Showing posts with label CIT Pentagon flyover. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CIT Pentagon flyover. Show all posts
Thursday, January 5, 2012
New Journal of 9/11 Studies Paper: "No plane at the Pentagon" Theories Refuted
Posted by
Adam Taylor
The Pentagon Attack: Problems with Theories Alternative to Large Plane Impact
By John D. Wyndham (PhD, Physics)
Abstract: The widespread belief among those who question the official account of 9/11, that a large plane did not hit the Pentagon on 9/11, is unsupported by the evidence. The failure of the 9/11 truth movement to reach consensus on this issue after almost a decade is largely due to a failure to rigorously apply the scientific method to each proposed theory. This paper, by so applying the evidence to each proposed theory, shows that a large plane hitting the Pentagon is by far the most plausible theory.
(Full paper)
By John D. Wyndham (PhD, Physics)
Abstract: The widespread belief among those who question the official account of 9/11, that a large plane did not hit the Pentagon on 9/11, is unsupported by the evidence. The failure of the 9/11 truth movement to reach consensus on this issue after almost a decade is largely due to a failure to rigorously apply the scientific method to each proposed theory. This paper, by so applying the evidence to each proposed theory, shows that a large plane hitting the Pentagon is by far the most plausible theory.
(Full paper)
Labels:
9/11 conspiracy Pentagon,
9/11 no plane theories,
CIT Pentagon flyover,
CITGO gas station Pentagon

Thursday, February 4, 2010
More Problems for the CIT-Heads: Paik Testimony
Posted by
JM Talboo
Pat Curley
ScrewLooseChange.blogspot.com
Thursday, February 04, 2010
ScrewLooseChange.blogspot.com
Thursday, February 04, 2010
Sometimes the Troofers do good debunking, but only on the parts of the fantasy that they don't agree with personally.
There are problems with some elements of Shinki and Ed Paik’s accounts, but CIT has compounded these by omitting or distorting elements of Ed and Shinki’s accounts, while selectively interpreting and hyping other elements. CIT has a history of doing this, they’ve consistently done it in ways that support their theory about ‘north path’ and ‘Pentagon flyover’, and their doing so- while accusing their critics of being ‘agents’ and ‘disinformation’- has created controversy and undermined their own credibility.Comment:
I think Pat is just mad that Scootle recently pointed out that, "ScrewLooseChange hasn't really been debunking much lately. It's essentially now little more than a 9/11 truth gossip blog. And when they do debunk it's usually a repost of something about CIT created by people in the 9/11 truth movement. And on the rare occasion when they do some original debunking, it's usually nitpicking."
Related Info:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)