Wednesday, February 20, 2019

RIP Ian Neal - Engineer and Founder of UK 9/11 Truth Campaign

Editor's Note: In response to the comment I've included below. If what you are saying is correct, one thing is certain, Judy Woods is not helping your case, but rather would seemingly be hurting it intentionally. Using easily debunkable evidence such as the dustification of the spire is a surefire way to make people disregard your theory...

RIP Ian Neal - Engineer and Founder of UK 9/11 Truth Campaign

Anthony Williams
RIP Ian, you did your best when nobody wanted to hear the Truth. Oddly enough, the red flag of an " inside job" as most rational people have understood 911 to be, is evidenced not at the site of " Ground Zero " as it has been subsequently called, but in several locations far away from New York, some as far as Alaska, where the seismic and magnetometric signals were checked after the event on that fateful day in New York.

The charts on the magnetometer measuring equipment show severe and abrupt changes in the polarity of the earth, from North to South, during the time of the collapse, and subsequently the indicator needles returned to normal positions after the collapses took place. The conclusion that can be drawn from this data is that during the collapse, there was a massive electrical interference , sufficient to abruptly disturb the north / south readings of earth's polarity, and this data was collected hundreds of miles away from New York. It follows therefore, that allegations of Directed Energy Weapons, might have been founded on such accredited data, and the spurious rumours of "mini nukes" or "nano thermite" or other kinetic weapons , was a smokescreen to distract, divert, and discredit genuine Engineering analysis of what happened on that day . The book by Dr. Judy Wood, "Where Did The Towers Go? " is the only definitive study of the events, and answers questions that were never addressed in the subsequent N.I.S.T. report.

The Problem Of Belief In The 9/11 Truth Movement

It's easy to believe...belief leads to endless opportunities and requires only one constant which is imagination. It's harder to research and study information which leads to knowledge, for that takes time and the willingness to dedicate yourself to the field of study without pre-concieved bias. This video i try my best to explain why the 9/11 Truth Community is so bereft of a willingness to dedicate themselves to study 9/11 in depth but rather wish for an easier alternative which relies on them not to study but to listen to others who sell them an imaginative fantasy wrought with incomplete data and a dead end.

The Problem Of Belief In The 9/11 Truth Movement

9/11 Commission Report - Sen. Mark Dayton

Sen. Mark Dayton pointing out multiple versions (under oath) issued by NORAD on what happened that day re: the hijacked airliners - where we have huge gaps of inaction for up to 15+mins (the FAA later proved it had informed NORAD, and NORAD did nothing - where hijacked aircraft were not intercepted for 2 hours!). There was a massive failure to follow standard operating procedure. People should have gone to jail for gross negligence and blatantly lying (that they couldn't see aircraft with their transponders switched off, that their RADARs were looking outward, that the hijack exercise drill that was happening at the exact same time as the real event "helped" with their response time?! - this drill with multiple phantom targets, VIGILANT GUARDIAN ... "is this real world or exercise" - quoted from ATC tapes.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 21st, 2019.]

Tulsi Gabbard - The Establishment Is Desperate To Stop Anti-War Candidate - David Icke

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 21st, 2019.]

"Nothing Happening at GITMO," Just One of the Biggest Cases in the History of the United States, Analysis & Opinion & What Follows: Capt. Dave Bertrand, Ret.

So….all the rhetoric from Trump, during the campaign about going after the Deep State is happening, while dis-information YouTubers are trying to profit from sensationalism, the truth of the matter is simple….Trump re-authorized and updated the NDAA section on the Amendments-Manual-Courts-Martial.

“Justice Act of 2016 (MJA), division E of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, Public Law 114-328, 130 Stat. 2000, 2967 (2016), except as otherwise provided by the MJA or this order, the MJA shall take effect on January 1, 2019.”

It took effect January 1st, the Military Tribunal at GITMO began January 29th 2019 (for the public), but actually a couple weeks earlier for procedural arguments in private.

So…you ask, “what does this 9/11 hearing have to do with the Deep State and the future incarceration of Obama, Clinton, Eric Holder, Brennan, Clapper, Bush, Cheney, etc?”

They’re ALL involved, one way or another to the 9/11 cover-up that has gone-on for the last 18 years, with little to no action taken to identify the true culprits and planners of 9/11, but a continued cover-up by an attempt (under Bush and Obama) to get a clear statement (via torture) of those being held at GITMO, to admit that Osama bin Laden launched an attack on 9/11 from a remote cave in Afghanistan.

