So after my recent interview with physicist David Chandler, I was perusing professor Jim Fetzer's website when I came across this...
Gee, what's this triple brackets thing around Chandler's name? HMM...
The Wikipedia article is a bit hyperbolic. The use of the brackets is often used to criticize (((they)) who cannot be otherwise named, because the (((censors))) will unjustly accuse the criticizer of being antisemitic. That being said, Chandler isn't Jewish. So why does his name appear this way?
This question was posed to Fetzer in an email chain of interested individuals. His answer? He didn't do it and don't you know it he "isn't into symbolism." Furthermore, the original author, Craig McKee, denies doing it and did not display Chandler's name like this in his original posting of the piece.
Looking elsewhere on Fetze's site, the mysterious symbol appears on postings of his time and time again...
As I stated in the email chain...
This still begs the question of how the, very widely used in alt right circles (see Red Ice TV YouTube comments), symbol got into that article and several others. This apparently was because unrelated authors, one of who says he did not put in his original article, put in their original articles. On top of all that, the poster of said articles failed to notice or wonder about this well known symbol. I have a bridge to sell you if you believe all that.
Architect Richard Gage from ae911truth.org, who I interviewed this past 9/11, apparently bought this explanation. I'm not an architect, professor, or physicist, but I'm no fool and I have a nice big orange bridge in the San Francisco area Gage is located for sale.
Blogger Ziggi Zuggam explained to Richard in the email chain...
I would like to see a big heartfelt "thank you" from Richard to JM Talboo for discovering this and exposing this internally - BEFORE it was discovered and exposed externally by hostile msm down the road, say maybe around Hulsey Report release time or grand jury time.
No thank you was forthcoming.
Fetzer acted like this line of a questioning was an attack and then proceeded to drone on about his criticism for Jews and Israel. Sorry, not gonna work on me buddy. As I explained to a few people in another email...
https://www.ae911truth.org/news/521-ilhan-omar-is-right-some-people-did-something-on-9-11
Oh I really don't think she was dog whistling the 9/11 truth movement at all. I agree with Owen from Infowars that she meant Jews given the larger context of what she was saying, who she was speaking to, and her history. I have responded...
http://911debunkers.blogspot.
Blaming Jews for 9/11 is misguided because the Jews are a people. Blaming Israel would be more fitting, but Israel is a country so not really. Blaming the Israeli intelligence agency the Mossad would be much more accurate given the evidence, but blaming them solely is misguided given the facts. Furthermore, some Mossad agents tried to warn the US of the impending attacks, so any Mossad agents involved in 9/11 were likely rogue...
http://www.historycommons.org/
http://georgewashington.
Many people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."
http://911debunkers.blogspot.
Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of the US government and intelligence apparatus, as well as other international intelligence agencies, were involved, doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved.
https://911debunkers.blogspot.
http://911debunkers.blogspot.
Elsewhere, I have defended Omar on things she has said.
I am in the process of writing a small blog defending David against Jim Fetzer's attacks warped in his would be criticism of Israel. Jim is a liar IMHO plain and simple. I do hope that you understand I have very nuanced views. That I give no one, no group, a pass, but I try to be fair and am not a bigot. My controversial views or questions on anything from UFOs...
http://debunkerbusters.
...to the Holocaust...
http://fakenewsinvasion.
...stand or fall on their own merits and have nothing to do with 9/11 research necessarily. This is a trap that has been set for us...
However, if a theorist bases their beliefs on poor argumentation, then other conspiracy theorists may want to distance themselves from him/her or question that theorist's ability to support their own ideas. Many such people are accused of being deliberately planted to discredit other theories, a technique called the 'poisoned well'. The media then proceeds to discredit an entire investigative movement based on a few silly theories - a strawman attack.
When the media lumps anybody who doesn't trust the government version of 9-11 into the category of flat earthers and holocaust deniers, any real conspiracy there might have been is given the ultimate defense. Namely, a pre-emptive, universal ad hominem on anyone who would dare talk about it publicly, the archetypal 'tin foil hatter'.
Sorry, the 9/11 truth movement is full of liars, fools, crooks, ingrates, and likely some government disinfo people too. Despite this, the good evidence noted on this site stands.
 |
| Click Pics to Enlarge |
Gee, what's this triple brackets thing around Chandler's name? HMM...
Triple parentheses or triple brackets, also known as an (((echo))), are an antisemitic symbol that has been used to highlight the names of individuals of a Jewish background, or organizations who are thought to be owned by Jewish people. The practice originated from the alt-right blog The Right Stuff; the blog's editors have explained that the symbol is meant to symbolize that the historic actions of Jews caused their surnames to "echo throughout history".[1] The triple parentheses have been adopted as an online stigma by antisemites, neo-Nazis, and white nationalists to identify individuals of Jewish background as targets for online harassment, such as Jewish political journalists critical of Donald Trump during his 2016 election campaign.[2][3]
Use of the notation was brought to mainstream attention by an article posted by Mic in June 2016.[4][5] The reports also led Google to remove a browser extension meant to automatically place the "echo" notation around Jewish names on web pages,[5] and the notation being classified as a form of hate speech by the Anti-Defamation League.[4] In the wake of these actions, some users, both Jews and non-Jews, have intentionally placed their own names within triple parentheses as a sign of solidarity.[6]
Prior to its use in this manner, ((( screen name ))) had been used in online communities such as AOL to indicate that a user was "cyberhugging" the user with the specified screen name.[7]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_parenthesesThe Wikipedia article is a bit hyperbolic. The use of the brackets is often used to criticize (((they)) who cannot be otherwise named, because the (((censors))) will unjustly accuse the criticizer of being antisemitic. That being said, Chandler isn't Jewish. So why does his name appear this way?
