Showing posts with label 911truth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 911truth. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Errol Morris takes on Donald Rumsfeld

“Errol Morris on Donald Rumsfeld, The Unknown Known, and Evidence-Based Journalism”, by Nick Gillespie and Jim Epstein, was released on April 3, 2014. The original writeup follows:
Donald Rumsfeld’s “war crime,” says Oscar-winning filmmaker Errol Morris, is “the gobbledygook, the blizzard of words, the misdirections, the evasions…and ultimately at the heart of it all…the disregard and devaluation of evidence.”
The former secretary of defense’s complicated relationship with the truth is the subject of Morris’ new documentary, The Unknown Knownwhich opens in theaters nationwide on Friday, April 4.The Unknown Known is an extended conversation with Rumsfeld, tracing his long career through the Nixon, Ford, Reagan, and Bush administrations, and focusing on his role in leading U.S. military forces into Iraq to fight a bloody and senseless war.
In the film, Morris engages in a verbal sparring session with Rumsfeld in an effort to break through the linguistic “evasions” and “gobbledygook” for which he’s known.
The title of the film comes from Rumsfeld’s response to a question by NBC reporter Jim Miklaszewski at a Pentagon news conference on February 12, 2002. When Miklaszewski asked Rumsfeld if there was any evidence that Iraq was supplying terrorists with weapons, Rumsfeld replied:
Reports that say that something hasn’t happened are always interesting to me, because as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns — the ones we don’t know we don’t know.
In a four-part series in The New York Times titled “The Certainty of Donald Rumsfeld,” Morris wrote: “Many people believe Rumsfeld’s reply was brilliant. I think otherwise.”
The Unknown Known is Errol Morris’ 10th documentary feature. He’s also the author of two best-selling books and the director of over 1,000 TV commercials. Much of Morris’ work explores, as he puts it, “how people prefer untruth to truth” and how they’re “blinded by their own spurious convictions.”
Reason TV‘s Nick Gillespie sat down for an extended chat with Morris about The Unknown Known. They discussed, among other things, the difference between Rumsfeld and Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, whose complicated relationship with his own mistakes is the subject of Morris’ Oscar-winning film, The Fog of War; Morris’ take on the Jeffrey MacDonald murder case, which was the subject of his book, A Wilderness of Error; how Obama compares to Bush; his friendships with Roger Ebert and Werner Herzog; and why “we’re all morons.”
Gillespie conducted the interview using an “interrotron,” a device Morris invented, which projects an interviewer’s face over the camera lens. It creates the impression that the subject is looking directly into the eyes of the viewer.
About 41 minutes.
Shot and edited by Jim Epstein

Friday, April 4, 2014

Kevin Ryan Responds to Noam Chomsky Ridicule of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth founded by Richard Gage: “Willful Ignorance” in Dig Within Blog

sf911truth.org

Noam Chomsky recently engaged in a smear campaign against Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth by misrepresenting what their efforts are, what they actually say, and their size, which he called “miniscule”. After some 30 email  correspondences with Noam Chomsky, author-researcher Kevin Ryan has regretfully had to conclude that Chomsky has not availed himself of information about 9/11 that is readily available to everyone after these many years, including the information sent to Noam Chomsky by Kevin Ryan. That includes his new book titled “Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects”.
Kevin Ryan calls Noam Chomsky’s dismissal of 9/11 research a position of “willful ignorance”. In his Florida speech Noam Chomsky responded to a question about World Trade Center Building 7 by claiming that he did not to know enough about the basic laws of physics to evaluate the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings on 9/11/01, saying that he would defer to the authority of people with credentials. 

In Dig Within, Kevin Ryan Ryan wrote that Chomsky made “an attempt to belittle, and downplay the sacrifices of, people seeking the truth”. Ryan reveals what Chomsky’s gate-keeper game is all about since he has a long history of dismissing deep political conspiracies going back to the JFK murder-coup of 1963. Chomsky supported the basic findings of the Warren Commission that Oswald acted alone. Kevin Ryan is co-founder of The Journal of 9/11 Studies and has a new book out titled “Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects”

Ryan states, “I’ve copied Chomsky on more than two peer-reviewed scientific articles in mainstream journals that describe evidence for demolition at the WTC… Chomsky acknowledged receiving the book in August and wrote to me that he was ‘pleased to have a copy of the book, and hope to be able to get to it before too long’.”


