Debunking the Debunkers

Sunday, May 23, 2010

A Picture is Worth a Thousand Excuses


But the government couldn't track the location of the planes because the terrorists on 9/11 turned off the transponders!

But NORAD only had 14 fighters on alert and none were at Andrews Air Force Base located 15 miles from the Pentagon!

But NORAD didn't know about Flight 93 until one minute after it already crashed!

But Payne Stewart's plane wasn't intercepted for over an hour!

Why not just blame it on the war games? I guess the detriment of charges of intentionally being stalled outweighed the benefit of a legitimate excuse.



"There is no way that an aircraft . . . would not be intercepted when they deviate from their flight plan, turn off their transponders, or stop communication with Air Traffic Control ... Attempts to obscure facts by calling them a 'conspiracy Theory' does not change the truth. It seems, 'Something is rotten in the State.'" - Capt. Daniel Davis, Former U.S. Army Air Defense Officer and NORAD Tac Director, decorated with the Purple Heart, the Bronze Star and the Soldiers Medal
Posted by John-Michael P. Talboo at 1:00 AM
Labels: andrews 14 planes 9/11, NORAD Flight 93 after it already crashed, Payne Stewart over an hour, the terrorists on 9/11 turned off the transponders
Newer Post Older Post Home

Core Of Corruption 2: Echoes of Treason - Official Trailer


Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign
Join the Blue Ribbon Online Free Speech Campaign!


Shop at Amazon.com through this widget and 100% of the sales commission goes directly to the FealGood Foundation.

Is This All New to You?

  • The Best Place for Beginners to Start...
  • A Quick Course on the Shortest Paths to 9/11 Truth...

Search This Blog

Contributors

  • AdamS
  • ScootleRoyale
  • StewBlog
  • dwheel39
  • Jimd3100
  • AdamT.
  • John-Michael P. Talboo
  • SpookyOne
  • ataviisms
  • Faith-R-Michaels
  • Fakeham

Subscribe to

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Best Collections of Evidence

  • "Debunking" Some "Debunker" Lies
  • 911truth.org's Top 40 Reasons the Official 9/11 Story is Bunk!
  • 911research.wtc7.net - Contents
  • Simplified Case for Inside Involvement in 9/11

Frequently Asked Questions

  • 9/11research.wtc7.net - Frequently Asked Questions
  • 911proof.com - Frequently Asked Questions
  • Fraser Valley 9/11 Truth - 9/11 Truth in Canada - Frequently Asked Questions
  • How Could and Why Would Anyone Besides Foreign Terrorists Plant Bombs in the World Trade Center?
  • Alleged 9/11 Plotters Offer to Confess at Guantánamo - What Does it Mean for the 9/11 Truth Movement?
  • But if 9/11 was a "conspiracy", people would have talked!
  • Why Should I Care About This Stuff, Even if it's True Isn't it a Distraction From More Important Issues?
  • What is the motive in the theory that 9-11 was an inside job?
  • Are Those Who Question 9/11 Anti-Semites?
  • What Did Israel Know?

Who is Really Debunking Who?

  • They REALLY oughta know better: Critiques of claims made by several prominent and semi-prominent 9/11 debunkers
  • The Debunking the Debunkers Exploding Paint Archive
  • Google Books: Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defenders of the Official Conspiracy Theory
  • 911 Truth News: HIT PIECES
  • 9/11 Debunkers: highlight hoaxes, ignore best evidence
  • The Journal of 9/11 Studies: Responses to 911-debunkers and "alternative theorists."
  • Debunking Myths on Conspiracy Theories
  • Debunking Skeptics

Constructive Criticism and Real Debunking

  • Disinformation: Infiltration, Misinformation, Disruption
  • Information Warfare: Ideas as Weapons in the Era of Deception
  • Arabesque911 - A Blog Devoted to Discussing 9/11 News, Research, and Disinformation
  • The Pentagon No-Jetliner Claims Marginalize the 9/11 Truth Movement by Reinforcing the Conspiracy Theorist Stereotype
  • Pentagon Attack Errors
  • The "Pod People" And The Plane That Crashed Into the Pentagon
  • Pentagon missile hoax: debunked by 9/11 truth activists
  • 9/11 Pentagon Witnesses
  • Debunking the Citizen Investigation Team in 11 Minutes
  • The CIT Deception Mock Trailer
  • Debunking "September Clues" and "No Plane" Theories
  • Theories of the Twin Towers' Destruction Rejecting Gravity-Driven Collapse
  • The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center
  • Discrediting By Association: Undermining the Case for Patriots Who Question 9/11
  • Constructive Criticism of the Films Loose Change 2nd Edition and 9/11 Mysteries

