Friday, September 24, 2021

Watch "Truth Teller's Radio 36: Debunking Death! Part 1 of 2 ☠️💀" on YouTube

Watch "Truth Teller's Radio 36: Debunking Death! Part 1 of 2 ☠️💀" on YouTube
https://youtu.be/D23C5_HYhLk 

Saturday, September 18, 2021

Video Title: TYT/HA GOODMAN OFFSHOOT KOOK EBON KIM STOLE MY AUNT BB/SCOTT CREIGHTON SCOOP, NOW GETTING SEX CHANGE

Description:  "Ye can't make this up. I outed "Aunt BB" and Scott Creighton as paid fakes. Then the scoop was given to flat earther or wtf Ebon Kim."

Editor's Note/My Comment: Scott Creighton wanted to get just a few specks of WTC dust to prove it wasn't nano-thermite, but rather conventional explosives. So I got him 6 vials or so. Then he questioned the providence, which was well established. Also, WTC dust is easy to identify due to its unique characteristics. In an event, he promised I could get it back  if he didn't test it. Then he stole it and cut off contact, so yeah. 


20 years after 9/11, mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed still awaits trial. What went wrong?

Here's one perspective... 

It's all about how the justice system at Guantanamo was set up, says one national security expert: "The system is set up to fail."

Here's another...

Hannity is on the right side of history on this issue. This is the biggest government overreach I've ever seen.

 


Hannity is on the right side of history on this issue. This is the biggest government overreach I've ever seen.

The Conspiracy Show: 9/11 20th Anniversary Special | Best of Strange Planet - The Directed Energy Weapon Proponents Make Their Case... Including Surprisingly the Late, Great Jim Marrs! - Search for Refutations on This Site and You Decide!

The best resource on these competing theories is here: 

https://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/theories/index.html

What they all have in common is a conclusion that gravity....... fire....... and planes, etc., were not the culprit. In other words the official story of why the buildings fell is bunk.

The American Journal 20th Anniversary of 9/11 Special Featuring Andrew Steele

Editor's Note: Andy has interviewed contributors to this blog several times and I once guest hosted his show as well. It's nice to see Infowars.com interviewing him for the 20th anniversary of 9/11.


Related:

9/11 Free Fall: John-Michael Talboo on Basile’s red/gray chips vs. primer paint experiment

9/11 Free Fall 2/6/14: Guest Host John-Michael Talboo: What's next for the Basile blind study?


John-Michael Talboo joins Andy Steele to discuss disinformation, particularly the notion put out by a minority on the Internet that no airplanes hit the Twin Towers, and explains why logic and the facts don't support this claim. They also share their own opinions on whether they believe this theory has been put out intentionally to distract newcomers to the issue and discredit the 9/11 Truth movement, and go over the actual evidence for controlled demolition that activists should be focusing on.
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/07/debunking-september-clues-and-no-plane.html


9/11 Free Fall 6/12/14: Stewart Bradley — 9/11 Truth and the Skeptic Community


9/11 Free Fall-- Debunking Popular Mechanics (9/27/12)


9/11 Free Fall 5/30/13: Actual Fire Collapses in Relation to the WTC

Friday, September 10, 2021

Excellent and Undebunkable Free 20th Anniversary 9/11 Truth eBook Featuring Much Material from 911debunkers.blogspot.com

A collection of essays by 9/11 researcher Adam Taylor. Eleven chapters in total, this eBook is comprised of previously posted essays written during my decade+ of research into the events of 9/11. Includes my article originally published at ScientificMethod911.org, updated and expanded upon since its initial release. Also included are my technical articles and blog posts on the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings, and responses to debunkers attempting to defend the official narrative of 9/11. Almost 300 pages in length, this eBook contains detailed discussions, and includes over 600 references providing factual support. Freely available for all, who may do with the information as they see fit.

Webpage link: https://911docs.wordpress.com/20yearson



Excerpts:

First and foremost, my sincerest thanks have to go towards my dear friend John-Michael Talboo. I would never have come as far as I have and done as much as I did without your help and guidance, and a platform to present my work on. You have been an invaluable research partner, and an even more invaluable friend.

... 