Note: Osama bin Laden was a CIA asset, tasked with organizing the CIA mercenaries in Afghanistan a.k.a. the Mujahidin a.k.a. al Qaida (The Data Base) and later a.k.a. ISIS and later a.k.a. ISIL and re-organized by John McCain as the “Syrian Freedom Fighters.” Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State and Hussein Obama used selected mercenaries to take-out Libya’s Kaddafi and conveniently blamed that on al Qaida (mercenaries) and took the shoulder launch rockets stolen by “al Qaida” and transferred them to the “Syrian Freedom Fighters” via John McCain (executed for treason)…..all planned during a secret CIA meeting with al Qaida, along with Ambassador Stevens in Benghazi where 4 Americans were killed because Hillary called for a stand-down….which WE expect to see justice in a Military Tribunal. And no….Hillary Clinton is NOT “dead.”

Regardless if one of the detainees made a statement that Osama bin Laden was the mastermind, along with KSM being brought to GITMO soon, their defense team are in an argument over torture and confessions.

Now here’s the catch 22……

Why is the defense arguing for future 9/11 hearings to be held in secret from the public, which was denied by Judge Marine Col. Keith Parrella ? Why not let the world see that their clients are innocent? What are the detainees saying about who they talked to and dealt with financially?? The CIA?? Israel?? Pakistan??

Who are these defense attorneys really working for? Who is paying them for the last decade to represent these detainees that might spill the beans of those (really) involved with 9/11?
When it is revealed…..what happens next??

The 9/11 hearings at GITMO are now completely overhauled by the Trump Administration, and just the fact alone, where Lindsey Graham asked such a revealing question to Kavanagh….the signing and updating of the Courts-Martial-Manual tells me (1) the truth about 9/11 will be revealed and all those involved and (2) those discoveries and prosecutions will lead to many arrests and will open the door for TREASON to be further adjudicated for other crimes against the United States.

Here’s what is very interesting…..

It seems the Military Tribunals will not only go after top leaders and politicians during the time before and after 9/11, but the tribunal is focusing on the intelligence agencies and the cover-up. That’s a new twist since Trump took office.

“Defense lawyers have repeatedly claimed that intelligence agencies were interfering in their independent relationships with their clients. They’ve found listening devices that looked like smoke detectors in their meeting rooms, which the original case judge had removed; a remote court audio kill switch, which the judge ordered unplugged; and the FBI recruiting defense team informants, which the judge ordered investigated.”

There are STILL many Deep State operatives in the intelligence agencies and Congress, together attempting to screw-up the Military Tribunal…most likely via the defense attorneys and rogue elements within the CIA in particular. Brennan and Clapper must be very worried at this stage of the game….

I do not see anything major going-down soon as the Military Tribunals resume again after a freak medical issue that forced the sitting Judge Keith Parrella to stop the hearings until he recovers, but what is certain…there are Deep State operatives in that court room that will certainly try to keep 9/11 limited in scope and centered around 19 fake hijackers that flew planes into New York and the Pentagon.

We [might] learn eventually as to why the 19 “hijackers” were selected and how and why they thought they were actually going to pull-off 9/11, a miraculous / fairy tale attempt… only discover, the 19 “hijackers” were patsies, training at a flight school for the [optics], monitored by the NSA for [future] media propaganda, being paid by a foreign source via the CIA, and what the hell was Mohamed Atta doing living a few blocks from the CIA headquarters at Langley?? Why did Bill Clinton have his records destroyed (before) 9/11??

The problem here is the Deep State is vastly corrupt. Judges can be controlled or killed, even military ones. And Trump is strongly influenced by the Israelis who will literally do anything to keep this crime covered up (Israeli operatives were deeply involved). If it comes to removing the President in order to derail what is happening then this is what will happen. The only way a successful trial can go ahead, in any legal setting, is with maximum security precautions. Jurors or judges will need to be kept in isolation and their identities protected so that their families cannot be threatened. Dynamic high profile arrests of those that have lied about the crime in previous instances (obstructing justice) need to happen immediately to draw attention to the case and put the perps on the back foot. Suspects in the crime need to be arrested on National Security grounds, and held in complete isolation, before the cases against them can be fully formed (just as enemy combatants have been held without proper trial and GITMO). When fighting against the mafia one must take drastic action because they don't play by any rules. In an open fight, those with the guns make the rules. It's come down to situation of being pretty close to a gun fight.


