Note: I strongly disagree with some of Griffin's research, such as his analysis of the phone calls from the planes on 9/11 and the Pentagon crash. However, his book does an excellent job in regard to the destruction of the WTC Towers and lack of air defense on 9/11.
Based on David Ray Griffin's book "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" and brilliantly rebuts Popular Mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory, and shows how their arguments do not stand up to empirical analysis. Pointing out that most objections to the alternative theory, according to which 9/11 was an inside job, are based on purely a priori arguments and a propagandistic use of the term "conspiracy theory," he shows that if we get empirical about 9/11, we can quickly see that the official story cannot be true.
Based on David Ray Griffin's book "Debunking 9/11 Debunking" and brilliantly rebuts Popular Mechanics and other defenders of the official conspiracy theory, and shows how their arguments do not stand up to empirical analysis. Pointing out that most objections to the alternative theory, according to which 9/11 was an inside job, are based on purely a priori arguments and a propagandistic use of the term "conspiracy theory," he shows that if we get empirical about 9/11, we can quickly see that the official story cannot be true.
