Why the 9/11 Truth Movement Still Matters in 2025: A Response to Media Dismissal and Smear Campaigns
As cultural civil war in the USA heats up, the media continues to focus on the idea that 9/11 conspiracy theories are a fringe issue that should be disassociated with mainstream political figures. A glaring example of this is the recent attempts to tarnish Donald Trump by associating him with conspiracy theorist Laura Loomer and, by extension, the entire 9/11 Truth Movement. This smear campaign against prominent figures who dare to question the official narrative serves as a reminder of just how powerful—and outdated—the narrative of mainstream media can be when it comes to 9/11 skepticism.
However, the reality is much more complicated. Recent polling and petitions show that 9/11 conspiracy theories enjoy significant public support, with millions of people still questioning the official account of the events of that fateful day. In this article, we will explore why the media’s efforts to tarnish individuals associated with 9/11 skepticism are both misguided and counterproductive, and why it's critical to take another look at the evidence.
The State of 9/11 Truth in 2025
In 2025, the 9/11 Truth Movement is alive and well, with numerous organizations and activists continuing to push for a more thorough investigation into the events of September 11, 2001. This is not a fringe issue; it's a mainstream concern. According to a recent article on AE911Truth, many of Trump's nominees were grilled about their stance on 9/11, with questions focusing on whether they would disassociate themselves from any theories surrounding the tragedy. These nominees were asked whether they agreed with the growing body of evidence pointing to a need for a new, independent investigation into 9/11. This ongoing demand for truth is fueled by growing skepticism in the public regarding the official narrative.
Moreover, various groups, such as AE911Truth and Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, continue to make strides in raising awareness and urging for further investigation. The 911debunkers blog itself also features numerous petitions and polls, with a significant percentage of the population still believing that the official story doesn’t tell the whole truth. While mainstream media outlets attempt to marginalize these voices, the truth is that these perspectives have much broader appeal than they're willing to admit.
For example, in 2025, AE911Truth released a document urging President Trump to look into the physical evidence of the World Trade Center collapse, emphasizing the need for a new investigation based on the overwhelming evidence of controlled demolition. This is a clear indicator that skepticism around the events of 9/11 is not going away, no matter how much media outlets try to discredit it. AE911Truth article on Trump.
The Science & Theories: What Do We Know?
A primary concern for many in the 9/11 Truth Movement is the thermite theory, which argues that the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings could have been facilitated by the use of thermitic materials, such as nano-thermite. Mark Basile, a key figure in this research, provided a preliminary report and video experiments demonstrating the presence of these materials in WTC dust samples. Basile's work has been instrumental in bringing this theory to the forefront of scientific discussions, particularly when it comes to explaining the unusual way the buildings collapsed—straight down, at near free-fall acceleration, without significant structural resistance.
Basile’s video experiments, in which he demonstrated the use of thermitic material to cut steel, were far more rigorous and conclusive than anything produced by his critics, such as James Millette. Millette, who has argued against the presence of thermite in the WTC debris, refused to test the very same types of materials that Basile did. Instead of engaging in scientifically rigorous testing, Millette’s claims appeared more like a refutation than an actual scientific study. This discrepancy points to a bigger problem: a reluctance among some researchers to engage with the evidence that supports alternative theories about 9/11.
At the heart of the controversy is the theft of crucial evidence. Scott Creighton, a supposed researcher involved in the 9/11 Truth Movement, stole samples that Mark Basile had provided for further analysis. Creighton, who has made no significant contributions to the field, attempted to discredit Basile and others by calling them “government disinformation agents.” Ironically, Creighton’s actions—stealing samples and offering nothing of value—are more reflective of the very disinformation tactics he claimed to oppose.
By contrast, Basile’s work, despite the controversy surrounding it, is grounded in actual evidence and experimentation. This presents a sharp contrast to the hollow rhetoric of individuals like Creighton, who were more interested in spreading misinformation than contributing to the scientific debate.
Furthermore, some have posited that the use of thermobaric devices, a type of weapon that creates high-pressure explosions, could have contributed to the building's destruction. This remains an under-explored area of research and could present an interesting avenue for future investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center.
The Suppression & Smear Campaign
The media’s strategy for discrediting the 9/11 Truth Movement is clear: guilt by association. Politicians and public figures are routinely questioned about their ties to anyone who questions the official narrative, and the mere mention of 9/11 skepticism is used to marginalize and discredit them. The case of Laura Loomer is a prime example. Loomer’s outspoken views on 9/11 skepticism, combined with her support for Trump, have led the mainstream media to paint her—and by extension, Trump—as conspiracy theorists. This type of smear campaign undermines the legitimacy of 9/11 skepticism, as though simply asking questions about the official narrative makes one unfit for public office or discussion.
In fact, this kind of media gaslighting is nothing new. For years, mainstream media outlets have framed those questioning the events of 9/11 as delusional or dangerous, while ignoring the thousands of engineers, architects, and experts who call for further investigation into the events of that day. Yet despite these efforts, skepticism remains widespread. In a recent poll conducted by AE911Truth, it was revealed that a large portion of the American public believes that the official story of 9/11 is incomplete or misleading.
Conclusion: Why This Still Matters
Despite mainstream media’s best efforts, the 9/11 Truth Movement is not a passing fad or a fringe conspiracy theory—it is a legitimate, public concern that demands further investigation. The calls for a new, independent investigation into 9/11 continue to grow, with many questioning the official narrative, not as an attack on the government, but as a call for accountability.
What the media fails to acknowledge is that these questions are not just the domain of a few conspiracy theorists—they represent a significant portion of the population that believes the truth has yet to come out. A populist leader like Trump, who claims to represent the will of the people, should not be dissuaded from engaging with these questions. Instead, he should push for transparency and advocate for an investigation into the true causes of 9/11.
In the end, it is the mainstream media that needs to evolve, not the public. If we are ever to truly understand what happened on that day, the conversation cannot be dismissed simply because it’s politically inconvenient. The truth matters, and it’s time for all of us to be willing to listen, question, and seek answers, no matter where they lead.
