Showing posts with label 2001. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2001. Show all posts

Saturday, February 1, 2014

Announcing a New Ballot Initiative: the "High-rise Safety Initiative"

February 01, 2014
High-Rise Safety Initiative Logo

Dear Supporters,
The  (NYC CAN) is excited to announce the launch of the “High-rise Safety Initiative,” a new ballot initiative that will amend the New York City Charter to require the NYC Department of Buildings to investigate all high-rise building collapses occurring in New York City on or after September 11, 2001, except the collapse of WTC 1 and 2. The Initiative will apply to the collapse of WTC 7 on September 11, 2001, as well as any high-rise collapse that occurs in the future.
As many of you know, the City of New York blocked NYC CAN’s 2009 ballot initiative from going before the voters and becoming law. Five years later, we are sponsoring a new ballot initiative that has been carefully crafted to withstand any legal challenge the City might bring.
We invite you to read the petition.

The Road to the Ballot

For the proposed charter amendment to appear on the November 4, 2014 ballot, we need to submit 30,000 signatures from registered New York City voters by July 3, 2014, and a second submission of 15,000 signatures by September 5, 2014. To be sure we have enough valid signatures, the High-rise Safety Initiative is aiming to gather 75,000 signatures for the first submission, and 35,000 signatures for the second submission.
After that we may have to face off against the City over the legality of the petition, a battle we are confident of winning. Once the amendment is officially on the ballot, we will launch a full-scale electoral campaign to educate New York City voters about the need for the High-rise Safety Initiative.

Our Success Depends on You

Our ability to gather the signatures, overcome a legal challenge and win the vote on November 4 depends on your generous support.
The petition drive, which will run from May to July 2014, will cost $250,000. The High-rise Safety Initiative is working with a political consulting firm that specializes in field operations to manage the petition drive – which all but ensures that we will successfully gather enough signatures if we meet our fundraising goal. After that, up to $50,000 may be needed for litigation.
Today we are asking you to make a generous donation to help us reach our $250,000 fundraising goal by May 1. With your generous support we will take the first steps toward mandating a new WTC 7 investigation and ensuring that the failure to properly investigate a high-rise collapse is never repeated in New York City.
Please go to HighriseSafetyNYC.org to learn more about the campaign and make your donation today.
We thank you for your commitment to NYC CAN’s efforts over the past five years. Now, with your generous support and lots of hard work, we can require the City of New York to investigate the collapse of WTC 7 and any high-rise collapse that may occur in the future.
Sincerely,
Ted Walter
NYC Coalition for Accountability Now

Wednesday, March 20, 2013

R.I.P Jane Pollicino, 1953 -- 2013: 9/11 Widow Took Courageous Stand for 9/11 Families and AE911Truth

Published on Mar 15, 2013
 
9/11 widow Jane Pollicino, a passionate supporter of AE911Truth, passed away on February 21 after suffering a stroke, according to Newsday.

Her husband, Steve Pollicino, died in the North Tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. Her husband's remains were never found.

Jane was an active member of NYC CAN, joining over 100 family members of 9/11 victims and first responders who stand side by side with the 1,700 Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth in calling for a real 9/11 investigation.

In 2009, she helped deliver a petition signed by over 80,000 New Yorkers to the New York City Council in an effort to begin a new 9/11 inquiry.

In 2011, she took part in the second TV ad by the Remember Building 7 campaign, in which 9/11 victims' family members joined architects and engineers in questioning the destruction of WTC Building Seven.

Most recently, Jane took a leading role in educating the public about 9/11 by appearing in our latest documentaries, 9/11: Explosive Evidence -- Experts Speak Out and Architects & Engineers: Solving the Mystery of WTC 7. She spoke in the most touching manner of losing her husband on 9/11, and asked why there has yet to be a real scientific investigation into what took his life and the lives of thousands of other victims. In the film, she pleads for real answers to questions such as, "Why is there no trace of more than 1,100 people?"

She also gave speeches at several major 9/11 Truth events, including the Investigate Building 7 conference in Connecticut in 2011 and the New York City premiere of Experts Speak Out in June 2012. In addition, she spent her last few years giving tours of Ground Zero to visitors at the 9/11 Tribute Center.

AE911Truth founder and CEO Richard Gage, AIA, notes, "Along with courageous 9/11 family member Bob McIlvaine, Jane was one of the most dedicated and consistent supporters of the critically important work we are doing here at AE911Truth on behalf of the 9/11 Truth movement. Her starring role at the beginning and end of Experts Speak Out is a haunting plea for justice that I hope will grip and move the hearts of all who have the good grace to see this film."
Her moving words at the film's conclusion will be a lasting memory to us all:

"The country owns this. We were all victims. We all should want answers. It's not just ours... It's not just mine. We all lost something that day."

