ReThink911 is Officially Airborne Forward the Video – Sign the Petition

ReThink911 is Officially Airborne
Forward the Video – Sign the Petition

Watch The Video Here: http://ReThink911.org

Dear ReThink911 Supporters,

The day we’ve all been waiting for has arrived. Today the ReThink911 campaign officially launches. Over the next month, tens of millions of people in 12 cities around the world will see the ads that thousands of you made possible with your hard work and generous donations.

But this campaign is way more than just these ads. It’s the educational materials we distribute, and it’s the tens of thousands of people—and one day millions of people—who raise their voices in support of a new investigation into the events of 9/11.

We kick off our people-powered educational campaign by asking you to take two vitally important actions:

1) Watch the newly released official ReThink911 video narrated by Daniel Sunjata—then forward it to all of your friends and family and everyone else on your contact list, and share it on Facebook and Twitter using the buttons below the video player. Let’s make this video go viral!

2) Sign the newly unveiled ReThink911 International Petition. When this petition reaches one million signers, it will be delivered to the Head of State of every nation that had citizens who died in the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Are you wondering when your city’s ads will be up? Here you go!

San Francisco – Bay Area Rapid Transit posters: already in circulation
Washington D.C. – Taxi tops: already in circulation
Boston – Taxi tops: already in circulation
Chicago – Taxi tops: already in circulation
Dallas – Stemmons Freeway billboard near Feizy Center: September 2 installation
Toronto – Dundas Square billboard: September 2 installation
London – Downtown billboard and street boards: September 2 installation
Sydney – Downtown street posters: September 2 installation
New York – Times Square billboard (47th St. & 7th Ave.): September 3 installation
Vancouver – Downtown transit shelters: September 4 installation
San Diego – Mobile billboard: September 5 to September 11
Ottawa – Bus posters: September 9 installation

Stay tuned in the coming days for photos and videos.

Thank you for making this historic campaign a reality!

Related:

Chemical Engineer Mark Basile and Other Professionals Speak Out for ReThink 911

Statement For 9/11 Justice Off To A Great Start

Jon Gold
CindySheehanSoapbox.blogspot.com
8/9/2012

Recently, I wrote a petition for people to sign called a "Statement For 9/11 Justice."

As of right now, there are 278 signatures. Not bad considering it was posted 5 days ago. Some of the people that have signed it that you may have heard of are 9/11 Family Member Lorie Van Auken, 9/11 Family Member Donna Marsh O'Connor, 9/11 First Responder Reggie Cervantes, 9/11 Whistleblowers Coleen Rowley and Sibel Edmonds, Cindy Sheehan, Ray McGovern, Dahlia Wasfi, John Judge, Daniel Sunjata, and journalists Pepe Escobar, William Rivers Pitt, and Jeremy R. Hammond.

A big thank you to them for lending their names to this statement.

The reason I wrote this statement was because I believe it is imperative that one like it exists. I believe we need to collectively put our feet down on this issue. Our media and our politicians will not tell the people the truth, so it is up to us to do so. The killing and the dying needs to stop, and the loss of our civil liberties needs to stop. The world needs to know there is no justification for any of it.

I am hoping this statement goes viral. I am hoping that millions sign it. Can you imagine how powerful a statement that would be? I am hoping that people still care enough to do so.

I can't get people to sign this on my own. I need your help. Please tell your family and friends about it. Please post it where you can. Your help is very much needed, and will be very much appreciated.

So, we are off to a great start, but it could be a lot better. Please do what you can. Thank you.

Related:

'Debunker' Related Excerpts from and Review of '9/11 Truther The Fight for Peace, Justice and Accountability' by Jon Gold

President Obama: 9/11 Families Ask You to Watch “9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out”

WTC 7 Petition to the National Institute for Standards and Technology, U.S. Congress, and President Obama

Properly Investigate the Crimes of 9/11 Petition

Corbett Report Radio 060 -- A Violation of Trust with Howard Cohen

Howard Cohen of Actors and Artists for 9/11 Truth discusses his forthcoming feature film, "A Violation of Trust." Set to star veteran Hollywood actors Ed Asner, Woody Harrelson, Daniel Sunjata, Michele Phillips, and more, "A Violation of Trust" dramatizes the first day of a new presidential investigation into 9/11.









Download link: http://www.corbettreport.com/corbett-report-radio-060-a-violation-of-truth-with-howard-cohen/

The Unofficial Story

I've just watched CBC's The Fifth Estate - "The Unofficial Story" and I'm unsure what to think of it. At first glance it appears to be a fair piece, at least compared to the History Channel, BBC and National Geographic propaganda pieces, but I can't help but feel it may have been a very subtle hitpiece.

The first thing I noticed was that they spliced Richard Gage's speech incorrectly. When he talks about a building falling at freefall for two and a quarter seconds, he is obviously talking about WTC7, but they use that snippet while talking about the South Tower. From that point on I was carefully analysing the piece from a video editor's perspective and noticed alot of splicing. Maybe it was harmless condensing but it was something I couldn't help but notice.

Next they get into the air defence timeline and stand down theories. They make no mention of the fact that the timeline has been revised several times and simply state the newest timeline as fact. They then whitewashed the concern that the skies of America were undefended for eighty minutes by cutting to James "[Loose Change is] Very Compelling Propaganda" Meigs, who for some reason always makes me think of Bill Hicks' "Suck Satan's C**k!" routine, who repeats his usual drivel about us watching too many films and believing in hyper competance and vast conspiracies. To be honest, if you believe the official story of 9/11, then it is you who has been watching too many films, because as Barrie Zwicker pointed out, the official fairytale is somewhat reminiscent of a Hollywood movie.

