Tuesday, June 30, 2009
Last night the BBC aired another of its hatchet jobs on the truth and patriot movements. This one concerning the London attacks of July 7th, 2005.
Even by the BBC's standards this was a pathetic attempt at debunking. Much of the program was spent debunking unimportant issues and old arguments. At one point they actually even brought up the sign on the bus that said "Outright Terror: Bold and Brilliant" and potrayed it as if we consider it a key piece of evidence.
They brought up Peter Power's mock terror drills and downplayed the extraordinary coincidence, while making no mention of the fact that on 9/11 there were also drills taking place simultaneously that were eerily like the attacks - OKC as well, which is the main reason the drills are so suspicious.
To the BBC's credit, they did mention the fact that metal and tiles were blown upwards by the train blasts. They even interviewed the survivor who made that statement and made it clear that he supported alternative theories. However, this evidence was glossed over.
Just like their 9/11 hitpieces, they did not actually defend the official story. They simply restated the official narrative as if it was a proven fact and then attempted to disprove alternative theories without responding to criticisms of the official narrative. They made out that there was a massive amount of concrete evidence to support the official story and no evidence to support alternative theories. In reality of course, it's the other way around. The official narrative has been torn apart by many researchers. The film "Ludicrous Diversion" does not even pose alternative theories, it simply points out the many flaws in the official narrative.
Much of the program was spent examining the effect the film "7/7 Ripple Effect" had on the muslim world. Brian Paddick, a Metropolitan Police Deputy Assistant Commissioner, argued in the piece how he felt it was important that the "conspiracy theories" be refuted as they could potentially make it more difficult to prevent "further atrocities". This is a dangerous spin. As if the "tin foil hat" stereotype wasn't enough, the BBC are actually subtly implying that these alternative theories are potentially dangerous and by questioning 7/7 you are promoting islamic extremism!
Throughout the program several attempts were made to portray 7/7 truthers as mentally unstable and dangerous individuals. Threatening emails to a Controlled Demolition company and Peter Power were mentioned and a video clip of WeAreChange UK "harassing" Peter Power was shown. Muad'Dib's anonymity was potrayed as "sinister" and his arrest was mentioned, as was the fact that he believes that he is the messiah. Kollerstrom 's holocaust denial was also mentioned and throughout the program, numerous comparisons were made to 9/11, thereby linking the 9/11 truth movement with all of this as well. It was as if you were watching Glenn Beck.
Towards the end of the program, the BBC mentioned that Tony Gosling was planning on working closer with the Muslim community. They even mentioned an event that is going to take place on the 4th anniversary of the attacks at the Birmingham Central Mosque. It seems strange that the BBC would mention this. Was this program just a typical hitpiece? Or was it some kind of preconditioning/predictive programming to associate 9/11 and 7/7 researchers with Islamic extremism in preparation for a false flag attack that will be used to defame us further?
After the establishment's lame attempts to link Von Brunn and 9/11 Truth, it honestly wouldn't surprise me. This is after all the same corporation that put out a propaganda piece in 2004 called "London Under Attack" which discussed the response to a simulated terrorist attack on three tube trains - effectively predicting 7/7 with Lone Gunmen like precision. Interesting how they made no mention of that in their hitpiece.
7/7 Crash Course.
London Bombings Data Page
More Brits Think Government Behind 7/7 London Bombings
Well this is an unexpected suprise. Heidi Montag, the star of some Reality show on MTV, is plugging Infowars and PrisonPlanet articles on Twitter. Her boyfriend Spencer Pratt is apparently a fan of this kind of stuff.
Even more suprising, and potentially very exciting is that she seems to have raised the curiosity of teen mega-sensation Miley Cyrus!
Now I'm no Miley Cyrus fan, and my opinions of her dropped even more when I found out she was supporting a bill to basically end free speech on the internet, but if she were to start voicing these important issues it would be great exposure for the movement. She's adored by young children and teenagers and she could be a great ally in the information war.
Maybe this is just wishful thinking, maybe not. She wouldn't be the first celebrity to "come out of the closet" with regards to this stuff; Charlie Sheen, Rosie O'Donnell, Christine Ebersole, Daniel Sunjata, Jesse Ventura, Tom DeLonge of Blink 182, Matthew Bellamy of Muse, Warren Cuccurullo of Frank Zappa/Duran Duran, Willie Nelson and many others have all put their careers on the line to voice their controversial opinions regarding important issues. And not one of them regrets it!
