Saturday, March 2, 2013

Victory for Protestor who says BBC 9/11 Coverage was False

Campaigner and film maker Tony Rooke claimed a moral victory today after a UK court gave him a conditional discharge even though he has refused to pay his BBC license fee. Over 100 supporters from as far away as Denmark and Norway cheered in front of the court house as independent media people conducted interviews and photographed the crowd. Court officials had booked their largest room for the case but were at a loss to find that well over 50 people could not be fitted in.

Tony said: "I am taken a back and hugely grateful for all the support." He is asking for at least one person to take up the campaign by refusing to pay or taking other legal action (see below).

Rooke argued that the BBC's coverage of the 9/11 terror attacks in New York has been so distorted that it amounts to giving aid and comfort to the unidentified terrorists who demolished three World Trade Centre buildings in 2001. Two hijacked planes were flown into the famous Twin Towers and a third tower WTC7 collapsed later in the day. The attacks were used as the pretext for a decade of wars and the introduction of police state measures across the NATO countries. Vast personal fortunes were made by White House and CIA officials who failed to thwart 9/11.
------------------------------------------------------------------
Sceptics say that the collapse of WTC7 must have been the result of something more than limited fires and damage from the Twin Towers, hit by the two hijacked planes. Argument has revolved around the speed of the collapse. In the BBC Conspiracy Files series, which endorsed every aspect of the official 9/11 story, it was stated that the building did not collapse at free fall speed, but later US officials were forced by video evidence to admit that it did just that.

A large group of over 1500 architects and engineers known as AE911 say that free fall collapse implies that the building had all its supports removed at the same instant which can only happen with a controlled demolition. Tony Rooke's legal argument is that in failing to correct their free fall misinformation and many other misstatements of fact, the BBC are a party to covering up the terrorists who organised the controlled demolition of WTC7.

The BBC has also failed to publicise the finding of Richard Clarke, head of counter terrorism at the White House in 2001. Two years ago Clarke made a bombshell announcement: in the weeks before 9/11 a secret "decision" must have been taken at the CIA to over rule FBI officers who wanted to arrest some of the people who according to the official story went on to commit the attacks. Clarke says that if this decision had not been made the 9/11 attacks would not have happened. Before Clarke went public the BBC programme makers were adamant this was a "conspiracy theory". Afterwards they failed to give it any prominence and failed to reinterview any of the officials who, if Clarke is right, must have lied to them.

Source: http://www.reinvestigate911.org/content/court-victory-protestor
___________________________________________________

The official account of the attacks is riddled with falsehoods and omissions of key evidence, such as the freefall collapses, the melted steel, the thermite signatures, plus reports and recordings of explosions, the conflicting accounts of the NORAD response, and other data. The official NIST World Trade Centre investigation is thoroughly discredited along with 'debunker' attempts to hide damning evidence of the controlled demolition of these three buildings.

Despite a concerted effort by the establishment and their defenders, the truth about what happened is virtually impossible to paper over. Justice can still be visited upon some of those involved. Indeed, the NIST 'investigators' can easily be targeted for producing a fraudulent report that hid or obfuscated evidence of Treason. For instance, their claim that there was no evidence for melted steel, a clear indication of incendiary action, is a bare faced lie.

All withheld NIST documentation, preserved steel, and crime scene photos or video need to be released to the public for independent review. The material should be seized to prevent destruction of any relevant material. Only the truth about 911 will end the war on terror and help to reign in a corrupt establishment.