The most productive period of my research, and where I posted most of my writings, was at the Debunking the Debunkers blog, created and hosted by my friend John-Michael Talboo. I also had the honor of contributing to Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, the largest independent organization scientifically analyzing the WTC collapses from a skeptical viewpoint. My research largely focused on the collapse of the Twin Towers and World Trade Center Building 7, whose destruction many believe was the result of controlled demolition with explosives.

...

23 “The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories,” America.gov, 5 May 2009, archived at http://web.archive.org/web/20110323153132/http://www.america. gov/st/webchat-english/2009/May/20060828133846esnamfuaK0.2676355.html. Comment on this article: John-Michael Talboo, “ALERT: US State Department Cannot Afford Professional Advice on WTC Destruction,” AE911Truth, 3 December 2010, at http://www1.ae911truth.org/en/news-section/41-articles/414- alert-us-state-department-cannot-afford-professional-advice-on-wtc-destruction.html.

...

For more on this discussion, see John-Michael Talboo and Adam Taylor, “Debunking 9/11 Debunking: On WTC’s Design to Withstand 707 Impact,” 3 October 2020, at https://911docs.files.wordpress.com/2020/10/debunking911 debunkingwtcwithstand707impact2.pdf.

...


We then get a discussion of Dr. James Millette’s study of the WTC dust, and how his study came to opposite conclusions to Dr. Jones’ et al. Millette’s study ultimately determined the material found was likely paint from the Towers.26 However, a detailed essay by researchers John-Michael Talboo and Ziggi Zugam shows many flaws in Millette’s study, and that further research needs to be done.27

...

John-Michael Talboo and Ziggi Zugam, “9/11: Explosive Material in the WTC Dust,” ver. 1.3, at https://citizenfor911truth.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/911explosivematerialv1-3.pdf. See also Wayne Coste, “Red/Gray Chips, 10 Years Later,” Truth Action Project, 27 April 2019, at https://www.911tap.org/10- publications/news-releases/802-red-gray-chips-10-years-later

Millette’s paper far from debunks the findings of the Active Thermitic Material paper. But even if that were the case, the evidence of demolition for the Twin Towers and Building 7 would still be substantial, as well as other non-demolition issues.31

31 John-Michael Talboo, “What Does it Mean for the 9/11 Truth Movement if James R. Millette Proves Nano-thermite Wasn’t Used to Take down the WTC Towers on 9/11?,” Debunking the Debunkers, 5 February 2012, at 911debunkers.blogspot.com/2012/01/what-does-it-mean-for-911-truth.html.

...

For a balanced take on this topic, see John-Michael Talboo, “A 9/11 Debunking Video Worth Considering,” Debunking the Debunkers, 6 August 2009, at http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2009/08/debunking-video-worthconsidering.html. 89

Related:

TTR32: DEBUNKERS AND TRUTHERS ARE BOTH WRONG ABOUT THE COLLAPSE TIMES OF THE WTC BUILDINGS ON 9/11

TTR EPISODE 24: JM TALBOO INTERVIEWS PHYSICS TEACHER DAVID CHANDLER ON THE UPCOMING 'CONFERENCE ON THE 9/11 PENTAGON EVIDENCE'

TRUTH TELLER'S RADIO EPISODE 16 - 9/11/2018 JM TALBOO INTERVIEWS RICHARD GAGE ABOUT THE 3000+ ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS FOR 9/11 TRUTH

Wednesday, September 8, 2021

Flashback: Seven 9/11 Hijackers Overstayed Their Visas, Were Never Deported - This Type of 'Mistake' is Happening Again According to Whistleblowers

Then:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2018/09/11/flashback-seven-9-11-hijackers-overstayed-their-visas-were-never-deported/

9/11 Whistleblowers: Michael Springmann, Former head American Visa Bureau, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia:

Now:

BREAKING: SECOND DHS WHISTLEBLOWER CLAIMS IT'S IMPOSSIBLE TO DENY WORK VISA RENEWALS

 

Related:

9/11 20TH ANNIVERSARY-IS THERE ANOTHER FALSE FLAG TO BE BLAMED ON AMERICAN PATRIOTS ON THE HORIZON:


A MAJORITY OF AMERICANS DON'T FEEL SAFE

ALEX JONES WAS RIGHT RAP SONG!

