Miley Cyrus wants to murder innocent children!

Jared Lee Loughner (three names!), the latest nutbar to go postal, was apparently a 'truther'. His friend in the video above describes how he was a fan of the movie Loose Change. Other reports say he was also a fan of Zeitgeist.

Not surprisingly, the debunkers are once again using this to demonize us. Pat Curley has written a number of posts, including Truther Body Count, in which he summarizes the high-profile cases of alleged truthers murdering people. Notice he recycles the Anti-Defamation League's thoroughly debunked BS about Poplawski being an Alex Jones fan. Pat concludes...

Paranoid schizophrenics are probably more likely to become Truthers than the general population, and probably more likely to have voices in their heads telling them to kill someone.

And arrogant narcissists are probably more likely to become debunkers than the general population, and probably more likely to exhibit the Fishsticks mentality where they believe themselves to be awesome, when really they're just douchebags. Pat being a prime example! Is paranoid schizophrenia more prevalent amonst truthers than the general population? Such a study has never been done, but I expect alot of truthers would probably be wrongly diagnosed as having paranoid delusions, like Clare Swinney was.

The mainstream media is also emphasizing Loughner's 9/11 conspiracy beliefs. One example is this AOL News article:

9/11 Truther
One former Loughner friend told The Associated Press that in high school Loughner expressed a belief in the 9/11 "Truther" movement -- the idea that the government was behind the Sept. 11 attacks. This makes the death of 9-year-old Christine Green, who was born on Sept. 11, 2011 [sic], all the more poignant.

So now if you believe 9/11 was an inside job, you don't just offend the family members, you want to kill nine year old girls who were born on 9/11!



Loughner's friend also said he enjoyed smoking Salvia Divinorum, a hallucinogenic herb recently made famous by Miley Cyrus. So using the propagandist's flawed logic, I guess that means she's a killer too!

Why is it when you point out that the systematic genocide of six million jews at the hands of the Nazis was driven by Darwinian ideology, the 'liberals' and 'skeptics' insist that that in no way discredits belief in Darwinism; yet when the odd deranged nut who happens to believe 9/11 was a false-flag kills a few people, those same 'liberals' and 'skeptics' shamelessly exploit the tragedy to smear us?

New Film Fabled Enemies and the Cumulative Argument for 9/11 Complicity

Let us for the sake of argument concede a point. For a moment we shall imagine that WTC 7 was actually "the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building," as we have recently been told by NIST's final report. While we are at, let's also forget the related issue of the Twin Towers' dramatic plunge to the earth that hurdled steel beams out laterally for hundreds of feet. No demolition there either, gravity was the cause of these ejections of course, that achieved the herculean feat of being lodged in neighboring buildings. Now that we've conceded these points, what are we left with? Well, according to the website oilempire.us we are left with the fact that demolition theories are NOT needed to prove complicity! We are left with the fact that the argument for government involvement in 9/11 is a cumulative one.

Maybe these demolition arguments really should be conceded though, after all, the Wikipedia article on the subject states that the "controlled demolition hypothesis has been dismissed in the structural engineering literature." Of course after this statement there is no mention of the growing list of structural engineers who have gone public with their doubts. Not to mention that as of this writing the "Notable proponents" section of the article fails to mention the 453 architectural and engineering professionals that are members of ae911truth.org. Also, despite various claims to the contrary, the 9/11 truth movement has had papers published that passed peer-review in independent journals, including publication in an established civil engineering journal. The mainstream journal The Environmentalist also published the paper "Environmental anomalies at the World Trade Center: evidence for energetic materials." But I forgot, these points are being conceded for arguments sake, not because they really should be, so I digress!

The reason I wish you to imagine a world where these arguments are dropped from the conversation, is because what is left is still a massive load of evidence for 9/11 government complicity, and not just the US government. The newly released film Fabled Enemies, by Loose Change producer Jason Bermas, shifts the focus from the physical anomalies of 9/11 to the volumes of evidence that fingers various intelligence networks for their participation in the attacks. While most "debunking" efforts focus on scientific evidence, some do try to take on the other aspects of evidence for government complicity, such as 911myths.com. So, I now invite you to take the 9/11 myth or 9/11 fable challenge. Is it the myths of the 9/11 truth movement? Or the fables of the official storytellers? You be the judge... Fabled Enemies (Super High Quality, full movie)