9/11 - The Toronto Hearings Sept. 11th 2011

Click here to see Graeme MacQueen's debunking of the debunkers.

Setting the Stage for Historic Hearings in Toronto

Related Info:



Click here for details.



Click here for details.

AE911Truth 10th Anniversary Activities

Upcoming BBC Hitpiece

UPDATE: The Eleventh Fail: The BBC & 9/11 Truth ... Four and a Half Years On

Okay so it seems 21:00 GMT, August 29, 2011 is when I'll get to watch a program that will once again renew my utter disgust toward the BBC.

The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0148yz5

According to Kevin Ryan, word on the street is this program will attempt to discredit Niels Harrit and the nanothermite paper. Since we've probably blogged about this topic more than anyone else on the internet, bring it on Beeb!

Scheduled for an hour before is probably the longest post I've written - a countdown of my top ten debunker fails, including one from the BBC.

But for now, here's a brief recap of some of the lies and dirty tricks in the BBC's past Conspiracy Files pieces:

1. Attacking 9/11 truth straw man by spending most of their first 9/11 program addressing theories rejected by most serious truthers, such as those surrounding the Pentagon. They also attempted to link the truth movement with anti-semitism.
2. Claiming every floor of WTC7 was on fire, when even NIST doesn't claim that. Most of the smoke eminating from the south side was most likely smoke from building 6 clinging to WTC7 via a negative pressure. Richard Gage mentioned this in the program but was ridiculed, despite the fact that this phenomenon can be observed happening to the north tower in footage shot shortly after the collapse of the south tower.
3. Appealing to the authority of Professor Sisson to whitewash the eutectic steel from WTC7. Professor Sisson simply asserted it wasn't unusual, without doing experiments. See here for an experiment that refutes Sisson's assertion.
4. Acknowledging that one of Steven Jones' dust samples was collected on the day of 9/11, before any cleanup work had begun, yet still attempting to attribute the iron microspheres to cleanup work.
5. Briefly mentioning the red chips but then dismissing them. Steven Jones apparently ran all kinds of experiments for their cameras but none of that footage made it into the program.
6. Denying the existence of nanothermite and ridiculing Steven Jones for talking about it, despite the vast amount of literature documenting its existence.
7. Misrepresenting Barry Jennings' timeline. The timeline only works if you assume Jennings spent half an hour on the stairwells. Apparently it takes half an hour to run down 17 flights of stairs! Not only that but they then accused the makers of Loose Change of twisting Barry's words regarding the dead bodies - even though they released the raw footage of their interview with him on the internet, something the BBC has not done. Jennings died suspiciously a couple of months after the program aired.
8. Both programs were full of emotional manipulation. Family members and first responders who find alternative views offensive were interviewed and sentimental music was played as they attacked 9/11 truth. The BBC neglected to mention the fact that most family members and first responders actually agree with us! Why didn't they interview people like Bob McIlvaine and Kevin McPadden? Their ignorance of these people is probably the most dispicable thing about these programs.

The film 9/11 and the British Broadcasting Conspiracy completely tears apart the first BBC piece; watch it here. See here for a critical review of their WTC7 piece.

San Diego's 10news Covers SecrecyKills.com - 8/19/2011

Videos uploaded by Jon Gold



http://www.10news.com/news/28922418/detail.html

Richard Clarke confirms what is the main point in Kevin Fenton's new book Disconnecting the Dots where he makes the point that elements in the CIA deliberately withheld information from the FBI, among others, that two known Al Qaeda operatives were in the United States and were known associates of the USS Cole bombers that the FBI were actively investigating...

Rather than focusing on the fact that has been confirmed by Mr Clarke that the CIA protected Al Qaeda operatives while in the U.S., the Screw Loose Change blog, instead focus on his theory.

SLC:

"But there is plenty of reason to doubt it. For one thing, Clarke himself admits that it's only a theory:"

http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2011/08/clarkes-speculation.html

Yes, and I also have my doubts about this theory. Because "this theory" is actually a "best case" scenario based on the belief that the head of CIA (George Tenet) didn't tell the President about these operatives being in the country. An alternative theory is that Tenet was following orders and protecting these hijackers from the FBI...

These are facts. These were known Al Qaeda terrorists and they were protected by CIA by not sharing this information. - James Dorman AKA jimd3100, Debunking the Debunkers blog

CPT12 9/11: Press For Truth Commentary - 8/11/2011 The following are the "in-between" clips that were shown during CPT12's presentation of 9/11: Press For Truth. The filmmakers Ray Nowosielski and John Duffy took questions on their new project concerning "Footnote 44" of the 9/11 Report, and also debuted an explosive interview with former Counterterrorism Czar Richard Clarke. Paul Thompson, the creator of the Complete 9/11 Timeline also took part in questions and answers.



www.secrecykills.com

Related Info:

Cutting Off Your Nose to Spite Your Face

Did Tenet Hide Key 9/11 Info?

Analysing the CIA Response to Richard Clarke's Allegations: Who Knew What When?

FAHRENHEIT 9/11: “Should George Bush have held at least one meeting since taking office to discuss the threat of terrorism with his head of counterterrorism?”

Previously Unreleased Colorado Public Television Footage: 9/11 Press for Truth on KBDI Channel 12

AE911Truth 10th Anniversary Activities

Posted by John-Michael P. Talboo

One simple action that can be taken to help out this campaign is sigining up to make phone calls to other ae911truth petition signers. I have made around 120 myself. You don't have to get off your butt, but get involved!



Click here for details.

For anybody who is going to be in NYC on 9/11, here are details about a showing of "9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out" that night.

Sun. Sept. 11th, 6:30 pm
All Souls Church
80th and Lexington Ave.
Take 6 train to 77th Street.
$10 at the door.
Richard Gage will be there.

Related Info:



Click here for details.



Click here for details.

The truth and the authority

Watching AE911Truth's new mini movie on WTC7, I was reminded of what actress Christine Ebersole said five years ago on the fifth anniversary of 9/11: "Truth is authority; authority is not truth".

All the debunkers have ever really had is the appeal to authority, but now they don't even have that - since the authority is now on our side. So many credible experts are featured in the fifteen minute video above. Debunkers and skeptics like to lump us in with moon landing deniers, holocaust deniers, creationists and people who believe elvis is still alive on mars or something, but I very much doubt you'll find a documentary made by any of those groups featuring as many professionals as this.

Will they ever acknowledge that 9/11 truth is much more credible than, at the very least, the fringe crap they lump us in with? Or will we forever be chasing a moving goalpost?

We have the authority now, but unlike the debunkers and skeptics we don't need to blindly appeal to it, because we also have the evidence.