The
Truth is Ineffable
by
James Hufferd, Ph.D.
________
Human
thought might mirror language – I don’t know. You’d have to ask an expert in
semiology or some such specialty. But let’s start this discussion at the
beginning – since one of our biggest problems is that we tend to speak before
thinking.
I do know, though,
that language, carefully-chosen or careless, directs, regulates, and controls
thoughts much as a traffic cop directs traffic. And the recognized establishment
(the élite) is the looming traffic cop as far as proper and permitted topics and
permitted conclusions for the majority of members of society. Getting closer
than that, in most cases, to who precisely decides these things – what
may be brought up and discussed and what is germane to conclude – is hard to
pinpoint. (Although a president warning that there are not to be any so-called
“outrageous conspiracy theories” about 9/11 would be one clear-as-day exception
to that. (As well as would be a president years later declaring that the whole
matter was decided and concluded and the guilty role of Osama and the 19 “a
fact”). And likewise significantly, a solemn religious service aired
ubiquitously nationwide to extend sacred cover to 9/11 to suggestively exclude
profane analysis of the monumental transgressions committed on that ineffable
(meaning unmentionable, therefore unthinkable), yet all-too-commonly
mis-referenced day.
A more mundane example
of speech directing thought: We never hear, as we once did, biofuels prominently
referenced as substitutes calculated to wean us from petroleum dependence, even
though the grain enthanol industry continues, offering a competitively-priced
vehicle fuel that is up to 85% biofuel alcohol and only 15% petroleum. (Of
cource, forward-looking Brazil was already running virtually all of its private
motor vehicles on 100% sugarcane alcohol a quarter of a century ago). Thus, as
many Midwesterners realize, in direct response to the predictable hostility to
such a troublesome notion by the rich and powerful petroleum lobby, the very
real possibility of wholesale substitution of petroleum by much cleaner and
ultimately cheaper renewables has vanished from our collective radar. Of course,
the oilers point out that the energy required to refine the alcohol from the
source crop adds greatly to the expense. But, does this cost exceed that of
recovering and refining gasoline – as well as the raw cost of trying to wrest
possession of much of it from its far-away rightful owners by brutal military
intervention, none of which they bother to mention?
Doubtful.
And who do you suppose
largely owns the petroleum industry? Ditto the communications industry, the
international drug trade, including “legal” pharmaceuticals and chemicals, and
increasingly the related food industry and war materiel, communications, service
industries of all kinds? Who owns anything, in fact, with truly high-end
potential and earnings? Answer: the same stupendously-moneyed central banking
and financial houses whose avatars literally pull the strings of the front- and
shadow-governments of the world’s collection of puppet regimes.
That’s the message of
my last two articles – which largely drew dismissal or silence from the
“knowing”. And some earlier postings alluded to it, too. I suggested that the
amorphous organs of governance away up at the top where the real-life “Unitary
Executive” holds imperceptible sway and has for decades, were likely the
ultimate originators of the directed activity that surfaced on 9/11.
And the response that
commonly came back was, “You don’t know that”. Or, “How do you know that?”
My answer: Because they’ve been ultimately responsible for creating virtually
every other major shock event in the world over the past several decades.
They’ve bragged about it a few times, and once or twice, most notably at the
start of the 1930s Depression, the public has even fleetingly caught on. And, as
for 9/11, these longest-shadow plotters pull the strings of the regimes
most-commonly implicated in 9/11, the U.S. and Israel, and certainly (I believe)
wouldn’t countenance any of their vassal states shaking up the world apart from
the long-established command structure.
So, I stand by the
suggested partial list of the NWO’s habits of executive operation I offered last
time. These are observable elements of their M.O.:
1)
The
absolute exclusive and exclusionary worship and service of money.
From top to bottom, money expresses irresistible power – buys access, installs
personnel, prevails legally and legislatively, arbitrarily transfers ownership,
commands “justice”, launches wars and governmental coups.
2)
Independence
and unaccountability of a distinct governing class.
Wealthy families and individuals are in fact a law apart. Citizenship rights of
effective participation in and more than incidental benefits from governing have
transferred almost entirely from ordinary citizens (regarded as so many street
children) to corporations and primarily
mega-corporations (the specialized investment tools of the top-level NWO
associates and their operatives).
3)
Fabrication
of truth.
Bona fide scientific evidence is ignored unless useful to the NWO’s purpose. The
“truth” is whatever the NWO announces it to be.
4)
Prior
positive determination.
Only the intents and purposes of the NWO determine the profile of events to
unfold. Means are found to so reshape the toolkit and landscape accordingly.
(9/11 is a good example: purpose determined, directive issued, means found or
shaped to achieve.)
5)
Inconsideration
of general welfare or collateral consequences.
An operation (a war, 9/11, financial catastrophe, ecological or nuclear
disaster, staged psy event), if
deemed beneficial for an NWO purpose, adverse human or ecological cost is
ignored. An objective is sometimes delayed to deceive the public, a false
priority touted, or an egregious objective pursued or carried out beyond public
view. But always in the name of the public.
6)
A
subjective sanity norm.
All meaningful dissenters from the “norm” (whatever the NWO’s decided intent is)
are called “delusional” and “criminal”. (This week, Vladimir Putin,
to be isolated for Russia’s holdout banking system independence (though no
longer totally separate, if ever), similar to that of Libya previously, joined
9/11 in these assigned categories).
7
Association
of operatives.
Only the very topmost circles of global governing élite – central bank barons
and top financiers primarily – are favorably served by NWO objectives.
Subordinated associates and a myriad of front-line operatives in all capacities
are fed with ample opportunities, stroked, and not-too-subtly reminded of the
outer darkness and gnashing teeth or far worse awaiting nonconformity through
constant real-life examples.
8.
Reckless
enamorment with technology.
Vast black budgets, producing futuristic gadgets and scientific means unknown to
the rest of humanity, are robustly deployed to achieve NWO-determined purposes
and objectives by their dominated militarily-organized and other agency
operatives and arms
And our
usually-implicated gang of perps got 9/11 done. The real head-perps? At this
point, if you mention them at all or suggest their involvement going forward
still today, you’re automatically installed in the ranks of kookdom and cited
and tweeted for buzzed delusionary ranting – due to someone somewhere
controlling discourse to discourage investigation into precisely who those
driven serial uber-powerful head-perps are and how they do what they do. So,
call me crazy! Even you may, conditioned, scoff and dismiss. But, I’ll double
down and win. It’s one world blanket shadow government, with Russia and China
struggling on the outs as the “free” world totters sightless at the
brink.
Related:
