Sunday, March 31, 2019

IS ADAM GREEN A MOSSAD AGENT ??? - Retarded to see comments like "Owen got destroyed!!" .....fuk sake he brought Adam on to HIS [Infowars] show and let the man bring it. Props to Owen.

Posted by
Is Adam Green an Israeli intelligence officer ? doing some background checks indicate he did have a career in telecommunications involved in data collection and spying. he was also allowed into Israel which as we know is a big RED FLAG to anyone that knows anything about Israels border security and intelligence gathering agencies.



YTCensorsMe Poop
“I can’t believe you’re having me on”. Talk about paranoia. Alex figured this out long ago. You want to take down the enemy, you don’t bring religion or race into it. Why do you think he calls them GLOBALISTS, it’s much smarter strategy. Where can I see an unedited version where Owen actually talks.

Editor's Note: As I've stated regarding another topic...
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2017/07/the-ugly-truth-about-cultural-marxism.html

To those who always scream JEWS!

Who cares, fight the agenda. MANY Jewish people do not push it and and/or fight against it. There are also of plenty of non-Jews who do push the agenda.

Green says that the only people we should be talking about celebrating on 9/11 were the infamous 5 dancing Israelis. However, a careful examination of this article...

Trump Is Right: Video Describes How Jersey City Muslims Held PRE-PLANNED 9/11 Rooftop Celebration: http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2016/01/trump-is-right-911.html

...will reveal that many Muslims did in fact celebrate on 9/11 and we get this interesting tidbit...
A WCBS newscast broadcast 6 days after the attacks, details how FBI investigators revealed that some muslim suspects living in an apartment building in Jersey City held a PRE-PLANNED rooftop party on the day of the attacks.
The task force investigators even stated that the suspects had a detailed model of the Word Trade Center, the type architects use, on the rooftop with them, along with binoculars.

As far as I can tell from the details we have about the Israeli incident compared to this, we are very well talking about different but similar situations...

The Five Dancing Israelis Arrested On 9-11:
https://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/fiveisraelis.html

In any event, that it was Muslims is what the report states, so Trump and Infowars are just reporting on that and related facts. They have covered the dancing Israelis and a ton of other evidence for Israeli involvement in 9/11 in the infowars produced film Fabled Enemies. Furthermore, Jones is not incorrect in stating Saudi Arabia played a major role...

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2016/03/rogue-elements-of-us-and-other.html

Who had the most involvement is a hotly debated topic.
R S
Furthermore, how did this Adam dude school Owen? Y'all are living in an echo chamber. Adam just spoke over him almost the entire time. Btw, I don't listen to Jones much. I'm not a sycophant like you guys.

FallenJedi
He was unprepared...Adam wasn't. I would have went after Adam's failure to ever criticise Islam or it's pedophile prophet and that by his own logic he is a shill for Mohammad.

President Goyim
Adam lost me when he banned me for saying GDL stuff. Nothing weird . No appeals.

He lost me more when he got a strike and spoke of fighting censorship, this cannot stand that they were "targeting" him, and all I could do was scowl, for this guy who banned me was two facing it to YOU guys faced. Something was shady and when Jake Moohony arse and Adam suddenly appeared in Israel, had a great vacation, and came back 100% UNMOLESTED by Israelis, I KNEW the fix was in. These two were in Israel to get put on the Zionist payroll so they will discuss all the Israeli EVILS, but never discuss organizing, taking action, protesting, etc.

Essentially, they were gonna be the SANCTIONED voice of the opposition. One more gatekeeper that will only take you so far and then "forget" to discuss ACTION...

Related:

I do not support or oppose Israel totally, it's a mixed bag, like with all countries and humans...

Will Trump Drain His Own Administration of 'Swamp' Creatures? - Trump’s recognition of an Israeli Golan Heights (seized from Syria in 1967) draws little enthusiasm from those who live there - Rep. Ilhan Omar: Riding The Third Rail - With Guest Phil Giraldi (Liberty Report) - Palestine Hasn't Controlled That Disputed Region Since the Early 1880s and 1900s, Let This One Go and Saudi Arabia Should Allow Them In
https://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2019/03/will-trump-drain-his-own-administration.html

No Real Evidence that Alex Jones is an Agent, Wikileaked Evidence to the Contrary:
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange recently released a stockpile of emails from the Texas based think-tank STRATFOR in the latest action bringing private information public. The emails were thought to have been obtained from the group Anonymous, a collection of hackers that have gained recognition over the years for hacking large corporations and government networks.  Alex Jones is mentioned in one of the secret emails from STRATFOR where he is described as a “lunatic”. The email reveals they wished he would have dropped the Osama bin Laden staged death story and “stopped complaining”. Far from being an operative, their private internal emails show he is considered a thorn in their side.
https://slipcatchers.wordpress.com/2012/03/04/truther-taylor-myth-debunked/

Joe Rogan is right about Alex Jones being right about a lot and more than he knows... 

http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2018/12/joe-rogan-is-right-about-alex-jones.html
at

A Majority of Americans Do Not Believe the Official 9/11 Story

Posted by
“Conspiracy Theorists” Now A Majority
By Paul Craig Roberts - January 11, 2019

TruePublica, a British website that has avoided the 9/11 issue, has had its fill of ignorant journalists at the BBC, Huffington Post and other propagandists for the military/security complex. The constant, shrill demeaning of experts and distinguished people who have raised questions about the official story has convinced TruePublica that skeptics who need so much shouting down must have a point.
The media has NEVER EXAMINED the evidence or explained the analysis provided by scientists, architects, engineers, pilots, and the first responders who experienced the explosions of the World Trade Center twin towers. The media has never asked for the release of the multiple videos that recorded whatever struck the Pentagon. The media has never investigated whether cell phones worked in 2001 from the altitudes at which the official story claims calls were made.
Instead two-bit punk presstitutes, such as the BBC’s Chris Bell and the Huffington Post’s Jess Brammer andl Chris York, label experts with knowledge and integrity “conspiracy theorists.” These presstitutes knowingly use a cover-up term that the CIA put into use via its media assets to discredit the expert skeptics of the Warren Commission Report on the assassination of President Kennedy.
The fact that the carefully presented evidence is NEVER ENGAGED EXCEPT WITH NAME-CALLING is a strong indication that the evidence is true and cannot be refuted.
TruePublica is such a mainline site that, in its own words, it does not even “publish news sourced by RT,” a far more reliable source of news than the BBC, CNN, or New York Times. However, it has dawned on TruePublica that after 18 years an ad hominem attack remains the only defense of the official story. The official account has NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER. It rests entirely on the AVOIDANCE OF EVIDENCE and on unverified assertions.

The success of the 9/11 Lawyers’ Committee in obtaining the consent of the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York to “comply with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. 3332,” which requires the convening of a federal grand jury to examine the unexamined 9/11 evidence, has impressed TruePublica as no US attorney would convene a grand jury on the basis of a conspiracy theory. Clearly compelling evidence has been presented to the US Attorney.
Obviously, Washington expects the Justice (sic) Department to escape from the bind into which it has been put by the Lawyer’s Committee, an escape that the presstitute media will aid and abet. Nevertheless, the escape will likely reinforce the public’s view that the government is afraid of the evidence and is no more likely to follow it than in the case of President Kennedy’s assassination, Robert Kennedy’s assassination, the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty and a large number of other officially covered up crimes.
More and more people will come to realize that ad hominem name-calling is not an acceptable response to evidence.

Some Interesting New Information About 9/11

TruePublica.org.uk





TruePublica Editor: We have published almost nothing about 9/11 on TruePublica. When independent news outlets do, they are immediately branded by the mainstream media and so-called ‘fact-checkers’ as conspiracy theorists. The BBC makes this point precisely in a 2018 article that starts like this – “On 11 September 2001, four passenger planes were hijacked by radical Islamist terrorists – almost 3,000 people were killed as the aircraft were flown into the World Trade Centre, the Pentagon and a Pennsylvania field. Just hours after the collapse of New York’s Twin Towers, a conspiracy theory surfaced online which persists more than 16 years later.”
The entire article is dedicated to all the ‘conspiracy theories’ involved in 9/11 and makes a mockery of anyone or anything that questions the official government line. They even heavily mock the brother of one man killed in 9/11 and frankly, true or not, the BBC’s report itself is rather sickening to read.
And yet, here we are, all these years later and it’s hardly surprising the theories of a conspiracy continue.
A 2016 study from Chapman University in California, found more than half of the American people believe the government is concealing information about the 9/11 attacks. This is in part because, large sections of the official US government report were redacted for years – and is still missing to this day.
The big problem is that the government is withholding crucial evidence. And then there’s other evidence the state and mainstream media refuse to even consider.

Paul Craig Roberts is an American economist and former United States Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy under President Reagan. Roberts was an associate editor and columnist for The Wall Street Journal and columnist for Business Week and has received the Warren Brookes Award for Excellence in Journalism. In 1993 the Forbes Media Guide ranked him as one of the top seven journalists in the United States.

