YouTube.com:ctcole77 (2 days ago) 911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
The history channel aired your favorite show last night :) "911 DEBUNKED"
911debunkerschannel (1 day ago)
"911 TRUTH = 911 LIES"
History Channel Hit Piece = Dirty Tricks, Malicious Lies & Journalistic Fraud...
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/august2007/210807_dirty_tricks.htm
ctcole77 (1 hour ago)
History Channel SCIENCE Piece = Educated expert testimony
Nanothermite paper = the first peer reviewed paper in which the chief editor NEVER reviewed it
Nanothermite paper = the first peer reviewed paper in which a physicist claims to be an expert in chemistry
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
911debunkerschannel (44 minutes ago)
"Nanothermite paper = the first peer reviewed paper in which the chief editor NEVER reviewed it"
"The editor in chief of the journal where recently the paper: 'Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe' was published, resigned, claiming she wasn't informed of the publication. She proceeds to provide not a single solid scientific rebuttal, only administrative bickering and personal political bias against, well.. inconvenient science. One particularly notable comment attributed to Ms. Pileni is this one: "Marie-Paule Pileni points out that because the topic lies outside her field of expertise, she cannot judge whether the article in itself is good or bad.". Strangely, her areas of research seem to contradict that." - Source: http://911blogger.com/node/19963
What you need to know about "Peer-review":
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/04/steven-jones-tells-911-debunkers-to-put.html
"Nanothermite paper = the first peer reviewed paper in which a physicist claims to be an expert in chemistry"
"First author is Professor Niels Harrit of Copenhagen University in Denmark, an Associate Professor of Chemistry. He is an expert in nano-chemistry; current research activities and his photo can be found here: http://cmm.nbi.ku.dk/" - Source: http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/04/active-thermitic-material-discovered-in.html
Chemical Engineer Mark Basile Discusses 9/11 WTC Dust:
http://911blogger.com/node/20998
Oh... and the work of the National Institute for Standards and Technology has not been peer-reviewed!:
http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/150907_nist_investigate_911.html
Related Info:
Visibility 9-11 Welcomes John-Michael Talboo and Stewart Bradley of Debunking the Debunkers Topics discussed include the "debunkers" take on the new scientific paper "Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe," and defence thereof.
The History Channel: JFK and 9/11
'Debunking NIST's Conclusions About WTC 7 is as Easy as Shooting Fish in a Barrel' and other Responses to 8/21/08 NIST Briefing on WTC7
No fish were harmed in the posting of this blog. Being a vegetarian I prefer my fish bullet-free. But in the interest of debunking the debunkers that would have you believe shooting fish in a barrel is not actually easy:
