WTC7 - The Stiffener Plates Explained (Invalidates NIST Report on Collapse)

A brief explanation of the relevance and consequences of NISTs failure to include these elements in their analysis of the WTC7 collapse. This is designed to be a brief introduction to the issue.


__________________________________

From the analysis above we can clearly see that NIST's hypothetical collapse scenario did not take into account relevant design details of World Trade Centre Building 7.  Their improbable explanation on the issue of the initial failure, which was not substantiated via any hard evidence anyway, now becomes impossible.

Furthermore, NIST's failure to account for the freefall collapse of this building also shows the inadequacies of their WTC7 'investigation'.

Related Info:

WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part III)  

Structural Aspects of Building 7’s Collapse: Why the NIST Report is Non-explanatory by Tony Szamboti

Submitted by Radical Pragmatist at 911blogger.com.

Related Info:

The Physics of WTC 7

World Trade Center 7: An Engineered Collapse

NIST's Admission of Freefall - Does It Matter?

The Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7

Re: NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed!

Scientists, Scholars, Architects & Engineers respond to NIST

The NIST WTC 7 Report: Bush Science reaches its peak

The NIST Analyses: A Close Look at WTC 7

Comments on the Draft Report NIST NCSTAR 1-9: “Structural Fire Response and Probable Collapse Sequence of World Trade Center Building 7”, issued by NIST August 21st, 2008

Re: NIST Report on WTC7 debunked and exposed!

TinFoilHatLady
YouTube.com
September 20, 2009





Related Info:

Interview With Political Activist/Commentator the Tin Foil Hat Lady

The Ultimate proof NIST is lying about WTC7

NIST Debunks Itself

Debunking NIST's August 21, 2008 Final Report on WTC 7

WTC7: NIST Finally Admits Freefall (Part II) & (Part III)

Scroll down past the videos for related info...

ae911truth
December 31, 2008
YouTube.com

Part I chronicles NIST's attempted obfuscation and eventual admission of freefall. Part II demonstrates that their replacement theory is based on fabricated evidence and is a continuation of the coverup. Part III spells out the significance of NIST's admission of freefall.

(Part II):

(Part III):

Related Info...

NIST Debunks Itself

Two Seconds That Will Live in Infamy

Rate of Building 7's Fall

Clarifying the Collapse Time of WTC 7

Speed of Fall - Twin Towers' Rates of Fall Proves Demolition

Frank Greening versus Isaac Newton

Steven Jones and Frank Greening (and others) correspond