Roberts wrote this really interesting piece of information just a few days ago that the mainstream media has been completely silent about: “Although the United States is allegedly a democracy with a rule of law, it has taken 17 years for public pressure to bring about the first grand jury investigation of 9/11. Based on the work of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth led by Richard Gage, first responder and pilots organizations, books by David Ray Griffin and others, and eyewitness testimony, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry has presented enough hard facts to the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York to force his compliance with the provisions of federal law that require the convening of a federal grand jury to investigate for the first time the attacks of September 11, 2001.
This puts the US Justice (sic) Department in an extraordinary position. There will be tremendous pressures on the US Attorney’s office to have the grand jury dismiss the evidence as an unpatriotic conspiracy theory or otherwise maneuver to discredit the evidence presented by the Lawyers’ Committee, or modify the official account without totally discrediting it.
“What the 9/11 truthers and the Lawyers’ Committee have achieved is the destruction of the designation of 9/11 skeptics as “conspiracy theorists.” No US Attorney would convene a grand jury on the basis of a conspiracy theory. Clearly, the evidence is compelling that has put the US Attorney in an unenviable position.”
If the Lawyers’ Committee and the 9/11 truthers trust the US Attorney to go entirely by the facts, little will come of the grand jury. If the United States had a rule of law, something as serious as 9/11 could not have gone for 17 years without investigation.”

Three weeks before Roberts’ made this statement a letter was published by Off-Guardian about a Huffington Post hit piece about an academic teaching journalism. Its first paragraph explains entirely its own position.
“An academic teaching journalism students at one of the UK’s top universities has publicly supported long-discredited conspiracy theories about the 9/11 terror attack, HuffPost UK can reveal.”
This entire article, like that of the BBC’s, vigorously attacks any individual or organisation that has the temerity to question the ‘official’ narrative on any major incident as offered up by the state, such as the Skripal poisonings, Syria’s chemical weapons, Iraq and Chilcot Report.
HuffPost even uses an unnamed former head of MI6 and an unnamed former Supreme Commander of Nato to dispel such challenges to this narrative and then attacks other sources of news such as RT as nothing more than Russian propaganda irrespective of the source. As a rule, TruePublica does not publish news sourced by RT but that does not make all of its content propaganda.
David Ray Griffin, a retired American professor and political writer who founded the Center for Process Studies which seeks to promote the common good by means of the relational approach found in process thought was the co-author of the book ‘9/11 Unmasked’ – part of the attack piece was centered on by the HuffPost hit piece.
The head of the 9/11 Consensus Panel, the other co-author, responded to the HuffPost.  For information, the goal of the Consensus Panel is to “provide a ready source of evidence-based research to any investigation that may be undertaken by the public, the media, academia, or any other investigative body or institution.”
That letter is as follows:
Dear Ms. Brammar and Mr. York:
I was the head information specialist serving the Medical Health Officers of British Columbia, Canada, for 25 years.
Your attack piece on Professor Piers Robinson and on the scholarly work of Dr. David Ray Griffin is the least accurate and the lowest quality published article I have ever seen.
I have assisted Dr. Griffin with 10 of his investigative books into the events of 9/11. In 2011 we decided to create the international 9/11 Consensus Panel to review and evaluate the official claims relating to September 11, 2001. The Panel we formed has 23 members, including people from the fields of physics, chemistry, structural engineering, aeronautical engineering, piloting, airplane crash investigation, medicine, journalism, psychology, and religion. (For the full list, see here).
In seeking a consensus methodology, I was advised by the former provincial epidemiologist of British Columbia to employ a leading model that is used in medicine to establish the best diagnostic and treatment evidence to guide the world’s doctors using medical consensus statements.
The Panel methodology has produced, seven years later, 51 refutations of the official claims, which were published as 911 Unmasked: An International Review Panel Investigation in September, 2018.
Each Consensus Point, now a chapter in this book, was given three rounds of review and feedback by the Panel members. The panelists were blind to one another throughout the process, providing strictly uninfluenced individual feedback. Any Points that did not receive 85% approval by the third round were set aside.
The Honorary Members of the Panel include the late British (and longest-serving) parliamentarian Michael Meacher, the late evolutionary biologist Lynn Margulis, and the late Honorary President of the Italian Supreme Court, Ferdinando Imposimato.
The Huffington Post drastically lowered its standards to publish this hit piece, and what influenced it to do so is a question worth pursuing.
Yours truly,
Elizabeth Woodworth, Co-author with Dr. David Ray Griffin of 9/11 Unmasked
TruePublica continues:
It is over 18 years now since the world-changing event of 9/11. One wonders when the information held by the American government, that continues to anger so many people affected by it will ever emerge.
However, one reason why such questions persist is precisely that of the actions of the US government itself. One should not forget those so-called ‘conspiracy theories’ that actually came true that continues to pour petrol on the flames of doubt.
For example, the American government killed thousands by poisoning alcohol to prove its point that alcohol was bad for the general public during prohibition. This was a ‘conspiracy theory’ that went on for decades – until it was proven to be true.
Then, you can take your pick of the lies government tells when it comes to starting wars – how about the lie the Saddam Hussain and Iraq had WMD ready to fire at Western targets. Total deaths exceeded 1 million. Yet another classic American lie was the Gulf of Tonkin incident in August 1964, as a pretext for escalating the country’s involvement in the Vietnam War that killed 60,000 American soldiers. Total deaths racked up 1.35 million, all based on a lie. That incident only came about because of an unintentional declassification of an NSA file in 2005.
Edward Snowden proved with his revelations in 2013 that the government was spying on everyone when the government had denied they had ever done so. It took a whistleblower to let us all know. The UK government has been found by the highest courts in the land to have broken numerous privacy and surveillance laws as a result of mass civilian surveillance systems.
Operation Mockingbird was a US government operation where journalists were paid to publish CIA propaganda, only uncovered by the Watergate scandal. It took a thief to unknowingly capture secret documents and recordings for the public to find out.
The list goes on and on – just as 9/11 will, so it will be interesting to see how the US Attorney, presented with evidence from so many prominent professionals will bury yet more 9/11 evidence. Don’t hold your breath though, the same questions will, no doubt, still be being asked in another 18 years time.

