Tangled Webs - NIST and WTC7

------------------------------------------------

According to the official explanation the collapse of WTC7 came about from the expansion of a steel beam leading to the progressive failure of the entire structure. However, analysis of the building plans show that this already dubious explanation is completely ridiculous given the construction details.

Indeed, it is hard to imagine how NIST made such basic errors in their report without resorting to a deliberate cooking of the books.

Re: NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed!

TinFoilHatLady
YouTube.com
September 20, 2009





Related Info:

Interview With Political Activist/Commentator the Tin Foil Hat Lady

The Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7

NIST Debunks Itself

Debunking NIST's August 21, 2008 Final Report on WTC 7

WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II) & (Part III)

Scroll down past the videos for related info...

ae911truth
December 31, 2008
YouTube.com

Part I chronicles NIST's attempted obfuscation and eventual admission of freefall. Part II demonstrates that their replacement theory is based on fabricated evidence and is a continuation of the coverup. Part III spells out the significance of NIST's admission of freefall.

(Part II):

(Part III):

Related Info...

NIST Debunks Itself

Two Seconds That Will Live in Infamy

Rate of Building 7's Fall

Clarifying the Collapse Time of WTC 7

Speed of Fall - Twin Towers' Rates of Fall Proves Demolition

Frank Greening versus Isaac Newton

Steven Jones and Frank Greening (and others) correspond

WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part I)

ae911truth
December 07, 2008
YouTube.com

In its draft report, released in August 2008, NIST attempted to cover up evidence that WTC7 fell at freefall, but the coverup was transparent. In its final report, released in November 2008, NIST finally acknowledged freefall, but couched it in a bizarre framework that continues to deny its clear significance.

___________________________________________________________

They previously admitted that the diesel fuel on the premises "played no role in the destruction of WTC 7," and that "the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse." They admitted that it fell "almost uniformly as a single unit," and now they also admit that it fell at free fall speed, these are all points that truthers have been making for years, and that "debunkers" vehemently refuted. So in the end NIST says that fire is the culprit, and that it was "similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings," causing, in their words "the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building," yet again another point truthers have spoke of for years. Next thing you know they'll be admitting there was molten metal in the rubble too! So, apparently appeal to authority makes classic characteristics of controlled demolition morph into new characteristics for a building fire.

Related Info:

WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II) & (Part III)

Debunking NIST's August 21, 2008 Final Report on WTC 7

The demolition expert in this video, Danny Jowenko, does not think the Twin Towers were brought down by controlled demolition due to their unconventional nature, but as the website 911review.com has pointed out:

A demolition that is planned as part of a covert operation to fit a narrative of events that attributes the total destruction of the building to a different cause (such as a jetliner crash and consequent fires) has a very different set of requirements than a demolition that is planned to legally remove a building in an urban setting.

And as 911blogger.com user "stallion4" has noted:

The towers weren't conventional demolitions. They were "top down" demolitions, which are rare in the professional demolition industry...

Building 7 was a classic demolition job -- bottom up -- the type of demolition that Danny Jowenko is qualified to give his professional opinion on.

Despite claims to the contrary, Jowenko has remained quite sure WTC 7 was a demolition. Perhaps the more conventional nature of WTC 7's demolition can be explained by evidence that indicates 10:45 a.m. was the originally planned demolition time.