911 Truth ~ Experts Speak Out

911 and War by Deception

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 18th, 2019.]

Tuesday, February 19, 2019

BBC Producer Admits Douma Attack was False Flag that Nearly Sparked Russia - U.S. Hot War

BBC producer Riam Dalati believes that the scenes caught on video from a hospital in Douma, Syria were staged, all in an effort driven by jihadist terrorists and White Helmet "activists" to draw the U.S. and its allies into full on confrontation with Syria, and by extension Russia.

The viral images caused a media firestorm in 2018, showing children allegedly suffering from chemicals, as main stream media channels, like the BBC itself, called for war with Assad.

The Duran’s Alex Christoforou and Editor-in-Chief Alexander Mercouris discuss the BBC producer's stunning admission, after a 6 month investigation, that reveals the "‘chemical attack" hospital scenes in Douma were completely staged.

[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, February 20th, 2019.]

Friday, February 15, 2019

My Thoughts on the State of 9/11 Demolition Research + 911 - WTC dismantled and hollow vs mini-nukes - edited - HD version

Here is a very spirited debate that's well worth a listen. I have often noted that there are reservations about Jim Fetzer by people I respect, but he comes off here very much as just a person with strong differences of opinion, not an agent of disinformation. That said, his position on the Pentagon strike and related issues is garbage as demonstrated time and time again on this site. He is no longer promoting Judy Wood's ideas and I find the theory of mini-nukes much more plausible. In the second video he makes a point that one must really consider that has only come to light in its full magnitude over the passing of the years.


Obviously controlled demolition itself would not garner such a result. Could the contents of the buildings really result in so many differing and often fast acting cancers?

Asbestos in the buildings was a concern, but that is associated mainly with mesothelioma.

Were the respirators and face masks worn at ground zero so ineffective that 10,000 first responders have died?

Of course Fetzer begs the question of radiation. On a recent podcast I interviewed David Slesigner who told me he's had smart researchers argue to him that there both were and were not high enough levels of radiation present to support this theory. The environmental anomaly of high levels of volatile organic compounds at ground zero are argued by Fetzer to better support his theory than the nano-thermite theory.

Regarding that theory, please note Mark Basile who was supposed to do what he thought would be a confirmation study, but due to personal complications has failed to produce a full report, has stated that he will refund anyone who donated to him via paypal. My family donated something like $200 if I recall. Mark has affirmed to blogger Ziggi it is still coming. I have had no contact with Mark for quite some time.

James Millete who was supposed to publish a refutation study also failed to follow through.

thermite or no thermite? – the saga of the red-gray chips:
"Millette’s failure to publish as promised has raised obvious questions about his faith in his own conclusions."

So in my view the original paper has neither been confirmed or refuted, although the preponderance of evidence seems to favor the former being the most likely outcome. But who knows. I've tried vert hard to resolve this issue as a concerned citizen.

In the past I have noted...

The truth movement has many differing opinions concerning the method of demolition, but almost universally agrees on the physical evidence... Even supporters of the nano-thermite evidence like Jim Hoffman have presented it alongside the other plausible theories of distributed conventional explosives (an idea which I have warmed up tomore than before) and better yet thermobaric devices, which have many desirable attributes for a covert demolition, including the advantage of an absence of conventional explosive residues. Combinations of conventional and non-conventional explosives has also been proposed. But again, the bottom line is, the physical evidence is widely agreed upon and must also be debunked, but as the following material demonstrates, the government investigators and defenders of the official story have failed at this task.

The official investigations conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology were not peer-reviewed...

OK, now to that debate...

HD version of a conversation between three nuke advocates (Don Fox, Joe Olson and Jim Fetzer) and Steve De'ak regarding evidence that suggests the WTC was not nuked, or vaporized, but that it was dismantled. 2-hours.

Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of The World Trade Centre
The enormous peak in Strontium and Barium concentration at WTC 01- 16 is readily apparent. The concentration of the two elements reaches 3670ppm and 3130ppm respectively or over 0.3% by weight of the dust. This means that 0.37% of the sample was Barium and 0.31% of the sample was Strontium by weight at that location. This is higher than even the Titanium concentration at WTC 01-16 of 0.25%. This is quite simply astronomical. Barium and Strontium compounds are not valid constituents of concrete or any other building material such as glass, aluminium, plaster and steel. They should not be there. Even at the other sampling locations the Barium and Strontium concentration does not fall below 400ppm, which is still an astronomically high level to detect for these elements. The mean concentration of Barium including the low girder coating readings is 533ppm and for Strontium, 727ppm. These are not trace amounts. They are highly dangerous and toxic amounts.

