Richard Gage, AIA | Resolution 17-5 | 2017 AIA Business Meeting

Richard Gage, AIA, gives closing remarks in support of Resolution 17-5 at the 2017 AIA Business Meeting. Resolution 17-5, which was sponsored by 70 members of the AIA, called upon the AIA to support a new WTC 7 investigation. It garnered just 4% of the vote, despite the fact that nearly half of the AIA members surveyed by AE911Truth after the vote agreed it was likely - if not completely evident - that WTC 7 was brought down in a controlled demolition. For more information, visit http://AE911Truth.org.

The Best 9/11 Evidence - Richard Gage, AE911Truth, ReThink 9/11 & The Path Forward

Richard Gage, founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, joins me to talk about the BEST 9/11 Evidence, and the best ways ordinary people out there can take action and fight for the truth by signing petitions, and using the best pieces of evidence and information when talking to others about 9/11 and recruiting others to sign the online petitions for these movements as well. United we Stand, Divided we Fall!

News:
Highrise Initiative
http://highrisesafetynyc.org/about/

Rethink WTC 7 Billboard in Times Square
http://rethink911.org/

Tod Fletcher – Major 9/11 Truth Activist Found Dead
http://memoryholeblog.com/2014/10/04/...

Bill Binney signs AE911Truth Petition:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/911-trut...

Face of Truth Campaign:
http://iamthefaceoftruth.com/

Enemies of the 9/11 Truth Movement: Disinformation, Debunking, Denial
Friends of the Truth Movement: Science, Skepticism, and Truth (Feynman quotes)

Strongest Pieces of Evidence

USGS Dust Study:
http://www.usgs.gov/blogs/features/us...

RJ Lee Group Study
http://www.ae911truth.org/documents/W...

Appendix C of the FEMA Report
http://www.fema.gov/pdf/library/fema4...

Carmen & Associates HTA Fire Investigations Manual
http://carmanfireinvestigations.com/d...

NFPA 921 – Eric Lawyer & Firefighters for 9/11 Truth
http://911blogger.com/topics/nfpa-921

Nanothermite:
http://alienscientist.com/nanothermit...

Debunking and Counter-Debunking:

Adam Taylor’s Guide to Debunking Popular Mechanics:

Part 1
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-sec...
Part 2
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-sec...
Part 3
http://www.ae911truth.org/news-sectio...
Part 4
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-sec...
Part 5
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-sec...
Part 6
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-sec...
Part 7
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-sec...
Part 8
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-sec...
Part 9
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-sec...
Part 10
http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-sec...

NIST (SAIC) Report:
http://www.journalof911studies.com/re...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArnYr...
http://911review.com/articles/ryan/ni...

Disinfo:

Judy Wood & Directed Energy Weapons hypothesis:
http://alienscientist.com/judywood.html

James Fetzer and the Mininuke hypothesis:
http://alienscientist.com/mininukes.html

9/11 Update - (Sep, 2014)

Richard Gage interviewed by George Noory. This interview has been shortened and edited.

For more information visit: http://www.ae911truth.org



Related:

Coast To Coast AM - September 4, 2014 9/11 Truth & Prophecy

911 Anniversary Q&A with Richard Gage

Q & A after the film Anatomy of a Great Deception.

TORONTO 9/11 TRUTH Michael Coren interviews Richard Gage

 

Related:

Complaint filed: cable host Michael Coren goes from ridiculing 9/11 Truth to calling it anti-Semitic hate speech

Are Those Who Question 9/11 Anti-Semites?

What Did Israel Know?

ReThink911.org Focused Activism - A Blog Made in Support of the ReThink911.org Campaign

Alex Jones and Richard Gage Debunk the National Geographic Hit Piece on 9/11 Truth

Richard Gage Debunks Popular Mechanics, AE911Truth

Richard Gage's Auckland Presentation Silences the Debunkers

9/11 Debunker Gets His Ass Handed To Him By Richard Gage - 20/07/2009

Richard Gage and Chris Mohr Debate WTC Collapse - Edited version of Gage and Mohr's debate with added comments and videos to address the sound issue and other points raised by Mohr.

AE911Truth Debates Explosive Expert: Richard Gage, AIA vs. Ron Craig -

Richard Gage Debunks Popular Mechanics, AE911Truth

Antonello talks with Richard Gage, founder of Architects and Engineers for 911 truth about the "official story" of September 11, 2001 and debunks NIST and Popular Mechanics attempt to debunk them. The Twin Towers, Building 7 and much more.



