A collection of essays by 9/11 researcher Adam Taylor. Eleven chapters in total, this eBook is comprised of previously posted essays written during my decade+ of research into the events of 9/11. Includes my article originally published at ScientificMethod911.org, updated and expanded upon since its initial release. Also included are my technical articles and blog posts on the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, and responses to debunkers attempting to defend the official narrative of 9/11. Almost 300 pages in length, this eBook contains detailed discussions, and includes over 600 references providing factual support. Freely available for all, who may do with the information as they see fit.
Webpage link: https://911docs.
Direct pdf link: https://911docs.files.
First and foremost, my
sincerest thanks have to go towards my dear friend John-Michael Talboo.
I would never have come as far as I have and done as much as I did without
your help and guidance, and a platform to present my work on. You have
been an invaluable research partner, and an even more invaluable friend.
...
We then get a discussion of Dr. James Millette’s study of the WTC dust,
and how his study came to opposite conclusions to Dr. Jones’ et al.
Millette’s study ultimately determined the material found was likely paint
from the Towers.26 However, a detailed essay by researchers John-Michael
Talboo and Ziggi Zugam shows many flaws in Millette’s study, and that
further research needs to be done.27 The most productive period of my
research, and where I posted most of my writings, was at the Debunking
the Debunkers blog, created and hosted by my friend John-Michael
Talboo. I also had the honor of contributing to Architects & Engineers for
9/11 Truth, the largest independent organization scientifically analyzing
the WTC collapses from a skeptical viewpoint. My research largely
focused on the collapse of the Twin Towers and World Trade Center
Building 7, whose destruction many believe was the result of controlled
demolition with explosives.
...
23 “The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories,” America.gov, 5 May 2009, archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20110323153132/http://www.america. gov/st/webchat-english/2009/May/20060828133846esnamfuaK0.2676355.html. Comment on this article: John-Michael Talboo, “ALERT: US State Department Cannot Afford Professional Advice on WTC Destruction,” AE911Truth, 3 December 2010, at http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/414- alert-us-state-department-cannot-afford-professional-advice-on-wtc-destruction.html.
...
For more on this discussion, see John-Michael Talboo and Adam Taylor, “Debunking 9/11 Debunking: On WTC’s Design to Withstand 707 Impact,” 3 October 2020, at https://911docs.files.wordpress.com/2020/10/debunking911 debunkingwtcwithstand707impact2.pdf.
...
...
Millette’s paper far from debunks the findings of the Active Thermitic
Material paper. But even if that were the case, the evidence of demolition
for the Twin Towers and Building 7 would still be substantial, as well as
other non-demolition issues.31
31 John-Michael Talboo, “What Does it Mean for the 9/11 Truth Movement if
James R. Millette Proves Nano-thermite Wasn’t Used to Take down the WTC
Towers on 9/11?,” Debunking the Debunkers, 5 February 2012, at
911debunkers.blogspot.com/2012/01/what-does-it-mean-for-911-truth.html.
...
Related:
TTR32: DEBUNKERS AND TRUTHERS ARE BOTH WRONG ABOUT THE COLLAPSE TIMES OF THE WTC BUILDINGS ON 9/11
TTR EPISODE 24: JM TALBOO INTERVIEWS PHYSICS TEACHER DAVID CHANDLER ON THE UPCOMING 'CONFERENCE ON THE 9/11 PENTAGON EVIDENCE'
