You're Either in Sheen's Korner or You're With the Trolls

My new t-shirt I found at Hot Topic. :)

Related Info:

The Sheen comments that matter

Charlie Sheen and Some Facts About 9/11 for President Obama to "Deal With"

Scootle's "Twenty Minutes With The President" Contest Entry

Debunking dsglop's ridiculous answers to Charlie Sheen's 20 points to Obama

Charlie Sheen Faces Down "Debunkers" on Larry King Live

The Sheen comments that matter

While the mainstream media is having a field day over Charlie Sheen's supposedly alcohol and coke-free ramblings on AJ's show yesterday, and having fun debating whether or not him emphasizing the real name of the Jewish creator of his now cancelled TV show constitutes anti-Semitism, Paul Joesph Watson has highlighted the quotes that really matter:

Sheen On Obama: “A Coward In a Cheap Suit”

In September 2009, Sheen produced a special video message in which he addressed Obama, along with a list of questions pertaining to contradictions in the official story of 9/11. Sheen’s argument was centered around the fact that six of the ten 9/11 commissioners have publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack.

“It’s still topical, it’s a timeless message, it’s still right there in the fold,” said Sheen of his 20 Minutes With the President campaign.

The actor then unloaded on Obama for failing to acknowledge or respond to Sheen’s questions.

“I would say to B.O. – how much faith can I possibly have in you to run this entire country when 20 questions from a high school drop out sitcom actor appears to be too much to handle for you and your staff,” said Sheen, adding that Obama had failed to respond in nearly two years since the actor produced his video message.

“You sir are obviously a coward in a cheap suit….quit hiding, it’s embarrassing,” added Sheen.

Charlie Sheen Unleashes On TSA

Actor Charlie Sheen unleashed on the TSA during a wild radio interview on The Alex Jones Show today, raging that he would eat the hands of any TSA worker who tried to touch his children, in response to the story that TSA agents harassed travelers and groped children in Savannah train station earlier this month after the passengers had left the train.

Comparing the TSA to a Gestapo-like occupying force, Sheen stated, “Anyone who wants to ignore it deserves to have their privates fondled by some clown who worked at Wal-Mart seven minutes before that….losers and clowns and trolls all of them.”

“Touch my children and I would eat your hands off your frikkin’ arms,” Sheen raged.

Funny how not one single gossip site has mentioned either of these statements. Not surprisingly, the interview has been met with mixed reactions. I enjoyed it for what it was, a celebrity train wreck. Plus, how else is Alex Jones gonna get a mention in a front page Daily Mirror article?! Hollywood is the ultimate psyop, and AJ's show is about exposing psyops, so I see nothing wrong with him talking about it once in a while. It's akin to him interviewing some MK-ULTRA victim about all the shit they've been through. And some may argue that's literally what it was.

And also ... "Scientology ... the church of the Martian idiot!" - HAHA!

Related Info:

Charlie Sheen and Some Facts About 9/11 for President Obama to "Deal With"

Scootle's "Twenty Minutes With The President" Contest Entry

Debunking dsglop's ridiculous answers to Charlie Sheen's 20 points to Obama

Charlie Sheen Faces Down "Debunkers" on Larry King Live

Debunking jawsfreak97

John-Michael pointed out this debunker to me because of a video he made regarding the squibs from the WTC. Having made a video addressing this very issue, I felt it was best to respond.



He also made a video attempting to debunk Charlie Sheen.



I felt that this too deserved a response.

Factual back-up, sources, and further research materials:

Un-debunking the WTC Demolition Squibs

Charlie Sheen and Some Facts About 9/11 for President Obama to "Deal With"

http://nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.html

My Demolition Company

Does New Footage of WTC 7's Collapse Disprove Controlled Demolition Theories?

Larry Silverstein, WTC 7, and the "Pull it" comment

Examples of Top Down Demolition

http://www.journalof911studies.com/articles/Article_5_118Witnesses_WorldTradeCenter.pdf

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/09/sibel-edmonds-is-credible-and-yes-she.html

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/02/sibel-edmonds-snafus-and-freedom-fries.html

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/02/nitpicking-nitpickers-curleys.html

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/12/tin-foil-hat-wearing-loons.html

CBC: The FIfth Estate- 911 The Unofficial Story Part 3

"Fake" Phone Calls? What The Evidence Shows

Charlie Sheen Faces Down "Debunkers" on Larry King Live

In other news, Charlie Sheen's fake interview with President Obama about 9/11 has earned him a fake debate on Larry King Live. Despite the fictitious nature of these non-events they are based on an untrue story.

Charlie Sheen Faces Down "Debunkers" on Larry King Live

Larry King Watches The Media Mayhem Unfold

TheSpoof.com
Written by Fatima Guillermo Chen
Story written: 18 September 2009

Los Angeles-Actor Charlie Sheen stirred controversy Thursday night during an appearance on "Larry King Live". Dressed in nothing but a pair of briefs and a tin foil hat, Sheen lived up to his commitment to a panel of three "so-called" 9/11 "debunkers".

Early last September, Sheen challenged his detractors to appear with him live on the show but could find no takers. Desperate to get someone to take the bait Sheen announced during an appearance on the "Alex Jones Show" "If you're intimidated by me I can understand. But they say that you can overcome a fear of public debate by imagining your opponent in his underwear. Well, I'll tell you what. I'll make it easy for you."

The temptation proved to be too much for at least three of many dis-infotutes Charlie had been calling out over the last few weeks and when they took him up on the challenge they agreed with one additional condition: that he wear a tin foil hat. Sheen agreed and what transpired next made for some bizarre but never-the-less interesting television.

The panel consisted of three so-called experts on the 9/11 tragedy.

Not ready for prime time host of FOX's "Red Eye", "Gutless" Greg Gutfeld was among the panel.

"Gutless" (a nickname coined by fellow UC Berkley students who claim that campus police escorted him to his car from class each night for a week because he was scared of a bully) has an impressive resume of getting fired from a number of brain candy magazine's like STUFF and MAXIM (whose bulk of subscribers are incarcerated in jails and prisons because it's the closest thing to porn that they are allowed to get. seriously. I'm not kidding about this).

An expert at losing readership, Gutless now works his same magic on the viewership over at FOX NEWS.

With his trademark frat-boy name calling and spoiled rotten brat arrogance, "Gutless" never once (during his giggling tirade) criticized or addressed any of the bullet points from Sheen's letter to the president. Instead, he ripped into Sheen for being everything that magazines like STUFF and MAXIM say are cool: sex, drugs, Rock N-roll. Thus concluding that this alone debunks the theory that 911 was an inside job.

Also on the panel was Meghan McCain, the largest of Senator John McCain's daughters, who weighed in (no pun intended)with her knowledge on the subject.

An accomplished twitterer and text messager, McCain also recently criticized Sheen's past lifestyle and used that as the basis why she believes no further investigation into 9/11 should be conducted.

McCain made these remarks during an appearance on the women's program "The View" (which had to be modified to fit your screen) where she was promoting her "McCain/Palin 2010" celebrity mud wrestling tour.

Last, and certainly least, was James Meigs, editor of "Popular Mechanics" Magazine (proving that you don't have to be popular nor a mechanic to work for "Popular Mechanics"). Meigs, who has no scientific background at all, is one of the most highly regarded experts on 9/11 and actually has produced a remarkable film on the subject called "How to Make your own Music Video". James can talk fancy and memorize stuff really good and looks real smart in glasses.

The interview got off to a rocky start when Meghan McCain viciously attacked sheen saying "What makes you an expert on 9-11, Charlie? You're just an actor. And you wouldn't even be an actor if your dad wasn't famous".

Sheen quipped back with "Oh, really, Meghan. And if it wasn't for your dad, you'd be serving up plates of chicken wings and shots of Jagermeister at the Phoenix TGI Friday's."

King, playing umpire, got in the middle of the two and put the discussion back on course.

Charlie's first question to the panel was from the many bullet points contained in his "20 Minutes with the President". Charlie asked "What is the meaning behind the following quote attributed to Dick Cheney which came to light during the 9/11 Commission hearings? The passage is taken from testimony given by then Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta.

During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, "The plane is 50 miles out." "The plane is 30 miles out." And when it got down to "the plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to the Vice President, "Do the orders still stand?" And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"

As the plane was not shot down, in addition to the fact that armed fighter jets were nowhere near the plane and the Pentagon defensive system was not activated, are we to take it that the orders were to let the plane find its target?"

To that question Meghan McCain quickly raised her hand and said "I'll take that one Larry". She then faced the camera and with the animation of a "Stepford Wife" stated "I personally believe the U.S. Americans are unable to do so because, uh, some, uh...people out there in our nation don't have maps, and, uh, I believe that our education like such as South Africa and, uh, the Iraq everywhere like, such as and...I believe that they should, our education over here in the U.S. should help the U.S., err, uh, should help South Africa and should help the Iraq and the Asian countries, so we will be able to build up our future for our..."