Controlled Demolition Theories Have Passed Peer-Review

  • What you need to know about "Peer-review"
  • Discussion of "Why the Observed Motion History of World Trade Center Towers is Smooth," by Jia-Liang Le and Z.P. Bazant
  • Anders Björkman Published in "The Journal of Engineering Mechanics"
  • Another Peer Reviewed Paper Published in Scientific Journal - 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust...'
  • Not an open journal publication: Steven E. Jones, “What accounts for the molten metal observed on 9/11/2001?”, Journal of the Utah Academy of Sciences, Arts and Letters, 83:252, 2006.
  • James Gourley Published in "The Journal of Engineering Mechanics"
  • Kevin R. Ryan, James R. Gourley, and Steven E. Jones - Published in "The Environmentalist"
  • 9-11 Truth Movement: Publication in a Peer-reviewed Civil Engineering Journal
  • Dr. Crockett Grabbe published in "The Journal of Engineering Mechanics"
  • 9/11 Debunkers Hide From Slam Dunk Evidence Of Controlled Demolition

The Work of the National Institute for Standards and Technology Has Not Been Peer-Reviewed!

  • Former Chief of NIST's Fire Science Division Calls for Independent Review of World Trade Center Investigation
  • NIST Whistleblower - Scroll down on page
  • The Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7
  • NIST's World Trade Center FAQ - A Reply to the National Institute for Standards and Technology's Answers to Frequently Asked Questions by Jim Hoffman
  • Scientists, Scholars, Architects & Engineers respond to NIST

Our Published Work on Other Sites

  • ALERT: US State Department Cannot Afford Professional Advice on WTC Destruction
  • FAQ # 2: What about the planes that slammed into the Twin Towers? Wouldn’t they have disturbed the demolition devices?
  • FAQ #7-Sounds of Explosions?
  • FAQ #9: Why does AE911Truth Represent Only a Small Percentage of Architects and Engineers?
  • Debunking the REAL 9/11 Myths: Why Popular Mechanics Can't Face Up to Reality

9/11 Documentaries

  • Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup
  • Loose Change: Final Cut
  • 9/11: Press for Truth
  • In Their Own Words
  • Fabled Enemies
  • Core Of Corruption Volume 1: In The Shadows

911blogger.com - Paying Attention to 9/11 Related Alternative News

Loading...

Visibility 9-11

Loading...
ae911truth.org

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Loading...

Firefighters for 9/11 Truth

Loading...

Activism

  • 911proof.com - Now What?
  • 911truth.org - GET INVOLVED
  • 911truth.org - Citizens' Action: 9/11 Petitions
  • 911truth.org - FACT SHEET
  • Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth - Guides To AE911Truth Activism
  • WeAreChange.org
  • The Civil Information Activist
  • Peace Action
  • Stop the War Coalition
TruthAction.org-What You Can Do

911Grassroots

Loading...

Remember Building 7

Loading...

WeAreChange

Loading...

Other Great 9/11 Websites

  • 9/11truth.org
  • 9/11 Truth News
  • Scientists for 9/11 Truth
  • Colorado 911 Visibility

Related Websites

  • Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
  • WhatReallyHappened.com - The History the US Government HOPES You Never Learn!
  • GlobalResearch.ca - Centre for Research on Globalization
  • GateCreepers.com - AN INFOWAR MUNITIONS CACHE

My Blog List

  • SPOOKYWEATHER
    Keiser Report (E292): Stripped To Teeth
    23 minutes ago
  • Phoenix Rising
    [MUST SEE] George Galloway on Syria & Libya
    3 weeks ago
  • Washington's Blog
    “Th[e National Security Agency's] Capability At Any Time Could Be Turned Around On The American People, And No American Would Have Any Privacy Left …There Would Be No Place To Hide. [If A Dictator Ever Took Over, The N.S.A.] Could Enable It To Impose Total Tyranny, And There Would Be No Way To Fight Back.“
    4 weeks ago
  • Skeptic Denialism
    Annoyingly persistant truther myths
    3 months ago