Related:
A Message to the 9/11 Grand Jury - ATTENTION POTENTIAL 9/11 GRAND JURY MEMBERS! - The NIST 9/11 report, is inadmissible in a court of law in the United States, because it fails the *Daubert* standard + Listen to These Three NIST Whistleblowers:

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/02/attention-potential-911-grand-jury.html

9/11 Truth Petitions/Polls and Debunking of Debunker Analysis Suggesting 9/11 Truth is Dead:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2013/10/911-truth-petitions-and-polls-and.html

Responses to 'The truth is rushing out there: why conspiracy theories spread faster than ever':

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2016/01/responses-to-truth-is-rushing-out-there.html
at

Saturday, March 30, 2019

YES, A PLANE HIT THE PENTAGON ON 9/11!!!!!!! <--- That is 7 exclamation points! <--- 8

Posted by


TTR Episode 24: JM Talboo Interviews Physics Teacher David Chandler on the Upcoming 'Conference on the 9/11 Pentagon Evidence'

Show Notes/More Info:

scientistsfor911truth.com

911speakout.org

https://www.youtube.com/user/DavidChandler911

Announcing: Conference on the 9/11 Pentagon Evidence:

http://911blogger.com/news/2019-02-25/announcing-conference-911-pentagon-evidence

Achimspok’s Channel / UA175 –  the last 12 seconds; UA175 – the last 12 seconds – part2; The last 12 seconds of the alleged flight UA175 – refined (Achimspok’s analysis provides a 3-dimensional model of the final approach of UA175 to the South Tower consistent with all of the video footage, a direct measurement of the actual high speed of the plane, and reason to believe it was not being controlled manually.) 

They REALLY oughta know better: Critiques of claims made by several prominent and semi-prominent 9/11 debunkers:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/05/they-really-oughta-know-better_05.html

No Flyover Witness:

http://911blogger.com/news/2009-11-08/cit-flyover-theory-rip#comment-221550

The CIT Rebuttal Letters: Debunking the National Security Alert Video Misinfo/Disinfo (Random Correspondence on the Issue, Specific Analysis, Thoughts):

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/03/the-cit-rebuttal-letters-debunking.html

Craig McKee: Liar for 9/11 Truth:

http://adamtaylor42.blogspot.com/2016/03/craig-mckee-liar-for-911-truth.html

Craig McKee Still Lying about the Pentagon:

http://adamtaylor42.blogspot.com/2016/03/craig-mckee-still-lying-about-pentagon.html

Why the CIT Analysis of the Pentagon Event on 9/11 Should Be Rejected Outright:

http://911speakout.org/why-the-cit-analysis-of-the-pentagon-event-on-9-11-should-be-rejected-outright/

The following is a reply to Craig McKee's response to the above link by Debunking the Debunkers blog contributor Ziggi Zugam:

In simple terms, Chandler notes the following about the Ranke process. Hemphill's testimony before Ranke starts messing with him is this:

- He saw the jet to his right

- he confirms it was in the direction of the VDOT tower. Ranke asks him if the jet was to the south of the tower but Hemphill says something like probably not that far south. This does not rule out that he saw it that far south, but indicates that it may have been more like over the tower or near it.

- he saw the jet over the bridge

- he saw it clip a light pole

- he saw it hit the building

All of the above clearly spells south side approach and confirms the official flight path plus the crash.

There are also two slight inconsistencies, he says it flew over the Annex building and the gas station.

A proper researcher would want to check into that.

The first inconsistency does not seem major because although Hemphill says over the annex he also places it towards the VDOT tower, so the over the annex claim does not seem to be very firm, more like maybe over the annex or slightly to its south. This does not seem a major problem for the official story because the guy is going by memory years after the event, without looking at a map, and this testimony puts the jet in the right southern direction - it is only a matter of how far south. But Ranke should have looked into this.

