911 Truth: Architects and Engineers ~ Experts Speak Out (RECAP)
The mother of the War on Terror is the 911 False Flag Attack. The truth about this attack is the only thing that can end the conflict. The architects and engineers featured in this clip explain the physical evidence, the forensic proof, that CLEARLY shows the destruction of the World Trade Centre buildings involved inside help.
Please watch the documentary and reflect upon the endless conflict we continue to face. There are powerful, yet identifiable, forces at work within "the establishment" that set our world on course for perpetual war.
Related Info (who dun it):
911 and War by Deception
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2018.]
The Truthseeker: 9/11 & Operation Gladio (RECAP)
'Bigger than Watergate': US 'regular' meetings with Al-Qaeda's leader; documented White House 'false flag terrorism' moving people 'like sheep'; the father of Twin Towers victim tell us why he backs this month's 9/11 campaign on Times Square and around the world; and the protests calendar for September.
Remember, only the truth about 911 will end the War on Terror.
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2018.]
RECAP: 911 Truth in 5 minutes - The Key Evidence vs Mainstream Conspiracy Denialism & Propaganda
The Hard Science:
There IS overwhelming physical evidence that reveals explosives were used to bring down the 3 WTC buildings on 911. There is nothing theoretical about the claim - forensic proof has sealed the case.
Simply put, it is IMPOSSIBLE to find Molten Steel, Thermite traces, plus actual fragments of High Tech Explosives in the rubble pile, and to have the freefall collapse of steel framed buildings, WITHOUT using incendiaries or explosives of the sort commonly employed by the military and demolition companies.
Either basic scientific principles (ones that have NEVER been disproved) are drastically in error or we are looking at the physical evidence of the controlled demolition of the WTC buildings. Ergo, 911 was an inside job.
The Propaganda:
For 17 years there has been a concerted effort by official investigators and the mainstream media to keep people ignorant of this information. However, thanks to the work of independent investigators and the availability of information via the Internet, these efforts have largely failed. The scientific proof of the inside job is irrevocably in the public domain.
However, there still remains a high level of ignorance concerning this key scientific evidence among the general population - due primarily to a self induced, culturally influenced, aversion to even consider the 911 truth question.
In today's society people have been conditioned to reject all things labeled "conspiracy" as if such claims were wholly unsubstantiated.
Association with mental illness and irrationality have hamstrung our ability to even look at the data. This is especially true when it comes to issues that can be labelled as being part of a "big government conspiracy". Most people, when it comes to these topics, end up being too indignant, embarrassed or afraid to even discuss them. No matter how good the information, even the most intelligent among us who decide NOT to weigh up the evidence, will always fail to see through the official deception.
Moreover, because conspiracy claims are the subject of such strong ridicule, many people who do actually chance to look into the details often find them psychologically too difficult to accept - regardless of how damning the information may be.
Adding to the disconnect here is the general population's inexperience at recognising the significance of hard scientific evidence. Few people, upon seeing video of the freefall collapse of WTC7, or seeing data that confirms structural steel had melted in all three buildings, would understand the strength of this hard science - even if explained to them.
On top of all these hindrances we also have to deal with the disinformation put out by various 'independent' 911 truth debunking 'experts' - who help fuel society's irrational anti-conspiracy bias (conspiracy-denialism).
Appearing online and in various 911 'documentaries' these individuals push distortions, heap ridicule, provide pseudo-scientific trick explanations, and tell outright lies about the facts in question. The agenda of such 'experts' is to act as credible authority figures, using their academic, institutional or professional backgrounds to discredit the hard evidence and build a "consensus" opinion backing the official lies. The mission, transparent to the well informed, is to basically hoodwink open minded members of the public. Many of these debunkers, who are too intelligent not to understand the science proving the inside job hypothesis, appear to be on the Government payroll. Indeed most are probably involved in a modern day version of Operation Mockingbird.
Nevertheless, despite the pervasive lies presented in the official 911 reports, the censorship by the corporate media, the disinformation efforts of the supposedly independent debunkers, and our own inabilities to come to terms with challenging information, the physical evidence of the inside job still stands.