Blog Archive

  • ►  2012 (43)
    • ►  December (1)
      • Debunking the Debunkers
    • ►  May (6)
      • 9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out - Tra...
      • Scientism - Why Pseudoskeptics Treat Science As A ...
      • Sibel Edmonds: US Government Needs to Keep the Fea...
      • WTC 7 Petition to the National Institute for Stand...
      • James Kust of the University of Wisconsin–Eau Clai...
      • My Top 10 Insane Conspiracy Theories
    • ►  April (5)
      • Insightful
      • Manufacturing Terror
      • TSA - Grope & Pillage
      • Debunker Related Excerpts from and Review of '9/1...
      • Two criticisms of the Harrit et al paper that are ...
    • ►  March (5)
      • Oystein's Contamination Denial
      • Tangled Webs - NIST and WTC7
      • Project Truth (WTC) - Sip 2.5 Cognitive Dissonance...
      • WTC Physical Evidence
      • Millette Versus Harrit et al: The MEK Test
    • ►  February (21)
      • Reflecting on the Verinage demolition method
      • Kurt Haskell's Awakening
      • Debunking the REAL 9/11 Myths: Why Popular Mechani...
      • Evidence Based "Conspiracy Theories" Beat Authorit...
      • What Does a Building "Engulfed" in Fire Look Like?...
      • Strange Meeting at Don't Attack Iran Campaign Laun...
      • Corbett Report Radio 060 -- A Violation of Trust w...
      • Petition: 9/11 First Responders Need Cancer Treatm...
      • TSA: Bullies, Thieves, Rapist and Child Molesters
      • REPORT: Drones Targeting Funerals/Rescuers in Paki...
      • Sign the Petition to Prevent War with Iran
      • WTC comparisons with controlled demolitions
      • Explosive Deconstruction Theory
      • Top Down Collapse Theory
      • Debunking the Debunking of the Debunkery of Septem...
      • Petition: Add Cancer To The James Zadroga 9/11 Hea...
      • Core Of Corruption 2: Echoes of Treason - Official...
      • David in Los Angeles, CA Writes...
      • Jesse Ventura: 63 Documents The Government Doesn't...
      • What Does it Mean for the 9/11 Truth Movement if J...
      • Shear Ignorance - NIST and WTC7
    • ►  January (5)
      • "Strange Sounds" DEBUNKED and EXPLAINED
      • Please Read What I Actually Wrote Before Saying My...
      • FAQ # 2: What about the planes that slammed into t...
      • JREFers acknowledge the nanothermite hypothesis's ...
      • New Journal of 9/11 Studies Paper: "No plane at th...
  • ►  2011 (157)
    • ►  December (2)
      • FAQ #9: Why does AE911Truth Represent Only a Small...
      • FAQ # 8: What Caused the Ejections of Dust and Deb...
    • ►  November (8)
      • 9/11 Truth Versus The BBC
      • 9/11 Truth Movement Trying to Co-opt the Occupy M...
      • Corbett Report Radio 011 – Occupy Building 7 with ...
      • Thermite Has Never Been Used in Building Demolitio...
      • FAQ #7 – Sounds of Explosions?
    • ►  October (5)
    • ►  September (11)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ►  July (13)
    • ►  June (12)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (11)
    • ►  March (24)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (16)
  • ▼  2010 (274)
    • ►  December (31)
    • ►  November (28)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ►  September (15)
    • ►  August (17)
    • ►  July (17)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ▼  May (18)
      • Bill Hicks on JFK: Two Critical lessons for the Ci...
      • NORAD and NORTHCOM proudly display their token
      • Molten Steel in the Rubble of the World Trade Cent...
      • Debunking JayBlack12100
      • The Physics of WTC 7
      • A Picture is Worth a Thousand Excuses
      • The State Department Debunked!
      • The Military Mindset
      • Debunk This! 009 ( False Flags )
      • Google Books: Debunking 9/11 Debunking: An Answer ...
      • The Liberal-Conservative Party!
      • Time To Broadcast The Truth
      • WTC Free Fall Rebuttal to dprjones
      • The UK Election Puppet Show [Updated]
      • More Discrediting by Association
      • Bin Laden "Living Comfortably in Iran"
      • They Are the Ones Who Are Not Skeptics
      • Bias and 911 Truth/Skeptics
    • ►  April (19)
    • ►  March (28)
    • ►  February (33)
    • ►  January (24)
  • ►  2009 (195)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (17)
    • ►  September (33)
    • ►  August (19)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (10)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (16)
    • ►  March (18)
    • ►  February (15)
    • ►  January (17)
  • ►  2008 (63)
    • ►  December (11)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (9)
    • ►  September (15)
    • ►  August (8)

Followers

Powered by Blogger.