Respondents to Beijing skyscraper fire ludicrously argue against controlled demolition on 9/11 by claiming building was struck by a plane
Paul Joseph Watson
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Respondents to an article about the Beijing skyscraper fire linked prominently on the Drudge Report argued against claims of controlled demolition of WTC 7 on 9/11 by stating that the building collapsed because it had been “hit by a 757″.
Following the devastating fire in the 44-story building that housed the Mandarin Oriental hotel, a blaze that consumed every floor of the structure but failed to bring the building down, we made the comparison to WTC 7, which suffered limited fires across just 8 floors on 9/11 and yet collapsed into its own footprint within 7 seconds.
Similar points were made in response to a Breitbart.tv video story about the Beijing fire, which was prominently linked from the ever-popular Drudge Report website.
In response, debunkers argued against WTC 7 being a controlled demolition by claiming that the building collapsed because it had been “hit by a 757″.
Of course, as anyone with an iota of knowledge understands, WTC 7 was not hit by a plane on 9/11.
After a respondent named BIll raises the issue of WTC 7, ‘JackieO’ responds, “Bill, your a stupid idiot leftwing scumbag. WTC7 was hit by a 757 you inbred idiot!”
Later in the thread, another respondent, ‘JefoRW’ states, “Bill, you my friend, and retarded. wtc7 was struck by a plane you fool. Go back to your cave.”
This blog continues below the image...
And so it appears as though many proponents of the official 9/11 story and debunkers of 9/11 truth actually believe that WTC 7 was hit by a plane, and those that point out that it wasn’t are ‘inbred cave-dwelling retards’.
Perhaps this gives us an insight into what kind of mental disposition is necessary for such fairy tales as hijackers’ paper passports being found, hostile planes being allowed to traverse the country unimpeded and ‘they attacked us because they hate our freedom’ to be readily accepted without question.
In reality, the only ‘inbred cave-dwelling retards’ are those unfortunate knuckleheads still unwilling to accept the fact that WTC 7 was not hit by a plane and that its collapse can only be explained by controlled demolition.
Research related articles:
Beijing Skyscraper Fire: The Silence Is Deafening
"Debunkers’ only response is to claim that no comparison to WTC 7 can be made, yet they feverishly compared completely dissimilar bridge collapses to twin towers in 2007." Click HERE to read the entire article...
Still Standing: The Building That Proves WTC 7 Was Imploded
Fire Consumes WTC 7-Size Skyscraper, Building Does Not Collapse
Clarifying the Collapse Time of WTC 7
WTC 7 Collapsed at the Same Speed as Known Controlled Demolitions
Leaked NIST Docs: “Unusual” Event Before Collapse Of WTC 7
BBC’s Third Tower: 30 Pieces of Good News
Glaring and damning errors already apparent in new BBC WTC 7 hit piece
BBC Article: “9/11 Third Tower Mystery ‘Solved’”
CNN: Conspiracy theorists ‘not swayed’ by WTC7 explanation
NIST WTC 7 Report: Shameful, Embarrassing And Completely Flawed
Debunking NIST’s Conclusions about WTC 7: Easy as Shooting Fish in a Barrel
Newly Uncovered WTC 7 Video Betrays More Foreknowledge Of Collapse
Scandal of six held in Guantanamo even after Bush plot claim is dropped