 | ||
| Click to Enlarge |
Dr. David Griscom recently won the 9/11 Physics Debate.
He has a PhD in Physics from Brown
University, worked at the
Naval Research Lab for 33 years, was chosen by NASA as a
Naval Research Lab for 33 years, was chosen by NASA as a
Principal Investigator of the Moon rocks,
and published over 190 papers
in peer reviewed independent scientific
journals, earning him a Hirsch
Index of 52 (a measure of his references in
the scientific community).
No top scientists came
forward to support the fishy official theory.
Not even NIST or JREF
would speak out at the debate to defend it.
The links to hear and see the
debate are at www.911Debate.org
Dr. Griscom covered the top 3 points from Physics that
show
the official story of 9/11 is not in accord with the laws of
nature.
Kevin Barrett, the host of No Lies Radio interviewed Dr.
Griscom
as they tried to find someone with a PhD
in Physics to compete
by March 1, and with a two week extension until March
15.
If no top scientists will speak out for the official 9/11
theory,
then how scientific is it?
Rick Shaddock
Association for Nine Eleven Truth Awareness
1629 K Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006
202-540-9920
202-449-9500 faxwww.ANETA.org
Lobbying Congress and Police for a Scientific Investigation of 9/11
Association for Nine Eleven Truth Awareness
1629 K Street NW, Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006
202-540-9920
202-449-9500 faxwww.ANETA.org
Lobbying Congress and Police for a Scientific Investigation of 9/11
Related:
'Debunker' Pat Curley: the King of Scientific Peer-review
Discrediting By Association: Undermining the Case for Patriots Who Question 9/11
