Yet the debunkers also like to claim that the rapid horizontal ejections from the towers were not that fast and the steel pieces were not that big. You can't have it both ways. Either wtc7 wasn't so heavily damaged, or the north tower exploded.
Refuting the Hollow Arguments of the So-called 9/11 Debunkers & Truthers
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
WTC7 - You Can't Have It Both Ways!
Hi, I'm Scootle and this is my first post here. Debunkers like to point out that WTC7 recieved alot of damage to its south face from the WTC1's collapse, which is supposedly what started the so called "raging inferno". However, as this video shows, the north tower did not simply "peel open" as Debunking911 puts it, it launched large pieces debris at it at speeds of over 50mph!
Yet the debunkers also like to claim that the rapid horizontal ejections from the towers were not that fast and the steel pieces were not that big. You can't have it both ways. Either wtc7 wasn't so heavily damaged, or the north tower exploded.
Yet the debunkers also like to claim that the rapid horizontal ejections from the towers were not that fast and the steel pieces were not that big. You can't have it both ways. Either wtc7 wasn't so heavily damaged, or the north tower exploded.