FAQ #13: Various authors claim that nuclear blasts caused or contributed to the WTC destruction. Why does AE911Truth not endorse this claim?:

My Thoughts on the State of 9/11 Demolition Research + 911 - WTC dismantled and hollow vs mini-nukes - edited - HD version

Thursday, February 14, 2019

John Brennan Dismisses Bipartisan Senate Intel Committee Finding No Collusion

Alex Jones in the News Again for Sandy Hook Lawsuits - What Exactly Did He Say FOR REAL NO SPIN - Jones Has Been Targeted for What He Gets Right Not Something He May Have Got Wrong

9/11: An Architect's Guide | Part 1: World Trade Center 7 (2/7/19 webinar - R Gage)

9/11: An Architect's Guide | Part 1: World Trade Center 7 (2/7/19 webinar - R Gage)


Truth Teller's Radio Episode 16 - 9/11/2018 JM Talboo Interviews Richard Gage about the 3000+ Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:

Richard Gage, Barbara Honegger, & David Meiswinkle | The New Criminal Grand Jury For 9/11 Truth

Richard Gage, Barbara Honegger, & David Meiswinkle | The New Criminal Grand Jury For 9/11 Truth


Major Breakthrough For 9/11 Truth: All-Star Investigators Join Lost Arts Radio

Major Breakthrough For 9/11 Truth: All-Star Investigators Join Lost Arts Radio


SGT Report 2018 “Sea Change: 9/11 Grand Jury Empaneled”

SGT Report 2018 “Sea Change: 9/11 Grand Jury Empaneled”


Alex Jones in the News Again for Sandy Hook Lawsuits - What Exactly Did He Say FOR REAL NO SPIN and Why is Free Speech Never Brought Up? - Jones Has Been Targeted for What He Gets Right Not Something He May Have Got Wrong

First off, I personally find some of the evidence for a Sandy Hook conspiracy compelling, but have not dug in to the issue deeply enough at all, including not having examined enough debunking material to have a firm opinion. Believe me, I studied 9/11 intensely for years before making this blog. I don't come to any opinion I have haphazardly or without doing my due diligence. Always keep this in mind when I'm presenting "crazy" information. But that really doesn't matter at with this issue as far as I'm concerned. It's much, much, deeper and important than what happened at Sandy Hook. It's what is happening to this country that bothers me and this issue is at the heart of it.

Alex Jones has stated time and time again that he considered all sides, that he changed his mind at times, but that for a long period of time he believed that kids were killed there, but that other elements were fake. Politifact confirms he is telling the truth in this characterization while at the same time trying to give Hillary Clinton a victory over him. In his "Final Statement on Sandy Hook" video from late 2016, which was memory holed thanks to censorship, he noted that for a very long time since the time period where he gave credence to it all being fake, he returned to his original position of thinking kids were killed, but still noted many anomalies that he did not think had been debunked while others had. He has repeatedly sincerely apologized if he hurt the feelings of any victim's family members.

Analyzing the official story of an historical event and considering the political impact of it, even if that means offending people involved, is not a crime. It's exercising free speech and just plain smart if one knows their history concerning government corruption and proven conspiracies.

These 33 conspiracy theories turned out to be true and here are 42 admitted false flag attacks. Source:

Sorry, I always question whether people's indignation is healthy when others question if people actually died in an event. Seeing as how our government actually put these phrases in a document...

"Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."
"Conduct funerals for mock-victims"

Jones did not threaten or harass these families. Defamation? Again, are we not allowed to call it like we see it when analyzing historical events, especially when the government has the history it does?

You know, things like this...

Operation Gladio was a false-flag terror program set up by the CIA and NATO. Although Gladio was eventually exposed, it was not just a single event, but an ongoing operation that remained secret for decades, in which hundreds of innocent people were killed and injured in terrorist attacks that were blamed on other groups.

