Alex Jones and Richard Gage Debunk the National Geographic Hit Piece on 9/11 Truth

TheAlexJonesChannel
YouTube.com
September 06, 2009

Nationally syndicated radio talkshow host Alex Jones interviews Richard Gage regarding his recent appearance on National Geographic Channel's two-hour special 9/11: Science and Conspiracy. Richard Gage is a San Francisco Bay area architect, a member of the American Institute of Architects, and the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth. More than 800 architects and engineers have now joined his call for a new investigation, including at least 29 structural and civil engineers.

National Geographic Channel on 9/11: Manipulation vs. Objectivity - AE911Truth plans to release a longer response than this one as soon as resources permit.

PrisonPlanet.com search results for: National Geographic 9/11

Related Info...

Dear friends who've just viewed the National Geographic Conspiracy Theory on 9/11

Exchange of emails (March 2009) with Robert Erickson, producer of the National Geographic special on 9/11

National Geographic Does 9/11: Another Icon Debased in Service of the Big Lie - Like Popular Mechanics' 9/11 Lies Straw Man, only dumber?

Finally, an apology from the National Geographic Channel

National Geographic vs Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup

THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas: Jason Debunks National Geographic & No Planes BS!

Debunking National Geographic - 9/11 Science and Conspiracy

National Geographic: "Science" and "Psychology"

National Geographic Should Stick to Documentaries About Girls Who Cry Blood

Sander Hicks: "National Geographic Pseudo-Science?"

National Geographic hitpiece will prove 9/11 fire collapse theory to be impossible.

National Geographic to Air New 911 "Documentary".

The CIT Deception - Mock Trailer!

I had fun making this...



Related:

"The CIT Deception" by brokenstyx

Trailer - The Obama Deception - A Film by Alex Jones

A Debunker Now Convinced of Controlled Demolition!

About a week ago a Youtuber calling himself strongatheist101 challenged me to a friendly 9/11 debate, much debate ensued and today I received this message:

"Thanks, you won, I now believe in 9/11 controlled demolition, in fact I am going to make a channel just about it."

This isn't the first time this has happened for me, but I just wanted to share this to show an example. And remember when you engage in public debates you might not make them change their mind, but you very well could convince someone reading the topic who is on the fence. Be patient and nice to these people, even when they are being an ass, you never know what might happen.

Bravo to strongatheist101 for being a true skeptic!

Debunking National Geographic - 9/11 Science and Conspiracy

Steeper33
YouTube.com
September 05, 2009

September 1 2009, Jack Blood Interviews Dr. David Ray Griffin on Deadline Live. Debunking National Geographic's 9/11 Science and Conspiracy.


___________________________________________________________

In regard to the interview Pat Curley of the Screw Loose Change blog states:

"He is criticising National Geographic for confusing incendiaries and explosives, and then he takes thermite, an incendiary, and says that all of their writings discuss how it is used as an explosive. Yeah... OK..."

Yeah OK? Good debunking there Pat.

"One of the critiques of theories that thermite was used to destroy the World Trade Center skyscrapers asserts that thermite preparations don't have sufficient explosive power to account for the observed features of the buildings' destruction. This criticism seems to be uninformed by knowledge of some of the aluminothermic preparations known to exist -- particularly those being researched for military applications." - Source: http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/theories/thermitetech.html

Stop acting like you don't know this Pat. Nat Geo damn well knew it too.

Next he quotes Griffin:

"Even if you did have steel columns and beams that started lose strength, you would have the building start to sag and lean to one side maybe. Floors start to droop down. No, you got a building that's absolutely solid. Absolutely still and then all of a sudden it collapses."

And responds with:

"WHAT?! Have any of you morons actually read the NIST report? The whole collapse was started by those 'drooping floors'. They even have pictures!"

Yeah, here is one of those pictures, and an explanation of why this argument is totally baseless. Griffin is aware of the inward bowing of perimeter columns prior to the collapses, he brings it up in his book Debunking 9/11 Debunking. He obviously is talking about a more extreme event.

Related Info:

9/11: Junk Science and Conspiracy – The Fairy tale narrative that goes down like Soma By Jack Blood

Dear friends who've just viewed the National Geographic Conspiracy Theory on 9/11

Exchange of emails (March 2009) with Robert Erickson, producer of the National Geographic special on 9/11

National Geographic Does 9/11: Another Icon Debased in Service of the Big Lie - Like Popular Mechanics' 9/11 Lies Straw Man, only dumber?

Finally, an apology from the National Geographic Channel

National Geographic vs Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup

National Geographic Channel on 9/11: Manipulation vs. Objectivity

THE INFOWARRIOR with Jason Bermas: Jason Debunks National Geographic & No Planes BS!

Alex Jones and Richard Gage Debunk the National Geographic Hit Piece on 9/11 Truth

National Geographic: "Science" and "Psychology"

National Geographic Should Stick to Documentaries About Girls Who Cry Blood

Sander Hicks: "National Geographic Pseudo-Science?"

National Geographic hitpiece will prove 9/11 fire collapse theory to be impossible.

National Geographic to Air New 911 "Documentary".

9/11 Missing Links

I recently rejected a comment promoting the film 9/11 Missing Links. In my opinion this film is nothing but racist propaganda that provides "debunkers" of 9/11 truth with ammunition.

I will not publish comments that promote this film as the "real truth" of 9/11.