On another note, The BBC is set to air another of it's Conspiracy Files hatchet jobs in 7 hours. This one focusing on the London Bombings. I predict they won't actually defend the flawed official narrative. Instead they will simply re-state it as fact and then criticise alternative theories. They'll bring in Peter Power and downplay the extraordinary coincidence of the simultaneous drills, they'll focus on some old debunked arguments and attack us strawman and then they'll resort to emotional manipulation by saying we hurt the family members and survivors etc. while completely ignoring the family members and survivors who do question the official story. In fact, I think the majority of family members are unsatisified with the lack of justice.
They probably won't mention the fact that metal and tiles on the trains were blown upwards, indicating that the bombs were placed underneath the trains, and if they do they'll probably make up some new law of physics like they did to explain WTC7's collapse.
... So predictable!
BBC 7/7 "Documentary": Just a hitpiece, or something more sinister?
Monday, June 22, 2009
Now I'm not denying the interview with Lloyd at the end is weird. I saw the full length version of their interview with him on Google a few months ago and something certainly is up there but this whole north side approach stuff has been debunked over and over by Jim Hoffman, Arabesque911Truth and even Dylan Avery. And 9/11 Blogger doesn't want anything to do with CIT's stuff.
First off, let's look at Pilots for 9/11 Truth. A number of its members promote World Trade Center no-plane theories - arguing that the speeds at which the planes were travelling were aerodynamically impossible at the altitudes they were flying at. Rob Balsamo, the head of the group, has defended these people's opinions, saying they are qualified to have them. This was all debunked recently using a simulator. This fact alone is enough to raise serious questions about the credibility of Pilots for 9/11 Truth.
People have questioned what happened at the Pentagon since day one, primarily due to the lack of video evidence of a plane hitting the Pentagon. A number of theories have been put forward ranging from missile theories, to 737 theories, to Tomahawk theories. All of these theories ignore the testimony of numerous eye witnesses who specifically say they saw an American Airlines Boeing 757.
So then a new theory was put forward by researcher Richard Eastman to account for this. This theory, known as the "flyover theory" or the "two-plane theory", argues that a Boeing 757, probably Flight 77, flew towards the Pentagon, but then pulled up and flew over at the exact same time as something else crashed into it.
The Citizen Investigation Team have given this theory new life by "proving" that the plane approached from the NORTH side of the CITGO gas station, as opposed to the official SOUTH side approach using the testimony of 13 eyewitnesses from strategic vantage points. Since whatever hit the Pentagon had to have come in from the south side in order to make the C-Ring hole. Then the plane had to have flown over, if it came in from the north. They assert that the witnesses stories have not changed since they were interviewed by officials a few months after the event and therefore their recollections cannot be due to faded memory. Of these 13 witnesses, all give a different flight path, some estimate drastically lower speeds and none actually saw the plane hit the building.
The problem with basing an investigation solely on eyewitness testimony is that the stories given by eyewitnesses on the day were so different. Some people saw a helicopter! That doesn't mean a helicopter hit! The team makes the opinions of these 13 people out to be the majority and claim that there is no evidence of eyewitness testimony confirming a flight path south of the CITGO gas station. This simply isn't true. They obviously ignore the work of Eric Bart who has compiled an extensive collection of eyewitness accounts - which can be viewed here and here. Here's some quotes CIT don't want you to see:
Eyewitnesses who confirm the official south side approach
"As we were driving into town on 395, there was an exit. We were trying to get off of the exit for the Memorial Bridge. On the left-hand side, there was a commercial plane coming in, and was coming in too fast and the[n?] too low, and the next thing we saw was [it?] go-down below the side of the road… coming down towards the side of the—of 395. And when it came down, it just missed 395 and went down below us”
"I had just passed the closest place the Pentagon is to the exit on 395… we realized the jet was coming up behind us on that major highway. And it veered to the right into the Pentagon."
- Gary Bauer
“The jet came in from the south.”
- Mickey Bell
“I looked out to the southwest, and it came right down 395, right over Colombia Pike."