The second inconsistency is more glaring because over the gas station does not fit well with the official flight path, and more importantly it does not agree with the rest of his testimony either, especially the over the bridge and hitting the light pole. Ranke should have asked Hill about this and maybe offered him up a map to help clear things up.

But what does Ranke do then?

He by-passes all that and cherry picks the over the gas station bit and starts asking over which side?

Hemphill answers:

"You know it’s hard to say, it looked like it went right over the top to me, you know, because of the way its flight path was, but you know you would have come pretty much right smack over the top of it, right over the bridge there, it takes you over to I think on the right if I did all those years ago, I said 110, I meant 27."

Hemphill was sure about seeing the jet to the right, seeing it over the bridge and hitting the light pole and the building, but now we have one more data point that he is not sure of that contradicts the others.

Ranke simply cherry-picks this "unsure" bit and allows it to over-ride the sure bits, and instead of noting to Hemphill how the contradiction he starts to talk to him about how this matches other testimonies and all that. He leads the witness. And Ranke makes no effort to ask about or clear up the apparent inconsistencies. He does not say "wait a minute...over the gas station does not seem to match over the bridge and hitting the light pole."

Also note that even in the paragraph (above) where Hemphill says not sure about the gas station, he also repeats the claim about over the bridge, and adds a bit about on the right of road 27, which is a glaring inconsistency.

Ranke simply ignores all this and takes the only claim that Hemphill is not sure about, and lets it over-ride the other claims that Hemphill was actually sure about.

Craig McKee does not manage to point this out in his 50 thousand word rant...the guy rants on and on without addressing the real issues. I do not think he is an agent, he think he is fucking stupid, and dishonest. The problem with his supporters is that they do not read Chandler's work themselves, they read Craig's articles about what Chandler says and thus of course they do not understand the issues at all because McKee is not smart enough to spot them himself or honest enough to admit that.

What Craig does is to parrot what Ranke does, cherry-picking the one claim that Hemphill was not sure about and letting that over-ride the claims he was sure about. Craig says:

"Hemphill clearly explains that the plane was over the Navy Annex and over the gas station. He repeats this several times throughout the three interviews."

But this of course is a lie. Hemphill clearly said in the first interview that he was not sure about the gas station bit, and that interview also made clear that the over the annex claim was flexible because he also indicated that the jet was close to the VDOT tower. What Hemphill actually clearly explained was that he saw the jet to his right, going over the bridge and hitting a light pole and the building.

What Hill does when he interviews Hemphill, is to try to set things straight. He points out the inconsistencies and sends the guy a map. Again it is made clear that he saw the jet to the right side, going over the bridge, hitting a light pole and then the building....Hemphill is still thinking he maybe saw the the jet over the annex and the gas station but again it is obvious that he is not set on this at all and further that arguing about the details is not the main thing. He basically confirms the official flight path. I think most people will realize that it is hard to judge the exact distance and location away from you when you are dealing with a jet at full speed and you see it for a few seconds. Another important point is that Hemphill says to Hill that he is basically confirming the same story that he told the FBI years ago, after the event:

Hemphill: OK, if you see the edge of the gas station where the gas station parking lot is, for the CITGO station, it was right over in that area, then it hit the Pentagon. Could it have been a little further over? Yeah, hell, I don’ t know. I only saw it for 3 to 5 seconds. But, the key point is what I saw was the left hand side of the aircraft. That’s what I drew for special agent Heidi Messerschmitt of the FBI.

So Hill did what Ranke should have done, what any honest and competent researcher would have done, clear up the inconsistencies by pointing them out to Hemphill and giving him a map. What he ends up with is the conclusion that Chandler and others get from the Ranke interview on its own when Ranke's BS is ignored, and the conclusion that Hemphill originally gave the FBI years ago...which is more or less the official flight path. The only people that got a different conclusion are Ranke and his followers by twisting Hemphill's testimony to suit their BS.

But Craig is calling Hill names for "manipulating" Hemphill to agree to his original FBI conclusion:

"He has changed his account, while not acknowledging that it was a change."

The CIT Virus:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/07/cit-virus.html

Was the scene with Lloyd England's taxi staged?:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/09/was-scene-with-lloyd-englands-taxi.html

Chapter 17 of 17: Powerpoint presentation of research by Wayne Coste, narrated by David Chandler -- Citizen Investigation Team Interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1HFxTZVHEVo

Regarding the flying ability, or lack thereof, of Hani Hanjour...