Related:

Debunking the REAL 9/11 Myths: Why Popular Mechanics Can't Face Up to Reality

C2CAM - 9-11 Truth - Coast To Coast AM

9/11 material starts at 0:39:27

Published on Jul 17, 2012 by Boomdaddy03

CLICK HERE TO WATCH THE LATEST UPDATED VIDEO THAT CAME OUT TODAY http://www.youtube.com/user/Boomdaddy03

Subscribe To Get Notified Of The Latest Releases As They Come Out http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=Boomdaddy03

Date: 06-09-09 Host: George Noory Guests: Richard Gage, Martine Colette

A practicing architect for 20 years, Richard Gage is the founding member of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth. He discussed the destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rises on 9-11, and why nearly 700 architects and engineers have found evidence for explosive controlled demolition, and are calling for a new investigation. Lauded as an engineering feat when they were constructed, the WTC Towers, according to the official explanation, were said to collapse because of the fires burning on the upper floors. Yet, Gage pointed out that other high-rise buildings with hotter and longer fires never collapsed in this manner.

Further, in the case of fire, if a building was to collapse, it would fall over and not straight down, he said. This type of collapse indicated there was no resistance from the structures below, he added. The collapse of Building 7 was also a curiosity, as the fires seen in photos & videos were fairly small, Gage detailed. However, witnesses near Building 7 said they heard the sounds of explosions, lending credence to the idea that controlled demolitions took place.

Evidence for controlled demolition of the Towers comes from a study by Dr. Steven Jones of the pulverized dust that surrounded the area after the collapse. The material was found to have the chemical signature of thermite, created through nanotechnology, something that military departments have been experimenting with in laboratories. Gage speculated that this thermite might have been planted in the Tower's elevator columns during a lengthy modernization project that was begun 9 months prior to 9-11. Because of this and other evidence, he is calling for a new and independent investigation to uncover the full truth about the events surrounding 9-11. He recommended signing the AE911 Truth Petition and visiting the NYC Coalition for Accountability Now site.



Related:

Alex Jones and Richard Gage Debunk the National Geographic Hit Piece on 9/11 Truth

9/11 Debunker Gets His Ass Handed To Him By Richard Gage - 20/07/2009

Debunking Dave Thomas, Ryan Mackey, and Zdenek Bazant et al.

Richard Gage's Auckland Presentation Silences the Debunkers

9/11 WTC Debate: Collapse by fire or explosive controlled demolition? 1/11 - Edited version of Gage and Mohr's debate with added comments and videos to address the sound issue and other points raised by Mohr.

If you were keeping score, Mohr probably did win the debate...

Chris Mohr's "respectful rebuttal" smells like debunking

AE911Truth Debates Explosive Expert: Richard Gage, AIA vs. Ron Craig

Reply: Gage's Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Fraud. WTC7 "small fires" lie EXPOSED!

Reply: Richard Gage Explains the Lack of Explosive Sounds

RIBA, AIA and Aaronovitch attack Gage

Cowardly AIA Panders to Political Correctness

Controlled Demolition Not Possible?

EXCLUSIVE AE911Truth Colorado 911 Visibility & Richard Gage: Premier Explosive Evidence w Live Panel

Published on Jun 8, 2012 by WACCTV

Colorado 911 Visibility brought Richard Gage to town to premier the final release of 9/11: Explosive Evidence Experts Speak Out Final Edition. Special to this premier and likely none of the other places it will premier was the panel of psychologists from the movie live to answer questions. This video contains more than an hour and a half of a never before seen question and answer session with Richard himself and the panel where topics from nanothermite to Judy Wood to Ace Elevator Company to Amy Goodman and Democracy Now! are all covered. We R Change was in the hizouse and Michael Storm got Richard to let him film it. Enjoy!



Related:

"A variety of media sources, including Popular Mechanics, BBC and the History Channel, have dismissed the assertions of AE911Truth and presented their own arguments in favor of the theory that jet fuel and office fires were the primary factor in the WTC skyscrapers' collapse." - Source

Here is a point-by-point refutation at AE911Truth, of Popular Mechanics' weak arguments regarding the controlled demolition of the three WTC buildings, written by Debunking the Debunkers blog contributer Adam Taylor

Hold the BBC Accountable - AE911Truth.org Action

Mock Debate: Strongest 9/11 Myth Arguments Crumble as Truth Prevails - The Video of the Debate

Debunking Joseph Nobles/boloboffin of AE911Truth.INFO

'9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out' Trailer & Rebuttal to Pat Curley

Here is the feature-length, low-resolution, pre-release version of the film:



Watch '9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out Final Edition'

Excerpt:

Psychologists help out the conspiracy theorists that won't let go of the official conspiracy theory.



