Collapse or Explosion? A Discussion of the WTC “Sounds of Explosions” Issue

Abstract

When the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center complex collapsed on September 11, 2001, they exhibited numerous features that several researchers have identified as being consistent with controlled demolition with explosives. However, others have argued that the Towers could not have been destroyed via explosives, noting that the collapse events lacked a critical feature of explosive demolition: sounds of explosions. The absence of these sounds, it’s argued, means explosives could not have played a role in the destruction of the buildings. In this paper, we examine this argument at length and show it to be groundless. We demonstrate that not only can explosive sounds be heard, but that even if this argument were correct, the entire premise of dismissing the demolition hypothesis based on this argument is fallacious to begin with. We also demonstrate that the official investigation into the destruction of these buildings failed to adequately consider this evidence as well, and therefore renders the conclusions of said investigation unfounded. The theory of controlled demolition with explosives has abundant evidence to support it, and this body of evidence does indeed include the sounds produced during the collapses.

[Read the full paper here.]

3 Recently Released 9/11 Truth Documentaries and 2 hours 13 minutes of Explosive Eyewitness Evidence

James B. at the Screw Loose Change blog posted the first video here, but chose to outsource the debunking to his commenters. Please do read the comments and watch the video. The first person you will see is Dr. Graeme MacQueen. Click here to see MacQueen's debunking of the debunkers. I don't agree with all of the evidence presented, (example) but I'm confident that you will agree with the panelists of the Toronto Hearings that the witnesses succeeded in "exposing the inadequacy of the official narrative of 9/11." Their final report is still in the works.