Skeptics' Guide to 9/11 Bias

Why is it that the very group who pride themselves on "critical thinking" refuse to think critically about 9/11?



By Stewart Bradley

Related Info:

It's not that I don't appreciate the work that SGU does, but on the topic of 9/11 they seem to violate their own rules. This video is not meant to criticize them but is a plea to be more fair in their assessment of new 9/11 information.

Check out the Skeptics Guide podcasts at:
http://www.theskepticsguide.org

Read the Charlie Sheen open letter here:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/twenty-minutes-with-the-president.html

More info:

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/10/charlie-sheen-and-some-facts-about-911.html

The NIST report is debunked here:
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/nist/
http://stj911.org/ryan/NIST_Responses.html http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200612/NIST-WTC-Investigation.pdf
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/NISTandDrBazant-SimultaneousFailure-WTCCollapseAnalysis2.pdf
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFpbZ-aLDLY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b74naeawdCs
http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/RFCtoNISTbyMcIlvaineDoyleJonesRyanGageSTJ.pdf
Popular Mechanics is debunked here:
http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/gopm/index.html
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/pop_mech/reply_to_popular_mechanics.htm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WULRQCgvsdE

Read the nanothermite paper at:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=13049

Here's the web site Steve Novella sent me:
http://ronmossad.blogspot.com/2009/04/final-word-on-niels-harrit-nanothermite.html

And the independent analysis of dust at the WTC site:
http://www.ehponline.org/members/2002/110p703-714lioy/lioy-full.html

Learn more about the people calling for a new investigation at:
http://www.ae911truth.org
http://patriotsquestion911.com
http://www.911truth.org
http://www.911independentcommission.org
http://www.journalof911studies.com