The following is very balanced commentary overall, although I could do without the cynicism. The other thing to consider is that the 9/11 truth movement doesn't need "debunkers" to point out our mistakes, or times when we have let speculation run rampant, etc. Being the truth seekers that we are, we do that just fine ourselves.
Thoughtful and balanced debate devoid of ad hominem attacks is a welcome thing to the vast majority of 9/11 truth seekers, sadly this is far from the MO of the "9/11 debunking" community as a whole, to say the very least.
pfarabee
YouTube.com
March 24, 2009
Related Info:
Debunking Myths on Conspiracy Theories
Conspiracies - 9/11 and The New World Order
Nanothermite Demolishes 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
I Am Not A Conspiracy Theorist
Is Obi-Wan Kenobi a Wacko Conspiracy Theorist?
John McCain is a Conspiracy Theorist
Hijacking the American Conscience: The Reality of Conspiracy in the USA & The Way to Progress
Constructive Criticism and Real Debunking
Constructive Criticism of the Films Loose Change 2nd Edition and 9/11 Mysteries
Disinformation: Infiltration, Misinformation, Disruption
Information Warfare: Ideas as Weapons in the Era of Deception
The Pentagon Attack: The No-Jetliner Claims
Pentagon Strike Theories - Ambiguous Evidence Spawns Proliferation of Theories
A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories
Theories of the Twin Towers' Destruction Rejecting Gravity-Driven Collapse
The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center
Arabesque911 - A Blog Devoted to Discussing 9/11 News, Research, and Disinformation