This question was posed to Fetzer in an email chain of interested individuals. His answer? He didn't do it and don't you know it he "isn't into symbolism." Furthermore, the original author, Craig McKee, denies doing it and did not display Chandler's name like this in his original posting of the piece.
Looking elsewhere on Fetze's site, the mysterious symbol appears on postings of his time and time again...
As I stated in the email chain...
This still begs the question of how the, very widely used in alt right circles (see Red Ice TV YouTube comments), symbol got into that article and several others. This apparently was because unrelated authors, one of who says he did not put in his original article, put in their original articles. On top of all that, the poster of said articles failed to notice or wonder about this well known symbol. I have a bridge to sell you if you believe all that.
Architect Richard Gage from ae911truth.org, who I interviewed this past 9/11, apparently bought this explanation. I'm not an architect, professor, or physicist, but I'm no fool and I have a nice big orange bridge in the San Francisco area Gage is located for sale.
Blogger Ziggi Zuggam explained to Richard in the email chain...
I would like to see a big heartfelt "thank you" from Richard to JM Talboo for discovering this and exposing this internally - BEFORE it was discovered and exposed externally by hostile msm down the road, say maybe around Hulsey Report release time or grand jury time.
No thank you was forthcoming.
Fetzer acted like this line of a questioning was an attack and then proceeded to drone on about his criticism for Jews and Israel. Sorry, not gonna work on me buddy. As I explained to a few people in another email...
https://www.ae911truth.org/news/521-ilhan-omar-is-right-some-people-did-something-on-9-11
Oh I really don't think she was dog whistling the 9/11 truth movement at all. I agree with Owen from Infowars that she meant Jews given the larger context of what she was saying, who she was speaking to, and her history. I have responded...
http://911debunkers.blogspot.
Blaming Jews for 9/11 is misguided because the Jews are a people. Blaming Israel would be more fitting, but Israel is a country so not really. Blaming the Israeli intelligence agency the Mossad would be much more accurate given the evidence, but blaming them solely is misguided given the facts. Furthermore, some Mossad agents tried to warn the US of the impending attacks, so any Mossad agents involved in 9/11 were likely rogue...
http://www.historycommons.org/
http://georgewashington.
Many people subconsciously make the mistake of only seeing the issues concerning 9/11 in black and white, as opposed to shades of gray. This is known as the black-or-white fallacy. In this case, the false dilemma is: 9/11 was either carried out by Al-Qaeda or it was "an inside job."
http://911debunkers.blogspot.
Just because the evidence suggests that rogue elements of the US government and intelligence apparatus, as well as other international intelligence agencies, were involved, doesn't mean bin Laden and Al-Qaeda hijackers weren't involved.
https://911debunkers.blogspot.
http://911debunkers.blogspot.
Elsewhere, I have defended Omar on things she has said.
I am in the process of writing a small blog defending David against Jim Fetzer's attacks warped in his would be criticism of Israel. Jim is a liar IMHO plain and simple. I do hope that you understand I have very nuanced views. That I give no one, no group, a pass, but I try to be fair and am not a bigot. My controversial views or questions on anything from UFOs...
http://debunkerbusters.
...to the Holocaust...
http://fakenewsinvasion.
...stand or fall on their own merits and have nothing to do with 9/11 research necessarily. This is a trap that has been set for us...
Myth #4: Conspiracy theorists believe in UFOs / Aliens / Apollo Moon / Holocaust denial
This is a straw man and an ad hominem fallacy. Not all conspiracy theorists believe in the same things, nor does believing in aliens invalidate their arguments on other theories. The only thing linking these things is that they are all perceived to be conspiracy theories. Each should be evaluated on its own merits.However, if a theorist bases their beliefs on poor argumentation, then other conspiracy theorists may want to distance themselves from him/her or question that theorist's ability to support their own ideas. Many such people are accused of being deliberately planted to discredit other theories, a technique called the 'poisoned well'. The media then proceeds to discredit an entire investigative movement based on a few silly theories - a strawman attack.
When the media lumps anybody who doesn't trust the government version of 9-11 into the category of flat earthers and holocaust deniers, any real conspiracy there might have been is given the ultimate defense. Namely, a pre-emptive, universal ad hominem on anyone who would dare talk about it publicly, the archetypal 'tin foil hatter'.
Sorry, the 9/11 truth movement is full of liars, fools, crooks, ingrates, and likely some government disinfo people too. Despite this, the good evidence noted on this site stands.