The World Trade Centre forensic evidence proves the official account is a lie and ends the 911 conspiracy debate. [Presently there are 5 peer reviewed scientific papers supporting the inside job hypothesis that remain unchallenged in the scientific literature.]
Whatever the truth is concerning the involvement of Osama Bin Laden, he certainly could not have rigged the Twin Towers or WTC7 with explosives.
The War on Terror is a hoax designed to foment conflict between the West and militant Islamic groups for the purpose of US strategic domination of the Middle East. Only the truth about 911 will end these Wars.
The first step is identifying the propaganda to be overcome whilst simultaneously recognising the hard scientific evidence of the inside job. Once EVERYONE understands the truth then the game will be over.
By SpookyOne
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2018.]
Blink Comparator Views of the Plane at the Pentagon - Countering 'No Plane' Disinformation (RECAP)
In March, 2002 five frames from one video camera were released (leaked?) as small bmp images that purportedly showed the Pentagon plane. It had an erroneous time stamp (added later it turns out; not in the original), lack of context, small image size, and it did more to sow confusion than shed light on what hit the Pentagon. Here is the first frame of that set just before impact, together with a zoomed detail view. [See link for image]
Longer videos from two cameras, one with and one without the foreground obstruction, were released in 2006 in response to a FOIA request for surveillance camera videos at or near the Pentagon on 9/11. One of the videos contained the original five frames. These images are archived by the 911datasets.com project through the 911encyclopedia.com website, which also documents the source FOIA.
Many people viewing these as still frames over the years (ourselves included) failed to see the plane. The lack of a clear visual image of the plane led to speculation that there was instead a small plane or a missile, and it opened the door to speculation that there was no plane at all. By the time the two longer videos were released in 2006, "no-plane at the Pentagon" speculation was well established to the point that this belief was virtually synonymous with the 9/11 Truth movement, in many people's minds.
The images shown below "blink" the frames that contain the plane with the frames just prior to them. These png images, blinked with a custom Javascript routine, use the images provided in the 2006 FOIA release. Animated GIF images were tried earlier, but the GIF compression reduces the color resolution. We have done no image enhancement: only magnification of the zoomed image pairs.
This is a zoomed-in detail of the view from what we shall call Camera 1.
The view from Camera 2 shows the plane a fraction of a second earlier. The wide angle lenses introduce barrel distortion, so the earlier image of the plane, which is closer to the edge of the frame, appears shortened.
http://911speakout.org/wp-content/uploads/BlinkedPentagonPlane.htmlGo to the linked article to see the blinked images and a full explanation.
The attacks of 911 were a false flag event. Aircraft were used to strike both the Twin Towers and the Pentagon in order to kick off the global 'war on terror'. Explosives were used at the Twin Towersand most likely at the Pentagon to 'finish the job' in terms of destroying their intended targets. World Trade Centre Building 7 was also brought down by explosives, and may have been timed to go down with the Twin Towers (in the dust clouds), except that it failed and didn't come down until 5:20pm. We know explosives had been set off inside WTC7 at an early stage due to the testimony of Barry Jennings.
Related Info:
A Plane Hit the Pentagon on 9/11 - Countering Disinformation and Misunderstandings
The "Pod People" And The Plane That Crashed Into the Pentagon (Countering 'no plane' Disinformation)
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2018.]
Basic 911 Forensic Proofs: Gordon Ross Master of Engineering Investigation into the Collapse of the WTC on 9/11
Master of Engineering, Gordon Ross presentation of his analysis of the destruction of the Twin Towers of the World Trade Centre on 11th September 2001.
The speaker here describes the damage to the steel structure found in the rubble pile that is accounted for by the use of explosives. The features seen are not explained by a gravitational collapse. In the opening he pointed out that that the debris expulsions during the 'collapses' do not occur on every floor, but every three floors, where the columns are welded together.
The video also points out that the key features of the damage done to the buildings involved steel columns that were accessible via the elevator shafts. Weaker columns that were not directly accessible could still be seen standing after the 'collapse fronts' had progressed downwards. The video clearly points out that the top sections of the Twin Towers didn't 'simply' crush the bottom section.
Most interesting is the concave damage done to the steel columns which indicate strong lateral forces applied to these elements. This further makes sense when we consider that a large portion of the debris pile formed well outside tower footprints - the debris didn't simply 'fall' into the basement areas. There were strong lateral forces that also pulverised the concrete floors to dust in mid air.
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2018.]
Basic 911 Forensic Proofs: 9/11 Experiments - The Mysterious Eutectic (Melted) Steel
Some disinformation sites have pushed the idea that hot fire temperatures (in enclosed places) can catastrophically weaken steel (but certainly not cause Swiss cheese holes!) with fire temperatures of 600 degrees Celsius (1112 F) that causes a 60% loss in strength (yet the towers were built to carry five times their load, and the undamaged sections of the building were still near full strength). These sites do not tell the reader that the size and duration of any fire is important because steel beams require a significant amount of energy to heat up and deform (steel conducts heat very well so that localised fire temperatures do not lead to catastrophic heating).
Small intense fires will not cause deformations, and even large ones take time to heat a structure (this is why fire testing of steel structures are run over a number of hours rather than minutes). The fire temperature is not the same as the heat needed to weaken a steel beam or connection. This point is well explained in the following video:
According to NIST they could not find evidence of hot sustained fires in the WTC Towers. There was no sustained greater-than-600-degree-Celsius fire. There was no chimney effect, or enclosed space heating that might have raised the temperatures within a confined area (the aircraft gouged huge open holes in the sides of the buildings). Certainly the rubble pile could not be said to be an ideal fire environment - it was not a cauldron, or sea of coals, and there was no black smoke from a supposed intense conventional fire that would have burnt wood and plastic used in office furnishings - all we see is white smoke that is indicative of either steam or a thermitic reaction.
The problem the official story has is two fold - no evidence of hot conventional fires in the Towers or rubble pile, and damning evidence of an unconventional incendiary attack upon the steel structure.
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2018.]
Evidence of Thermite - Dr. Steven Jones
Evidence of thermite in the World Trade Center debris.
This short 6 minute clip explains clearly the forensic signature of thermite in the World Trade Centre dust. The material that was examined had been heated until a liquid state (the spherical nature of the metal was caused due to surface tension). The metal spheres were not simply molten structural steel but the product of a thermitic reaction (see clip).
Importantly, the high number of metal spheres in the dust indicated that there MUST have been many tons of this stuff in the buildings. This metallic debris was a common feature of the WTC dust and is a certain proof that thermite was used in the demolition of the Twin Towers and Building 7 (along with high explosives most probably).
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2018.]
RECAP: The Reason the Grenfell Tower Tower Didn't Collapse is Because it Wasn't Rigged with Explosives
People thought about the Grenfell Tower collapsing but didn't really want to say anything afterwards on social media. The thought of collapse was planted in people's minds because of what happened on 911 and because of a TV coverage caption that stated there were 'fears of a collapse' ...
To quote myself on social media: "yeah, the reason it didn't completely collapse is that there were no bombs in the Grenfell Tower. People will [understandably] argue that the Grenfell Tower was more fire resistant because it was (apparently) a concrete reinforced building, and not a pure steel framed building. Even for the steel framed buildings, they don't collapse due to fire. You need bombs."
Debating the building's construction of reinforced concrete vs steel frames is a red herring in terms of what happens to the latter. Steel framed buildings are also highly fire resistant. The major factor in a building's survival is a LACK of EXPLOSIVES (juxtaposed to what people might expect concerning fire):
9/11 In Perspective
A reminder that Facts Trump Consensus Opinion:
Remember this recent example: when it was proved that Ulcers were caused by bacteria, not stress, which was the previous consensus. Plus don't forget the political aspect when it comes to information that challenges a prevailing narrative.
And when experts point out exactly what is wrong with an official story so that you UNDERSTAND the issue, then you logically must accept the new evidence. Alas, most people don't have the time to research and are generally straight-jacketed to their preconceived assumptions.
