Obama invokes 9/11 aaa-gain!

Why is it that every time the presidents want to go invade another country or send troops to some other country for anything, or take away more of our Constitutional rights they invoke 9/11?
Perhaps because 9/11 is the lie that changed the world and gave us a never ending war, plus a reason that the government can invoke support for just about anything in the guise of keeping us "safe".
Here is that quote from Politics Daily
"We are at war," Obama said. "We are at war against Al-Qaeda, a far-reaching network of violence and hatred that attacked us on 9/11, that killed nearly 3,000 innocent people, and that is plotting to strike us again. And we will do whatever it takes to defeat them."

Lately every time Obama opens his mouth he is war drumming and using 9/11 as the call to arms.
Obama is sounding more like Bush everyday.

Obama also called America the homeland.
THE WHAT???? yes that's right.. you read it correctly..the man said the homeland.
Such a subtle note of brainwashing PSYOP propaganda that word "homeland" is.

Here is the quote from "Salon News
"First, although our intelligence community had learned a great deal about the
Al Qaeda affiliate in Yemen, called Al Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula, that we knew that they sought to strike the United States and that they were recruiting operatives to do so, the intelligence community did not aggressively follow up on and prioritize particular streams of intelligence related to a possible attack against the homeland."

Obama invoking 9/11 and calling America "The Homeland" are techniques employed by those who have the need for propaganda or PR to spindoctor something so that "We The People" will buy it. (Remember that Obama and all presidents reads from a teleprompter and someone writes his/their speeches.)
I went to http://www.gatecreepers.com/entries/propaganda-techniques-infowarrior-resource-part/#1.9 and looked up propaganda.
Here is what they had to say.
Propaganda Techniques" is based upon "Appendix I: PSYOP Techniques" from "Psychological Operations Field Manual No.33-1" published by Headquarters; Department of the Army, in Washington DC, on 31 August 1979 (from http://www.zoehouse.com/is/sco/proptech.html)
Here are a few of the types of propaganda that I heard in Obama's talk.
Assertion:
Assertions are positive statements presented as fact. They imply that what is stated is self-evident and needs no further proof. Assertions may or may not be true.
Glittering Generalities:
Glittering generalities are intensely emotionally appealing words so closely associated with highly valued concepts and beliefs that they carry conviction without supporting information or reason. They appeal to such emotions as love of country, home; desire for peace, freedom, glory, honor, etc. They ask for approval without examination of the reason. Though the words and phrases are vague and suggest different things to different people, their connotation is always favorable: "The concepts and programs of the propagandist are always good, desirable, virtuous."
Generalities may gain or lose effectiveness with changes in conditions. They must, therefore, be responsive to current conditions. Phrases which called up pleasant associations at one time may evoke unpleasant or unfavorable connotations at another, particularly if their frame of reference has been altered.
Vagueness:
Generalities are deliberately vague so that the audience may supply its own interpretations. The intention is to move the audience by use of undefined phrases, without analyzing their validity or attempting to determine their reasonableness or application.
Rationalization:
Individuals or groups may use favorable generalities to rationalize questionable acts or beliefs. Vague and pleasant phrases are often used to justify such actions or beliefs.
Simplification:
Favorable generalities are used to provide simple answers to complex social, political, economic, or military problems.
Transfer:
This is a technique of projecting positive or negative qualities (praise or blame) of a person, entity, object, or value (an individual, group, organization, nation, patriotism, etc.) to another in order to make the second more acceptable or to discredit it. This technique is generally used to transfer blame from one member of a conflict to another. It evokes an emotional response which stimulates the target to identify with recognized authorities.
Least of Evils:
This is a technique of acknowledging that the course of action being taken is perhaps undesirable but that any alternative would result in an outcome far worse. This technique is generally used to explain the need for sacrifices or to justify the seemingly harsh actions that displease the target audience or restrict personal liberties. Projecting blame on the enemy for the unpleasant or restrictive conditions is usually coupled with this technique.
Last but not least I leave you with this quote from Hermann Göring
"Of course the people don't want war ... that is understood. But voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

Related Info:

Obama Plays The 9/11 Card Again

The Christmas Underwear Terrorist

IT'S A TRAP!!!