- Tim Timmerman
“The plane took a flight path straight up 395.”
- Michael Tinyk
“I saw a jumbo tail go by me along Route 395. It was like the rear end of the fuselage was riding on 395. I just saw the tail go whoosh right past me.”
- Dave Winslow
“I watched it come in very low over the trees and it just dipped down and came down right over 395 right into the Pentagon.”
- Don Wright
Eyewitnesses who SAW the plane hit the Pentagon
It "flew above a nearby hotel and drop its landing gear. The plane's right wheel struck a light pole, causing it to fly at a 45-degree angle"
"The right engine hit high, the left engine hit low. For a brief moment, you could see the body of the plane sticking out from the side of the building. Then a ball of fire came from behind it."
- Noel Sepulveda
"At the point where the fuselage hit the wall, it seemed to simply melt into the building. I saw a smoke ring surround the fuselage as it made contact with the wall. It appeared as a smoke ring that encircled the fuselage at the point of contact and it seemed to be several feet thick. I later realized that it was probably the rubble of churning bits of the plane and concrete. The churning smoke ring started at the top of the fuselage and simultaneously wrapped down both the right and left sides of the fuselage to the underside, where the coiling rings crossed over each other and then coiled back up to the top. Then it started over again -- only this next time, I also saw fire, glowing fire in the smoke ring. At that point, the wings disappeared into the Pentagon. And then I saw an explosion and watched the tail of the plane slip into the building."
- Penny Elgas
"The first thing you smell is the burning. And then you can smell the aviation fuel. And then you can smell this sickly, rotten-meat smell"
- Mark Kirk
"Once they stabilized Brian, they transferred him to George Washington Hospital where...the best, cutting edge burn doctor in the U.S. The doctor told him that had he not gone to Georgetown first, he probably would not have survived because of the jet fuel in his lungs(!)"
Even the CITGO video debunks the northern approach theories. The plane's shadow was caught briefly on a camera looking out the south side of the building. But that video was probably edited wasn't it?! They had already crashed two Boeing aircraft but they wouldn't crash a third into a section of the Pentagon reinforced to survive a jet impact now would they?! No, instead they flew the plane over the Pentagon, and at the same time launched a perfectly timed missile strike at it and used explosives to blow light poles out of the ground while agents planted pieces of plane debris on the lawn! Then they went through all the extra trouble of disposing of the passengers, repainting/disposing of the plane, faking photos of plane debris inside the impact hole and photographs of burnt passengers from Flight 77 and bribing all the witnesses who saw the plane hit the building, the forensic officials who positively identified all the passengers and all the firefighters who go into graphic detail in a book about how they picked up bits of burnt children! Honestly, and people wonder why we're called crazy!
I'll end on a quote from Prison Planet forum moderator jimd3100 posted on May 07, 2009, 11:47:04 PM
"In case you haven't figured this out. Recently Alex Jones was accused of being a racist due to comments made on the unmoderated infowars boards. Recently Alex Jones was associated with a nut that killed cops because he made comments on a AJ message board. (nevermind the fact that the comments were against AJ) Recently youtube eliminated an infowars account because they showed AJ defending himself(he showed the newspaper trying to smear him) meanwhile youtube has no problem hosting a video by "truthers" claiming the old cab driver nearly killed on 9/11 by a lightpole KNOCKED OVER BY A PASSENGER JET as it slammed into the pentagon, is actually an undercover mass murdering operative. Can you see what's coming down the pipe? I'll spell it out for you.....
Before the USS Cole was hit they tried hitting another ship....before the WTC were blown to kingdom come they bombed it. Guess what's coming down the pipe?
I'm one of the least "conspiracy" minded people on here IMO, and even I can see this one. Q: DO you believe that if the "powers that be" have a golden opportunity to not only give a devastating blow to Alex Jones, but the entire truth movement and Daniel Sanjata and Dylan Avery all at the same time that they wouldn't do it? Ans: It doesn't matter. We'd be idiots to sit here and let ourselves be put in that situation.
Here's a headline from the future that you are not going to see as long as I am moderating here......