Understanding can be a difficult thing (psychologically, and time wise). This video is a good place to start, and helps explain why the Grenfell Tower did NOT collapse:
Architects and Engineers: Solving the Mystery of Building 7
Note: The recent Plasco Building 'Collapse' in Tehran was also a controlled demolition (likely a 'debunking' psy-op intended to throw water on what happened in NY). However, as psychologially difficult as this may be to accept, there is hard evidence of explosions, violent horizontal ejections, and impossible molten metalin the debris indicating incendiary use, because open air fires do not melt steel to the extent seen. A reasoned alternative explanation for this incident, not involving controlled demolition, would be welcome - but thus far none have been forthcoming (except for the "it can't be, therefore it isn't" mode of response/denial in the face of the physical evidence).
Spook
ps. Generally, in terms of fire temperatures, you need a lot of energy to weaken a steel or concrete building. You can have hot localised temperatures, but if the fire is not large enough and long lasting, it will often not significantly impact a heat resistant structure, including steel. It's important to take into account the difference between heat vs temperature. Small hot fires don't have enough energy to cause damage to fire resistant building structures:
Heat vs Temperature
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2018.]
9/11 In Perspective
None of these buildings collapsed into their own footprint at near-freefall acceleration, so why did the World Trade Center buildings?
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2018.]
Osama Bin Laden DIED in Late 2001 - Don't fall for the "We Killed Him in 2011" Propaganda (RECAP)
Bin Laden has been dead for more than 10 years. Every video and audio tape after the "fat Bin Laden confession" have been fakes. Bin Laden likely had nothing to do with the attacks of September 11 (see links below). He almost certainly died in the months after the taped "confession" video.
The 2001 Bin Laden Confession tape is not a Confession.
The Real Bin Laden Denied Involvement in the Attacks.
Bin Laden's Personal Bodyguards were Captured in Early 2002 Absent OBL.
Swiss Scientists 95% Sure that 2002 Bin Laden Recording was Fake.
The 2004 Bin Laden Threat tape is a Fake.
Experts Agree: Bin Laden tapes are Fakes.
Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive?
The Real Bin Laden Died in Late 2001 or Early 2002.
The 911 attacks were an Inside Job.
The FBI admits there is no Evidence linking OBL to 911.
Bin Laden Was not Killed in 2011.
The Death of Osama Bin Laden - A Deception Too Far.
The reason for "keeping Bin Laden alive" for years after his death is because he represents a propaganda tool when it comes to the issue of 911 truth and his spectre helps limit dissent regarding the military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. After all, we are told that Bin Laden confessed to 911 and that we are fighting against fanatics who initiated the conflict.
Exposing the truth about the September 11 attacks will destroy this deception and end the costly wars in the Middle East. It is vitally important that we promote the facts and science proving 911 was an Inside job.
Without specifically exposing false flag terror we can never be free of the War on Terror.
[Reposted in light of the recent 'Bin Laden wives witnessing Osama's death' propaganda story that has been doing the rounds (http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/world/wives-recount-the-killing-of-bin-laden-20130709-2po86.html). ]
Related Info:
Bin Laden was a US Intelligence Asset Right up until 911
**Fake Al Qaeda Exposed:
A Summary of the War on Terror and Circumstances of Bin Laden's 2011 Hoaxed Death:
What really happened with the 2011 Bin Laden 'Kill' Propaganda Mission (Navy SEALs were not involved?).
**In reference to Fake Al Qaeda Exposed, Yousef Al Khattab apparently now preaches a message of peace. Nevertheless, we must still be wary of hyped threats and false flag terror.
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2018.]
This 1967 CIA Memo Is Still Used to Discredit Conspiracy 'Theorists' Today
This is how it worked then and it's still how it works now. If you read this document (see video), you'll see elements of it still in play today every time something major happens that they don't want anyone asking questions about.
The term, as it is applied today, causes brain freezing and misguided thinking to occur.
[Posted at the SpookyWeather blog, September 11th, 2018.]
