By James Hufferd, Ph.D.
*
There once was a small
country, covering far less than 1% of the earth’s land surface, the home to a
single percent of the earth’s people, which nevertheless occupied and firmly
controlled the destiny of four or five of the seven continents and a myriad of
islands spanning the globe. Its rousing paean hymn was this: “Rule, Britannia! Britannia, rule the
waves! Britons never will be slaves!” Her vast sway – because either be
slave-master or slave? – held and honored until, after WW II, it suddenly
occurred to people very widely
across the world that ridding humankind of Nazi and Axis tyrannies, aggression,
and attendant cruelties could conceivably suggest liquidating English-speaking
and Allied captive empires, too.
Yet today, Britain
herself, and even far more so America, are, according to controversial author
Christopher Bollyn and a host of others, on prima facie evidence, controlled by an
even smaller and demographically-
According to Bollyn,
9/11, the capstone and keystone of America’s (and half the world’s) subsequent
activities and woes, was entirely an operation planned and carried out by the
Mossad, the Israeli security agency, using Israeli-American dual citizen Mossad
assets infesting the entire U.S. government and management of the World Trade
Center as agents, operatives, and pawns.
I heard and saw
Christopher Bollyn’s whole presentation keyed to prove his contention in person
for the first time a week ago at my own local chapter of 911 Truth and found his
argument powerful and very persuasive, but not fulfilling my usual criteria for
judging explanations of the September 11, 2001 crimes.
I have been looking
for and pleading with those who have insisted that “Israel did it” to provide
forensic proof such as would be routinely required in a straight-up court of law
to substantiate their allegation. And I have never been provided with such – and
perhaps regrettably, I still haven’t been. If the Mossad “did” it (a more than moderately
believable premise, to be sure), all of the evidence supporting that to date is
circumstantial, none of it operational or forensic.
Even Brandon Martinez,
in his opus on Zionist intrigue and 9/11 culpability, Grand Deceptions, is constrained
to honestly admit (page 55) that “There is no indication that the Israelis were
involved in the 9/11 attacks…” I myself would, in fact, go a little farther than
he did and state that there is ample circumstantial evidence that they may have been involved in the actual
operation. There were certainly plenty of them hanging around the scenes,
evincing foreknowledge and enthusiasm. Is that splitting hairs? For exacting
legal purposes, I don’t think it is. Israel couldn’t be convicted of “doing” it based on lead-pipe evidence
that any of us know of for certain now – again, unless one or more of you are holding
out!
Bollyn’s mode of
“proof” – remarkable and brilliantly damning and with the ring of probability,
but not proof in the jurisprudence sense – is that uncanny predictions and
highly suspicious statements were made, before and aft, by various Israelis, in
fact, a whole gallery of rogues, that could be construed to demonstrate intent
and very likely planning as well and satisfaction afterward, together with a
network of hidden instrumental Israeli ownership and control of this, that, and
the other company within the United States. The matrix, if as described, was all
there.
Assuming guilt, what
are the implications of Bollyn’s not “inside job”, but “outside job” theory, if
it’s true that Israel’s highly-secretive and duplicitous espionage agency the
Mossad did it all, employing Israeli-controlled businesses and enough
dual-citizen U.S. government operatives to actually hijack the U.S. agencies,
civilian and military, necessarily involved – as laid out in his classic, Solving
9-11?
And, who do I think
was ultimately responsible, as a plausible alternative? I think the Israeli
government, like the American and today the British, is ultimately a puppet
itself of an aloof higher consortium, or more precisely, an international cabal, that operates by
possessing most of the world’s wealth and worships only power and both its spawn
and sire, money. And I think that important and complex operations such as
9/11-- plus there are lots of additional instances by now – are assigned thereby
either jointly or to whoever’s primary covert security agencies are best-suited
or most convenient to execute the job. And, for post-mortem purposes, it matters
little which outlaw in the global gang pulled the trigger. That designated
outlaw may well have been the Mossad, but dual-citizens, observers, and bag men
are not trigger-men or the “brains” – allegedly, that elusive Israeli government
agency. For, plausibility is not legal proof.
But yet, every
country, including the United States, remains ultimately liable for safeguarding
if possible its own security. And even to stand by and refuse to stop the
execution of the great crime(s) or prosecute thereafter as a whole government or
a whole society by due process whatever perpetrators after a mass-murderous
attack, however both of those heinous refusals are rationalized or regarded,
must still be seen as the lowest conceivable form of treason. An invader,
foreign or domestic, will invade; but a sane and good society will not stand
down.
JH:
2/26/15