Before she could finish, the show went to break and when they returned, Charlie directed his next question to Gutfeld, asking "Mr. Gutfeld you claim that anyone who questions the official story of 911 is a whack-job! How do you take into account all the credible voices raiseing their concerns? People who actually sat on the 9-11 commission like Max Cleland and John Farmer, not to mention the dozens of senior military officials, 700 plus architects and engineers, over 200 pilots and aviation officials, hundreds of survivors and family members, even the Japanese Diet…"

Gutfeld interrupted Sheen and replied "Well, I never did like the Japanese Diet. All that raw fish and sticky white rice. I'm a meat and potatoes kind of guy. And what the hell is a soft shell crab anyway?"

At that point the camera cut back to Sheen who was holding his face in his hands and shaking his head.

The questioning continued along those lines and when Sheen finally got around to quizzing James Meigs on the free fall collapse of building 7 into it's own footprint, Miegs responded by saying "I'm sorry it's our policy not to debate the subject of 9-11".

This infuriated Sheen to the point of standing to his feet and starting towards Meigs but then stopped short when he produced a DVD of "Terminal Velocity" and asked Sheen "I'd really appreciate if I could get this autographed . Its not for me its for my wife. Its her favorite movie. She just loves you. Big fan. Always saying "why can't you have hair like that?"…bitch".

It was definitely compelling stuff and really should be seen with one's own two eyes to be fully appreciated. You might find a clip on You Tube.

In the end no questions were ever really answered though I suspect the panel will go back to their respective propaganda ministries and claim victory with countless stills of a naked tin capped Charlie looming large in the background.

Such is life in this big three ring circus we call the main-stream media.

Related Info:

Charlie Sheen and Some Facts About 9/11 for President Obama to "Deal With"

Scootle's "Twenty Minutes With The President" Contest Entry

Debunking dsglop's ridiculous answers to Charlie Sheen's 20 points to Obama

The Sheen comments that matter

But if 9/11 was a "conspiracy", people would have talked---A Guide to the 9/11 Whistleblowers

A Guide to the 9/11 Whistleblowers

March 5, 2010
The Corbett Report

When losing a discussion on the facts of 9/11, a so-called 9/11 "debunker" will often rely on an old canard to "prove" that 9/11 could not have been an inside job: "So many people want their quarter hour of fame that even the Men in Black couldn't squelch the squealers from spilling the beans," write self-satisfied defenders of the government story. According to the logic of this argument, if there are no 9/11 whistleblowers then 9/11 was not an inside job.

So what if there are 9/11 whistleblowers? What if these whistleblowers come from every level of government and private industry, individuals who have even had their cases vindicated by internal government reports? As you are about to see, there are numerous such whistleblowers and each one is a thorn in the side of those who want to pretend that the 9/11 Commission represents the sum total of knowledge on the 9/11 attacks. Click here to read the entire article.
___________________________________________________________

But if 9/11 was a "conspiracy", people would have talked!

AdamS
politically-confused.blogspot.com
September 10, 2009

Whistleblowers are numerous, whether they be Bush administration officials, military officers, or FBI agents. The argument that people would have spoken out if 9/11 was an inside job, is fair - but ignores the fact that people have spoken out. And risked a lot in the process.

Comprehensive list of 9/11 whistleblowers

It should be noted that the term 'conspiracy theory' accurately describes both the official account and any alternative explanations, since all describe a covert, illegal action between multiple people, which is all 'conspiracy' means. Hate to ruin good propaganda with facts, but it doesn't mean 'woo woooo' crazy owl noises...
___________________________________________________________

9/11 Documents Claim Intelligence on Bin Laden, Targets Withheld From Congress

Uploaded by TheRealNews on Sep 7, 2011

Jeffrey Kaye: In a Truthout report, a whistle blower reveals senior military commanders prior to 9/11 blocked intelligence that located Bin Laden and predicted WTC and Pentagon were likely targets

___________________________________________________________

9/11 Family Member Patty Casazza: Government Knew Exact Date and Exact Targets

November 05, 2007
GeorgeWashington.blogspot.com

9/11 family member and "Jersey Girl" Patty Casazza has just revealed that whistleblowers told her that -- before 9/11 -- the government knew the exact day, the type of attack, and the targets.