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2010/12/knee-deep-in-crap.html

The Pentagon No-Jetliner Claims Marginalize the 9/11 Truth Movement by Reinforcing the Conspiracy Theorist Stereotype:

http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/noplane/slides.html

Peer-reviewed Papers Refuting Pentagon No-Jetliner Claims:

http://scienceof911.com.au/papers/

Pentagon Attack Errors:

http://www.911review.com/errors/pentagon/index.html

The "Pod People" And The Plane That Crashed Into the Pentagon:

https://www.whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/ppfinal.html

Pentagon missile hoax: debunked by 9/11 truth activists:

http://www.oilempire.us/pentagon-truth.html

9/11 Debunked: 136 Eyewitnesses to Pentagon Attack:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1wQ2BJsgx0

Pentagon Eyewitnesses Analysis of the Pentagon Attack Eyewitness Accounts:

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/witnesses.html

Editor's Note: I was very conservative during the show when recalling these numbers. They are higher than I stated...

about 89 The amount of eye witnesses I gathered who stated they saw an object crash into the Pentagon. The vast majority of the still available ones.

at least 45 The amount of eye witnesses who reported seeing a plane and described it with words like: 'airliner', 'big', 'silver', 'roaring', etc.

at least 23 The amount of eye witnesses who specifically said they saw an American Airlines jet. In all cases a large jet.

The CIT Deception Mock Trailer:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/09/cit-deception-mock-trailer.html

A Message to the 9/11 Grand Jury - ATTENTION POTENTIAL 9/11 GRAND JURY MEMBERS! - The NIST 9/11 report, is inadmissible in a court of law in the United States, because it fails the *Daubert* standard + Listen to These Three NIST Whistleblowers:

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/02/attention-potential-911-grand-jury.html

Many people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."

Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of the US government and intelligence apparatus, as well as other international intelligence agencies, were involved, doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved...

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2014/10/permanent-top-post-by-jm-talboo-and.html
at

Wednesday, March 27, 2019

He once tried to kill President Reagan. Now John Hinckley says he’s ‘happy as a clam’

Posted by
L.A.TIMES
Two years after he was discharged from a mental hospital, John W. Hinckley Jr. lives in a modest house on a golf course, runs a small antiques business, adopted a cat named Theo, and drives for his mother and older brother. “This is the best I’ve ever felt in my life,” he told a psychiatrist about his life in the historic colonial-era town of Williamsburg in coastal Virginia, according to court records. “I’m happy as a clam, to be honest.” But at 63, Hinckley continues to face challenges, some universal and some unique to the man who shot and nearly killed President Reagan outside a Washington hotel on March 30, 1981.
READ MORE AT THE LA TIMES
Related:

John Judge The Reagan shooting 1988



Talk - John Judge - A Talk about 9/11

at

Just Checked, Yep, YouTube is Still a Disgrace

Posted by

"RT is funded in whole or in part by the Russian government Wikipedia" Must of been a hard decision to choose between that tidbit and the dictionary definition of 9/11 that usually is on freethinking videos. This emerging global society makes me sicker than when it used to just be in science fiction movies. BBC videos say "BBC is a British public broadcast service Wikipedia." What a joke. Like CNN isn't a mouthpiece for a faction of the US government. Giving debate questions to Hillary beforehand. Like no money ever goes in either direction there. YouTube is a disgrace in every possible way. Telling adults what is OK and not OK to see and hear. These psychopaths do it outright from their ivory towers and high horses and also let mob rule of the offended brigade infringe upon free speech as well. We can't stand for this people. We must speak out constantly. "The BBC has put a lot of mental gymnastics into public perception that there is difference between the British government and the BBC, but the reality is that is has just been an exercise in wordplay, while the BBC fully is directly owned by the British government, directly run by the British government, and directly funded by the British government. You’ll see some people try to tell you that the BBC is not a state-owned/funded/operated news outlet, but they’re people who are buying into the whole re-branding thing, where they consider the term state-owned to have negative connotations to it, and they whip out the term for propaganda use when it applies to others, but they don’t want to subject their own state-owned/funded/operated outlet to their own discrimination, and so they create mental buffers to pretend that they’re somehow different."... https://www.quora.com/Is-the-BBC-the-state-owned-and-state-controlled-TV-operator-in-the-UK How to Defeat the Censorship of the Democrat Big Tech Media Complex: https://911truthactivism.blogspot.com/2019/02/how-to-defeat-censorship-of-democrat.html Related: 100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities: http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html ATTENTION POTENTIAL 9/11 GRAND JURY MEMBERS! - The NIST 9/11 report, is inadmissible in a court of law in the United States, because it fails the *Daubert* standard + Listen to These Three NIST Whistleblowers: https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/02/attention-potential-911-grand-jury.html
at

Tuesday, March 26, 2019

YouTube Search Filters Censorship to Hide New Zealand Shooting Video? - YouTube Search Filter Censorship on ALL KEYWORDS!! BIG COVER-UP CONFIRMED! Glitch Caught on Camera!

