Wednesday, June 5, 2013

Update: New Evidence from AE911Truth Chemical Engineer Mark Basile - Ignition of Red/Gray Chip Vs. Three Different Paint Chips

Mark Basile has tested samples of paint, and found that neither the blue nor red paint chips exhibit any of the thermitic properties that the active red/gray chips demonstrate. Update: He has now also tested a sample of known WTC primer paint. Take a look at the results:

Harrit et al. state: "To merit consideration, any assertion that a prosaic substance such as paint could match the characteristics we have described would have to be accompanied by empirical demonstration using a sample of the proposed material, including SEM/XEDS and DSC analyses."

But, as suspected, no tested paint chips have ignited and produce molten iron spheres. In case you didn't know, Dr. James Millette's conclusion in his preliminary report, is that the red/gray chips in the 2009 paper by Harrit et al. are an unidentified type of WTC paint. It's new evidence like this that motivated me to raise funds for a new project with Chemical Engineer Mark Basile, who is featured in the new film by Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out.

9/11: EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY EXCLUSIVE - - Mark Basile Chemical Engineer:

Harrit et al. thanked Basile for his independent discovery of the red/grey chips making the molten iron spheres when heated. The team confirmed Basile´s discovery with further tests that demonstrated that the chips produce the spheres when they ignite at about 430°C. This was a major discovery since normal combustion does not result in reduced iron and iron melts at about 1,538°C, way above the temperature obtainable with conventional combustion. Millette does not challenge these results because his report has no ignition tests at all, and he has not confirmed that he will attempt to publish. Millette has done research for the government, so his involvement in studying these chips should break the taboo and bring attention to this area of research. I am co-authoring a paper that will cover this debate in detail. Update: Version 1.2 is now posted here. It still has some kinks that need worked out, but a much better PDF version is on the way.

Most importantly, unlike the other two studies which have both been accused by many of bias, Basile is going to oversee the testing, but scientists in an independent lab will do the work. They will have no idea that the dust is from the WTC or from 9/11, to ensure absolute and unquestionable objectivity.

Please visit for detailed information on the study and the fund raiser that's been set to help with lab costs. We have added a pay pal option that goes directly to Mark Basile, as can be seen by this screen shot of a test donation made by my mother. We did this for anyone that was perhaps weary to donate to a third party collecting the funds.


Hello Kimberly Talboo,

This email confirms that you have donated $1.00 USD to mark basile ( using PayPal.

Donation Details

Confirmation number:02W56285C37770237
Donation amount:$1.00 USD
Total:$1.00 USD
Purpose:Mark Basile_WTC_Dust_Analysis
Contributor:Kimberly Talboo

Recipient information

Donations coordinator:mark basile