Why is this important? Because, previously, some of the best-known whistleblowers have been willing to give only vague information about the government's foreknowledge. For example, they said only that the government knew of the general timeframe for the attacks, or that the government had a list of potential targets, on which the World Trade Center was one of many potential targets (of course, other whistleblowers have been more specific)...

Casazza further stated that these whistleblowers saw how Sibel Edmonds was being harrassed and gagged, and were fearful that the same thing would happen to them. So they approached the Jersey Girls to ask them to demand the 9/11 Commission subpoena the whistleblowers. The Jersey Girls tried to bring the whistleblowers before the 9/11 Commission, and the Commissioners agreed, but then never let the whistleblowers testify, let alone subpoena them.

Why is this important? Because defenders of the official government story have argued that 9/11 couldn't have been an inside job or else whistleblowers would have come forward. Ms. Cassaza confirms what many have said: there are a lot of 9/11 whistleblowers who are afraid to come forward -- especially without a supboena -- for fear of being attacked and harassed.

A video of Ms. Cassaza's statement has just been released:



Ms. Cassaza's statements were made at the 9/11: Families, First Responders & Experts Speak conference.

Many whistleblowers have, in fact, already come forward. See for example this video. And for a more comprehensive refutation of the argument about a lack of whistleblowers, see this.

Thanks to Jon Gold for his key participation in the conference, and for the tip.
___________________________________________________________

As pointed out to me by Fran Shure at colorado911visibility.org this supports an earlier account:

David Schippers the former Chief Investigative Counsel for the US House Judiciary Committee and head prosecutor responsible for conducting the impeachment against former president Bill Clinton. Schippers stated that at the behest of several FBI agents he had attempted multiple times to warn US Attorney John Ashcroft, along with other federal officials, of the impending attacks weeks before they occurred, only to be stalled and rebuffed in each attempt.

As summarized in the books The War on Freedom and The War on Truth by Nafeez Ahmed, who personally corresponded with Schippers, "According to Schippers, these agents knew, months before the 11th September attacks, the names of the hijackers, the targets of their attacks, the proposed dates, and the sources of their funding, along with other information."
___________________________________________________________

Obstruction of FBI Investigations prior to 9/11
A group of FBI officials in New York systematically suppressed field investigations of potential terrorists that might have uncovered the alleged hijackers - as the Moussaoui case once again showed. The stories of Sibel Edmonds, Robert Wright, Coleen Rowley and Harry Samit, the "Phoenix Memo," David Schippers, the 199i orders restricting investigations, the Bush administration's order to back off the Bin Ladin family, the reaction to the "Bojinka" plot, and John O'Neil do not, when considered in sum, indicate mere incompetence, but high-level corruption and protection of criminal networks, including the network of the alleged 9/11 conspirators. (Nearly all of these examples were omitted from or relegated to fleeting footnotes in The 9/11 Commission Report.) - Source: http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2008/08/top-40-reasons-official-911-story-is.html
___________________________________________________________

How is it that none of the conspirators have changed their minds and come forward?

Operatives would be carefully screened to assure their loyalty to the attack's planners and to each other. Given the magnitude of the crime, admission of involvement would expose a conspirator to swift silencing by co-conspirators, vigilante justice by an outraged public, or harsh judgment by a court of law. It is also possible that many of the operatives could have been killed before or during the attack. - Source http://911research.wtc7.net/faq/conspiracy.html#whistleblowers ___________________________________________________________

Operation Gladio was a false-flag terror program set up by the CIA and NATO. Although Gladio was eventually exposed, it was not just a single event, but an ongoing operation that remained secret for decades, in which hundreds of innocent people were killed and injured in terrorist attacks that were blamed on other groups.

Some thoughts on 9/11, debunkers, truthers, etc.

Scroll down past the "video" for commentary...



One thing that is great about the internet is that it gives the average man a voice, and therefore a chance to break the corporate stranglehold on the media, but it is also a double-edged sword. Uninformed and not so well thought out opinions are just as bad, or worse, when they come from citizen journalists.

From the Video..

"Alex Jones, the guy is a nut."

Reply...

This opinion is not really expanded upon, so the best defense for Jones I can offer is to point out that this is simply an ad hominem attack, and to note his achievements, and praise...

