The Hard Science:
There IS overwhelming physical evidence that reveals explosives were used to bring down the 3 WTC buildings on 911. There is nothing theoretical about the claim - forensic proof has sealed the case.
Simply put, it is IMPOSSIBLE to find Molten Steel, Thermite traces, plus actual fragments of High Tech Explosives in the rubble pile, and to have the freefall collapse of steel framed buildings, WITHOUT using incendiaries or explosives of the sort commonly employed by the military and demolition companies.
Either basic scientific principles (ones that have NEVER been disproved) are drastically in error or we are looking at the physical evidence of the controlled demolition of the WTC buildings. Ergo, 911 was an inside job.
The Propaganda:
For 17 years there has been a concerted effort by official investigators and the mainstream media to keep people ignorant of this information. However, thanks to the work of independent investigators and the availability of information via the Internet, these efforts have largely failed. The scientific proof of the inside job is irrevocably in the public domain.
However, there still remains a high level of ignorance concerning this key scientific evidence among the general population - due primarily to a self induced, culturally influenced, aversion to even consider the 911 truth question.
In today's society people have been conditioned to reject all things labeled "conspiracy" as if such claims were wholly unsubstantiated.
Association with mental illness and irrationality have hamstrung our ability to even look at the data. This is especially true when it comes to issues that can be labelled as being part of a "big government conspiracy". Most people, when it comes to these topics, end up being too indignant, embarrassed or afraid to even discuss them. No matter how good the information, even the most intelligent among us who decide NOT to weigh up the evidence, will always fail to see through the official deception.
Moreover, because conspiracy claims are the subject of such strong ridicule, many people who do actually chance to look into the details often find them psychologically too difficult to accept - regardless of how damning the information may be.
Adding to the disconnect here is the general population's inexperience at recognising the significance of hard scientific evidence. Few people, upon seeing video of the freefall collapse of WTC7, or seeing data that confirms structural steel had melted in all three buildings, would understand the strength of this hard science - even if explained to them.
On top of all these hindrances we also have to deal with the disinformation put out by various 'independent' 911 truth debunking 'experts' - who help fuel society's irrational anti-conspiracy bias (conspiracy-denialism).
Appearing online and in various 911 'documentaries' these individuals push distortions, heap ridicule, provide pseudo-scientific trick explanations, and tell outright lies about the facts in question. The agenda of such 'experts' is to act as credible authority figures, using their academic, institutional or professional backgrounds to discredit the hard evidence and build a "consensus" opinion backing the official lies. The mission, transparent to the well informed, is to basically hoodwink open minded members of the public. Many of these debunkers, who are too intelligent not to understand the science proving the inside job hypothesis, appear to be on the Government payroll. Indeed most are probably involved in a modern day version of Operation Mockingbird.
Nevertheless, despite the pervasive lies presented in the official 911 reports, the censorship by the corporate media, the disinformation efforts of the supposedly independent debunkers, and our own inabilities to come to terms with challenging information, the physical evidence of the inside job still stands.
The World Trade Centre forensic evidence proves the official account is a lie and ends the 911 conspiracy debate. [Presently there are 5 peer reviewed scientific papers supporting the inside job hypothesis that remain unchallenged in the scientific literature.]
Whatever the truth is concerning the involvement of Osama Bin Laden, he certainly could not have rigged the Twin Towers or WTC7 with explosives.
The War on Terror is a hoax designed to foment conflict between the West and militant Islamic groups for the purpose of US strategic domination of the Middle East. Only the truth about 911 will end these Wars.
The first step is identifying the propaganda to be overcome whilst simultaneously recognising the hard scientific evidence of the inside job. Once EVERYONE understands the truth then the game will be over.
By SpookyOne
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2019.]
There IS overwhelming physical evidence that reveals explosives were used to bring down the 3 WTC buildings on 911. There is nothing theoretical about the claim - forensic proof has sealed the case.
Simply put, it is IMPOSSIBLE to find Molten Steel, Thermite traces, plus actual fragments of High Tech Explosives in the rubble pile, and to have the freefall collapse of steel framed buildings, WITHOUT using incendiaries or explosives of the sort commonly employed by the military and demolition companies.
Either basic scientific principles (ones that have NEVER been disproved) are drastically in error or we are looking at the physical evidence of the controlled demolition of the WTC buildings. Ergo, 911 was an inside job.
The Propaganda:
For 17 years there has been a concerted effort by official investigators and the mainstream media to keep people ignorant of this information. However, thanks to the work of independent investigators and the availability of information via the Internet, these efforts have largely failed. The scientific proof of the inside job is irrevocably in the public domain.
However, there still remains a high level of ignorance concerning this key scientific evidence among the general population - due primarily to a self induced, culturally influenced, aversion to even consider the 911 truth question.
In today's society people have been conditioned to reject all things labeled "conspiracy" as if such claims were wholly unsubstantiated.
Association with mental illness and irrationality have hamstrung our ability to even look at the data. This is especially true when it comes to issues that can be labelled as being part of a "big government conspiracy". Most people, when it comes to these topics, end up being too indignant, embarrassed or afraid to even discuss them. No matter how good the information, even the most intelligent among us who decide NOT to weigh up the evidence, will always fail to see through the official deception.
Moreover, because conspiracy claims are the subject of such strong ridicule, many people who do actually chance to look into the details often find them psychologically too difficult to accept - regardless of how damning the information may be.
Adding to the disconnect here is the general population's inexperience at recognising the significance of hard scientific evidence. Few people, upon seeing video of the freefall collapse of WTC7, or seeing data that confirms structural steel had melted in all three buildings, would understand the strength of this hard science - even if explained to them.
On top of all these hindrances we also have to deal with the disinformation put out by various 'independent' 911 truth debunking 'experts' - who help fuel society's irrational anti-conspiracy bias (conspiracy-denialism).
Appearing online and in various 911 'documentaries' these individuals push distortions, heap ridicule, provide pseudo-scientific trick explanations, and tell outright lies about the facts in question. The agenda of such 'experts' is to act as credible authority figures, using their academic, institutional or professional backgrounds to discredit the hard evidence and build a "consensus" opinion backing the official lies. The mission, transparent to the well informed, is to basically hoodwink open minded members of the public. Many of these debunkers, who are too intelligent not to understand the science proving the inside job hypothesis, appear to be on the Government payroll. Indeed most are probably involved in a modern day version of Operation Mockingbird.
Nevertheless, despite the pervasive lies presented in the official 911 reports, the censorship by the corporate media, the disinformation efforts of the supposedly independent debunkers, and our own inabilities to come to terms with challenging information, the physical evidence of the inside job still stands.
The World Trade Centre forensic evidence proves the official account is a lie and ends the 911 conspiracy debate. [Presently there are 5 peer reviewed scientific papers supporting the inside job hypothesis that remain unchallenged in the scientific literature.]
Whatever the truth is concerning the involvement of Osama Bin Laden, he certainly could not have rigged the Twin Towers or WTC7 with explosives.
The War on Terror is a hoax designed to foment conflict between the West and militant Islamic groups for the purpose of US strategic domination of the Middle East. Only the truth about 911 will end these Wars.
The first step is identifying the propaganda to be overcome whilst simultaneously recognising the hard scientific evidence of the inside job. Once EVERYONE understands the truth then the game will be over.
By SpookyOne
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2019.]
