Scroll down past the video for some thoughts...
He says even if it was true who cares! Oh I dunno, the family members maybe for starters! To act as if it wouldn't matter if 9/11 was a false-flag event is beyond words.
Regarding his comments on secrecy...
"Manhattan Project, the name given to the United States effort—strongly aided by the United Kingdom—to build the atomic bombs that helped end World War II (1939-1945). The Manhattan Project ranks as the largest industrial and scientific effort in the history of the world, costing more than $2 billion in 1945 dollars and involving more than 175,000 workers. All research and experiments were conducted in almost total secrecy." - http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_701610456/manhattan_project.html
And as David Ray Griffin points out in his lecture 9-11: Myth Or Reality?...
Myth # 3: "Such a big operation involving so many people, could not have been kept a secret because someone involved in it would have talked by now."
"This claim is based on a more general myth which is that it is impossible for secret government operations to be kept secret very long because someone always talks. But how could one notice? If some big operations have remained secret until now, we, by definition, don’t know about them."
And as reported on the George Washington Blog November 05, 2007...Does that sound like a leak Mr. Chomsky?
He says that "anybody who knows anything about the sciences would instantly discount that evidence", so evidently these people don't know a thing about science...
S.P.I.N.E. : The Scientific Panel Investigating Nine-Eleven
One posting of this diatribe on YouTube saw it fit to title the video "Chomsky dispels 9/11 conspiracies with sheer logic." Logic dictates that the possibility that the US government killed thousands of its own citizens, and subsequently launched two wars, including a war on civil liberties is of massive importance. A response of "who cares" is what we get from supposedly the world's top public intellectual.
Related info...
David Ray Griffin Vs. Noam Chomsky on 9-11 Conspiracy
Where Noam will not roam:Chomsky manufactures consent, supports the official stories of 9/11 and JFK
Chomsky: "It Doesn't Matter Even If There Was A Conspiracy Behind 911"
William Blum to Noam Chomsky: How Could It NOT Matter Whether 9/11 Was a False-Flag Op?
Free Speech Zone "because of 9/11"
Care2.com user comments on this post can be viewed HERE.
Posts
6 comments:
Um... I do not see anything mentioning Peer review in your so-called scientific section. My guess is they are a self-selected group of people who knew what they wanted to find before they "found" it. That is not good science.
And one of your articles is actually a link to something else on your own website! That's not biased at all, is it?
Sorry. But extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and this isn't it.
You want peer-review? Here ya go...
http://www.journalof911studies.com/
I have no clue what you are talking about when you say "one of your articles is actually a link to something else on your own website". Everything on this post links to outside sources.
If you mean the last link, that is simply to show the comments on this post on the Care2.com News Network, as it plainly states.
"extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence..."
I agree! So where is the extraordinary evidence that shows the official 9/11 conspiracy theory is true? Actually there is far more evidence supporting the state-sponsored theory, a reality many want to ignore so they can live happily apathetic in their propaganda bubble.
Great point Colin. Here is something related from the article "Debunking Myths on Conspiracy Theories" - http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2008/10/debunking-myths-on-conspiracy-theories.html
"Myth #2: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof
Just because someone says a claim is extraordinary does not make it so. People often label any theories that are contrary to the government's version as 'extraordinary', thus implying that the government and it's associated media have a monopoly on what is considered reasonable.
Claims are only extraordinary if they have no historical precedent. Therefore, all that is needed to prove that the theory can be proven with ordinary evidence is to point out to a similar case that has happened before."
Influential conservative, and father of Reaganomics, Paul Craig Roberts, has pointed out that false-flag events are actually pretty Mundane. This is demonstrated very well in the film TerrorStorm...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5948263607579389947&ei=QyL0SKqwBYKM-QHhx4HdDg&q=terror+storm
The true crazies are the ones who are gullible enough to believe the "official" story/stories.
There is a mountain of evidence that has never properly been answered.
Just a few examples:
Where are the videos of the plane that hit the pentagon? Why have we not seen them? There must be 100 different angles...yet, no video for us to see.
Building 7 was a beautiful implosion. Say whatever you want about collateral damage from the trade center...the fact is buildings much closer and smaller withstood the fire and stress without imploding into their shadow.
Conincidentally, all the buildings that were targeted that day in New York were owned by the same guy...and he just updated his insurance shortly before the "attacks." He was also paid several billion dollars without much difficulty. You try and make any insurance claim with even a little doubt about it's truth and see how quickly you get paid.
No military response to an attack which took place over a period of hours. You try and fly a plane anywhere near the pentagon and see how quickly you'd be shot down.
The quick and inexpensive investigation into one of, if not, the most tragic incidents to ever hit American soil. Should this not have been investigated to the satisfaction of the masses at any cost? They spent more money investigating Clinton and Monica.
If Bush and the boys are innocent there should be no reason for them to be afraid of re-opening the investigation. The investigation should be done by a non-us group of experts.
It is clear the government can do whatever it wants these days...even this blatant and people will still sit idly around playing with their crackberries.
Wake-up and demand an investigation. They, the government, know the apathy of the people and are well aware that this will fade away with time. This must never be forgotten until the guilty are prosecuted...never!
Post a Comment