratic Party, and the campaign she headed did.
     And now, her defeated opponent (who probably defeated her, truth be told, with the nationwide primary electorate) is expected to meekly concede and turn over his delegates to her. And in the attempt to at least defeat the “awful” Mr. Trump and save America from that fate, her opponent predictably will (and by now has done) – all the while seeming smilingly oblivious to the citizen-mounted election fraud lawsuits playing out on his behalf, doomed and slower than snail’s-pace.
     Oh, and, by the date of the massive California primary, at the end of the primary season in June, the DNC had put a complete stop to the embarrassing exit polls exposing the sham results in so many of the earlier contests.
     It’s been pointed out that, in foreign elections, which the U.S. State Department (not long ago headed by HRC herself) routinely monitors, a deviation in the announced results of more than 2% from the results of the exit polls will cause the elections to be thrown out, or at least not recognized by the U.S. or accepted internationally, due to confirmed fraud.
     So, the question arises, who would support this ill-reputed, untrusted, shall we say thoroughly reviled by a majority presidential candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton? What gives such an obvious ringer of a nominee even a ghost of a chance against the candidate of the other major party? Of course, only one factor – the identity of the other major candidate, the said to be as well universally-reviled, foul-mouth, loud-mouth, insulting widely reputed right-wing hate-monger billionaire builder and developer Donald J. Trump, deftly role-caste as the candidate even Hillary Rodham Clinton could beat in the vituperous cage-match-to-the-death we are about to witness – the outcome of which may well depend on which side controls the most voting machines.
     Then, assuming for a moment a somewhat fair count, what if we the people, the voters, don’t go along with the Γ©lite’s deal, of seeing Trump, all in all, as just too, too bad? What if we decide to take our chances with this odious-and-to-be-every-day-made-more-odious Trump, rather than the (to them) only somewhat reeking international criminal, faded empty-pantsuit wonder-vessel so confidently thrust in our faces? What if we, like the Brits, say a considered, close, but in its result resounding and impudent “no” and stick our fingers in the clever controllers’ eyes, opting to pick up the pieces and recover over the years to come? Why don’t we just try that? And you abroad can watch us.
JH: 7/26/16

Friday, July 22, 2016

National Geographic - CIA Secret Experiments (Documentary)

National Geographic - CIA Secret Experiments... by debunkerbuster

Source Material:

The Search for the "Manchurian Candidate": The CIA and Mind Control: The Secret History of the Behavioral Sciences

42 of 43 people found the following review helpful 5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent Research.

John Marks is an excellent researcher. MK Ultra is an extremely dark chapter in the history of the intelligence, military, and R&D community. There are some troubling insights that I feel compelled to repeat here. First, this covert community destroyed an enormous amount of their records and documentation on secret activities in the late 60's and early 70's. They obviously destroyed the most damning portion of the paper trail. Yet out of the relatively benign information still available, we get proof of unethical conduct and allusions of possible illegal acts. There is even a hint that research was conducted on microwaves, ultrasonic, and electrical stimulation of the brain. There's little or no information on what was discovered in *these* subjects, or even whether the activities were truly halted. We now have indication that the military just so happens to have data on the use of sub & ultra sonics in nonleathal weapons. It's possible that the information, and possibly even current MK Ultra influenced research, is still around. I've heard military personnel say most of the very sensitive research does not occur on the CIA operative level, but in subcontractors and middle management who keep their own research records and staff. Didn't Sirhan Sirhan say he'd been in a hypnotic trance? Did he say this before MK Ultra was revealed, or after? I wonder...

N Lombardi Jr says: MKULTRA was not revealed until 1973-74, 7 years after RFK's assassination. What came out in the trial was that Sirhan Sirhan supposedly hypnotized himself, and therefore was deemed culpable.

The CIA Commits Over 100,000 Serious Crimes Each Year

Sirhan Sirhan, a Patsy in the RFK Murder -- Dr... by debunkerbuster

Thursday, July 21, 2016

The 28 Pages - Finally Revealed

After some 14 years the classified 28 pages of the Senate report on 9/11 have finally been released, albeit in redacted form. Founder of Brian McGlinchey joins the Liberty Report to explain how public pressure led to the release...and what the pages mean.
Be sure to visit for more libertarian commentary.


Released 28 Pages Reveal Double Cross War On The USA

BREAKING NEWS: 28 Pages Prove 9/11 Was An Inside Job

Empire Unmasked Excerpt explaining the 28 pages and beyond

Those Secret 28 Pages on 9/11: Read This Before You Read Them

Empire Unmasked Excerpt explaining the 28 pages and beyond

What I put in The empire Unmasked covered everything revealed in the 28 and a lot more that wasn't said, but I was using the exact same FBI Full Field Investigation reports to get a lot of the info. If mass media is accepting FBI Regional Field Office Reports (and they are that is why I waited a couple days) then based on the same criteria Israel is guilty as sin. I knew that releasing the 28 would release their sources and in doing so it would trap Israel. And I went over these documents in my film the Empire Unmasked. First I am animating the info from the 28 because it requires a visual and because we were remastering my movie The Empire Unmasked anyway. It is going slowly because I can't get the financing yet that I need to do it right. You could fix that. There are like 26k subscribers to my channel. My birth day is on the 26th, how about a money bomb, even just a dollar a month on Patreon by 10% of you and we would finance all the projects for the rest of the next two years. And if you haven't gotten or seen the Empire Unmasked I highly recommend you do. It isn't just about 911, its about the Iraq War, ISIS, Anthrax, and methods of fiance for covert ops from the 30s to now. That's why it is 5 hours. I went over the 1,800 pages worth of FBI docs and police reports on the Israelis, and a lot more. I often explain these events on radio shows and videos but to really tel it all it takes about 5hours. Considering how much time you may look up things on these topics watching a 5hr non Jonestown well documented film will save you a lot of time. Buying it also helps me make my RFK and JFK films.


Released 28 Pages Reveal Double Cross War On The USA

BREAKING NEWS: 28 Pages Prove 9/11 Was An Inside Job

Those Secret 28 Pages on 9/11: Read This Before You Read Them

Sunday, July 17, 2016

Declassified 28 pages of 9/11 report indicate high-ranking Saudis helped hijackers

After 14 years, the formerly classified 28 pages of the 9/11 Commission Report are finally available. The report indicates that the hijackers received support from individuals that may have been working for Saudi Arabian government. RT correspondent Caleb Maupin joins Manila Chan to discuss the newly declassified documents, which also say that Saudi Arabia was not investigated by the FBI because it is a close US ally.


Those Secret 28 Pages on 9/11: Read This Before You Read Them

BREAKING NEWS: 28 Pages Prove 9/11 Was An Inside Job



Released 28 Pages Reveal Double Cross War On The USA

BREAKING NEWS: 28 Pages Prove 9/11 Was An Inside Job

Empire Unmasked Excerpt explaining the 28 pages and beyond

Those Secret 28 Pages on 9/11: Read This Before You Read Them

Saturday, July 16, 2016

The War On Conspiracy Theories - The David Icke Videocast/Podcast Trailer

The Terrorism Trend In Europe

35% of French Muslims and 42% of the French millennial Muslims support suicide bombing. Just over 35% of British Muslim millennials support the same thing. 26% of Muslims in America aged 18-29 think suicide bombing is acceptable. Do you think these numbers will go down now that most of these countries in Europe are letting migrants from the middle east pour into their countries?


28 pages of 9/11 report detail possible Saudi ties to attack

Are STILL too many redactions. Since Bush "dodged the questions" about Bandar and 9/11 when 9/11 Commissioner John Lehman asked him about it, would someone please arrest Bush? Thanks.

Interesting tidbits from the 28 redacted pages:

“A CIA report also indicates that Bassnan traveled to Houston in 2002 and met with an individual who was (redacted). The report states that during that trip a member of the Saudi Royal Family provided Bassnan with a significant amount of cash. FBI information indicates that Bassnan is an extremist and supporter of Usama Bin Laden, and has been connected to the Eritrean Islamic Jihad and the Blind Shayk;” - pg. 417

“According to FBI documents, several of the phone numbers found in the phone book of Abu Zubaida, a senior al-Qa’ida operative captured in Pakistan in March 2002, could be linked, at least indirectly, to telephone numbers in the United States. One of those U.S. numbers is subscribed to by the ASPCOL Corporation, which is located in Aspen Colorado, and managed the affairs of the Colorado residence of the Saudi Ambassador Bandar. The FBI noted that ASPCOL has an unlisted phone number. A November 18, 2002 FBI response to the Joint Inquiry states that “CIA traces have revealed no direct links between numbers found in Zubaida’s phone book and numbers in the United States.” - pgs. 418-419

“A second individual who may have been in contact with al-Hazmi and Al-Mihdar also has ties to the Saudi Government, including connections to the Saudi Ambassador to the United States.” - pg. 421

“The (redacted) memorandum dated July 2, 2002, incorrectly noted that al-Bayoumi’s wife, while living in San Diego, was receiving $1200 a month from Princess Haifa Bin Sultan, the wife of Prince Bandar, the Saudi Ambassador to the United States. The FBI has now confirmed that only Osama Bassnan’s wife received money directly from Prince Bandar’s wife, but that al-Bayoumi’s wife attempted to deposit three of the checks from Prince Bandar’s wife, which were payable to Bassnan’s wife, into her own accounts.” - pg. 426

“Bassnan also has other ties to the Saudi Government. Bassnan’s wife received a monthly stipend from Princess Haifa. In a recent search of Bassnan’s residence, the FBI located copies of 31 cashiers checks totally $74,000, during the period of February 22, 1999 to May 30, 2002. These checks were payable to Bassnan’s wife and were drawn on the Riggs Bank account of Prince Bandar’s wife. The FBI has determined that there has been a standing order on Princess Haifa’s account since January 1999 to send $2000 a month to Bassnan’s wife. Baseman’s wife was allegedly receiving the funding for “nursing services,” but, according to the (redacted) document, there is no evidence that Bassnan’s wife provided nursing services. (redacted sentence)” - pg. 427

“In the October 9, 2002 hearing FBI Executive Assistant Director D’Amuro commented on this funding:

I believe that we do have money going from Bandar’s wife, $2,000 a month up to about $64,000. What the money was for is what we don’t know.

(Redacted) testified:

(Redacted sentence) She gives money to a lot of different groups and people from around the world. We’ve been able to uncover a number of these…but maybe if we can discover that she gives to 20 different radical groups, well, gee, maybe there’s a pattern here.” - pg. 428

(Too many redactions in the paragraph, but this is an interesting sentence) “The FBI has identified this address as the address of Prince Bandar.” - pg. 429

Jon Gold on Fri, 07/15/2016 - 3:16pm.


Those Secret 28 Pages on 9/11: Read This Before You Read Them