Sibel Edmonds: US Government Needs to Keep the Fear Factor Alive by Creating Terror Threats

The Obama administration has the worst track record when it comes to prosecuting whistleblowers. Obama once claimed he'd work hard to have a transparent government, but many have faced retaliation for revealing controversial government information. Sibel Edmonds, who is a whistleblower, waited 340 days for FBI clearance of her memoir but finally released it on her own. Edmonds, founder of the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition, joins us for more.



-------------------------------------------------
Edmonds talks about her experience with the controlled mass media, the cover-up of pre-911 intelligence and also general corruption in Government departments - with individuals inside the USA working with foreign nations (presumably Turkey and Israel) to the detriment of US National Security.

Regarding Bin Laden, and Bin Laden related groups, according to Sibel, the CIA and State Department had been working with them throughout the 90s, right up to, and AFTER the attacks of September 11. In other interviews she has also said that the US had intimate ties to Osama Bin Laden right up to the day of the attacks.

This is the real world we live in. The billion dollar budgeted intelligence agencies DO have tentacles everywhere, but they don't talk about it. They know what's going on and manipulate things to serve certain geopolitical interests. This sort of thing has been going on for a long time. And >> if these interests find themselves with no serious threats, or rather no military excuse to intervene in foreign countries, like at the end of the Cold War, then they lose a measure of their ability to control events - hence the War on Terror.

This is a great clip.

And note: when asked about bombshell information, Sibel states she did not release information that she knew was classified. There is obviously more story to tell. However, what we do know is damning enough.

Related Info:



FBI Blocks 9/11 Whistleblower’s Book

Two more recent interviews with Edmonds

Debunking the Debunkers:

FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds is Credible... and Yes... She is a Truther Too!

Sibel Edmonds, SNAFUs, and Freedom Fries!

Nitpicking the Nitpickers: Curley's Mistranslation

Curley's Mistranslation - Part Deux!

Nafeez Mossadeq Ahmed on the Death of Osama Bin Laden

Related info:

Nafeez Ahmed: Divisive Speculation Harms The Movement

Not a Deather, but a Doubter; Still a Truther

Rashard Mendenhall: 'I just have a hard time believing a plane could take a skyscraper down demolition style'

The Death of Osama, 9/11 and the War on Terror

Bin Laden Didn't Destroy WTC 7!

Death of Bin Laden May Distract from a More Disturbing Story

Will the real Osama please stand

They (The FBI) used a Spanish Lawmakers face to show us what Bin Laden would look like today.
HUH?????
They even used his unique facial lines. You know the lines around a persons eyes ect.Those kind of features are unique to each person, sorta like a fingerprint.
The FBI distributed widely the digitally enhanced poster of Osama.
Naturally Gaspar Llamazares was quite horrified to discover that the FBI had used his face for the Osama update.
Here's a quote from this article.
"Gaspar Llamazares of the United Left party said he would no longer feel safe traveling to the United States after his hair and facial wrinkles were taken from the Internet and appeared on a wanted poster updating the U.S. government's 1998 photo of the Al-Qaida leader."

The USA, FBI, CIA psyop hoax of Bin Laden is starting to unravel more and more.
related article links:
FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds is Credible... and Yes... She is a Truther Too!
BBC Propaganda: Is Osama Bin Laden dead or alive?

Call to Action re: Amy Goodman's show on Bin Laden

 Pictured is Dan Wallace (now deceased) of NY911Truth, Fallen Firefighter's Son

From ny911truth.org

Hello all,

Yesterday Amy Goodman interviewed author Steve Coll on his new book about the Bin Laden family. The whole interview was skewed to present Bin Laden as responsible for 9/11. She touted how Coll is a Pulitzer prize-winning author. Unfortunately, key detail was left out which questions whether Bin Laden had been involved at all. As a journalist she must come to question how Bin Laden could have been accused and convicted for 9/11 within an hour of the attacks on all the major news stations without an investigation. Surely she must know that the Taliban offered to turn him over if the U.S. provided evidence of his guilt. This evidence never materialized. Now we must approach Amy and urge her to air alternative viewpoints. Let's urge her to have Kevin Barrett or Bin Laden expert Professor Bruce Lawrence, head of Duke University’s Religious Studies program.

Include any of these talking points:

It has been reported that Bin Laden actually denied involvement with 9/11. See http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/16/inv.binladen.denial/

On his web site Robert Fisk displays a page from the Pakistani newspaper Ummat in which Bin Laden stated, "I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle.

From a PBS timeline, on Sept. 16, 2001

Osama bin Laden denies any involvement in the 9/11 attacks in a statement to Al Jazeera television, saying, "I would like to assure the world that I did not plan the recent attacks, which seems to have been planned by people for personal reasons."

Project Censored 2008 article titled

"No Hard Evidence Connecting Bin Laden to 9/11"
http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/16-no-hard-evidence-connecting-bin-laden-to-9-11/

At the 7th anniversary of 9/11, we must urge Amy to provide a "fair & balanced" account of the facts. However, please be civil and respectful. Appeal to her professional position as a journalist, rather than berate her. THIS IS KEY! Please mail Amy today at mail@democracynow.org or producers@democracynow.org.

Please include some version of the following thought --- "I know you support a new investigation of 9/11. You had former Sen. Mike Gravel on to discuss the NYC 9/11 Ballot Initiative. They now have reached 30,000 petition signatures, which is a milestone. It's time for an update on Democracy Now. Please contact Les Jamieson at info@nyc911initiative.org to schedule an interview with him and one of the celebrity endorsers. The world deserves an authentic, comprehensive investigation. The NYC 9/11 Ballot Initiative is the vehicle to accomplish this task."

Thanks to all for helping to get an opposing viewpoint on the most visible example of alternative media.

Towards truth,
Les Jamieson

Our Government and 9/11

Of course there's an explanation. And our government has provided several.

Some people only believe the government's story about 9/11. But what do they believe when the government tells two different, contradictory stories about the same thing? Here are some examples:

Government Story: National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice told Congress, "I don't think anybody could have predicted that ... they would try to use an airplane as a missile, a hijacked airplane as a missile."

Contradictory Government Story: Our government claims that the Japanese kamikaze pilots used airplanes as missiles in WWII.

Government Story: Air Force Gen. Richard Myers said, "You hate to admit it, but we hadn't thought about this."
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=44621

Contradictory Government Story: On September 11th, 2001, the Air Force could not intercept the hijackers because it was carrying out multiple drills using the exact scenario Myers claimed they hadn't thought about.

Government Story: 9/11 justified invading Iraq.

Contradictory Government Story: Bush said Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

Government Story: "The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him." --G.W. Bush, 9/13/01

Contradictory Government Story: "I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority." -- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02

There are many more contradictory government stories, but that's a sampling. I don't know about you, but when two stories contradict each other, it seems to me that both cannot be true.

So for those who believe the government's stories about 9/11, I'd like to know which contradictory story they believe. For example, do they believe that the U.S. was attacked by Al Quedah under the command of Osama bin Laden, in which case catching bin Laden would be the government's highest priority, or do they believe that catching bin Laden isn't a priority, in which case it isn't likely that he had anything to do with 9/11 (unless our government isn't interested in catching those responsible for 9/11).

Do they believe that the Air Force couldn't intercept the hijackers because it was carrying out war games designed around the scenarios of hijackers taking over civilian aircraft and using them as weapons, or do they believe that the government never imagined such a scenario?

Another contradictory story that has puzzled me is that the White House told New Yorkers that the air around ground zero was safe to breathe after 9/11. Yet the WTC buildings had been condemned due to asbestos, and if the buildings were brought down by plane crashes and fires, that asbestos had to be in the air. Do those who believe the government's contradictory stories believe that the government has a right to condemn buildings due to asbestos because it can be harmful to people's health, or do they believe that asbestos is safe to inhale?

I'm really curious. When the government tells two contradictory stories, how do those who believe the government's stories decide which one to believe, or do they believe both simultaneously?

------------------
This article was first posted at http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=9265