Posted by
YouTube Search Filter Censorship on ALL KEYWORDS!! BIG COVER-UP CONFIRMED! Glitch Caught on Camera!

Proof YouTube and the Government are trying to hide something by not allowing users to search for videos made Today, This Week, or this Month!! What are they hiding!! Try it for yourself and tell me what you think in comments!!!



Issue still taking place.

The timing here, with you posting on the 17th, strongly suggests this is about them hiding the New Zealand shooting video from the 15th. It's fake in the opinion of a great many people including various experts. They have been scrubbing the net since then until today still.

March 15th: Interview with 'Top Newsman in New Zealand' Who Breaks Down All the Suspicious Things about the Mosque Killings Including Shooter Drill Taking Place the Same Day:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/03/stop-blaming-trump-for-new-zealand.html

Dr. Eowyn, How we know New Zealand mosque shooting video is a CGI fake:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/03/dr-eowyn-how-we-know-new-zealand-mosque.html

Robert David Steele, New Zealand False Flag to Disarm America or even start World War III - FALSE FLAG? Why The World Has Questions About Christchurch:

http://mindtreasury.blogspot.com/2019/03/robert-david-steele-new-zealand-false.html

ALERT: Brighteon.com video platform under extreme threat from internet infrastructure providers, forced to delete all New Zealand shooting videos, essentially “at gunpoint” by the globalist controllers of the ‘net - NZ ADOPTS HARSH GUN CONTROL MEASURES AFTER CHRISTCHURCH MASSACRE - New Zealand Blocks Bitchute, 8chan, etc, Gets Told to Fuck Off by Kiwifarms:

https://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2019/03/alert-brighteoncom-video-platform-under.html

  1. A New Zealand shooting video hit YouTube every second this ...

    www.engadget.com/2019/03/18/youtube-new-zealand-shooting-videos
    A New Zealand shooting video hit YouTube every second this weekend. YouTube joined the race to remove graphic footage. Christine Fisher, @cfisherwrites. 03.18.19 in Internet.

  2. New Zealand shooter, the video and more of the weekend's top news

    www.usatoday.com/story/news/2019/03/17/boeing-crashes-to-the-new-zealand...
    From Boeing crashes to the New Zealand shooter, here's what to know. ... made the announcement on Twitter and released a two-and-a-half-minute video in which she discusses policies such as ...

  3. New Zealand mass shooting shows tech companies can't control ...

    www.cnet.com/news/new-zealand-mass-shooting-shows-tech-companies-cant-control...
    For every video of the mass shooting in New Zealand that YouTube and Facebook block, another two or three seem to replace it. On Friday, a gunman in Christchurch attacked Muslims praying at a ...
at

Lawyers' Committee for 9/11 Inquiry Submits New Filing to U.S. Attorney Listing Names and Companies

Posted by

On March 12, 2019, the Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry filed a petition supplement with the U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York naming persons and private companies that might have information relevant “to the 9/11-related crimes at the World Trade Center.” 


According to the Lawyers’ Committee press release, “The Committee’s original Petitions [filed in April and July of 2018] presented extensive expert scientific and eyewitness evidence that pre-placed explosives destroyed WTCs 1, 2 and 7. Today’s filing builds on that evidence of ‘what’ crimes were committed focusing on the ‘who,’ ‘why,’ and ‘how’” of the events of 9/11.

The intent of this latest filing is to provide detailed information to the Special Grand Jury regarding people or companies that may have information relevant to their inquiry.

The petition makes clear that the Lawyers' Committee is not implying guilt or direct involvement with the crimes, only that the listed people or entities “may have material information relevant to the Special Grand Jury’s investigation.”

Both Petitions and a names-redacted version of the Petition Supplement are available at https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/.

The named persons include eye witnesses to the explosions (including first responders), companies that provided “construction, maintenance, or repair work” in the three WTC towers, and WTC security companies and staff prior to 9/11.

Also named are companies and persons with access to high-tech explosives and incendiaries as well as “those who owned and leased WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7” and “who received or may have received insurance payments after 9/11.”

The petition also includes “entities who benefitted financially or politically from the War on Terror.” Specifically, “At least one organization stated in a published report one year before 9/11 that it would take a ‘new Pearl Harbor” event to motivate the American people to make the commitment of money and troops needed for the U.S. to assert its military power to maintain American global dominance over the coming century.”

The petition goes on to state that “those involved in leadership roles in such organizations as well as principals for major military contractors used in the post-9/11 war on terror” may be of material interest to the Special Grand Jury.

Others named in the petition are “persons arrested after being observed celebrating the WTC attacks,” those with “foreknowledge acting with a profit motive via stock trades,” and “persons who controlled the premature destruction of 9/11 evidence.”

