 |
| The evidence indicates they were right about Cruz! http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/search?q=NATIONAL+ENQUIRER |
 |
| http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/05/i-rather-literally-burn-money-than-read.html |
The : ‘EVIL HILLARY CLINTON’ FRAMED TRUMP FAMILY OVER RUSSIA, DON JR. MEETING WAS SETUP
Allegedly done with help from the group Fusion GPS…
Hillary Clinton and a firm with ties to the Democratic party setup President Donald Trump and his family in an attempt to destroy the billionaire businessman and politician according to the National Enquirer.
The tabloid magazine, which has made no secret of its pro-Trump agenda, came to this conclusion after what they describe as an ‘exhaustive investigation’ into the matter.
These attempts by ‘evil’ Hillary to bring down her rival included luring Donald Jr. into meeting with shadowy Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskyaya claims the tabloid.
And the firm in the middle of all this is Fusion GPS according to the tabloid, the same group that allegedly compiled Christopher Steele’s scandalous dossier of claims about President Trump that was published in January...
To put it in spy terms it was like a honey trap, Only they weren't selling sex to Donald Jr. They were selling fictitious dirt of Hillary,' said former CIA officer Larry C. Johnson.
'And once they bit on the meeting, they had him right where they wanted him!'
More:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4711832/Evil-Hillary-Clinton-framed-Trump-family-Russia.html
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html
Does The National Enquirer have a track record of breaking legitimate news stories?
https://www.quora.com/Does-The-National-Enquirer-have-a-track-record-of-breaking-legitimate-news-stories
Actually, Nat'lEnquirer probably has to have credible facts to back up their sensationlized stories in order to withstand any lawsuits that may come their way. Definitely more credible than CNN
Katherine McChesney ralph kimball • 2 days ago
NATIONAL ENQUIRER ALWAYS HAS EVIDENCE THEIR CLAIMS ARE TRUTHFUL.
bobshits1 • 3 days ago
National Enquirer is far more credible than CNN, MSNBC, NYT, and so on!!
Excerpt from NATIONAL ENQUIRER article:More:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4711832/Evil-Hillary-Clinton-framed-Trump-family-Russia.html
100% Proof! Russian Collusion was a Hoax Designed to Impeach Trump and Divert Attention from Internal Email Leak & Clinton Criminal Activities:
http://trumpisright.blogspot.com/2017/07/ex-trump-adviser-on-firestorm-over.html
Does The National Enquirer have a track record of breaking legitimate news stories?
https://www.quora.com/Does-The-National-Enquirer-have-a-track-record-of-breaking-legitimate-news-stories
3 Answers
https://www.infowars.com/national-enquirer-evil-hillary-clinton-framed-trump-family-over-russia-don-jr-meeting-was-setup/#disqus_thread
Katherine McChesney Cassandra2 • 2 days ago
One would think that the National Enquirer is fake but they always have evidence to support their claims. NATIONAL ENQUIRER ROCKS.
McKean • 2 days ago
Yes.
It's not amazing and they miss the mark much more often than they hit it... but they have broken open a few major stories.
A few examples:
(2011) The National Enquirer reports on Tiger Woods many affairs and mistresses.
(2011) The Enquirer published a story claiming that Steve Jobs had only six weeks to live because of cancer... he died 7 months later of cancer
(2007) The National Enquirer revealed John Edward's affair with Rielle Hunter, a former campaign worker.
(2003) They break the story of Rush Limbaugh's addiction to painkillers and opiates.
(2001) They revealed the existence of Jesse Jackson's illegitimate child.
So, as a result, I am usually skeptical of their "stories" but they have been known to get it right as well. This makes some of their more popular claims more difficult to dismiss out of hand.
Yes. Ten minutes ago I discussed this with my fiancée, who has directed national media relations for several high profile organizations. Her words:
Everybody underestimates the Enquirer. But the Enquirer is the one everybody [media relations professionals with secrets to bury] really fears.
And she pointed out their record of breaking several huge stories involving politicians' infidelities.
Don't sleep on the Enquirer. Their bread and butter may be goofy stuff, but that doesn't mean they don't have any real reporters.
If you were to write an authentic history showing the evolution of the US mass media, the National Enquirer is more important than The New York Times, because the legitimate media moved closer to tabloid than the other way around.
What CNN considers "Breaking News" today is the sort of thing only covered by the National Inquirer in the past.
In the past you would never have known that a real news story was uncovered by the National Inquirer because CBS would never admit it.
The National Inquirer paid , sometimes real money, for scoops-especially about celebrities. During the lengthy OJ Simpson trial they were able to afford informants better than the police or legitimate media. There was so much money to be made in the OJ case that all the media moved tabloid.
The National Inquirer and Reader's Digest operated below the radar screen of intellectuals, people in academia paid no attention. There is no library in the US that ever collected the Readers Digest or National Inquirer. Research is made more difficult because all the records went up in a fire.
In the current political battle in the US understanding how tabloid stories work has high value. This is a kind of software invented by National Inquirer.
https://www.infowars.com/national-enquirer-evil-hillary-clinton-framed-trump-family-over-russia-don-jr-meeting-was-setup/#disqus_thread
Katherine McChesney Cassandra2 • 2 days ago
One would think that the National Enquirer is fake but they always have evidence to support their claims. NATIONAL ENQUIRER ROCKS.
Actually, Nat'lEnquirer probably has to have credible facts to back up their sensationlized stories in order to withstand any lawsuits that may come their way. Definitely more credible than CNN
Katherine McChesney ralph kimball • 2 days ago
NATIONAL ENQUIRER ALWAYS HAS EVIDENCE THEIR CLAIMS ARE TRUTHFUL.
bobshits1 • 3 days ago
National Enquirer is far more credible than CNN, MSNBC, NYT, and so on!!
To put it in spy terms it was like a honey trap, Only they weren't selling sex to Donald Jr. They were selling fictitious dirt of Hillary,' said former CIA officer Larry C. Johnson.
'And once they bit on the meeting, they had him right where they wanted him!'
 |
| https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/60m235/excia_who_exposed_gchq_spying_on_trump_for_obama/ |