Even if Jones did cross a line, the non-stop media blitz on him and the unprecedented censorship that he predicted would happen years ago, that he has been the biggest victim of to say the least having essentially been depersoned 1984 style, is beyond overkill. If anyone has been harassed over this it is him and all of us. We are losing our free speech and Jones, his Sandy Hook saga, and conspiracy theorizing is being used as major ammo to justify taking away a god given constitutional right, our first defense for fighting tyrants and oppression.

It is important to understand that by and large the recent massive wave of censorship is being aimed at conservatives and those who analyze evidence of criminal conspiracies and expose deep corruption, often labeled with the CIA created and weaponized term of derision "conspiracy theorist."

Here is how we can fight back...

These recent events should offer a clue as to what is really going on here. Well, if you have an ability to get a clue that is.

Jones Has Been Targeted for What He Gets Right Not Something He May Have Got Wrong

Joe Rogan is right about Alex Jones being right about a lot and more than he knows...

The following is from a defense of Jones posted at the website of author James Fetzer, PhD.

Alex Jones and Infowars posed the single greatest threat to the monopoly of media that was fastidiously put into place by the C.I.A. The Company, as the C.I.A. is known within intelligence circles, does not like competition of any sort for its Mockingbird Media; hence, the takedown of Alex Jones has begun in earnest.

This is also why Deep State forced Jones’ to recant the Pizzagate story. They left him no choice so critical is the ongoing Pedogate conspiracy to their control of political leaders and government officials alike.[1]  Just like Sandy Hook, Pedogate remains their Achilles’ heel. If not Alex Jones, another high profile truth speaker will eventually expose it in a manner that the body politic will get the message loud and clear.
Bottom Line: Sandy Hook really is where TPTB drew the line in the sand. Once Alex Jones and Infowars crossed it, they became a target for every mainstream organization in the country. However, this extreme reaction alone from Deep State has exposed their agents and operatives throughout American society. The MSM has especially been revealed as the deceptive and duplicitous traitors to the Republic that they truly are.  In point of fact, half the people now understand that truly THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA IS THE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE!
More info on a few of the things mentioned...

“The CIA owns everyone of any significance in the major media.” — former CIA Director William Colby Source:

More JFK Files Revelations: CIA Employed 40 Journalists...

The CIA Commits Over 100,000 Serious Crimes Each Year:

STFU Up Tom Arnold! Roseanne Isn't Racist, Your Buddy Arnold Schwarzenegger Is. Pizzagate Hasn't Been Debunked and There's An Intellectual Case for Conspiracism:

It is interesting to note that Fetzer and another well-known Sandy Hook investigator named Wolfgang Halbig are also being sued, but are not backing down at all...

Wolfgang Halbig Interview  Feb 3, 2019

Sandy Hook Lawsuit: Jim Fetzer testimony

"Sandy Hook Lawsuit: Jim Fetzer testimony - In this interview/deposition, Jim Fetzer presents the legal evidence which is being submitted in court to expose the false flag attack of Sandy Hook."


In Honor of Free Speech...

Editor's Note: You know what some powerful and corrupt people might do if they were involved in a hoax and a prominent individual was exposing it (even if just by asking questions or pointing out anomalies)? They might demonize him, sue him repeatedly, and kick him off the internet! lol :P

A free book for your consideration, 
also worth considering is criticism regarding of one of its major contributors.


Tuesday, February 12, 2019

What's Actually In The Dark Overlord Files?: Dark Overlord 9/11 document supports a pre-2002 death of Bin Ladin - Flight 93 Shot Down - Passenger Shot and Killed on Flight 11 - Jason Bermas: 'Lying about the security measures. They're covering up their tracks.'

► Bush Knew Bin Laden Murdered in 2001: ► David Ray-Griffin says Bin Ladin likely dead December 2001: His death, according to those who share this pre-2011 bin Ladin account, say he was killed during the late 2001 Tora Bora strikes. I've read the book Mr. Griffin wrote titled "Is Osama Bin Laden Dead or Alive?" and I'd highly recommend it to anyone out there. The many CIA created "Bin Laden" tapes are obviously a hoax, a propaganda campaign aimed at keeping the boogey man alive despite him either succumbing to his kidney failure or being killed by US bombs in Tora Bora late 2001. Share your comments below! What do you think? ► The 9/11 files from @TheDarkOverlord 's data dump can be got here:
Just zip the files, download, and browse!! Please support this open crowd sourced method of exposing criminal intent/motive/evidence related to the false flag terror attack of the WTC complex on September 11, 2001. Peace & Love God bless -Chris Regarding court case and TSA documents Jason Bermas states: "They're trying to prove basically in a lot of these cases... Of course security measures were there. The're lying about the security measures. They're covering up their tracks. Of course they're taking the negligence or let it happen on purpose approach to this."