Twenty Four Uncut Interviews from the Film

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth debunk Judy Wood

News that the Democracy Now! radio show was scheduling a debate on 9/11/2006 between a spokesperson for the Popular Mechanics book Debunking 9/11 Myths and the creator of Loose Change Dylan Avery prompted the following letters

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth LA Press Conference

AE911Truth Podcast Episode 1

LIVE STREAM WORLD PREMIERE "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out"

WORLD PREMIERE TOUR "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out"

Opening Night - "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" Tuesday, May 22, 2012 - Beverly Hills, CA

Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth LA Press Conference

Press conference with Ed Asner

Related:

"A variety of media sources, including Popular Mechanics, BBC and the History Channel, have dismissed the assertions of AE911Truth and presented their own arguments in favor of the theory that jet fuel and office fires were the primary factor in the WTC skyscrapers' collapse." - Source

Here is a point-by-point refutation at AE911Truth, of Popular Mechanics' weak arguments regarding the controlled demolition of the three WTC buildings, written by Debunking the Debunkers blog contributer Adam Taylor

Hold the BBC Accountable - AE911Truth.org Action

Mock Debate: Strongest 9/11 Myth Arguments Crumble as Truth Prevails - The Video of the Debate

Debunking Joseph Nobles/boloboffin of AE911Truth.INFO

'9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out' Trailer & Rebuttal to Pat Curley

Here is the feature-length, low-resolution, pre-release version of the film:



Watch '9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out Final Edition'

Petition to President Obama: 9/11 Families Ask You to Watch “9/11: Explosive Evidence -Experts Speak Out”

Excerpt:

Psychologists help out the conspiracy theorists that won't let go of the official conspiracy theory.



Twenty Four Uncut Interviews from the Film

EXCLUSIVE AE911Truth Colorado 911 Visibility & Richard Gage: Premier Explosive Evidence w Live Panel

AE911Truth Podcast Episode 1

LIVE STREAM WORLD PREMIERE "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out"

WORLD PREMIERE TOUR "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out"

Opening Night - "9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" Tuesday, May 22, 2012 - Beverly Hills, CA

Maybe with Some Goading Keith Olbermann Will Flirt with 9/11 Truth a Bit More

Send tweets to Keith Olbermann:

@KeithOlbermann -- Richard Gage from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth AE911Truth.org : in New York around 9/11. PLEASE interview him!!!

Also, Thumbs Up this Current TV request:

http://getsatisfaction.com/currentcom/topics/please_have_olbermann_inteview_richard_gage_from_ae911truth_org_re_9_11

Maybe he will do it now that he's on a smaller network and more in charge.

Spread the word so we get as many people tweeting him and voting for the CTV request.

Then cross your fingers and/or pray.

Source:

http://911blogger.com/news/2011-09-02/get-richard-gage-countdown-keith-olbermann

As Pat Curley of the Screw Loose Change blog has pointed out, Olbermann has flirted with LIHOP.



Olberman has stated that it is the Bush administration's "criminal neglect that allowed the attacks to occur."



And he was the only major U.S. media source to cover the Cheney Iran false flag story.



Olbermann has stated that the idea that the Twin Towers were blown up "may be a lot stronger stuff than most Americans can contemplate," but that was back in 2006. In late 2010, when FOX News host Judge Andrew Napolitano made comments supportive of the demolition hypothesis, Frances Martel of the Mediaite blog noted that Olbermann didn't "take any particular issue" with Napolitano's comments. So maybe with some goading he will flirt with 9/11 truth a bit more!

Related Info:



NEW YORK PREMIERE OF DOCUMENTARY '9/11: Explosive Evidence – Experts Speak Out' By Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth

Richard Gage’s Asterisk

Richard Gage’s Asterisk
by Michael Wolsey
www.visibility911.com

March 29, 2011

Anyone who knows Richard Gage, AIA very well or has worked with him, knows that Richard insists that when you cite his name anywhere, whether in voice or print, that you include his title AIA, which stands for American Institute of Architects. I assume it’s much like a Dr. following his name with the letters PhD and is obviously important to Richard for whatever reasons. Those of us who know, always include the AIA tag when formally referring to Richard. We know that if we do not, Richard will be quick to correct us!

Unfortunately, Richard now has another inclusion in his title; an Asterisk.

In early 2009, I learned that Richard Gage, AIA and founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth had given a written endorsement of a new documentary about the September 11^th Pentagon attack titled National Security Alert. This film was being aggressively promoted by two people, Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis who call themselves the Citizen Investigation Team or CIT. Craig and Aldo were apparently seeking written or verbal endorsements of their film from high profile members of the 9-11 Truth Movement.[1] At some point, they had approached Richard and he agreed to give them a statement. Richard’s written endorsement reads as follows:

"The exhaustive effort by Craig Ranke and Aldo Marquis of Citizen Investigation Team to contact, record, document, and analyze numerous first-hand eyewitness accounts of the actual flight path of the airliner at the Pentagon on 9/11 has been long overdue, but worth waiting for. The evidence they have uncovered and compiled in their DVD "National Security Alert" deserves serious attention - particularly in light of what we now know about the explosive destruction of the three World Trade Center high-rises that day."