Dateline Sept 22 2009
Arlington Loyd England the cab driver nearly killed on 9/11 was murdered today by a "9/11 conspiracy theorist". Mr Noplane Idiot was arrested at the scene reading a copy of Catcher in the Rye. Police Spokesman Capt NWO PIG said Mr Idiot made statements suggesting the act was carried out as a form of vigilante justice. "He believes based on movies and messages he saw on "conspiracy" message boards that Mr England helped carry out the attacks."
Internet searches showed that Mr Noplane Idiot was a frequent visitor to prisonplanet forum. The forum is hosted by the notorious Alex Jones who has made several films claiming the attacks were orchestrated by the U.S. Government. He was also producer of Loose Change Final cut. Search results also revealed Mr Idiot was also frequent visitor to the loose change forums, hosted by Dylan Avery maker of the "conspiracy series". His newest film Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup narrated by Rescue Me star Daniel Sanjata was released today. Mr Jones claims he has no control over who comes to the boards and what is posted. However investigations reveal the boards are moderated.
Think that's pretty unlikely? Yea, it is.
It's just as unlikely as Barry Jennings being dead 2 days before the WTC 7 report comes out.
Think that's just dumb? What's even dumber is sitting here allowing ourselves to be put in that position.
"I trust them, I don't think the folks that would blow Kennedy's brains out and murder 3000 Americans would take advantage of us like that." <----that's dumb.
Know what's even dumber? These DisInfo preposterous 9/11 truth killing movies, these idiots want you to promote.
I've never accused anyone of being an "operative", other than Gen Stubblebine. But if I was to make the accusation, it would be against these CIT retards. Why? For several reasons. They constantly use the exact same phrase James Woosley the former CIA head and NWO Bitch used to describe why no WMD were found in Iraq. "Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence". Meaning just because we didn't find WMD in Iraq doesn't mean there wasn't a sh*tload of it. And just because no one saw a passenger jet fly over the pentagon doesn't mean it didn't happen. How much BS are you willing to take?
Also, Russel Pickering, John Farmer, Mike Walter, Keith Wheelhouse, Father McGraw, Joel Sucherman, and Lloyd England are all according to the makers of these idiot films, undercover operatives. And those are just then ones I've seen myself them make publicly. Well I'll throw that accusation right back at them. They are either insane, or they themselves are the operatives. Wether they are or not is irrelevant. The results are the same. And they can be used in the same way. They are not helping the truth movement. They are destroying it. Driving people in the movement out with their insanity. I've seen it. You think they are helping? Yea, it's real helpful for independent honest researchers to get people to talk to us after these retards visit them and then accuse them of being mass murdering operatives if they don't tell them what they want to hear. That's real f**king helpful. Honest? They are self promoting BS artists. "It was planned"....OMG! DID you hear that? There it is smoking gun proof! And you fall for this BS? Everyone in the world knows 9/11 was planned but when the old cab driver says it, it means he helped plan it? They are either dishonest insane a**holes or operatives. It doesn't matter. It's the same results. I've seen their movies. All of them. They are a disgusting joke. What's pitiful is seeing you fall for this crap. And people fall for it because they are allergic to a passenger jet hitting the pentagon. How incredibly stupid. This disinfo BS has gotten so bad that we now have a remote controlled passenger jet at the pentagon, but it doesn't fly into it....no, you wouldn't want that...so it flys over it. That's f**kin stupid. They have no choice. Everyone that was there saw a large passenger jet fly into the pentagon. I've been telling you that from day one. They went there and filmed them. They have no choice but then make up this stupid idea of a flyover. Everyone was fooled. No one saw it fly away. But everyone drew the wrong flightpath! No they didn't. That's why England, Walter, Sucherman, Wheelhouse, McGraw and about 100 other people are all "operatives". Because they don't place the plane slightly off the path. And those that drew the wrong flight path? They all swear they watched the passenger jet slam into the pentagon. Your own 10 year old knows that every witness swearing in court that they watched with their own eyes a passenger jet hit the pentagon, is NOT proof a passenger jet didn't hit the pentagon. How much BS are you willing to take?
You should be helping us stamp out this disinfo not spread it. I thought you people wanted to expose the truth of 9/11? This Disinfo crap is getting out of hand. We're nipping this in the bud. We have no choice. It's gotten to the ridiculous point where we are willing to admit a jet was at the pentagon but it didn't go in, and the witnesses who were there are lying operatives. It keeps getting worse......and I'm not going to sit here and let it come on down the pipe. There are reasons for this disinfo.
There are reasons for the various disinfo BS that some of you seem to love to hear, and fall for.
Operatives or not the results are the same. How about giving a sane 9/11 truther a 7 page front page article? Here are your heros promoting 9/11 truth...
For a critical review of all the Pentagon theories see http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/index.html. Flight 77 hit the Pentagon folks, they're just withholding the proof to distract the conspiracy theorists from the hard scientific evidence at the World Trade Center and focus on speculative no-plane theories. It's a psy-op. Probably the only good Pentagon theory I've seen is the plane-bomb theory.
A Clarification on Disinfo
The CIT Virus
Sunday, June 21, 2009
It's a pretty good video by debunker standards, but I do have some problems with it. For one thing Barry was sure he was inside on the 23rd when the second plane hit. Then again, as this video states, it does seem like a bit of a stretch that he would be able to drive to WTC7, park up, meet Hess, go up to the 23rd floor, go back down and go back up again in only 17 minutes so let's assume he was mistaken and let's go with the official timeline and assume he and Hess entered the 23rd floor shortly after it was officially evacuated and let's assume they didn't try to leave until after the south tower had came down - as implied in the BBC documentary.
A big stretch in my mind is the idea that it would take them half an hour just to go down 17 floors! Especially when you consider that, in the BBC documentary, he said he was "jumping landings"!
Another thing, in the BBC documentary Barry said (when he made it down to the sixth floor) "there was this eerie sound, the whole building went dark, and the landing that we were standing on gave way". Now if AlienEntity's timeline is correct, shouldn't the building have already been dark? What with all the electrical power being shut off at 9:59?
And of course there's the biggest problem of all - they were on the NORTH SIDE of the building. In his interview with Dylan and Jason he said "When I was on the stairs I saw 'north side'." He also described how he was blown back by the force of the blast.
Even if he was on the sixth floor when the north tower came down, how could falling debris (or should I say "implausible far-flung debris"?) hitting the SOUTH side of the building create an UPWARD, EXPLOSIVE force, sufficient to destroy a landing all the way on THE OTHER SIDE?
Giving Hess the final word in the video is a bit rich considering he's Giuliani's lawyer and obviously has a vested interest in defending the official story. He wouldn't lie now would he?
"The fact that the coffee was still hot also suggests that Barry was in the OEM center shortly after 9am, since the order came down to evacuate it after WTC2 was hit. It collapsed almost an hour later at 9:59 am, so what was Barry doing hanging around in an abandoned center for a whole hour?" - Source: The Third Tower: A Critical Examination
The 9/11 Interview with Michael Hess: Evidence that NIST Lied about When He and Barry Jennings Were Rescued
Thursday, June 18, 2009
It is our responsibility to stand up and ask for a new independent investigation. We must stop supporting the empty concept called “war on terrorism” and the laws that erode our freedoms, based on the official and faulted conspiracy theory of the 9/11 Commission — which didn’t even mention the collapse of Building 7.
Richard Gage, Prof. David Ray Griffin, Steven E. Jones, Annie Machon.
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
June 16, 2009
Recent months have seen numerous breakthroughs for the truth movement in the corporate media, from Fox 26’s interview with Richard Gage of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth to 9/11 Press For Truth being aired on local television in Colorado to coverage of this year’s Bilderberg conference in major British newspapers. Despite these positive developments, however, primetime TV dramas are continuing to portray those skeptical of the official 9/11 story (a clear majority of the American public according to poll after poll) as deranged terrorists who are likely to commit acts of violence.