Architects, engineers, and scientists who have relevant research findings are also named as potential witnesses for the inquiry.

On November 7, 2018, the U.S. Attorney’s Office replied to the Lawyers’ Committee in writing that it would comply with federal law 18 U.S.C. § 3332 which requires it to provide citizen reports of federal crimes to a Special Grand Jury.

However, since that date, the Lawyers’ Committee has received no communication from the U.S. Attorney’s Office. Due to this lack of communication, the group informed the U.S. Attorney in this filing that it is considering further legal action (Mandamus lawsuit) to compel the Office to comply.
 
Links for further information
Lawyers’ Committee for 9/11 Inquiry
https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org.

Persons with Material Information, March 12, 2019 (32-page submission, redacted)
https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/12-march-2019-persons-with-material-information/

Cover letter submitted to U.S. Attorney with the submission
https://www.lawyerscommitteefor9-11inquiry.org/12-march-2019-supplement-cover-letter/

Make a Donation to Colorado 9/11 Truth!
Colorado 9/11 Truth exists only with your support. Your donation of any amount keeps us active. Visit the donation page on our website here.

Related:

A Message to the 9/11 Grand Jury - ATTENTION POTENTIAL 9/11 GRAND JURY MEMBERS! - The NIST 9/11 report, is inadmissible in a court of law in the United States, because it fails the *Daubert* standard + Listen to These Three NIST Whistleblowers:

https://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2019/02/attention-potential-911-grand-jury.html
at

Jussie Smollet EXPOSED our Judicial System - Jussie Smollett Charges Dropped To Protect Obama’s Involvement - Alex Jones Called It

Posted by

https://www.infowars.com/was-jussie-smollett-hoax-a-democrat-conspiracy/
https://truepundit.com/jussie-smolletts-sisters-worked-for-barack-obama/

Editor's Note: Be proud to be the black Alex Jones, Lucas! He is ON POINT, the world is crazy! http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2018/12/joe-rogan-is-right-about-alex-jones.html




Related:

REPORT: Chicago prosecutor with ties to former Obama aide under renewed scrutiny over Jussie Smollett case

The prosecutor who texted Jussie Smollett’s family at the request of a former Michelle Obama aide to discuss getting the FBI to take over the Empire actor’s case has come under renewed scrutiny after all charges against him were sensationally dropped.
Chicago police are furious about Tuesday’s decision to drop Smollett’s charges and are demanding that Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx be investigated over her handling of the probe...

http://dennismichaellynch.com/report-chicago-prosecutor-with-ties-to-former-obama-aide-under-renewed-scrutiny-over-jussie-smollett-case/













Jussie Smollett is a Complete Idiot and Piece of Excrement - Mainstream Media Falsely Claim Their Initial Reporting Was Careful!

Editor's Note: My initial reporting and many others like me in the alternative press/media was much more careful and correct!

Friday, February 1, 2019

What Really Happened to Empire Star Jussie Smollett?




What Really Happened to Empire Star Jussie Smollett?

Related:

Fake News vs Real Hate:


Fake Hate Crimes:







HOAX: MUSLIM TEEN ADMITS SHE MADE UP TRUMP HATE CRIME ATTACK:


Motive... Empire’s Jussie Smollett continues to showcase his music outside the popular television drama and just released his new video “F.U.W. (Fuck Up World).” In the song and visual, Jussie Smollett addresses the turmoil that’s taken place since Donald Trump became President. The video also depicts the injustices and fights against various races, religions and the LGBT community. On the song, Jussie sings, “Why we back in the past/ It’s the same script, different cast/ All these alternative facts/ Catch me outside, how ’bout that/ Why is it so hard to keep hope/ Who got that popular vote/ Was the whole thing just a joke?/ It’s a fucked up world but here we are in it…” http://www.gripmagazine.com/empires-jussie-smollett-f-u-w-video/



Mark Dice
✔@MarkDice

So "Empire" actor Jusse Smollett forgot the alleged attackers yelled "MAGA" at him until after that TMZ story went viral on Twitter and police called him up and asked him why it was trending and then he 'remembered' that was what happened?

6,315
10:58 PM - Jan 29, 2019
Twitter Ads info and privacy

2,452 people are talking about
#Infowars update 1/30/2019 #FreeRogerStone & Empire actor liar liar pants on fire.


Related:

Truth Teller's Radio Episode 23: JM Talboo Interviews Gerald Pechenuk, LaRouche Political Action Committee - Russian Collusion/Hacking HOAX! Roger Stone DID NOTHING WRONG!:
Jussie Smollet EXPOSED our Judicial System - Jussie Smollett Charges Dropped To Protect Obama’s Involvement -  Alex Jones Called It
at
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)