"This guy is a national treasure, a light breaking through the electronic Berlin Wall of the US media establishment."
- BBC Reporter Greg Palast

"Alex Jones is a true patriot, a genuine hero." - Actor/Director Charlie Sheen

Also noteworthy is that he admits he has only watched a small section of one of Alex's videos.

From the Video...

"Let's just say the government did it OK? Here is the problem, truthers are never going to prove it, because it's been how long, that's right, 8 years! I doubt all of the sudden they are going to find the evidence that they supposedly haven't found yet."

Reply...

First off, the government just released it's draft report on WTC 7 in August of 2008, so obviously this is an ongoing issue!

And contrary to what the person who put this "video" together thinks, there is still ongoing research by truthers that involves new evidence...

Nanothermites and WTC Dust

Finally, there is also something to be said for people having knowledge, despite anything that happens in an official sense, I'm a sucker for the truth of an adage. Knowledge = Power. How do we know another 9/11 hasn't already been averted? As is pointed out in the book 9/11 Synthetic Terror - Made in the USA by Webster Griffin Tarpley (Note: I don't agree with all of his conclusions, or past allegations against other activists)...

"The open secret about drills is that they often hide the real thing."...

"Activists soon discovered Sudden Response 05, based on a 10-kiloton nuclear explosion in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina. The websites mentioned (http://team8plus.org/ http://total411.info/) raised such a hue and cry about this drill, forcing an article in the main local newspaper trying to calm worried people down. The exposure worked well enough to cause the drill to be shut down before its completion. This was followed by a terror drill involving explosions in San Francisco Bay: a strange blast in the financial district at the end of this drill sent a woman to the hospital in critical condition. Then cam Granite Shadow/Power Geyser in Washington DC, with weapons of mass destruction and overtones of a military coup. All of these exercises were made more sinister by the shift of the official US strategic nuclear posture from deterrence and retaliation to global strike, meaning nuclear sneak attack, under CONPLAN 8022-22."

From the Video...

"Let's just drop this debate and move on to something more important because there's a lot more shit going on around the world that needs to have our attention now. We gotta move on."

Reply...

Well I for one can chew gum, rub my stomach, and pat my head at the same time. Furthermore, I think that anyone who makes such a statement hasn't thought the issue through. The implications of 9/11 being an inside job are massively important when we live in a post-9/11 world. Suggested reading...

Why We Need a New Investigation of 9/11 NOW!

We Can't "Move Forward" Without Truth and Justice

Zinn: 9/11 Truth Is For “Fanatics”, Has “No Practical Political Significance”

Rampant Un-American Censorship of the 9/11 Truth Movement

On Thursday of last week a blatant attempt by Microsoft to stifle the 9/11 truth movement was exposed on the website 911blogger.com. The poster, VeilLifter, reported that the online gaming service Xbox Live deleted his user name, www911TRUTHorg. Upon checking the Terms of Use the only thing that might have applied was their policy regarding "advertising," although 911truth.org is a non-profit, educational organization, it could have been an honest mistake. However, after switching the user name to x911 False Flag, it was also deleted whitin 24 hours. The next attempt was the user name Sept11FalseFlag, and yet again the same result occurred, this time within a few days. Rather than being an isolated incident, this seems to be a part of a continuing trend.

Yesterday I put out this message:

In this week's International edition of Newsweek (Dec 1, 2008), there's an article entitled "President 2.0". In reading it, I discovered that a new site (http://www.change.org/ideas) is collecting and posting ideas for the Obama administration and the top 10 ideas, the ideas that have received the most votes, will be presented to the President on Inauguration Day. An idea was just added to suggest that a new investigation into 9/11 be conducted.

However, today I received this email from the site:

Hello John-Michael,

We wanted to send you a note about an idea you recently voted on in the Ideas for Change in America competition titled "Conduct a new, independent investigation into the attacks of September 11, 2001

We support calls for truth and transparency in our government on every subject and welcome you to directly petition the new administration about this matter, which you can do at http://change.gov/page/s/ofthepeople. However, this is unfortunately outside the scope of the Ideas for Change in America project, which aims to offer specific policy solutions rather than investigations into past government action. As such, it is not eligible to enter the second round of the competition.

We understand that good people may disagree with our vision. But this is a private effort not connected to the Obama campaign or transition team, and we reserve the right to keep the competition and its content aligned with the stated mission and overall spirit of the project.
Thank you for your understanding. As mentioned above, we welcome you to directly petition the Obama administration about your proposal athttp://change.gov/page/s/ofthepeople. And we hope you continue your work to advance change.