An example of this phenomenon comes from the crime series Law & Order: SVU. A recent episode of the series featured a storyline in which a deranged "conspiracy theorist" in New York murders tourists taking his picture because he believes they are uploading the pictures to a government database. In a classic example of guilt by association, the investigators’ search of the deranged terrorist’s computer reveals that he visits online forums and is interested in 9/11 truth and "Bildurburg" (sic). See a screenshot of the fictional terrorists’ computer (courtesy of the PrisonPlanet Forum below:
Attempts to portray those in the truth community as mentally unhinged are by no means new. A&E’s FBI drama The Beast once famously featured an episode in which a dope smoking terrorist delivered a rambling, inarticulate rant about government involvement in 9/11 in an obvious attempt to portray 9/11 truthers as seedy and delusional. Penn & Teller pronounced the entire 9/11 movement to be "Bullshit" on their popular HBO program of the same name by seeking out the movement’s most ridiculous representatives and destroying their character rather than dealing with any substantive claims about the attacks of that day. Glenn Beck—who previously said that Ron Paul supporters were terrorists—has recently discussed how militia members are white supremacists who are likely to commit an anthrax attack in America in order to kill hundreds of thousands of their fellow citizens. And, most chillingly, Beck has tried to link Holocaust Museum shooter Von Brunn to 9/11 Truthers based on no evidence whatsoever.
Ridiculous flights of fancy and transparent media distortions like these would be easy to dismiss if they were not so obviously related to official government talking points and policy papers. Just last week, President Obama tried to equate those who question the government’s account of 9/11 with those who wanted the attacks to happen, saying; "I am aware that some question or justify the events of 9/11. But let us be clear: al Qaeda killed nearly 3,000 people on that day.". This is on the heels of a Missouri State Police report asserting that supporters of third party political candidates are potentially dangerous terrorists and Homeland Security documents painting gun owners and returning war vets as violent radicals.
That the corporate media is echoing the government line on domestic terrorism should come as no surprise to those who have been paying attention to the way government openly uses Hollywood, TV, music, books and other media to insert their propaganda into pop culture. As Episode 088 of The Corbett Report podcast points out, the Bush Administration worked hand in hand with Holllywood and TV in the immediate aftermath of 9/11 to begin whipping up mass hysteria to support the Administration in their disastrous "War on Terror." Click on the player below to listen to the episode:
Of course it is up to those who understand the agenda of demonization of the truth movement in the corporate media to counteract this cultural programming in whatever way possible. Actor Daniel Sunjata, co-star of the hit TV series Rescue Me, has been helping inject serious discussion about the questions that still surround the 9/11 attacks into that series and using his celebrity and intelligence to draw attention to the issue through his writing. He needs to be applauded for his efforts and supported by the truth community to encourage others in similar positions to follow his lead.
For those without a corporate media outlet and devoid of celebrity to draw instant attention to the issue, it is still important to demonstrate to others how the media has always been (and continues to be) used to manipulate public opinion and popular sentiment on a range of issues from 9/11 truth to the importance of flu shots to the reality of global warming. One effective way to do this is by using new media technologies to spread information, by writing articles and creating videos to help people understand how they are being programmed by the corporate media.
To that end, The Corbett Report has released two videos in an ongoing series dedicated to exposing the way media is used to manipulate, shape and influence public sentiment on key issues. So far, the series has examined Ridley Scott’s Bladerunner and Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World with future installments dealing with Franz Kafka’s The Trial, the Wachowski brothers’ The Matrix and V for Vendetta, L. Frank Baum’s Wizard of Oz, Stanley Kubrick’s 2001 and Eyes Wide Shut and many more well-known books and movies.
Click here to watch the first two installments of the series.
Bladerunner: Film, Lit and the NWO
Mainstream Media Smear-Fest 2009
Monday, June 15, 2009
- Obama warns not to challenge official story
"These are not opinions to be debated, these are facts to be dealt with!"
- Hypocrite Brzezinski slams conspiratorial view of history
Oh, the sick irony!
- Law & Order episode features deranged artist obsessed with "9/11 conspiracies"
Relevant dialogue begins around 7:10.
- Glenn Beck's outrageous lie - Says Von Brunn is "a hero" to 9/11 Truthers
Truth activist sues him for defamation!
- Glenn Beck called about the Nanothermite discovery - calls caller a "freak!"
- 9/11 Commissioner Richard Ben-Veniste addresses 9/11 Truth movement
Complete with obligatory "no-planers" association.
"First they ignore you.
Then they ridicule you.
And then they attack you and want to burn you.
And then they build monuments to you."
Sunday, June 14, 2009
June 14, 2009
Support the families' call for a real investigation by going to http://www.nyccan.org/ and help them with the NYC Ballot Initiative and call your Reps and tell them to support H.R. 847, the James Zadroga 9/11 Health & Compensation Act which will help the 9/11 First Responders.