Next they briefly talk Pentagon no-plane theories with Craig Ranke. Now I'm no fan of CIT's work and I'm glad they didn't spend much time on it but when the narrator mockingly said "So many conspiracy theories, so little time" that really pissed me off. This isn't something to joke about. If it was something like the moon landing hoax theory (which they later brought up), then fair enough, joke all you want , it isn't really that important. But when you're talking about the defining moment of the 21st century, remarks like that are totally inappropriate.

Next they talked to John Farmer who said there was no basis for controlled demolition theories (which is a blatant lie), however he did admit that the official government version "doesn't square with reality". This is a heck of a statement coming from the Former Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission and by itself should warrant a new investigation. However it was talked about as if it was no big deal.

In part three they spent alot of time on the controversial fake phone call theories. Now I'm neutral on that issue and I don't like to flat out say they were all fake because it's such a sensitive area and can't really be proven either way. Professor Dewdney however did not share my reservation and was willing to say without a doubt that the emotional calls were fake. He also repeated the claim that Mark Bingham's "imposter" screwed up by saying "Hi mom this is Mark Bingham", a claim which I have always known was incorrect, since the first 9/11 documentary I ever saw was The Flight That Fought Back, which features his mother explaining what that was about. Dewdney at first incorrectly called him "Bob Bringham" and was the only person in the piece to put forward an alternative narrative. All of his baseless assertions, factual errors and fringe speculation was used to whitewash the genuine concern surrounding Barbara Olsen's alleged calls, which was glossed over.

Lastly they discussed Building 7, but did not make a big enough deal over the fact that it admittedly fell at freefall. Once again Brent Blanchard makes an appearance, and he's in just as much denial as ever. The red chips were brought up briefly. Well actually, photos of them were shown on screen while Gage was talking about the microspheres. The interviewer was obviously trying very hard to get Gage to speculate but thankfully he didn't. The piece then ended on some powerful words by Daniel Sunjata.

All in all, it could have been worse I suppose. At least they didn't bring on some token family member and have them say how much they hate us. Then again, they also didn't talk to any family members on our side. I really am getting tired of these whitewashes/hitpieces. And I'm equally tired of the "conspiracy theorist" label. Alex Jones was talking to Jon Ronson a few weeks ago and Ronson (about 9 minutes into this clip) said that the truth about 9/11 would be the biggest news story ever and he finds it hard to believe any reporter would turn down such a story if it had any truth to it. The reason few reporters are interested is simply because of the term "conspiracy theory". The stereotype associated with that term has been implanted so much into popular culture that most reporters will simply dismiss us and our theories as crazy. And those reporters that have done fair pieces on us still use the term conspiracy theory because they don't know what else to call it. And because they label it a conspiracy theory, few people will take any interest. As long as the media continues to portray 9/11 truth as a conspiracy theory, instead of a serious search for truth by family members, survivors, first responders and concerned citizens of planet Earth, the dumbed down, drugged and distracted masses will never take it seriously.

The next celebrity truthers?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/pop-star-miley-cyrus-asks-what-is-infowars.html

Well this is an unexpected suprise. Heidi Montag, the star of some Reality show on MTV, is plugging Infowars and PrisonPlanet articles on Twitter. Her boyfriend Spencer Pratt is apparently a fan of this kind of stuff.

Even more suprising, and potentially very exciting is that she seems to have raised the curiosity of teen mega-sensation Miley Cyrus!

Now I'm no Miley Cyrus fan, and my opinions of her dropped even more when I found out she was supporting a bill to basically end free speech on the internet, but if she were to start voicing these important issues it would be great exposure for the movement. She's adored by young children and teenagers and she could be a great ally in the information war.

Maybe this is just wishful thinking, maybe not. She wouldn't be the first celebrity to "come out of the closet" with regards to this stuff; Charlie Sheen, Rosie O'Donnell, Christine Ebersole, Daniel Sunjata, Jesse Ventura, Tom DeLonge of Blink 182, Matthew Bellamy of Muse, Warren Cuccurullo of Frank Zappa/Duran Duran, Willie Nelson and many others have all put their careers on the line to voice their controversial opinions regarding important issues. And not one of them regrets it!

On another note, The BBC is set to air another of it's Conspiracy Files hatchet jobs in 7 hours. This one focusing on the London Bombings. I predict they won't actually defend the flawed official narrative. Instead they will simply re-state it as fact and then criticise alternative theories. They'll bring in Peter Power and downplay the extraordinary coincidence of the simultaneous drills, they'll focus on some old debunked arguments and attack us strawman and then they'll resort to emotional manipulation by saying we hurt the family members and survivors etc. while completely ignoring the family members and survivors who do question the official story. In fact, I think the majority of family members are unsatisified with the lack of justice.

They probably won't mention the fact that metal and tiles on the trains were blown upwards, indicating that the bombs were placed underneath the trains, and if they do they'll probably make up some new law of physics like they did to explain WTC7's collapse.

... So predictable!

Related Info:

BBC 7/7 "Documentary": Just a hitpiece, or something more sinister?