ANOTHER NINETEEN: INVESTIGATING LEGITIMATE 9/11 TRUTH SUSPECTS

The Huffington Post ran an article by Ashley Alman on 11-26-13 titled: “Here’s The Video To Share With Anybody Who Still Buys Into 9/11 Truther Stuff”. The writer uses the video posted by the person who posed the question to Noam Chomsky, Bob Tuskin, without crediting him or covering his commentary at his video. 

Bob Tuskin YouTube Channel, Oct 18, 2013 – Florida 9/11 Truth activist Bob Tuskin poses a question to Noam Chomsky. He and his movement get ridiculed by Chomsky, but no rational response to the question posed was given. Rather than discuss the scientific points made in recent years by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Chomsky calls AE911Truth a “miniscule group”.
ij

This avoidance of questions and the use of a haughty anti-intellectual engagement of the matters under debate has been going on for a long time. Such methodology only leads to speculation about what Chomsky must really think and whether he is under threats or if he is simply a “Left Gatekeeper” used to make certain topics “taboo” to keep them out of legitimate analysis of pivotal events. 

 
Kevin Ryan, author of “Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects”. “Kevin Ryan is the co-editor of 9/11 Studies and a whistleblower from Underwriters Laboratories. He has contributed to many books and scientific articles on the subject of 9/11, and has made presentations around the U.S. and Canada. He has appeared on National Public Radio, Air America Radio, Pacifica Radio, C-SPAN Book TV, and Colorado Public Television.” Kevin Ryan’s blog is titled “Dig Within”.

Related links from N CA 9/11 Truth Alliance member, singer-songwriter Vic Sadot

BERKELEY CALLING ReBlogs Kevin Ryan at “Dig Within” Blog “NOAM CHOMSKY AND THE WILLFUL IGNORANCE OF 9/11” 

Vic Sadot Music Report: Noam Chomsky & 9/11 “BLOWBACK OR BLOODY TREASON” Questions“NOAM CHOMSKY & The WILLFUL IGNORANCE OF 9/11”. Kevin Ryan responds to recent Chomsky remarks in Florida ridiculing Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth as a “tiny” group. Vic Sadot Music Report aimed a Broadside Ballad at Chomsky with a post of the BLOWBACK OR BLOODY TREASON music video from  TRUTH TROUBADOUR YouTube Channel featured in the post on the Kevin Ryan exposé of Noam Chomsky’s specious complaints about people who continue to look into 9/11 and demand accountability.

Related:

Much more on Noam Chomsky from the Debunking the Debunkers blog.

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

My Demolition Company

Written August 22, 2008

OK... OK... So maybe NIST's final WTC 7 report released yesterday is shameful, embarrassing, and completely flawed, but the good news is that debunking NIST's conclusions about WTC 7 is as easy as shooting fish in a barrel! The best news of all is that since the geniuses at NIST have now shown, after their three-year research efforts, that fire can collapse a skyscraper into its own footprint at nearly freefall speed, I'm starting my very own, one man, demolition company!

Here are my tools of the trade...

1. A very reasonably priced copy of the 9/11 Commission Report if I do say so myself...

$11.99 with shipping.

2. This nifty fire extinguisher butane lighter...

$1.99 FREE SHIPPING!

And I'm ready to do the job with under 16 bucks overhead cost. That's right folks, that is all the equipment I need according to NIST! The 9/11 "debunkers" tried much harder, bringing up the "massive hole" in the building. The same massive hole described here.

"I walked around it (Building 7). I saw a hole. I didn't see a hole bad enough to knock a building down, though." - former NYPD officer and first responder, Craig Bartmer

Even NIST now admits that "the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse."

Of course the diesel fuel for WTC 7's emergency generators was something that seemed to have some promise, but no. They state that the diesel fuel "played no role in the destruction of WTC 7," and that it was "the first known instance of fire causing the total collapse of a tall building," and that they were "similar to fires experienced in other tall buildings."

So, if you need a building demolished just let me know, I'll do it for half price... maybe even free. Because the 9/11 Commission report is almost 12 bucks, the lighter is almost 2 smackers, but knocking down a building with office fires...

PRICELESS!

Update September 30, 2009:

I just found out that a two man operation was started on the same day my one man operation was last year...

Photobucket

Related:

WTC7 and the British Brainwashing Conspiracy