Published on Jun 23, 2012 by Free Fall
Hosted by Bernie Suarez and Andrew Steele. In this episode Bernie and Andy talk about the Scientific Method and NIST's disregard for it in favor "computer model science". The guest this week is engineer Wayne Coste, who talks about 9/11 science and censorship.
*****Links for show on 6/29/12*****
*National Construction Safety Team Act
*The Scientific Method on Wikipedia
*Scientists simulate jet colliding with World Trade Center
9/11 Free Fall airs every Friday at 8PM EST / 7PM CST on WWCR 3
For shortwave users WWCR 3 can be found at:
4840 kHz 00:00 - 11:59 UTC
13845 kHz 12:00 - 23:59 UTC
To volunteer for Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth go to ae911truth.org.
"Debunkers" who try to downplay the credentials of the members of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth and other individuals in the truth movement ignore that even electrical engineers take classes relevant to the issues surrounding 9/11.
Skeptical Inquirer Publishes Two Letters from AE911Truth Supporters About 9/11 Truth Hit Piece
"As a registered professional engineer committed to the scientific method, I would like to echo Ted Goertzel's support for the peer-review process. Goertzel says, "review panels must have full access to all datasets ... It is especially important that ... qualified specialists [have] an opportunity to present alternative views ... " Engineers who observe the destruction of WTC 7 as possible only by controlled demolition have been stifled by the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) decision to suppress details of their WTC 7 failure models. For example, NIST replied: "Indeed the NIST Director has determined that the release of 3,370 files from the [failure] analysis results ... might jeopardize public safety and therefore, these files have been withheld." Suppressing this analysis from peer review is unconscionable. Public safety is endangered when engineers are precluded from studying how an ordinary office fire could completely and utterly destroy a forty-seven-story modem skyscraper such that for more that 100 feet it exhibited free-fall acceleration. Goertzel notes, "technological conspiracies often ... [make] bizarre claims that ... [information is] suppressed. In this case, it is not a bizarre claim but rather a bizarre reality. We welcome Goertzel's, and SKEPTICAL INQUIRER's, public call for NIST to release its suppressed analysis."
Wayne H. Coste, P.E., Petition Signer, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Controlled Demolition Theories Have Passed Scientific Peer-review - The Work of the National Institute for Standards and Technology Has Not!
Debunking the Only Bad Review of 'The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False'
Revisiting 9/11/2001 --Applying the Scientific Method
Watch '9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out Final Edition'
Petition to President Obama: 9/11 Families Ask You to Watch “9/11: Explosive Evidence -Experts Speak Out”
The following includes related links that debunk the debunkers and demonstrate that thousands of 9/11 family members think 9/11 was an inside job to some extent:
WTC 7 Petition to the National Institute for Standards and Technology, U.S. Congress, and President Obama
Properly Investigate the Crimes of 9/11 Petition - To be delivered to: The United States House of Representatives, The United States Senate, and President Barack Obama: