Tuesday, March 31, 2009

Conspiracies - 9/11 and The New World Order

The following is very balanced commentary overall, although I could do without the cynicism. The other thing to consider is that the 9/11 truth movement doesn't need "debunkers" to point out our mistakes, or times when we have let speculation run rampant, etc. Being the truth seekers that we are, we do that just fine ourselves.

Thoughtful and balanced debate devoid of ad hominem attacks is a welcome thing to the vast majority of 9/11 truth seekers, sadly this is far from the MO of the "9/11 debunking" community as a whole, to say the very least.

March 24, 2009

Related Info:

NWO Conspiracy Bullshit

Debunking Myths on Conspiracy Theories

Conspiracy Theories

Conspiracy Theorists

Conspiracies - 9/11 and The New World Order

Nanothermite Demolishes 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Meet the 9/11 Conspiracy Nuts

I Am Not A Conspiracy Theorist

Is Obi-Wan Kenobi a Wacko Conspiracy Theorist?

John McCain is a Conspiracy Theorist

Hijacking the American Conscience: The Reality of Conspiracy in the USA & The Way to Progress

Constructive Criticism and Real Debunking


Constructive Criticism of the Films Loose Change 2nd Edition and 9/11 Mysteries

Disinformation: Infiltration, Misinformation, Disruption

Information Warfare: Ideas as Weapons in the Era of Deception

The Pentagon Attack: The No-Jetliner Claims

Pentagon Strike Theories - Ambiguous Evidence Spawns Proliferation of Theories

A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories

Theories of the Twin Towers' Destruction Rejecting Gravity-Driven Collapse

The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center

Arabesque911 - A Blog Devoted to Discussing 9/11 News, Research, and Disinformation

Reply to Reynolds & Wood by Steven E. Jones