TRUMP STRIKES BACK: Hackers Set To Release Secret 9/11 Emails:

What's Actually In The Dark Overlord Files?: Dark Overlord 9/11 document supports a pre-2002 death of Bin Ladin - Flight 93 Shot Down - Passenger Shot and Killed on Flight 11 - Jason Bermas: 'Lying about the security measures. They're covering up their tracks.'

ATTENTION POTENTIAL 9/11 GRAND JURY MEMBERS! - The NIST 9/11 report, is inadmissible in a court of law in the United States, because it fails the *Daubert* standard + Listen to These Three NIST Whistleblowers

By Greg Roberts

The NIST's investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster, that resulted in the NCSTAR report, is inadmissible in a court of law in the United States, because it fails the Daubert standard, this determines the standard for admitting expert testimony in federal courts, The Federal Rules of Evidence and the Admissibility of Expert Opinion Testimony in an Adversarial Evidentiary Proceeding

Under the standards established by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc., 509 U.S. 579, 113 S. Ct. 2786, 125 L. Ed 2d 469 (1993) and its progeny, expert testimony offered to support the official theory and hypotheses concerning the cause of the destruction of World Trade Center Buildings 1, 2 and 7 (the WTC) on September 11, 2001 would probably be excluded from admission into evidence by an impartial judge in a civil or criminal proceeding

Under Daubert and FRE 702, when carrying out evidentiary gate-keeping duties under the Federal Rules of Evidence, judges must at a minimum inquire into:
  • 1 Whether the opinion or theory is susceptible to testing and has been subjected to such testing
NIST fail - their theory is unproven and untested, there own testing, in particular, the material and fire tests conducted by NIST, did not support its initial findings They did not look for evidence of explosives, contrary to NFPA guidelines.
More importantly, any actual relevant sections of the official report are classified for public safety, they will not even release them to a licensed NYC architect in regards a FOIA request
  • 2 Whether the opinion/theory has been subjected to peer-review and publication
The NIST report is not peer reviewed, it was and still is, self published and thus has zero credibility. In academia, peer review is used to determine an academic paper's suitability for publication.
  • 3 Whether there is a known or potential rate of error associated with the methodology used and whether there are standards controlling the techniques’ operation
The rate of error is 100%. That is, the previous rate of success in collapsing two 110-story steel skyscrapers such as WTC 1 and 2, by a fire ignited by jet fuel (even taking into account aircraft impact damage) and one 47 story steel skyscraper such as WTC 7 (which had no aircraft impact damage) is 0%. The official explanation of the destruction of these three buildings on September 11, 2001 assumes unprecedented processes and events in all three cases.
  • 4 Whether the opinion/theory has been scrutinized and generally accepted by the scientific community.
There is no general acceptance of the United States Government conspiracy theory in the scientific community. The official theory has been rejected by many qualified experts who have reviewed and scrutinized the NIST reports and the data that NIST has made available.
*There are additional factors considered by courts, but all four main Daubert factors are applicable to all cases generally (where the Federal Rules of Evidence apply or where the state courts have adopted the Daubert or similar test)

NIST's specific objectives were:
  • Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed following the initial impacts of the aircraft and why and how WTC 7 collapsed;
  • Determine why the injuries and fatalities were so high or low depending on location, including all technical aspects of fire protection, occupant behavior, evacuation, and emergency response;
  • Determine what procedures and practices were used in the design, construction,
  • Identify, as specifically as possible, areas in current building and fire codes, standards, and practices that warrant revision.