Best,
- The Ideas for Change in America Team

They shouldn't have preemptively thanked me for understanding, because I don't! This idea was in first place in the category of criminal justice, and was the leading idea on the site overall with 660 votes. The second place idea has yet to reach 400, and most other top ideas haven't reached 300. What is the point of letting the people pick the top ten ideas for "change" if you decide what they can and cannot pick. Furthermore, saying that the truth of 9/11 isn't a potential policy solution is utterly ridiculous when our foreign policy is completely based on this event, and much of our domestic policy as well. Click here to see these points in more detail.

Related Info:
change.org deletes new 9/11 investigation idea as it had more votes then any other idea
These are only the most recent censorship issues, here are some previous examples:

YouTube:

A video entitled "BBC Reported Building 7 Collapse 20 Minutes Before It Fell" somehow failed to achieve the honor it deserved for having 390,000 views and 9400 comments. This should have ranked the video at #26 in the category of most discussed of all time, as well as #8 in most discussed of all time in the category of news and politics.

Google Video:

The film "TerrorStorm: A History of Government Sponsored Terrorism" found itself the apparent victim of statistical manipulation when viewing totals numbering in the hundreds of thousands were reset to zero, preventing it from reaching tens of millions of people. 9/11 truth related stories have also had trouble making it into Google search engine results at times, such was the case when the story of actor Charlie Sheens' questions about 9/11 yielded no search results.

MySpace:

The website PrisonPlanet.com, which covers the topic of 9/11 truth on a regular basis, is admittedly censored by MySpace when it is posted on user bulletins of people who have chosen to link to one another, the excuse being that the URL is used so frequently in user posted bulletins that MySpace's servers automatically classify it as spam and ban it.

New York Indymedia:

The site began censoring all articles questioning the official version of the 9/11 attack in June of 2005. Click here for more info.

Digg:

In Feb of 2007 a computer programmer unearthed a bug on the website that allowed him to view a "bury" feature used to suppress controversial content, of course 9/11 truth was a target of this disingenuous abuse.

Related Info:

Is Digg Rigged?

The Huffington Post:

On 07/23/2008 Arianna Huffington admitted in an interview with Politico:
"There are certain obvious things we have, certain specific things," says Huffington. "Conspiracy theories — we don’t allow conspiracy theories. If you thought Sept. 11 was caused by the Bush administration, your comment is not going to appear unless it is a mistake."

So, Huffinton readily admits that she doesn't allow free speech, and you could gather from her comments that this is due to her thinking it is all just conspiracy theory nonsense, but perhaps she is afraid of the repercussions of such a revelation. Perhaps she fears that if government complicity were revealed that it would cause, as David Ray Griffin suggests in his book Debunking 9/11 Debunking of many of the elite class, "a crisis of confidence in US institutions, or lead to a global economic meltdown," either way she is a gatekeeper. So, what of the rest? Honest mistakes? Concerted effort? Cognitive dissonance? Some combination thereof? You decide, but ask yourself this, why all the fuss over something that supposedly has no substance, why not let it prove itself as being so lacking in validity and just watch it fade away?

AllAboutJazz.com forum member, Saundra Hummer, states the following regarding this blog post:

If this is not to be believed, then why the censoring of a radical, not to be taken seriously, article? This to me is more than a little bit strange. The censorship of this position and theory, makes one more likely to believe that there is fire behind the smoke, that there is more to this article than one can imagine. A lot of bright men who know of these things, tell us not all is as we've been told.

Not a conspiracy theorist myself, but this is so odd, this censoring of those who question the validity of the 9/11 official reports. About MicroSoft, read up on the PNAC's giving of all copyrights to it involving Iraq. Sure it's going to keep things down if it can, or so I believe.
Why on earth would anyone fuel the fire of doubt with censorship if there is nothing to it? Perhaps they believe it falls into the trap of degrading their blog site, like the senseless blather of "Nuke em", and other such nonsense. The censorship which is happening seems senseless, but then this administration, along with it's supporters and perhaps even it's detractors, those at the top, as well as their underlings, haven't always, or perhaps never, had their thinking hat's on, just their ass hat's.

Related Info:

We Don't Care for Free Speech...

Free Speech Zone "because of 9/11"
 
Wikipedia renames 9/11 controlled demolition page to a "conspiracy theory"
 
School Censors "9/11 Truth Now" Shirt