R.I.P. Jane ..our thoughts are with your family at this time.
 


Source:

http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/727-jane-pollicino-1953-2013-911-widow-took-courageous-stand-for-ae911truth.html

Dearly Departed, Jane Pollicino, 59, spoke out for 9/11 families

911Blogger
March 3, 2013

"Jane Pollicino, 59, of Plainview, who became a prominent voice for families of 9/11 victims after she lost her husband in the Twin Towers attack, died Feb. 21. She suffered a stroke while on vacation with her family in Cancun, Mexico.

Pollicino was a homemaker when her husband, Steve, a corporate bond trader and vice president at Cantor Fitzgerald, was killed on Sept. 11, 2001. Her children,..."

Jane was a featured speaker in Architects & Engineers For 9/11 Truth's: Explosive Evidence EXPERTS SPEAK OUT and will be missed,

Long Island NewsDay
http://www.newsday.com/long-island/obituaries/jane-pollicino-59-spoke-out-for-9-11-families-dies-1.4730532

Jane Pollicino Interview NYC CAN Update 911 Family Member Speaks Out

Remember Building 7, Hartford, Conn. Part 5 - 3/26/11 - 911 Family Member Jane Pollicino

PBS - Colorado broadcasts 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (2012 documentary) http://youtu.be/Ddz2mw2vaEg?t=54m15s (featured at 54min 16sec)

Related:

Please sign this petition that Pollicino was helping to spearhead.

 

Thousands Of Victims' Family Members Believe 9/11 Was An Inside Job


9/11 Families Ask: What Happened to the Third Building That Collapsed in the WTC Attacks?

"The Jersey Girls" support AE911Truth efforts


Video of this event co-sponsored by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Scholars and Family Members Submit Request for Correction to 9/11 NIST Report

We, the undersigned Families, First Responders and Survivors of September 11 raise our voice with those from across our country and around the world in support of NYC CAN and the establishment of an independent, impartial subpoena powered investigation into the events surrounding the September 11 attacks on our nation.

Respected Leaders and Families Launch 9/11 Truth Statement Demanding Deeper Investigation into the Events of 9/11

9/11 Family Member Patty Casazza: Government Knew Exact Date and Exact Target

9/11 Family Member "I Get Used As A Sacred Cow"

Friday, September 12, 2008

Our Government and 9/11

Of course there's an explanation. And our government has provided several.

Some people only believe the government's story about 9/11. But what do they believe when the government tells two different, contradictory stories about the same thing? Here are some examples:

Government Story: National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice told Congress, "I don't think anybody could have predicted that ... they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile."

Contradictory Government Story: Our government claims that the Japanese kamikaze pilots used airplanes as missiles in WWII.

Government Story: Air Force Gen. Richard Myers said, "You hate to admit it, but we hadn't thought about this."
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44621

Contradictory Government Story: On September 11th, 2001, the Air Force could not intercept the hijackers because it was carrying out multiple drills using the exact scenario Myers claimed they hadn't thought about.

Government Story: 9/11 justified invading Iraq.

Contradictory Government Story: Bush said Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

Government Story: "The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him." --G.W. Bush, 9/13/01

Contradictory Government Story: "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." -- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

There are many more contradictory government stories, but that's a sampling. I don't know about you, but when two stories contradict each other, it seems to me that both cannot be true.

So for those who believe the government's stories about 9/11, I'd like to know which contradictory story they believe. For example, do they believe that the U.S. was attacked by Al Quedah under the command of Osama bin Laden, in which case catching bin Laden would be the government's highest priority, or do they believe that catching bin Laden isn't a priority, in which case it isn't likely that he had anything to do with 9/11 (unless our government isn't interested in catching those responsible for 9/11).

Do they believe that the Air Force couldn't intercept the hijackers because it was carrying out war games designed around the scenarios of hijackers taking over civilian aircraft and using them as weapons, or do they believe that the government never imagined such a scenario?

Another contradictory story that has puzzled me is that the White House told New Yorkers that the air around ground zero was safe to breathe after 9/11. Yet the WTC buildings had been condemned due to asbestos, and if the buildings were brought down by plane crashes and fires, that asbestos had to be in the air. Do those who believe the government's contradictory stories believe that the government has a right to condemn buildings due to asbestos because it can be harmful to people's health, or do they believe that asbestos is safe to inhale?

I'm really curious. When the government tells two contradictory stories, how do those who believe the government's stories decide which one to believe, or do they believe both simultaneously?

------------------
This article was first posted at http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=9265