DEBUNKING: 'Video Proof Showing No Planes Hit The WTC On 9/11' [AGAIN!]

Every so often a disinfo-misinfo video that claims to be proof that no planes were used during the 911 attacks appears. Or reappears. This video is doing the rounds presently:



While the attacks of 911 were definitively the result of an 'inside job', constituting a criminal conspiracy, real aircraft were involved. The video in question makes two claims, both of which shall be addressed.
_______________________________________

The 1st claim is that the plane cannot cut through the steel structure of the building.

It can.

Given enough speed it should. In WW2 relatively slow flying Japanese propeller driven aircraft, made of aluminium and wood, that hit steel battleship armour put airplane shaped holes through the sides of the ships:

The 2nd claim was that the wing of the aircraft should have covered the building as it flew by but appeared to disappear when it made contact.

The answer to this 'problem' is found by understanding the camera's perspective. The buildings we see on the left are actually in the foreground. The aircraft's wing moves behind it because it's positioned in the background along with the Twin Towers. A direct debunking of this point can be found here:

World Trade Center - Holographic or CGI Plane? - Debunked


Besides, there's HEAPS of witnesses and other videos of the second plane hitting the building:



It is more logical to assume there is something 'wrong' with that one video than all the rest of the evidence.

Plus there are photos of plane wreckage in the towers after they collapsed, and part of an engine in the street ....

______________________________________

The no planes video is misinformation. I believe it is being pushed intentionally to smear the truthful evidence of inside help in the attacks. Rational people who research this matter should be able to make up their own minds about the (lack of) strength to these claims.

Related links:
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com.au/2009/07/debunking-september-clues-and-no-plane.html

http://911debunkers.blogspot.com.au/2009/07/debunking-september-clues-and-no-plane.html

'Cognitive Infiltration' My Encounter with a 9/11 Dis-information Group on Facebook

[Sourced from Rise Like Lions blog]

The second thing which stood out was that the majority of posts were promoting Dr Judy Wood and Andrew Johnson.

They both propose a Directed Energy Weapon theory, as well as Andrew a 'No-Planes' theory.

After considerable research on both positions it was clear that neither had much support for their credibility, however for the casual researcher this may not be so easy.

This was a big red flag , especially as a few of the members were actively supporting one another with these dubious theories.
http://abbyk-newfinds.blogspot.co.uk/2012/10/my-encounter-with-911-dis-information.html

____________________________________

Slowly but surely large sections of the online public are becoming educated and wise when it comes to evaluating evidence - accepting material that is based on science and documented observation rather than accepting fanciful, or rather, unfounded theories. Moreover, many informed people are now less taken aback by the more 'lunatic' claims recognising them for what they are - disinfo (or a genuinely misguided postulate).

Remember, having the public understand the solid truth about 911 is vital in stopping the NEVER ENDING War on Terror.  Because this war is fueled by false flag attacks we can NEVER make peace - our own side is pushing the conflict. We must recognise what is going on.

New Journal of 9/11 Studies Paper: "No plane at the Pentagon" Theories Refuted

The Pentagon Attack: Problems with Theories Alternative to Large Plane Impact

By John D. Wyndham (PhD, Physics)

Abstract: The widespread belief among those who question the official account of 9/11, that a large plane did not hit the Pentagon on 9/11, is unsupported by the evidence. The failure of the 9/11 truth movement to reach consensus on this issue after almost a decade is largely due to a failure to rigorously apply the scientific method to each proposed theory. This paper, by so applying the evidence to each proposed theory, shows that a large plane hitting the Pentagon is by far the most plausible theory.

(Full paper)

9/11: The Absurdity of the No-Planes-in-New York Theory

YouTube.com
alawson911



PLEASE SEE THE BEST COMMENT EVER, BELOW.

Although it will make sense if viewed in isolation, this is not meant to be a stand-alone video; it was compiled as a companion to a text article of the same name. Links to the websites that host the article are as follows:

These are the links to the text article of the same name.

http://salem-news.com/articles/august012011/no-planes_al.php

http://www.rense.com/general94/911%20-%20The%20Absurdity%20of%20the%20No-Planes-in-New%20York%20Theory.pdf

MARIAUTUBE made a great comment on August 2nd.
Since I'm a New Yorker I can absolutely assure every single IDIOT that says there were no planes that day; that there were freaking planes !! Are you freaking insane !!?? The 1st plane flew almost right over me !! There were thousands of people if not hundreds of thousands, who saw the freaking planes and not just saw them from NYC but from Brooklyn, New Jersey and Queens. OMG, I just don't understand how these morons make these claims when they weren't even here !!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you, Maria.

Related Info:

5 No-planer Claims Refuted

5 No-planer Claims Refuted

This is for anyone who still thinks the no-plane theories have any credibility. Please consider this my public statement about no-plane theories: They have no merit and are all wrong.

Related Info:

Debunking "September Clues" and "No Plane" Theories

The plane does decelerate:

Interpreting the Boeing-767 Deceleration During Impact with the WTC Tower

The F=MA argument

No "TV Fakery":

A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories

Letter Added to A Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories

Rebuttal of Ace Baker's "Chopper 5 Composite" Analysis

DEBUNKING “SEPTEMBER CLUES” A POINT-BY-POINT ANALYSIS

September Clues - Busted! U-Tube version

South Towers Anomalies -- Busted!

Impossible speed? No:

Simulator Proves “Impossible Speed” was “probable” for Flt 11 and Flt 175

9/11: Impossible Speed & Impact -- Busted!

9/11: Possible or Impossible Speed?

Can planes penetrate steel structures? Yes:

9/11 No Planer Open your eyes War Planes vs Steel

There were reliable witnesses to the crashes:

No Planes Theory: R.I.P.

9/11 — Plane Impacts: Real or Faked?