To support this site please make a small one time donation to: 


More Info and SUBSCRIBE HERE: https://www.bitchute.com/video/DdiKC5N0pYm5/

ALEX JONES WAS RIGHT RAP SONG!

Richard Gage Resigns From Architects & Engineers (The Fringe Elements Involved)


Gage allowed the "no plane at the Pentagon" nuts, almost certainly disinformation artists, into the organisation and now he's resigned over tensions with these people - according to the video. Many people warned AE911truth.org about this situation over the years. If it is still possible, action needs to be taken to fire anyone involved with the "no planes" group. They all need to go along with anyone that supported their baseless claims.

The problem has been building for more than ten years. It should have been obvious that the 'no planes' people were highly detrimental additions to AE911truth - something further highlighted by the unacceptable behaviour they displayed towards their critics. Their actions were a massive red flag. The nonsense peddling jackals viciously attacked people within the organisation, people like David Chandler, who presented solid evidence to debunk the no planes at the Pentagon misinformation. Gage and members of the board should have fired all those that supported the faulty position and supported people like Chandler. 

According to truth activist and researcher Ryan Dawson, who directly contacted Gage, he first allowed in the nuts because they brought more supporters to the organisation and more money. It seems like financing played a large role. However, this was done at the expense of their most important element, which was the furtherance of a credible, and academically supported, critique of the official account (centered around the destruction of the Twin Towers and Building 7).

The clip here mentions the writings of Government connected power Lawyer Cass Sunstein, who, in a book, called for the dismantling of groups pushing conspiracy theories that he considered dangerous to the establishment. The Wikipedia entry on this matter explains it thusly:
Sunstein co-authored a 2008 paper with Adrian Vermeule, titled "Conspiracy Theories," dealing with the risks and possible government responses to conspiracy theories resulting from "cascades" of faulty information within groups that may ultimately lead to violence. In this article they wrote, "The existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest, is no trivial matter, posing real risks to the government's antiterrorism policies, whatever the latter may be." They go on to propose that, "the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups",[42] where they suggest, among other tactics, "Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."
And so it looks like this actually happened. It's not surprising when one considers past situations where the Government, or people connected, helped dismantle the most effective opposition groups from within.

The first incident that comes to mind is the CIA's involvement with the high powered NICAP UFO group back in the 1960s. Today we know that the CIA had a number of people involved with running NICAP who eventually participated in the removal of the group's founder and driving force - Major Donald Keyhoe. He wanted to put more pressure on the Government while others preferred a more respectful approach. It's more complicated than that, but it's unlikely the CIA agents within NICAP went out of their way to help advance the organisation (perhaps only on a superficial level). For more information see this link: The CIA's Infiltration of NICAP

It should be remembered that during the late 60s  the CIA was also actively engaged in stopping independent inquiry into the JKF assassination. We have their own document where they outlined methods to discourage investigation by the public by weaponising the term "conspiracy theory" - using it as a prerogative. It was used to imply that there was no evidence to back up accusations of a cover-up, and those advocating such a thing were mentally ill. It was a method of psychological warfare to discourage the public from looking at the publicly available information and thinking logically about the official narrative. 

It wasn't just the CIA engaged in undermining opposition groups in the past. The FBI also ran a program known as COINTELPRO that, according to Wikipedia; was a series of covert and illegal projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting, and disrupting domestic American political organizations.

So what happened to AE911truth is not a surprise at all. The writing has been on the wall for a long time. The way to counter such ploys is to follow the most rational approach when it comes to the evidence and exclude people who step too far outside logic-driven best practice. There will always be some level of political disagreement within groups, but when it comes to research driven projects, and where people are clearly standing upon baseless positions, then those people MUST GO.  

Biden orders review and declassification of 9/11 documents - BIDEN ADMIN IN CHAOS AFTER DRONE STRIKING CHILDREN, BIDEN CHECKS WATCH AT CEREMONY FOR FALLEN TROOPS

 


Biden orders review and declassification of 9/11 documents - BIDEN ADMIN IN CHAOS AFTER DRONE STRIKING CHILDREN, BIDEN CHECKS WATCH AT CEREMONY FOR FALLEN TROOPS