God dammit! I hate being duped by disinformation. Ok so there's this image making its rounds around the internets that has been presented as an actual scan from one of the airport body scanners now cropping up all over the globe in light of the recent staged terrorist incident. People in the truth and patriot communities have been using it as evidence that the scanners are more revealing than the mainstream media is telling us. While I have no doubt that the scanners are indeed more revealing than what the media is telling us, I've just learned this image is disinformation.

When the image is inverted it looks like this:


See the above image uncensored [NSFW]

Now at first I, like others, assumed this meant the scanners are even more detailed. That was until I was directed to this:


Body in 360° [NSFW]

It's a CD of royalty-free photos of a nude woman. Here are two of those images:


See the above image uncensored [NSFW]

It would appear as though someone has just taken those two photos, photoshopped them to invert the colours and add weapons and claimed them to be body scanner images. I kind of wish I hadn't shown it to all my friends and said "See, the media is lying to you!" now. Grrr.

Related Info:

Inverted Body Scanner Image Shows Naked Body In Full Living Color

Was sieht man wirklich im Nackt-Scanner?
(The source of the fake images)

"9/11 was an Inside Job" por Scootle Royale (Sub. Español)

I was already aware that the song "Yet Another '9/11 Was An Inside Job' Song" by Debunking the Debunkers blog contributor Scootle Royale had been translated into Spanish. However I just found out that YouTube user "NewWorldNoticias" added Spanish subtitles to the video a few weeks ago. As I've pointed out before the 9/11 truth movement has been exploding worldwide for quite some time, and this fact pains the so-called debunkers. ¡9/11 verdad ahora!

Scootle's Comment:

I just found out my uplifting "...Here's Tom With The Weather" video has also been translated into a foreign language. This one in German. It's gained more views over there in 3 weeks than the original has in 3 months.

Muchas gracias and vielen dank to those who took the time to translate and subtitle the videos. :)

Here's a message someone sent me on Youtube a few days ago:

Dude great job on the 9/11 was an inside job song! I listen to it over and over again. It really gets you thinking about the possibility that it may have been a inside job! You have really persuaded me that it was an inside job!

Nice to know I'm not just preaching to the choir. The mainstream media constantly tells us that we are powerless. Well I think this is living proof that, no matter how insignificant we think we are, we can all do something. I mean I can't even sing for god sakes!

The Christmas Underwear Terrorist

Obama's weekly address talked mainly about Yemen and the terrorist cells of Al-Qaeda.
It seemed to me to be nothing but a bunch of propaganda crap from Obama to justify more war..Obama spent about 20 seconds on our nations security failures and the rest was about getting the terrorist outside our borders in another country.
Well apparently they can't get the terrorist when they are pointed out and warned about IN our country. Why should we believe they can get them elsewhere?
While Obama says that he is going to make sure this does not happen again..that is what we were told after 9/11. The same type of departmental communication failure (that the government claims in it's official conspiracy theory of 9/11 allowed a "terrorist attack"to happen),.. happened again.

The failures and breakdown in communications that allowed this person to get on board that plane after the terrorist's father went to people in American government and said "hey my son is disturbed and going to do something crazy" or the fact that the FBI knew this man was up to something because he was on a watch list.. says more than Obama's words could ever say. Perhaps the problem is that the FBI watch list contains over half a million names.
I am quite sure that many on that list do not deserve to be there. So maybe if the FBI could actually get the real terrorists separate from those that are not terrorist they could get something done.
Either our government is full of irresponsible, bumbling, overpaid, freakin idiots, or that terrorist incident was allowed to happen to justify to us (We The People) why America's sons and daughters are going to be dying in Yemen now.
Obama's speech had nothing to do with focusing on the main problem which is not terrorists, but our government's inability to do its job under the broad sweeping Unconstitutional laws that we already have. Obama said that our Homeland security people deserved to be commended for the excellent job they have been doing that we never hear about. Well my first thought is... why didn't we hear about it... and the second thought I have is... from their actions that we do hear about... you could not prove it.
Ron Paul had something to say about this subject.



Update:

The CIA gave the Christmas Underwear Terrorist A Visa for our Country???

Related Info:

More research on this subject at infowars.com:

America is walking into a Al-Queda trap

Why did we lose our rights if the government isn't even keeping us safe?

They Should Have Used Fire...

Another failed controlled demolition! When will these demolition companies learn that the most efficient way to bring a building down is to start a few fires!?

You're doing it wrong! Chinese demolition men accidentally create the leaning tower of Liuzhou