Prior to Richard’s endorsement of CIT, I knew about Craig and Aldo and their kooky theory that speculates that Flight 77 flew over the Pentagon. I confess that I didn’t really pay that much attention to them. I consider CIT’s work to be counter to the truth and believe that unsubstantiated claims of truth based on dishonest research and methods and speculation actually hurts our efforts at achieving a new 9-11 investigation. It was also a highly held belief that in most cases, it’s best as a movement to ignore disruptions such as these, which is what I did with CIT.

With much fanfare, CIT boasted their high profile endorsers to as much of the movement as would listen and used these peoples’ names as an appeal to authority [2] to further promote their film. I saw this behavior as extremely dishonest and was very disappointed in Richard and the others. [3] I considered this a tipping point and a place where 9-11 activists could no longer ignore CIT. Since then, we have published several podcasts as well as articles on the topic at visibility911.com. [4]

In response, I personally contacted Richard and some of the other endorsers with polite, yet firm emails asking them if they knew the whole story behind CIT. I urged them to look further into Aldo and Craig if they had not done so in the beginning, and reconsider their endorsements of what I considered to be the worst disinformation in the 9-11 movement history. I also had a chance to sit down with Richard face to face when he was in Denver in August of 2009.

My biggest concern was that Richard’s endorsement of CIT was helping CIT’s credibility and hurting his own. It is my opinion that there is very strong evidence to support the Controlled Demolition hypotheses at the World Trade Center on 9-11. Richard and his organization AE911T had gained much credibility over the years in this area. I did not want to see this hard work discredited by association with CIT and I saw this as a real possibility. I informed Richard of my concerns, as well as why I believe what I do. I was certainly not alone in my critique of CIT and I know Richard was hearing from many others on this topic. After spending over an hour and a half talking on this, Richard admitted to me privately that he had probably made a mistake with regards to CIT but still failed to fully retract his endorsement.

In December 2009, Richard issued a “clarification” of his CIT statement, and in February of 2011, after educating himself about who Craig and Aldo really are, issued his “complete withdrawal of support” for CIT and their film.

Personally I welcomed this withdrawal of support by Richard, although I wished he hadn’t given them the statement in the first place. I argued for a long time that the damage had been done, and that even if Richard took back his support from CIT, that they would never remove his name or words from their website. This was even a prediction I made privately after Richard issued the withdrawal; repeat, that CIT will NEVER remove his name or endorsement from their website.

Since then, I have from time to time checked back to the “Praise for Citizen Investigation Team” webpage to verify my prediction. It is no great surprise to me, nor should it be to anyone familiar with CIT’s methods, that Richard’s endorsement continues to be posted at the CIT website along with the others. The only difference now is that Richard’s words are now followed by a big red Asterisk which is actually a link to another page at the website which contains a long and wordy response by CIT to Richard’s withdrawal of support. The link is neither prominent or easy to see. It is linked only to the Asterisk itself and unless you are looking for it, you won’t see it.

The reasons that CIT will never remove Richard’s statements are not hard to understand. It’s not because of pride or ego or anything like that. The main reason, and one of the main goals of disinformation is to discredit good information with bad . Since Richard and AE911 promote solid information, one way to undermine them is to discredit them. When Richard, and all the other endorsers gave their names to CIT, they all in one way or another discredited themselves by associating good information with bad; some have called it the “turd in the punchbowl”. The endorsements provide a strong tie between the good and the bad and these ties will never be broken; they are actually the goal.

Dishonest? Heck yea, but what else is new with CIT.

Endnotes:

[1] It should be noted here that in my experience in the movement which goes back to 2003, I have never known any film about 9-11 to seek or even need endorsements. The movement has at times been hungry for tools to use on their friends and new video’s about the 9-11 attacks are no exception. The success or failure of a film was based on the films’ own merits.

[2] Argument from authority (also known as appeal to authority) is a fallacy of defective induction, where it is argued that a statement is correct because the statement is made by a person or source that is commonly regarded as authoritative. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_authority

[3] This list includes David Ray Griffin, Richard Gage, Aidan Monaghan, Barrie Zwicker, Sander Hicks, Kevin Barrett, Peter Dale Scott, and Ed Asner.

[4] It is not my intention in this essay to discuss the relative dangers in disinformation/ misinformation as it relates to CIT. This topic has been extensively covered on our podcast and at my blog.

Blueprint for Truth - Trailer

ae911truth
YouTube.com
October 25, 2008

Trailer for the new 2008 Research Edition of Blueprint for Truth. DVD available at http://ae911truth.org