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) an agency of the U.S. Department of Commerce failed on every single one of these objectives


Former NIST Employee Speaks Out with LTE in Europhysics News:
Originally published at AE911Truth.Org by AE911 Staff on 11/24/16
Two days ago, Europhysics News released its first issue since the publication of “15 years later: On the physics of high-rise building collapses,” which has now been viewed nearly 350,000 times since its release — and which even caused the magazine’s server to break down at one point.
Lo and behold, on page 43 is a startling and extraordinary letter to the editor by a former employee of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Peter Michael Ketcham, who worked at NIST from 1997 until 2011.
Peter Ketcham (bottom center) appears in this photo from the NIST Mathematical and Computational Sciences Division’s “Summary of Activities for Fiscal Year 2000.”
In his letter, Mr. Ketcham makes it clear that he did not contribute to NIST’s World Trade Center investigation. In fact, it wasn’t until last August that he began reading the NIST WTC reports and watching documentaries challenging NIST’s findings. The more he investigated, he writes, “the more it became apparent that NIST had reached a predetermined conclusion by ignoring, dismissing, and denying the evidence.
Mr. Ketcham closes his stunning 500-word rebuke by calling upon NIST to “blow the whistle on itself now” before awareness of the “disconnect between the NIST WTC reports and logical reasoning” grows exponentially.
The courageous stand Mr. Ketcham has taken in criticizing the reports issued by his former employer of 14 years is yet another sign of the rapidly increasing skepticism toward the official 9/11 narrative among scientific and technical professionals. No doubt, his emergence will help accelerate the path toward exposing NIST’s WTC reports as false and unscientific.
Former Chief of NIST’s Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation:


James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST’s investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11.
Dr. Quintiere made his plea during his presentation, “Questions on the WTC Investigations” at the 2007 World Fire Safety Conference. “I wish that there would be a peer review of this,” he said, referring to the NIST investigation. “I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they’ve done; both structurally and from a fire point of view.”
“I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable,” explained Dr. Quintiere. “Let’s look at real alternatives that might have been the cause of the collapse of the World Trade Towers and how that relates to the official cause and what’s the significance of one cause versus another.”
Dr. Quintiere, one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, also encouraged his audience of fellow researchers and engineers to scientifically re-examine the WTC collapses. “I hope to convince you to perhaps become ‘Conspiracy Theorists’, but in a proper way,” he said.


From the 
book The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False:
We also have the testimony of a former NIST employee who had held "a supervisory scientist position at the top civil service grade" until 2001, after which he worked as a part-time contractor until 2006. Although this man wishes to remain anonymous, for fear of possible retaliation, he is known to physicist Steven Jones, who has confirmed that he is indeed who he says he is... Speaking in particular about the implications of NIST's politicization for its work on 9/11-related issues, he wrote:

When I first heard of [9/11 truth] and how the NIST "scientists" involved in 911 seemed to act in very un-scientific ways, it was not at all surprising to me. By 2001, everyone in NIST leadership had been trained to pay close heed to political pressures. There was no chance that NIST people "investigating" the 911 situation could have been acting in the true spirit of scientific independence, nor could they have operated at all without careful consideration of political impact. Everything that came from the hired guns was by then routinely filtered through the front office, and assessed for political implications before release.

Truth Teller's Radio Episode 16 - 9/11/2018 JM Talboo Interviews Richard Gage about the 3000+ Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth:

My Demolition Company

Written August 22, 2008

OK... OK... So maybe NIST's final WTC 7 report released yesterday is shameful, embarrassing, and completely flawed, but the good news is that debunking NIST's conclusions about WTC 7 is as easy as shooting fish in a barrel! The best news of all is that since the geniuses at NIST have now shown, after their three-year research efforts, that fire can collapse a skyscraper into its own footprint at nearly freefall speed, I'm starting my very own, one man, demolition company!

Here are my tools of the trade...

1. A very reasonably priced copy of the 9/11 Commission Report if I do say so myself...

$11.99 with shipping.

2. This nifty fire extinguisher butane lighter...


And I'm ready to do the job with under 16 bucks overhead cost. That's right folks, that is all the equipment I need according to NIST! The 9/11 "debunkers" tried much harder, bringing up the "massive hole" in the building. The same massive hole described here.

"I walked around it (Building 7). I saw a hole. I didn't see a hole bad enough to knock a building down, though." - former NYPD officer and first responder, Craig Bartmer

Even NIST now admits that "the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse."

Of course the diesel fuel for WTC 7's emergency generators was something that seemed to have some promise, but no. They state that the diesel fuel "played no role in the destruction of WTC 7," and that it was "the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building," and that they were "similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings."

So, if you need a building demolished just let me know, I'll do it for half price... maybe even free. Because the 9/11 Commission report is almost 12 bucks, the lighter is almost 2 smackers, but knocking down a building with office fires...


Update September 30, 2009:

I just found out that a two man operation was started on the same day my one man operation was last year...



WTC7 and the British Brainwashing Conspiracy